Martine Escoffre-Barbe
Paris Descartes University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Martine Escoffre-Barbe.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2014
Philippe Rousselot; Aude Charbonnier; Pascale Cony-Makhoul; Philippe Agape; Franck E. Nicolini; Bruno Varet; Martine Gardembas; Gabriel Etienne; Delphine Rea; Lydia Roy; Martine Escoffre-Barbe; Agnès Guerci-Bresler; Michel Tulliez; Stephane Prost; Marc Spentchian; Jean Michel Cayuela; Josy Reiffers; Jean Claude Chomel; Ali G. Turhan; Joelle Guilhot; François Guilhot; François-Xavier Mahon
PURPOSE More than half of patients with chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CP-CML) in complete molecular response (CMR) experience molecular relapse after imatinib discontinuation. We investigated loss of major molecular response (MMR) as a criterion for resuming therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multicenter observational study (A-STIM [According to Stop Imatinib]) evaluating MMR persistence was conducted in 80 patients with CP-CML who had stopped imatinib after prolonged CMR. RESULTS Median time from imatinib initiation to discontinuation was 79 months (range, 30 to 145 months);median duration of CMR before imatinib discontinuation was 41 months (range, 24 to 96 months); median follow-up after discontinuation was 31 months (range, 8 to 92 months). Twenty-nine patients (36%) lost MMR after a median of 4 months off therapy (range, 2 to 17 months). Cumulative incidence of MMR loss was estimated as 35% (95% CI, 25% to 46%) at 12 months and 36% (95% CI, 26% to 47%) at 24 months, whereas probability of losing CMR was higher. Fluctuation of BCR-ABL transcript levels below the MMR threshold (≥ two consecutive positive values) was observed in 31% of patients after imatinib discontinuation. Treatment-free remission was estimated as 64% (95% CI, 54% to 75%) at 12 and 24 months and 61% (95% CI, 51% to 73%) at 36 months. Median to time to second CMR was estimated as 7.3 months in re-treated patients. CONCLUSION Loss of MMR is a practical and safe criterion for restarting therapy in patients with CML with prolonged CMR.
Blood | 2013
Xavier Leleu; Michel Attal; Bertrand Arnulf; Philippe Moreau; Catherine Traulle; Gerald Marit; Claire Mathiot; Marie Odile Petillon; Margaret Macro; Murielle Roussel; Brigitte Pegourie; Brigitte Kolb; Anne Marie Stoppa; Bernadette Hennache; Sabine Brechignac; Nathalie Meuleman; Béatrice Thielemans; Laurent Garderet; Bruno Royer; Cyrille Hulin; Lotfi Benboubker; Olivier Decaux; Martine Escoffre-Barbe; Mauricette Michallet; Denis Caillot; Jean-Paul Fermand; H. Avet-Loiseau; Thierry Facon; Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome
The combination of pomalidomide and dexamethasone can be safely administered to patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and has significant efficacy, although the optimal regimen remains to be determined. Patients with MM whose disease progressed after multiple lines of therapy have limited treatment options. We designed a multicenter, phase 2 randomized study assessing two different dose regimens of pomalidomide and dexamethasone in advanced MM. Treatment response was assessed centrally. Pomalidomide (4 mg) was given orally on days 1 to 21 (arm 21/28) or continuously (arm 28/28) over a 28-day cycle, plus dexamethasone given weekly. Eighty-four patients (43, arm 21/28 and 41, arm 28/28) were randomized. The median number of prior lines was 5. Overall response rate was 35% (arm 21/28) and 34% (arm 28/28), independent of the number of prior lines and level of refractoriness. Median duration of response, time to disease progression, and progression-free survival was 7.3, 5.4, and 4.6 months, respectively, which was similar across cohorts. At 23 months follow-up, median overall survival was 14.9 months, with 44% of the patients alive at 18 months. Toxicity consisted primarily of myelosuppression, which was manageable. The efficacy and safety data presented here, along with data from other phase 2 trials, suggest that pomalidomide 4 mg per day on days 1 to 21 of 28 with dexamethasone should be investigated in future trials. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT01053949).
