Mary Ann Head

Organ procurement and transplantation network/united network for organ sharing histocompatibility committee collaborative study to evaluate prediction of crossmatch results in highly sensitized patients.

Background. The requirement for a prospective crossmatch limits some organ allocation to local areas. The delay necessitated by the crossmatch restricts the distance across which offers can be made without unduly increasing the ischemia time. A collaborative study involving 14 transplant centers was undertaken by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) Histocompatibility Committee to evaluate the accuracy with which the detection of unacceptable human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens by most advanced solid phase immunoassays can predict crossmatch results. In addition, using actual patients’ unacceptable HLA antigens, the number of compatible donors that would have been available from the OPTN deceased kidney donors during 2002 to 2004 were investigated. Methods. Panel reactive antibodies were performed by conventional or solid phase assays, and crossmatches were performed by cytotoxicity or flow cytometry. Analyses were stratified for T and B cell and by method of identifying unacceptable HLA antigens and crossmatch techniques. Results. Combination of solid phase immunoassays and flow cytometry crossmatches resulted in a higher prediction rates of positive T cell (86.1%–93.5%) and B-cell crossmatches (91%–97.8%). Prediction of negative crossmatches based on different combination of panel reactive antibodies and crossmatch techniques varied from 14.3% to 57.1%. Furthermore, numerous potential compatible donors were identified for each patient, regardless of their ethnicity, in the OPTN database, when predicted incompatible ones were excluded. Conclusions. The above results showed that with the advent of solid phase immunoassays, HLA antibodies can now be accurately detected resulting in prediction of crossmatch outcome. This should facilitate organ allocation and prevents shipment of organs to distant incompatible recipients.

HLA-DR mismatching correlates with early cardiac allograft rejection, incidence, and graft survival when high-confidence-level serological DR typing is used.

To determine if cardiac allograft outcome is improved among patients with fewer HLA-DR mismatches with their donors, we studied 132 recipients of a primary cardiac allograft who were transplanted between December 1985 and December 1991. These recipients and their donors all had high-confidence-level serological HLA-DR typing, previously shown to correlate highly with DNA DR typing. Patients were divided in two groups based on the HLA-DR mismatch with their donors. Group I consisted of 78 patients with 1 or zero DR mismatch and group II of 54 patients with 2 DR mismatches. Allograft outcome measurements included incidence of moderate rejection, incidence of allograft vasculopathy at 12 months, cardiac function measured as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and cardiac index (CI), and actuarial graft survival up to 7 years. Groups I and group II were not different with regard to recipient age, donor age, ischemia time, pulmonary vascular resistance, sex, or PRA greater than 0%. Group II had a higher incidence of moderate rejection on the first-week biopsy (47% vs. 25%, P = 0.019), and during the first month (84% vs. 58%, P = 0.006), but no difference was found in frequency of rejection from months 2 to 12. LVEF was not different in the groups at any point. CI was better in group I at 12 months (2.76 vs. 2.5, P = 0.03). No statistically significant difference was found in incidence of allograft vasculopathy (17% vs. 26%, P = 0.204). Actual graft survival at 1 year was better for group I (91% vs. 74%, P = 0.008), and actuarial graft survival at 6 years also favored group I (76% vs. 56%, P = 0.04). Using high-confidence-level serological HLA-DR typing assignments we demonstrated that HLA-DR mismatching correlates highly with cardiac allograft outcome. Implications are that heart transplant survival could be improved if prospective matching were feasible and prioritized or if immunosuppression were tailored to the HLA-DR match.