Martina Šlaj
University of Zagreb
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Martina Šlaj.
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | 2010
Luka Cala; Stjepan Špalj; Martina Šlaj; Marina Lapter; Mladen Šlaj
INTRODUCTION Improved facial esthetics can be fully achievable only if facial preferences of the treated group are known. We hypothesized that facial profile perception and preferences could be influenced by orthodontic treatment. METHODS Differences in facial profile preferences between children with and without an orthodontic history were investigated in a sample of 1626 children aged 12 to 19 years (mean age, 14.8 ± 2.2 years) from 24 public schools in Zagreb, Croatia, randomly selected by using a cluster sampling procedure. Eight profile distortions for each sex, morphed by a digital imaging technique, were used for estimation. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), Bonferroni, and 2 independent sample t tests were used to compare the preferences of the groups. RESULTS A straight profile was the most favored in both sexes, regardless of previous orthodontic history. A bimaxillary alveolar protrusive profile with thicker lips was preferred among the female profiles, and a bimaxillary retrusive profile with flat lips and a prominent chin was preferred among the male profiles. Orthodontic history and personal facial profile had little effect, and sex had a slightly greater influence on personal facial profile preferences. CONCLUSIONS It seems that orthodontic therapy has no clinically relevant influence on facial profile preferences. Depending on the patients sex, orthodontists should have different criteria for treating borderline patients with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion and mandibular prognathism.
Angle Orthodontist | 2013
Slavica Pejda; Marina Lapter Varga; Sandra Anić Milošević; Senka Meštrović; Martina Šlaj; Dario Repić; Andrija Bošnjak
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of different bracket designs (conventional brackets and self-ligating brackets) on periodontal clinical parameters and periodontal pathogens in subgingival plaque. MATERIAL AND METHODS The following inclusion criteria were used: requirement of orthodontic treatment plan starting with alignment and leveling, good general health, healthy periodontium, no antibiotic therapy in the previous 6 months before the beginning of the study, and no smoking. The study sample totaled 38 patients (13 male, 25 female; mean age, 14.6 ± 2.0 years). Patients were divided into two groups with random distribution of brackets. Recording of clinical parameters was done before the placement of the orthodontic appliance (T0) and at 6 weeks (T1), 12 weeks (T2), and 18 weeks (T3) after full bonding of orthodontic appliances. Periodontal pathogens of subgingival microflora were detected at T3 using a commercially available polymerase chain reaction test (micro-Dent test) that contains probes for Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Tannerella forsythia, and Treponema denticola. RESULTS There was a statistically significant higher prevalence of A actinomycetemcomitans in patients with conventional brackets than in patients with self-ligating brackets, but there was no statistically significant difference for other putative periodontal pathogens. The two different types of brackets did not show statistically significant differences in periodontal clinical parameters. CONCLUSION Bracket design does not seem to have a strong influence on periodontal clinical parameters and periodontal pathogens in subgingival plaque. The correlation between some periodontal pathogens and clinical periodontal parameters was weak.
Journal of Forensic Sciences | 2010
Mario Legović; Anja Sasso; Izak Legović; Gordana Brumini; Tomislav Ćabov; Martina Šlaj; Irena Vančura; Marina Lapter
Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine the development of the mandibular third molar and its relation to chronological age. The evaluated material consisted of 979 orthopantomograms of patients of Croatian Caucasian origin aged between 5.7 and 14.6 years. Third molar developmental stages were evaluated according to the stages proposed by Nolla. The frequencies of different stages of mineralization and the mean value of the mineralization of the mandibular third molars with regard to age, gender, and size of the mandible were determined and the coefficient of correlation determined between the age of the subject and the stage of development of the mandibular molars. Statistically significant correlation was determined between mineralization of the mandibular third molar and chronological age of the subjects (boys, mandibular left third molar r = 0.779, right third molar r = 0.793; girls, mandibular left third molar r = 0.746, right third molar r = 0.725). It can be concluded that the accuracy of age estimation based on Nolla’s method is applicable for Croatian children.
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | 2011
Martina Šlaj; Stjepan Špalj; Damir Jelušić; Mladen Šlaj
INTRODUCTION The form and the size of a dental arch are products of the configuration and the naturally established balance of the jaw, alveolar bone, and muscles. We investigated which arch dimensions mostly discriminate particular dentoalveolar classes and sexes. METHODS Plaster dental casts were collected from 137 white adolescent subjects (71 girls, 66 boys) aged between 15 and 18 years (mean, 16.0 ± 1.2 years) with Class I (43 subjects: 24 girls, 19 boys), Class II (50 subjects: 28 girls, 22 boys), and Class III (44 subjects: 19 girls, 25 boys) malocclusions. Casts were scanned with the ATOS II SO (small objects) scanner (GOM mbH, Braunschweig, Germany) and measured with ATOS Viewer software (version 6.0.2; GOM mbH). RESULTS The major discriminating factors of the particular dentoalveolar classes are the mandibular canine width/depth ratio and the maxillary molar width/depth ratio, which explain 82.8% of the total variability (P <0.001). Class III subjects with the widest and shallowest frontal segment of the mandibular arch and the posterior segment of maxillary arch are clearly distinguished from Class II subjects whose abovementioned segments are the deepest and narrowest. Class I subjects are more similar to Class II than to Class III subjects. The most homogenous are Class III subjects, with 61.1% of them correctly classified, followed by Class II (57.8%) and Class I (52.4%). Sex differences are significant in linear measurements, but not in ratios. CONCLUSIONS Variability of dental arch dimensions and forms is a common characteristic of all dentoalveolar classes. Maxillary arch form is more distinguishing in the posterior segment, and mandibular arch form is more distinguishing in the anterior segment. Class III patients have the most detectable arch form, and Class I the least detectable arch form.