Blood | 2015
Yves Chalandon; Xavier Thomas; Sandrine Hayette; Jean-Michel Cayuela; Claire Abbal; Emmanuel Raffoux; Thibaut Leguay; Philippe Rousselot; Martine Escoffre-Barbe; Emmanuelle Tavernier; Marina Lafage-Pochitaloff
In this study, we randomly compared high doses of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib combined with reduced-intensity chemotherapy (arm A) to standard imatinib/hyperCVAD (cyclophosphamide/vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone) therapy (arm B) in 268 adults (median age, 47 years) with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The primary objective was the major molecular response (MMolR) rate after cycle 2, patients being then eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) if they had a donor, or autologous SCT if in MMolR and no donor. With fewer induction deaths, the complete remission (CR) rate was higher in arm A than in arm B (98% vs 91%; P = .006), whereas the MMolR rate was similar in both arms (66% vs 64%). With a median follow-up of 4.8 years, 5-year event-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated at 37.1% and 45.6%, respectively, without difference between the arms. Allogeneic transplantation was associated with a significant benefit in relapse-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; P = .036) and OS (HR, 0.64; P = .02), with initial white blood cell count being the only factor significantly interacting with this SCT effect. In patients achieving MMolR, outcome was similar after autologous and allogeneic transplantation. This study validates an induction regimen combining reduced-intensity chemotherapy and imatinib in Ph+ ALL adult patients and suggests that SCT in first CR is still a good option for Ph+ ALL adult patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00327678.
Blood | 2015
Anne Huynh; Sébastien Maury; Reza Tabrizi; Kheira Beldjord; Vahid Asnafi; Xavier Thomas; Patrice Chevallier; Stéphanie Nguyen; Valérie Coiteux; Jean-Henri Bourhis; Yosr Hichri; Martine Escoffre-Barbe; Oumedaly Reman; Carlos Graux; Yves Chalandon; Didier Blaise; Urs Schanz; Véronique Lhéritier; Jean-Yves Cahn; Hervé Dombret; Norbert Ifrah
Because a pediatric-inspired Group for Research on Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (GRAALL) protocol yielded a markedly improved outcome in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative ALL, we aimed to reassess the role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients treated in the GRAALL-2003 and GRAALL-2005 trials. In all, 522 patients age 15 to 55 years old and presenting with at least 1 conventional high-risk factor were candidates for SCT in first complete remission. Among these, 282 (54%) received a transplant in first complete remission. At 3 years, posttransplant cumulative incidences of relapse, nonrelapse mortality, and relapse-free survival (RFS) were estimated at 19.5%, 15.5%, and 64.7%, respectively. Time-dependent analysis did not reveal a significant difference in RFS between SCT and no-SCT cohorts. However, SCT was associated with longer RFS in patients with postinduction minimal residual disease (MRD) ≥10(-3) (hazard ratio, 0.40) but not in good MRD responders. In B-cell precursor ALL, SCT also benefitted patients with focal IKZF1 gene deletion (hazard ratio, 0.42). This article shows that poor early MRD response, in contrast to conventional ALL risk factors, is an excellent tool to identify patients who may benefit from allogeneic SCT in the context of intensified adult ALL therapy. Trial GRAALL-2003 was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00222027; GRAALL-2005 was registered as #NCT00327678.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2016
Sébastien Maury; Sylvie Chevret; Xavier Thomas; Dominik Heim; Thibaut Leguay; Françoise Huguet; Patrice Chevallier; Mathilde Hunault; Nicolas Boissel; Martine Escoffre-Barbe; Urs Hess; Norbert Vey; Jean-Michel Pignon; Thorsten Braun; Jean-Pierre Marolleau; Jean-Yves Cahn; Yves Chalandon; Véronique Lhéritier; Kheira Beldjord; Marie C. Béné; Norbert Ifrah; Hervé Dombret
BACKGROUND Treatment with rituximab has improved the outcome for patients with non-Hodgkins lymphoma. Patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) may also have the CD20 antigen, which is targeted by rituximab. Although single-group studies suggest that adding rituximab to chemotherapy could improve the outcome in such patients, this hypothesis has not been tested in a randomized trial. METHODS We randomly assigned adults (18 to 59 years of age) with CD20-positive, Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative ALL to receive chemotherapy with or without rituximab, with event-free survival as the primary end point. Rituximab was given during all treatment phases, for a total of 16 to 18 infusions. RESULTS From May 2006 through April 2014, a total of 209 patients were enrolled: 105 in the rituximab group and 104 in the control group. After a median follow-up of 30 months, event-free survival was longer in the rituximab group than in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.98; P=0.04); the estimated 2-year event-free survival rates were 65% (95% CI, 56 to 75) and 52% (95% CI, 43 to 63), respectively. Treatment with rituximab remained associated with longer event-free survival in a multivariate analysis. The overall incidence rate of severe adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups, but fewer allergic reactions to asparaginase were observed in the rituximab group. CONCLUSIONS Adding rituximab to the ALL chemotherapy protocol improved the outcome for younger adults with CD20-positive, Ph-negative ALL. (Funded by the Regional Clinical Research Office, Paris, and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00327678 .).
Blood | 2015
Xavier Leleu; Lionel Karlin; Margaret Macro; Cyrille Hulin; Laurent Garderet; Murielle Roussel; Bertrand Arnulf; Brigitte Pegourie; Brigitte Kolb; Anne Marie Stoppa; Sabine Brechiniac; Gerald Marit; Béatrice Thielemans; Brigitte Onraed; Claire Mathiot; Anne Banos; Laurence Lacotte; Mourad Tiab; Mamoun Dib; Jean-Gabriel Fuzibet; Marie Odile Petillon; Philippe Rodon; Marc Wetterwald; Bruno Royer; Laurence Legros; Lotfi Benboubker; Olivier Decaux; Martine Escoffre-Barbe; Denis Caillot; Jean Paul Fermand
The combination of pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (Pom-Dex) can be safely administered to patients with end-stage relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, we observed a shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in these patients when characterized with adverse cytogenetics (deletion 17p and translocation [4;14]) in the Intergroupe Francophone Myélome (IFM) 2009-02 trial. We then sought to determine whether MM with adverse cytogenetics would benefit more from Pom-Dex if exposed earlier in the multicenter IFM 2010-02 trial. The intention-to-treat population included 50 patients, with a median age of 63 years (38% were ≥65 years). Interestingly, there was a striking difference in time to progression (TTP), duration of response, and overall response rate (ORR) according to the presence of del(17p) compared with t(4;14) (TTP, 7.3 vs 2.8 months; duration of response, 8.3 vs 2.4 months; and ORR, 32% vs 15%). OS was prolonged after Pom-Dex, particularly in t(4;14), given the short TTP, suggesting that patients were rescued at relapse with further lines of therapy. Pom-Dex, a doublet immunomodulatory drug-based regimen, is active and well tolerated in adverse cytogenetic patients with early RRMM, particularly in those with del(17p), who are characterized by a high and rapid development of a refractoriness state and known for their poor prognosis. Future studies will determine the underlying mechanisms of Pom-Dex activity in del(17p). This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01745640.
Blood | 2017
Delphine Rea; Franck E. Nicolini; Michel Tulliez; François Guilhot; Joelle Guilhot; Agnès Guerci-Bresler; Martine Gardembas; Valérie Coiteux; Gaelle Guillerm; Laurence Legros; Gabriel Etienne; Jean-Michel Pignon; Bruno Villemagne; Martine Escoffre-Barbe; Jean-Christophe Ianotto; Aude Charbonnier; Hyacinthe Johnson-Ansah; Marie-Pierre Noel; Philippe Rousselot; François-Xavier Mahon
STOP second generation (2G)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is a multicenter observational study designed to evaluate 2G-TKI discontinuation in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients receiving first-line or subsequent dasatinib or nilotinib who stopped therapy after at least 3 years of TKI treatment and in molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5) with undetectable BCR-ABL1 transcripts for the 2 preceding years at least were eligible for inclusion. This interim analysis reports outcomes of 60 patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months (median 47, range: 12-65). Twenty-six patients (43.3%) experienced a molecular relapse defined as the loss of a major molecular response (MMR). Relapses occurred after a median time of 4 months (range: 1-38). Cumulative incidences of molecular relapse by 12 and 48 months were 35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.79% to 49.41%) and 44.76% (95% CI, 33.35% to 59.91%), respectively. Treatment-free remission (TFR) rates at 12 and 48 months were 63.33% (95% CI, 51.14% to 75.53%) and 53.57% (95% CI, 40.49% to 66.65%), respectively. In univariate analysis, prior suboptimal response or TKI resistance was the only baseline factor associated with significantly worse outcome. A landmark analysis demonstrated that loss of MR4.5 3 months after stopping TKI was predictive of failure to maintain MMR later on. During the treatment-free phase, no progression toward advanced phase CML occurred, and all relapsing patients regained MMR and MR4.5 after restarting therapy. In conclusion, discontinuation of first-line or subsequent 2G-TKI yields promising TFR rates without safety concerns. Further research is encouraged to better define conditions that will offer patients the highest chance to remain free from 2G-TKI therapy.
