Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Martinus J. Buekers is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Martinus J. Buekers.


Behavioural Brain Research | 2003

When visuo-motor incongruence aids motor performance: the effect of perceiving motion structures during transformed visual feedback on bimanual coordination.

Hedwig Bogaerts; Martinus J. Buekers; Frank T. J. M. Zaal; Stephan P. Swinnen

Two experiments are reported in which bimanual coordination tasks were performed under correct and transformed visual feedback conditions. Participants were to generate cyclical line-drawing patterns, with varying degrees of coordinative stability, while perceiving correct or transformed visual information of the trajectories on a screen. Visuo-motor transformations that dissociated the perceived movement direction from the actually generated direction, were applied to one or both limbs, resulting in varying degrees of perceptual grouping power. The transformed feedback did not influence the most stable coordination patterns (in-phase) whereas the accuracy and/or stability of the less stable coordination patterns (anti-phase and particularly orthogonal) benefited from particular visual feedback manipulations, i.e. when coherently grouped visual motion structures emerged, the quality of coordination improved significantly. These findings indicate that perceptual transformations aid the production of more complex coordination patterns, thereby underscoring the importance of perception-action coupling in bimanual coordination.


Neuroscience Letters | 2000

The synchronization of human arm movements to external events

Martinus J. Buekers; Hedwig Bogaerts; Stephan P. Swinnen; Werner Helsen

Previous research revealed the existence of coupling mechanisms (e.g. iso-directionality) at the level of perception and action. The present experiment investigated how the strength of the perception-action coupling affected synchronization performance. Arm movements were to be synchronized with a moving light that traveled back and forth from the left to the right side of a runway. Four experimental conditions were administered representing the orthogonal combination of two viewing conditions (intermittent vs. continuous) and two synchronization modes (in-phase, i.e. arm moving in the same direction as the light vs. anti-phase, i.e. arm moving in the opposite direction). Performance outcome measures, movement kinematics, and relative phase were used to examine the data. The results revealed a better synchronization performance when the arm and light traveled in the same direction (iso-directionality) during the continuous viewing condition. Apparently, the strength of the perception-action coupling has a severe impact on the quality of the synchronization of an arm movement to an external event.


Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology | 1992

The effect of erroneous knowledge of results on skill acquisition when augmented information is redundant

Martinus J. Buekers; Richard A. Magill; Kellie G. Hall

Even though it can be shown that verbal knowledge of results (KR) is redundant with sensory feedback for learning certain motor skills, such findings do not eliminate the possibility that when KR is available it influences underlying learning processes. In order to examine the function of KR more closely, two experiments were designed in which the subjects received conflicting information about their own sensory feedback and the KR presented by the experimenter. In Experiment 1, two erroneous-KR groups, a correct-KR group, and a no-KR group performed 150 practice trials on a simple anticipation timing task and then performed three no-KR retention tests of 30 trials each following intervals of 10 minutes, 1 week, and 1 month. The results supported previous findings that providing correct KR is redundant in anticipation tasks. However, learning was influenced by KR as subjects performed according to the erroneous KR information, thereby ignoring their sensory feedback even after a 1-month interval. In Experiment 2, subjects practised a more complex striking response for the anticipation task for 75 trials and then performed no-KR retention trials either immediately, or 1 day or 1 week later. One of the groups received erroneous KR after 50 practice trials with correct KR. The results confirmed and extended those from Experiment 1, as erroneous KR, even after initial practice with correct KR, influenced retention performance. These results indicate that although KR provides information that is not needed to learn anticipation timing skills, this augmented verbal information is a dominant source of information that influences underlying cognitive processes involved in learning motor skills.


Cortex | 2003

The control of sequential aiming movements: the influence of practice and manual asymmetries on the one-target advantage.

Ann Lavrysen; Werner Helsen; Luc Tremblay; Digby Elliott; Jos J. Adam; Peter Feys; Martinus J. Buekers

The present experiment was conducted to explore the effect of practice on the one-target advantage in manual aiming, as well as asymmetries in intermanual transfer of training. Reaction and movement times for the first movement were longer in the 2-target than in the 1-target task, regardless of the amount of practice, hand preference and practice hand. When two movements were required, peak velocity was lower and, proportionally, more time was spent after peak velocity. Our kinematic results suggest that the one-target advantage is related to both predefined strategies as well as movement implementation processes during execution. Therefore, an integration of advance planning and on-line explanations for the one-target advantage is suggested. Regarding manual asymmetries, right-handers showed more transfer of training from the left to the right hand than vice versa. Left-handers exhibited a reversed pattern of asymmetric transfer of training to right-handers, but they were more disadvantaged using their non-dominant hand. These latter two findings have implications for models of manual asymmetry and upper limb control.


Cortex | 1998

Manual asymmetries and saccadic eye movements in right-handers during single and reciprocal aiming movements

Werner Helsen; Janet L. Starkes; Digby Elliott; Martinus J. Buekers

Two experiments examined the coordination of eye and hand movements in right-handed subjects who completed single (Experiment 1) and reciprocal (Experiment 2) aiming movements with each hand. In both experiments eye movements preceded hand movement, and arrived well in advance of the hand to allow pickup of visual information about relative position of the hand and target to correct te ongoing movement. With reciprocal aiming differences emerged between the hands. A right hand advantage was found for movement execution, and a left hand advantage for movement initiation. Manual asymmetries were not due to practice differences between hands. Subjects made larger initial saccades and more corrective saccades when aiming with the left hand. The pattern of eye-hand coordination was consistent with Woodworths (1899) two component model of limb control, and at odds with models of limb control which suggest that online visual pickup is of minor importance.


Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology | 2003

The learning of goal-directed locomotion: A perception-action perspective

Gilles Montagne; Martinus J. Buekers; Cyril Camachon; Aymar de Rugy; Michel Laurent

This study was designed to better understand the process underlying the learning of goal-directed locomotion. Subjects walked on a treadmill in a virtual reality setting and were asked to cross pairs of oscillating doors. The subjects behaviour was examined at the beginning of the learning process (pretest), after 350 trials (intermediate test), and after 700 trials (posttest). The data were analysed at three different levels, each representing a specific aspect of the global response: performance outcome, displacement kinematics, and current arrival condition. While some aspects of performance outcome suggested the presence of a ceiling effect in the intermediate test, both displacement kinematics and current arrival condition clearly highlighted continuous transformations of the control mechanism involved. The learning process is best described as (1) the establishing of a relationship between specific information and a movement parameter and (2) the optimization of this relationship. The optimization process is characterized by the further exploration of the available behavioural repertoire and by the refinement of the dialogue between information and movement.


Biological Cybernetics | 2002

Perception-action coupling model for human locomotor pointing

A. de Rugy; Gentaro Taga; Gilles Montagne; Martinus J. Buekers; Michel Laurent

Abstract. How do humans achieve the precise positioning of the feet during walking, for example, to reach the first step of a stairway? We addressed this question at the visuomotor integration level. Based on the optical specification of the required adaptation, a dynamical system model of the visuomotor control of human locomotor pointing was devised for the positioning of a foot on a visible target on the floor during walking. Visuomotor integration consists of directly linking optical information to a motor command that specifically modulates step length in accordance with the ongoing dynamics of locomotor pattern generation. The adaptation of locomotion emerges from a perception–action coupling type of control based on temporal information rather than on feedforward planning of movements. The proposed model reproduces experimental results obtained for human locomotor pointing.


Human Movement Science | 2001

The one-target advantage: A test of the movement integration hypothesis

Werner Helsen; Jos J. Adam; Digby Elliott; Martinus J. Buekers

Two experiments were conducted to compare the temporal structure of single aiming movements to two-component movements involving either a reversal in direction or an extension. For reversal movements, there was no cost associated with the movement time for the first segment of the movement. However, regardless of movement direction, initiation instructions, handedness or effector, two-component extension movements were always associated with a longer movement time for the first movement segment. This disadvantage for extension movements, but not reversal movements, is consistent with the notion that there is interference between the execution of the first movement and implementation of the second movement. By contrast, because the muscular force used to break the first movement is also used to propel the second movement, reversal movements are organised as an integrated unit.


Journal of Motor Behavior | 1994

Resolving a conflict between sensory feedback and knowledge of results, while learning a motor skill

Martinus J. Buekers; Richard A. Magill; Katrien M. Sneyers

In a recent study, Buekers, Magill, and Hall (1992) showed that even when verbal knowledge of results (KR) was redundant with sensory feedback, erroneous KR influenced the learning of motor skills. To determine why this occurred, we conducted two experiments. In Experiment 1, subjects performed 50 practice trials on a complex anticipation task and then performed three non-KR retention tests of 25 trials each. The results indicated that when correct KR and erroneous KR were provided alternately, subjects ignored the erroneous KR and performed according to the correct KR. Experiment 2 compared different ratios of no KR to erroneous KR. The results showed that, for low ratios (1:1 and 4:1), learning experience was similar to a condition in which erroneous KR was presented on all trials. For a higher ratio (9:1), however, learning performance was similar to performance when KR was correct on all trials or was not presented. These results are interpreted as support for the hypothesis that when two conflicting sources of information are available, the subjects degree of uncertainty about the valid source of information influences his selection of the information to guide performance.


Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers | 2000

The study of locomotor pointing in virtual reality: The validation of a test set-up

A. De Rugy; Gilles Montagne; Martinus J. Buekers; Michel Laurent

The goal of this experiment was to validate an experimental set-up for studying locomotor pointing. The specific and also original element of this set-up was the interactive nature of virtual reality and movement production. This interaction was achieved through the coupling of a treadmill and a Silicon Graphics system. This latter system generated on a screen (3 × 2.3 m) an environmental array that moved according to the action produced by subjects on a treadmill. The task was to place either foot on a spatial target that appeared on the floor in front of the subject’s displacement trajectory. We analyzed the step length patterns of subjects approaching these targets, along with the current target-subject relationship. The results are in agreement with aperception-action coupling type of control mechanism that operates continuously as the subject approaches the desired target. Apparently, these findings mirror observations of real-life locomotion, indicating that the present set-up provides a valid and useful tool for examining human locomotion.

Collaboration


Dive into the Martinus J. Buekers's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Werner Helsen

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michel Laurent

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tanja Ceux

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard A. Magill

Louisiana State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cyril Camachon

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge