Mary A. Quasebarth

Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has been used to treat a variety of splenic disorders. However, there have been few direct comparisons of this approach with open splenectomy (OS). METHODS Results and outcomes were compared retrospectively in 46 consecutive patients treated by laparoscopic (n = 26) or open splenectomy (n = 20) from January 1990 through March 1996. The two groups were similar in age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiology classification. Splenectomy was performed for a variety of indications, and the majority of patients in both groups had normal or near-normal size spleens. All data are expressed as mean +/- standard deviation. RESULTS Laparoscopic splenectomy was successfully completed in all 26 attempted cases. Operative times were significantly longer for LS (202 +/- 55 minutes) than for OS (134 +/- 43 minutes) (P < 0.001); however, operative times in the last 13 LS cases (176 +/- 48 minutes) averaged 51 minutes less than in the first 13 cases (227 +/- 51 minutes). Estimated operative blood loss was less for LS (222 +/- 280 mL) than for OS (376 +/- 500 mL) (P = not significant). A mean of 2.0 units of red blood cells was transfused in 4 (15%) of 26 patients during LS vs 1.0 unit transfused in 2 (10%) of 20 patients who had OS (P = NS). Patients who underwent LS required significantly less parenteral pain medications, had a more rapid return to regular diet, and were discharged sooner than patients who had OS. Complication rates were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that LS is technically safe and has several advantages over OS. Laparoscopic splenectomy should become the procedure of choice for the removal of normal and near-normal size spleens.

Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly

Background: A study was conducted to determine whether extremely elderly patients, age 80 years or older, were at higher risk for adverse outcomes from laparoscopic cholecystectomy than patients younger than 80 years. Methods: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted in 421 patients age 65 years or older from 1989 through 1999. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (age 65-79 years; n = 351) and group 2 (age, 80-95 years; n = 70). A prospective database was analyzed for mean ± standard deviation and using Students t-test and chi-square analysis. Results: Advanced age (group 2) was associated with a higher mean American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class (2.7 vs 2.3; p < 0.001) and a greater incidence of common bile duct stones (43% vs 26%; p < 0.01), as compared with those of younger age (group 1). Mean operative times in group 2 were 106 ± 45 min as compared with 96 ± 38 min in group 1, a difference that is not significant. The extremely elderly (group 2) had a four-fold higher rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy (16% vs 4%) and a longer mean postoperative hospital stay (2.1 vs 1.4 days). Grades 1 and 2 complications also were more common in group 2: grade 1: group 1, 8.8% vs group 2, 17% and grade 2: group 1, 4.3% vs group 2, 7.1% (p < 0.05). One patient in group 1 had a myocardial infarction 13 days postoperatively, and two deaths occurred in the extremely elderly group within 30 days postoperatively. Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly is associated with more complications and a higher rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy than in elderly individuals younger than 80 years. The greater chance of encountering a severely inflamed or scarred gallbladder and common bile duct stones as well as increasing comorbidities likely account for these differences in outcome.

Experimental development of an endoscopic approach to neck exploration and parathyroidectomy

BACKGROUND Recent advances in minimally invasive surgical technology have the potential to lead to new applications outside body cavities. The purpose of the present study was to develop techniques for obtaining endoscopic exposure and access to the pretracheal space in the neck with the goal of performing neck exploration and parathyroidectomy and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of such an approach experimentally. METHODS The technique for endoscopic neck exploration was developed in eight adult mongrel dogs and was further evaluated in a survival dog model and in human cadavers. The pretracheal space was accessed by a 2.5 cm midline incision in the lower neck. This space was expanded with a balloon dissector, and exposure was maintained with an external lift device. A 5 or 10/12 mm midline port and two to four lateral 5 mm cervical ports were placed, and dissection was carried out with pediatric endoscopic instruments and an ultrasonic coagulator. Excised parathyroid tissue was verified histologically. RESULTS Two-gland parathyroidectomy was successfully completed in five of six dogs; inadequate exposure led to a failed procedure in one animal. Mean operative time was 130 +/- 6 minutes, and there were no operative complications. Serum calcium levels did not change significantly after operation (p = not significant). At autopsy, approximately 20 ml of clear sterile fluid was present in the pretracheal space of every dog. In five human cadavers mean dissection time for attempted four-gland parathyroidectomy was 69 +/- 38 minutes (range, 45 to 135 minutes). Four of four parathyroids were identified and removed in two patients, three of three parathyroids in one patient, three of four parathyroids in one patient, and two of four parathyroids in one patient. CONCLUSIONS Parathyroidectomy may be performed safely and reliably in an animal model with minimally invasive techniques that can be applied to parathyroid dissection in human cadavers. These results suggest that an endoscopic approach to neck exploration and parathyroidectomy is potentially feasible and may warrant further study in clinical trials.

