Mary C. Clouser

Co-occurring mental health and alcohol misuse: Dual disorder symptoms in combat injured veterans

OBJECTIVEnService members face difficulties during military deployment potentially resulting in morbidities such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and alcohol misuse. The co-occurrence of alcohol misuse and mental health disorders is termed dual disorder and has been associated with adverse outcomes.nnnMETHODSnThe study included 812 high-risk (i.e., endorsing combat exposure with documented combat injury) male U.S. veterans of Operation Iraqi Freedom, injured between October 2004 and November 2007, identified from the Expeditionary Medical Encounter Database.nnnRESULTSnPTSD and depression symptoms were significant correlates of alcohol misuse. Veterans with dual disorder symptoms reported a significantly higher mean number of health complaints on the Post-Deployment Health Reassessment compared with those endorsing only mental health symptoms.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThese results highlight how mental health disorders among injured service members increases the odds of problem drinking and those with dual disorder have elevated health complaints.

Dwell Time and Psychological Screening Outcomes Among Military Service Members With Multiple Combat Deployments

Recent studies have found that longer dwell times, or the period of time between deployments, may be protective against combat-related psychological outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between dwell time and psychological morbidity, while accounting for combat exposure. U.S. Marines with two combat deployments between 2005 and 2008 were identified from electronic deployment records. Those who screened positive for post-traumatic stress disorder and depression, and who were referred for mental health services were identified from the Post-Deployment Health Assessment. For the final study sample of 3,512 Marines, dwell time was calculated as time between deployments, and was analyzed as a ratio over length of first deployment. After adjustment for all covariates, there was an interaction (p = 0.01) between dwell time and combat exposure on mental health referral outcome. For personnel with maximum reported combat exposure, longer dwell times were associated with a 49% to 92% reduced odds of mental health referral. Longer dwell times may be protective against combat-related psychological outcomes. Because multiple deployments are likely to be the norm in future military operations, regulating dwell time, particularly for those with greater risk of combat exposure, should continue to be explored.

Effectiveness of the combat pelvic protection system in the prevention of genital and urinary tract injuries: An observational study.

BACKGROUND Historically, the incidence of genital and urinary tract (GU) injuries in major conflicts has been approximately 5%. To mitigate the risk of blast injury to the external genitalia, the United States and United Kingdom issued protective overgarments and undergarments to troops deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. These two systems combined constitute the pelvic protection system (PPS). Our hypothesis was that PPS use is associated with a reduction of GU injuries in subjects exposed to dismounted improvised explosive device blast injuries. METHODS We identified two groups for comparison: those who were confirmed to have worn the PPS at time of injury (n = 58) and a historical control group who were confirmed as not wearing the PPS (non-PPS) (n = 61). Patients with any level of lower extremity amputation from dismounted improvised explosive device blast mechanism were included. The primary outcome measure was presence of a GU injury on admission. A univariate analysis assessing the strength of association with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals was performed between the PPS and non-PPS groups. RESULTS Mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was higher in the PPS versus the non-PPS group (26.1 vs. 19.3, p = 0.0012). Overall, 31% of the patients in the PPS group sustained at least one GU injury versus 62.3% in the non-PPS group. The odds ratio of sustaining a GU injury in the PPS group as compared with the PPS group is 0.28 (31% vs. 62.3%; 95 % confidence interval, 0.62–0.12; p < 0.001). The most frequent injures were open scrotal/testes wounds, followed by open penis, and open bladder/urethra injuries. CONCLUSION The use of the PPS is associated with a decreased odds ratio of GU injury. Despite a 31% absolute reduction, future work should focus on improved efficiency. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level IV; therapeutic study, level V.

The Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence: Overview of the Research and Surveillance Division

Congress authorized creation of the Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence (EACE) as part of the 2009 National Defense Authorization Act. The legislation mandated the Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to implement a comprehensive plan and strategy for the mitigation, treatment, and rehabilitation of traumatic extremity injuries and amputation. The EACE also was tasked with conducting clinically relevant research, fostering collaborations, and building partnerships across multidisciplinary international, federal, and academic networks to optimize the quality of life of service members and veterans who have sustained extremity trauma or amputations. To fulfill the mandate to conduct research, the EACE developed a Research and Surveillance Division that complements and collaborates with outstanding DoD, VA, and academic research programs across the globe. The EACE researchers have efforts in four key research focus areas relevant to extremity trauma and amputation: (1) Novel Rehabilitation Interventions, (2) Advanced Prosthetic and Orthotic Technologies, (3) Epidemiology and Surveillance, and (4) Medical and Surgical Innovations. This overview describes the EACE efforts to innovate, discover, and translate knowledge gleaned from collaborative research partnerships into clinical practice and policy.

