Marvin R. Lamb

Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization ☆ ☆☆

Recent evidence from neuropsychology has proven useful in defining neural and cognitive subsystems involved in certain cognitive processes such as spatial attention (Posner, Walker, Friedrich, & Rafal, 1984) and imagery (Farah, 1988; Kosslyn, 1986). In this article we discuss neuropsychological evidence that suggests a modular system is responsible for the organization of parts and wholes by the visual system. We review both normal and neuropsychological evidence that suggest that hierarchical organization of objects within objects involves the coordination of at least four separate subsystems, one that emphasizes the global properties of a figure (association with right posterior superior temporal-parietal regions), one that emphasizes the local properties of a figure (associated with left posterior superior temporal-parietal regions), one that controls the distribution of attentional resources to these subsystems (associated with right or left lateral parietal lobe), and one that interconnects global and local properties and relies on the integrity of posterior temporal-temporal pathways.

Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions.

Subjects identified target letters that occurred randomly at the local or global level in a divided attention task. The visual angle of the stimuli was varied. Neurologically intact controls showed a reaction time advantage for local targets which increased as visual angle increased. Patients with lesions centered in the posterior superior temporal gyrus (STG) showed a larger local advantage than controls if the lesion was on the right and a global advantage if the lesion was on the left. STG patients were no more influenced by visual angle than were controls. Control subjects also showed the usual interference of global distractors on responding to local targets. STG patients showed little evidence of interference. Control patients with lesions centered in the rostral inferior parietal lobe performed normally. The findings suggest that several component mechanisms are involved in the processing of hierarchical levels of structure, each linked to specific anatomical regions.

The processing of hierarchical stimuli: Effects of retinal locus, locational uncertainty, and stimulus identity

Three experiments examined the effects of changes in retinal locus and locational uncertainty in the processing of hierarchical stimuli. In Experiment 1, stimuli were presented randomly in the left, center, or right portions of a display. Central presentation decreased reaction times for identifying small letters presented within a hierarchical stimulus pattern (i.e., local letters) but not for a single small letter presented alone. In Experiment 2, all stimuli were presented centrally, thus eliminating the locational uncertainty that existed in Experiment 1. The elimination of locational uncertainty resulted in faster reaction times (as compared with the central data of Experiment 1) for identifying small letters, whether or not they appeared in a hierarchical pattern. In Experiment 3, eye movements were monitored and eliminated as a possible source of these effects. The results are discussed in terms of possible effects of an attentional “spotlight” on hierarchical stimulus processing. It was also found that the identity of the target letter (i.e., whether it was an H or an S) had a large effect on performance. Finally, in contrast to earlier findings (Hoffman, 1980; Martin, 1979), the response-time advantage at a given level and the amount of Stroop-type interference produced at the other level did not always covary, suggesting that these two effects may reflect the operation of separate mechanisms.

The effect of visual angle on global and local reaction times depends on the set of visual angles presented.

It has been shown that there is a transition from a global to a local advantage in reaction time as visual angle increases (Kinchla & Wolfe, 1979), and it has been assumed that this transition reflects lower level (e.g., retinal) processes. In three experiments, we examined whether higher level (e.g., attentional) processes play a role in this transition. In each experiment, subjects received a different stimulus set in each of two blocks of trials. In Experiment 1, stimuli subtending 1.5°, 3°, 4.5°, or 6° of visual angle vertically (small-stimuli set) were randomly presented in one block, while the other block consisted of random presentations of 3°, 6°, 9°, or 12° stimuli (large-stimuli set), The subjects’ task was to identify targets that appeared randomly at either the local or the global level. It was found that the transition from a global to a local reaction-time advantage took place at a larger visual angle for the large-stimuli set than for the small-stimuli set. The same effects of stimulus set were found in Experiment 2, in which the small-stimuli set included 1.5°, 3°, or 6° stimuli while the large-stimuli set included 3°, 6°, or 9° stimuli. In Experiment 3, eye position was monitored to rule out the possibility that subjects adopted different fixation strategies depending on which stimulus set was being presented. The findings suggest that attention plays a major role in determining the relative speed of processing of local-and global-level information.

Do response time advantage and interference reflect the order of processing of global- and local-level information?