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Initial Experience with Critical View of Safety Dissection and Routine Intraoperative Cholangiography

BACKGROUND Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is emerging as a potentially less invasive alternative to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy. As this technique is more widely used, it is important to maintain well-established practices of the critical view of safety (CVS) dissection and intraoperative cholangiography (IOC). We present our initial experience with SILC using CVS dissection and routine IOC. STUDY DESIGN Fifty-four patients with biliary colic were offered SILC, which was performed through the umbilicus. CVS with photo documentation was attained before clipping and transecting the cystic structures. IOC was done using various needle puncture techniques. Assessment of CVS was carried out by independent surgeon review of operative still photos or videos using a 3-point grading scale: visualization of only 2 ductal structures entering the gallbladder; a clear triangle of Calot; and separation of the base of the gallbladder from the cystic plate. RESULTS SILC was performed in 54 patients (15 male and 39 female). Six patients required 1 supplementary 3- or 5-mm port. Complete IOC was successful in 50 of 54 patients (92.6%). CVS was achieved at the time of operation in all 54 patients. Photo documentation review confirmed 3 of 3 CVS criteria in 32 (64%) patients, 2 of 3 in 12 patients (24%), 1 of 3 in 3 patients (6%), and 0 in 3 patients (6%). CONCLUSIONS As laparoscopic cholecystectomy becomes less invasive, proven safe dissection techniques should be maintained. Dissection to obtain the CVS should be the goal of every patient and IOC can be accomplished in a high percentage of patients. This approach places patient safety considerations foremost in the evolution of minimally invasive cholecystectomy.

Adrenalectomy for Familial Pheochromocytoma in the Laparoscopic Era

ObjectiveTo report the results of treatment of patients with familial pheochromocytomas in the laparoscopic era. Summary Background DataThe optimal surgical management of pheochromocytomas that arise in familial neoplasia syndromes may be complicated by bilateral involvement and associated endocrinopathies. MethodsTwenty-one patients with familial pheochromocytomas (15 with multiple endocrine neoplasia [MEN] 2A, 4 with MEN 2B, 1 each with von Hippel-Lindau and neurofibromatosis type 1) underwent adrenalectomy between December 1993 and July 2001. Clinical, biochemical, and pathologic data were obtained by retrospective review of perioperative medical records, postoperative biochemical testing, and patient questionnaire. ResultsMean age at diagnosis was 37 ± 11 years. Twenty of the 21 patients had elevated urine catecholamines, and all had radiographic evidence of an adrenal tumor or tumors. Pheochromocytoma-related symptoms were present in 11 patients (52%). One patient with MEN 2B underwent open adrenalectomy due to previous adrenal surgery and megacolon. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy was attempted in the remaining 20 patients (9 right, 11 left, 2 bilateral). Two patients (9.1%) were converted to open adrenalectomy. Intraoperative hypertensive episodes occurred in 15 patients (71%) and were easily controlled medically. Mean operative time was 216 ± 57 minutes, mean postoperative length of stay was 3.1 ± 1.3 days, and mean tumor size was 3.1 ± 1.0 cm. Minor complications occurred in three patients (14.3%) and major complications in two patients (9.5%). During a mean follow-up of 57 months, a contralateral pheochromocytoma developed in four patients with MEN 2 (33%); three of them underwent adrenalectomy. There have been no long-term complications related to hypertension or adrenalectomy. ConclusionsThis study is the largest series of patients with familial pheochromocytoma undergoing adrenalectomy during the laparoscopic era. The results suggest that the laparoscopic approach is safe and effective for managing unilateral or bilateral adrenal medullary disease in this population.

Perioperative outcomes and complications of open vs laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in a mature surgical practice.

Background: Although the laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach to hernia repair has been associated with less pain and a faster postoperative recovery than traditional open repair, many practicing surgeons have been reluctant to adopt this technique because of the lengthy operative times and the learning curve for this procedure. Methods: Data from all patients undergoing TEP repair since 1997 and open mesh repair (OPEN) since 1999 were collected prospectively. Selection of surgical approach was based on local hernia factors, anesthetic risk, previous abdominal surgery, and patient preference. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired t-tests and chi-squared tests. Data are mean ± SD. Results: TEP repairs were performed in 147 patients and open repairs in 198 patients. Patients in the OPEN group were significantly older (59 ± 19 years OPEN vs 51 ± 13 years TEP) and had a higher ASA (1.9 ± 0.7 OPEN vs 1.5 ± 0.6 TEP; p < 0.01). TEP repairs were more likely to be carried out for bilateral (33% TEP, 5% OPEN) or recurrent hernias (31% TEP, 11% OPEN) than were open repairs (p < 0.01). Concurrent procedures accompanied 31% of TEP and 12% of OPEN repairs (p < 0.01). Operative times (min) were significantly shorter in the TEP group for both unilateral (63 ± 22 TEP, 70 ± 20 OPEN; p = 0.02) and bilateral (78 ± 27 TEP, 102 ± 27 OPEN; p = 0.01) repairs. Mean operative times decreased over time in the TEP group for both unilateral and bilateral repairs (p < 0.01). Patients undergoing TEP were more likely (p < 0.01) to develop urinary retention (7.9% TEP, 1.1% OPEN), but were less likely (p < 0.01) to have skin numbness (2.8% TEP, 35.8% OPEN) or prolonged groin discomfort (1.4% TEP, 5.3% OPEN). Conclusions: Despite a higher proportion of patients undergoing bilateral repairs, recurrent hernia repair, and concurrent procedures, operative times are shorter for laparoscopic TEP repair than for open mesh repair. TEP repairs can be performed efficiently and without major complications, even when the learning curve is included.

Is laparoscopic antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the elderly safe and effective

AbstractBackground: The elderly have prevalence rates and clinical features of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) similar to those in younger individuals, but the role of laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) in the elderly has not been clearly established. The purpose of this study was to determine if the results of LARS in the elderly are comparable with those in younger patients. Methods: All patients undergoing LARS for GERD at the Washington University Medical Center were entered prospectively into a computerized database. Between May 1992 and June 1998, 339 patients underwent LARS and were divided into two groups based on age: nonelderly (ages, 18–64 years; n= 303) and elderly (age, ≥65 years; n = 36). Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and statistical analysis was performed. Results: Elderly patients had a higher American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score (2.3 ± 1.5) and a longer hospital stay (2.1 ± 0.2 days) than the younger group (ASA, 1.9 ± 0.5; hospital stay, 1.6 ± 0.9 days; p < 0.001). Operation times averaged 154 ± 68 min in the elderly compared with 134 ± 49 min in the nonelderly (p= NS). Grade I complications occurred significantly more frequently in the elderly (13.9%) than in the nonelderly (2.6%), but the incidence of grade II complications was similar between the groups (elderly 2.8% vs nonelderly 2.7%). There were no grade III complications in either group, but there was one death in the nonelderly group. At follow-up ranging to 81 months (median, 27 months), the two groups had similar low incidences of heartburn and dysphagia. Anatomic failures of LARS developed in 19 nonelderly patients (6.2%) compared with 2 elderly patients (5.5%; p= NS). Conclusions: As shown in this study, LARS is safe and effective in elderly patients with GERD. Age older than 65 years should not be a contraindication to laparoscopic antireflux surgery in properly selected patients.