Slovenian Journal of Public Health | 2018
Renata Vidaković; Stjepan Špalj; Mladen Šlaj; Martina Šlaj; Višnja Katić
Abstract Introduction The aims were: evaluation of the correlation between the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) and Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON); the assessment of orthodontic treatment need for schoolchildren in a population with two indices, separately for schoolchildren with mixed and permanent dentition; the estimation of the population share that could not receive orthodontic treatment because of the presence of caries and/or gingivitis. Methods A total of 2652 Zagreb school children (7 - 19 years old, 52.4% of them were females) completed a questionnaire regarding previous orthodontic treatment and the type of appliance used. Their oral cavity was also inspected. The DAI and ICON indices were used for the assessment of malocclusion prevalence. Results The subjects with mixed dentition had a greater need for orthodontic treatment, when compared to subjects with permanent dentition, when using the DAI index (p<0.001). When using the ICON index, 11.7% of subjects with mixed dentition had very severe malocclusion, as opposed to 5.8% of subjects with permanent dentition. The DAI and ICON scores correlated positively linearly (r=0.521; p<0.001). A higher prevalence of both gingivitis and caries was recorded more often in boys; caries more often in the group with the mixed dentition, and gingivitis in the group with permanent dentition (p<0.05). Conclusion The DAI and ICON indices have moderate agreement in assessment of malocclusion severity scores. One third of all schoolchildren with various degrees of both ICON and DAI indices have gingivitis, and half of them have caries.
Acta stomatologica Croatica | 2018
Ana Škrinjarić; Mladen Šlaj; Martina Šlaj
Objective To compare the degree of dental arch fluctuating asymmetry (FA) among patients with Class I, II, and III malocclusions. Subjects and methods The sample comprised randomly selected plaster casts of 131 patients: 39 Class I (19 males and 20 females), 57 Class II (23 males and 34 females), and 35 Class III (20 males and 15 females). Dental models were scanned and digitized using ATOS II SO. The measurements of the teeth and dental arches were taken using the ATOS viewer version 6.A.2 software. Six arch widths and five arch depths were measured. The FA was assessed as a composite index of total weighted asymmetry (TWA). The analysis of variance was used to determine whether there were any statistically significant differences between the groups. Results Composite TWA measures of fluctuating asymmetry for dental arch variables were the highest in Class III, and lowest in Class I malocclusion. Males displayed a higher degree of asymmetry than females. The asymmetry degree was higher in the mandibular dental arches than in the maxillary dental arches in all malocclusion groups. Conclusion The TWA values were low but they differed significantly between the groups of malocclusion. Class III malocclusion displayed higher FA values than Class I and Class II malocclusion. Higher FA of dental arches in Angle’s Class III can be considered an indicator of increased developmental instability in this malocclusion due to high levels of genetic and environmental stress during the period of early development.
Acta Informatica Medica | 2018
Kenan Demirovic; Martina Šlaj; Stjepan Špalj; Mladen Šlaj; Sedin Kobaslija
Aim: Aim of article was to compare the shear bond strength of indirectly and directly bonded orthodontic brackets. Materials and methods: The experimental in vitro study included 60 maxillary and mandibular premolars. Teeth were mounted on cold-cure acrylic blocks for each tooth separately and divided into two groups: directly bonded brackets (30 teeth) and indirectly bonded brackets (30 teeth). Brackets (Discovery, Roth 0.022”, Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany) were bonded using Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) in direct method, while in indirect technique, a combination of Transbond XT and Sondhi Rapid Set (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) was used. The shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index (ARI) were evaluated. The in vivo study included 30 subjects - 15 with indirectly bonded brackets and 15 with directly bonded brackets. Survival rate was assessed during the period of 6 months. Results: No statistically significant difference in the shear bond strength was found in direct (7.48±1.61 MPa) and indirect labial bonding methods (7.8.2±1.61 MPa). Both methods produced very similar amount of adhesive remnant on tooth surface (median = 1; interquartile range 1–2). There were no significant differences in bracket survival rate between methods. Conclusion: Regarding the shear bond strength, adhesive remnant on tooth surface, and survival rate, both indirect and direct methods of orthodontic bracket bonding seem to be equally valuable methods in clinical practice.
European Journal of Orthodontics | 2010
Stjepan Špalj; Martina Šlaj; Suzana Varga; Mihovil Strujić; Mladen Šlaj
Angle Orthodontist | 2010
Martina Šlaj; Stjepan Špalj; Dubravko Pavlin; Davor Illes; Mladen Šlaj
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | 2008
Mario Legović; Izak Legović; Gordana Brumini; Irena VanĎura; Tomislav Ćabov; Maja Ovesnik; Senka Meštrović; Martina Šlaj; Ana Škrinjarić