Navon’s (1977) global precedence hypothesis was based primarily on the joint occurrence of two effects: a response time (RT) advantage for identifying global targets, and interference by global distractors on responding to local targets. Although the hypothesis has been questioned on the basis of experiments in which it has been shown that a local RT advantage and local interference can occur, it is still frequently assumed that these two effects are a valid measure of the order in which local and global levels of structure are processed. In the present experiment, this assumption was examined. Subjects identified target letters that occurred randomly at the global or local level in a divided-attention task. The visual angle subtended by the stimulus pattern was varied, a manipulation known to affect the relative speed of response to local- or global-level information. Local targets were identified faster than global targets at the larger visual angles, but there was no difference in RT at the smallest visual angle. Despite this change in RT advantage, the interference effect did not change as a function of the visual angle of the stimulus pattern. Moreover, global distractors interfered with responding to local targets but local targets had no effect on responding to global targets, which is exactly the opposite of the finding one would expect if RT advantage and interference reflected order of processing. These findings are not consistent with the assumption that RT advantage and interference reflect order of processing in a simple way.

Spatial memory and the performance of rats and pigeons in the radial-arm maze

The resource-distribution hypothesis states that the ability of an animal to remember the spatial location of past events is related to the typical distribution of food resources for the species. It appears to predict that Norway rats would perform better than domestic pigeons in tasks requiring spatial event memory. Pigeons, tested in an eight-arm radial maze, exhibited no more than half of the memory capacity observed in rats in the same apparatus and may not have used spatial memory at all. The results were interpreted as supporting the hypothesis.

The role of spatial frequency in the processing of hierarchically organized stimuli

Can spatial frequency differences between local and global forms account for differences in the way different levels of structure are analyzed? We examined this question by having subjects identify local or global forms of hierarchical stimuli that had beencontrast balanced. Contrast balancing eliminates low spatial frequencies, so that both local and global forms must be identified on the basis of high spatial frequency information. Response times (RTs) to global (but not local) forms were slowed for contrast-balanced stimuli, suggesting that low spatial frequencies mediate the global RT advantage typically found. In contrast, interference between local and global forms was little affected by contrast balancing or by shifts of attention between local and global forms, suggesting that it does not result from inhibitory interactions between spatial frequency channels or from temporal precedence of low versus high spatial frequency information. Finally, shifts of attention between local and global forms were also little affected by contrast balancing, suggesting that they were not based on spatial frequency.

Spatial frequency and attention: Effects of level-, target-, and location-repetition on the processing of global and local forms

Is attentional selection between local and global forms based on spatial frequency? This question was examined by having subjects identify local or global forms of stimuli that had been “contrast balanced,” a technique that eliminates low spatial frequencies. Response times (RTs) to global (but not local) forms were slowed for contrast-balanced stimuli, suggesting that low spatial frequencies mediate the global RT advantage typically reported. In contrast, the beneficial effect of having targets appear at the same, as opposed to a different, level as that on the immediately preceding trial was unaffected by contrast balancing. This suggests that attentional selection between different levels of structure is not based on spatial frequency. The data favor an explanation in terms of “priming,” rather than in terms of adjustments in the diameter of an attentional “spotlight.”

Spatial attention and cuing to global and local levels of hierarchical structure

Five experiments investigated the role of attention in identifying global and local targets in hierarchically structured patterns. Hierarchical patterns were presented at a variable stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) either after a cue (4 arrows or shaded boxes) or after no cue. Targets occurred at the cued level 80% of the time and at the uncued level 20%. On uncued trials, target level probability was .5. Global cues produced benefits for both global and local targets over SOA on cued trials. Local cues produced benefits only for local targets. For uncued trials, responses favored local targets overall when interspersed with locally cued trials but favored global targets when interspersed with globally cued trials. The role of an attentional window and discrete distribution of attention over global and local levels of hierarchical patterns are discussed.

Normal global-local analysis in patients with dorsolateral frontal lobe lesions

The role of prefrontal cortex in the analysis of global and local levels of a visual stimulus was assessed by measuring reaction time to identify a target at one level or the other. Unlike patients with temporal-parietal lesions (STG), there were no global-local performance deficits in right or left prefrontal groups (RFL or LFL). Reallocation of attention to global and local levels was measured by examining changes in performance when the probability of a target appearing at one level or the other varied. While patients with lateral parietal lesions (IPL) have been shown to have deficits in these conditions, both RFL and LFL showed normal changes in performance. In sum, the performance of prefrontal groups differed from both IPL and STG groups but not from normal controls. These results strengthen previous arguments that posterior association cortex is crucial in responding to global and local levels of a pattern.