Haematologica | 2011
Mathilde Hunault-Berger; Thibaut Leguay; Xavier Thomas; Ollivier Legrand; Françoise Huguet; Caroline Bonmati; Martine Escoffre-Barbe; Laurence Legros; Pascal Turlure; Patrice Chevallier; Fabrice Larosa; Frederic Garban; Oumedaly Reman; Philippe Rousselot; Nathalie Dhedin; Marina Lafage-Pochitaloff; Marie C. Béné; Norbert Ifrah; Hervé Dombret
Background The prognosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the elderly is poor. The GRAALL-SA1 phase II, randomized trial compared the efficacy and toxicity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus continuous-infusion doxorubicin in patients 55 years or older with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Design and Methods Sixty patients received either continuous-infusion doxorubicin (12 mg/m2/day) and continuous-infusion vincristine (0.4 mg/day) on days 1–4 or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m2) and standard vincristine (2 mg) on day 1, accompanied by dexamethasone, followed at day 28 by a second cycle, reinforced by cyclophosphamide. End-points were safety, outcome and prognostic factors. Results Myelosuppression was reduced in the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin arm with shorter severe neutropenia (P=0.05), shorter severe thrombocytopenia (P=0.03), and fewer red blood cell transfusions (P=0.04). Grade 3/4 infections and Gram-negative bacteremia were reduced in the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin arm (P=0.04 and P=0.02, respectively). There was a trend towards fewer cardiac events among the patients who received pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (1/29 versus 6/31). The complete remission rate was 82% and, with a median follow-up of 4 years, median event-free survival and overall survival were 9 and 10 months, respectively. Despite the better tolerance of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, no differences in survival were observed between the two arms, due to trends towards more induction refractoriness (17 versus 3%, P=0.10) and a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (52% versus 32% at 2 years, P=0.20) in the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin arm. Conclusions With the drug schedules used in this study, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin did not improve the outcome of elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia despite reduced toxicities.
Blood | 2011
Raouf Ben Abdelali; Vahid Asnafi; Thibaut Leguay; Nicolas Boissel; Agnès Buzyn; Patrice Chevallier; Xavier Thomas; Stéphane Leprêtre; Françoise Huguet; Norbert Vey; Martine Escoffre-Barbe; Emmanuelle Tavernier; Oumedaly Reman; Nathalie Fegueux; Pascal Turlure; Philippe Rousselot; Jean-Yves Cahn; Véronique Lhéritier; Yves Chalandon; Marie-Christine Béné; Elizabeth Macintyre; Hervé Dombret; Norbert Ifrah
Despite recent progress in the understanding of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) oncogenesis, few markers are sufficiently frequent in large subgroups to allow their use in therapeutic stratification. Low ERG and BAALC expression (E/B(low)) and NOTCH1/FBXW7 (N/F) mutations have been proposed as powerful prognostic markers in large cohorts of adult T-ALL. We therefore compared the predictive prognostic value of N/F mutations versus E/B(low) in 232 adult T-ALLs enrolled in the LALA-94 and Group for Research on Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (GRAALL) protocols. The outcome of T-ALLs treated in the pediatric-inspired GRAALL trials was significantly superior to the LALA-94 trial. Overall, 43% and 69% of adult T-ALL patients were classified as E/B(low) and N/F mutated, respectively. Strikingly, the good prognosis of N/F mutated patients was stronger in more intensively treated, pediatric-inspired GRAALL patients. The E/B expression level did not influence the prognosis in any subgroup. N/F mutation status and the GRAALL trial were the only 2 independent factors that correlated with longer overall survival by multivariate analysis. This study demonstrates that the N/F mutational status and treatment protocol are major outcome determinants for adults with T-ALL, the benefit of pediatric inspired protocols being essentially restricted to the N/F mutated subgroup.
Leukemia Research | 2010
Sophie Park; Charikleia Kelaidi; Rosa Sapena; D. Vassilieff; Odile Beyne-Rauzy; Valérie Coiteux; Norbert Vey; Christophe Ravoet; Stéphane Cheze; Christian Rose; Laurence Legros; Aspasia Stamatoullas; Martine Escoffre-Barbe; Agnès Guerci; M.P. Chaury; Pierre Fenaux; Francois Dreyfus
ESAs are increasingly used to treat anemia of lower risk MDS, even before RBC transfusion requirement. From a previously published patient cohort treated with ESAs, we selected 112 patients with de novo low or int-1 IPSS MDS with Hb<10 g/dl, serum EPO<500 UI/l and who had never been transfused. Erythroid response rate at 12 weeks was 63.1% (IWG 2006). In multivariate analysis, an interval between diagnosis and ESA onset<6 months, Hb level>9 g/dl, and serum EPO<100 UI/l predicted better response to ESA while shorter interval between diagnosis and ESA onset (p=0.01), lower serum EPO (p=0.04) and WHO diagnosis of RCMD-RS (p=0.03) were associated with longer response. Median interval from diagnosis to transfusion dependency was 80 months and 35 months, respectively, in patients with onset of ESA < 6 months and ≥ 6 months from diagnosis (p=0.007). Those results support early onset of ESA in lower risk MDS, to better avoid the consequences of anemia. Early introduction of ESA may also delay the need for RBC transfusions, hypothetically by slowing the disease course, but prospective studies are required to further assess this point.