Laparoscopic splenopexy for wandering (pelvic) spleen

Wandering spleen is a rare clinical diagnosis with a high incidence of splenic torsion and infarction. The preferred treatment for this condition currently is splenopexy to reposition and fixate the spleen in the left upper quadrant of the abdomen to preserve splenic function. We recently performed the first splenopexy for a wandering spleen using laparoscopic techniques. The patient was a 19-year-old woman who had an asymptomatic lower abdominal/pelvic mass found on physical examination. Diagnostic evaluation (ultrasound, computed tomography scan, and liver-spleen scan) showed an absent spleen in the upper abdomen, normal uterus and ovaries, and an 11 x 7-cm pelvic spleen. Laparoscopic splenopexy was performed using Vicryl mesh to suspend and fixate the spleen in the left upper quadrant of the abdomen. Total operative time was 175 min, there were no intra- or postoperative complications, and the patient was discharged on the 1st postoperative day. Follow-up at 2 and 7 months indicated that she was asymptomatic with a nonpalpable spleen. The results suggest that a laparoscopic approach to splenopexy should be considered for the treatment of patients with a wandering spleen.

Development of a laparoscopic approach to neurolytic celiac plexus block in a porcine model

AbstractBackground: Neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) is an effective method of palliative pain control in cases of inoperable pancreatic cancer. This study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility of a laparoscopic approach to NCPB in an experimental animal model. Methods: The laparoscopic technique for NCPB was developed in an acute study of six domestic swine followed by a chronic study of nine domestic swine that were monitored 3–21 days after surgery for adverse neurologic, gastrointestinal, or other sequelae. Using a four-port laparoscopic technique, the esophageal hiatus was dissected to expose the aorta at the level of the diaphragmatic crura. Under combined endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) guidance, 5 ml of sclerosant dye (95% ethanol mixed with India ink) was injected into either side of the para-aortic soft tissue via a percutaneously placed 18-gauge spinal needle. After the animals were killed, the aorta and periaortic tissue were harvested from each animal for gross and histologic analysis. Results: Under LUS guidance, sclerosant was injected successfully into the para-aortic soft tissue in all animals. There were no intraoperative complications in the acute animal group. Placement of sclerosant injection was successful in all nine chronic cases. Two pigs in the chronic study group died in the immediate postoperative period secondary to pneumothorax. No adverse neurologic, gastrointestinal, or other sequelae were observed in the remaining seven animals at 3–21 days postoperatively. After the animals were killed, we found no injuries to the aorta or esophagus, and histologic analysis demonstrated good placement of dye-labeled sclerosant with no compromise of aortic structural integrity. Conclusion: A laparoscopic approach to the aortic hiatus and NCPB is feasible. Further studies are warranted to evaluate this approach in patients who undergo staging laparoscopy for pancreatic cancer and are found to have unresectable disease.

Laparoscopic removal of an Angelchik prosthesis

Abstract. The use of Angelchik prosthetic rings for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease has been associated with frequent complications, including dysphagia and migration, erosion, or disruption of the ring. Although reports of the laparoscopic insertion of Angelchik rings have been published, there have been no descriptions of the laparoscopic removal of rings inserted at open laparotomy. Our group recently removed an Angelchik ring laparoscopically in an 80-year-old woman with progressive, refractory dysphagia and esophageal narrowing due to an Angelchik ring originally placed in 1981 via an upper midline incision at open operation. Upper endoscopy and dilatation had failed to provide symptom relief. An extensive adhesiolysis was performed laparoscopically, and the Angelchik ring was dissected free from the proximal stomach, diaphragm, and liver. The fibrous pseudocapsule enclosing the ring was divided, and the prosthesis was removed from around the esophagus and abdominal cavity. Intraoperative upper endoscopy confirmed resolution of the esophageal stricture. There were no intraoperative complications, and the patient was discharged home on the 3rd postoperative day tolerating a regular diet. Postoperatively, she experienced resolution of her dysphagia and complained only of mild reflux symptoms, which were easily controlled with famotidine and antireflux precautions. This case suggests that laparoscopic removal of Angelchik prosthetic rings is feasible for surgeons familiar with advanced laparoscopic procedures of the esophageal hiatus and should be considered for symptomatic patients, even if the ring was inserted via an open operation.