Development of a comprehensive Blast-Related Auditory Injury Database (BRAID).

The Department of Defense Hearing Conservation Program provides specific guidance for service components to prevent occupational hearing loss; however, it does not specifically contend with the unique noise exposures observed in the theater of war, such as blasts and explosions. In order to examine the effects of blast injury on hearing sensitivity, we developed a large database composed of demographic, audiometric, point of injury, and medical outcome data, with the primary aim of developing a long-standing and integrated capability for the surveillance, assessment, and investigation of blast-related hearing outcomes. Methods used to develop the dataset are described. Encompassing more than 16,500 Navy and Marine Corps personnel, the Blast-Related Auditory Injury Database (BRAID) includes individuals with a blast-related injury and nonblast control subjects. Using baseline and postdeployment hearing threshold data, a retrospective analysis of the cohort revealed that the rate of hearing loss for the injured servicemembers was 39%. The BRAID will be useful for studies that assess hearing patterns following deployment-related injury, such as blast exposures, that facilitate exploration of health outcomes and whether they are predictive of audiometric disposition and that help establish hearing loss prevention strategies and program policies for affected military commands and servicemembers.

Characterization and Comparison of Combat-Related Injuries in Women During OIF and OEF

Although historically restricted from combat roles, women suffer from combat-related injuries, especially in recent conflicts where asymmetrical warfare erases distinctions between forward and rear operating areas. U.S. servicewomen who sustained combat-related injury in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) or Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) between January 2003 and May 2014 were identified from the Expeditionary Medical Encounter Database. Injuries were characterized using Abbreviated Injury Scale and International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes. Of the 844 combat-related injury episodes in women, 51% (n = 433) were OIF injuries and 49% (n = 411) were OEF injuries. Blast events were responsible for 90% of injuries. The average Injury Severity Score was 3, with no statistical difference in means between OIF and OEF. Of significance were increased head injuries in OEF compared with OIF (80% vs. 48%; p < 0.001). Although the majority of combat-related injuries suffered by women were mild, some women suffered life-threatening injuries, and nearly 65% of the injury episodes resulted in more than one injury. More research is needed as the roles of women in the military continue to expand. Future studies will investigate quality of life outcomes and gender differences in combat-related injuries.

Health-related quality of life among US military personnel injured in combat: findings from the Wounded Warrior Recovery Project

PurposeLittle is known about the long-term, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of those wounded in combat during Operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and New Dawn. The present study described the overall HRQOL for a large group of US service members experiencing mild-to-severe combat-related injuries, and assessed the unique contribution of demographics, service- and injury-related characteristics, and mental health factors on long-term HRQOL.MethodThe Wounded Warrior Recovery Project examines patient-reported outcomes in a cohort of US military personnel wounded in combat. Participants were identified from the Expeditionary Medical Encounter Database, a US Navy-maintained deployment health database, and invited to complete a web-based survey. At the time of this study, 3245 service members consented and completed the survey. Hierarchical linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the unique contribution of each set of antecedents on HRQOL scores.ResultsHRQOL was uniquely associated with a number of demographics, and service- and injury-related characteristics. Nevertheless, screening positive for posttraumatic stress disorder (Bu2009=u2009−u2009.09; Pu2009<u2009.001), depression (Bu2009=u2009−u2009.10; Pu2009<u2009.001), or both as a set (Bu2009=u2009−u2009.19; Pu2009<u2009.001) were the strongest predictors of lower long-term HRQOL.ConclusionsPostinjury HRQOL among service members wounded in combat was associated with service and injury experience, and demographic factors, but was most strongly linked with current mental health status. These findings underscore the significance of mental health issues long after injury. Further, findings reinforce that long-term mental health screening, services, and treatment are needed for those injured in combat.

Association of Specific Lower Extremity Injuries With Delayed Amputation

INTRODUCTIONnDespite medical interventions to preserve viability and functionality of injured limb(s) among combat-injured service members, delayed amputations may occur. The goal of this study was to determine whether specific lower extremity (LE) injuries were associated with delayed amputations.nnnMETHODSnThe Expeditionary Medical Encounter Database was queried for combat-related LE injuries between 2003 and 2015. The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) was used to categorize LE injuries by severity. Injury episodes with a maximum LE AIS of 1 or amputation on the day of injury were excluded. The final sample included 2,996 service members with at least one LE injury with an AIS ≥2. The frequencies of specific LE fractures and nerve and vessel injuries were determined. Logistic regression with paired independent variables was performed to examine the impact of multiple LE injuries on the odds of delayed amputation.nnnRESULTSnDelayed LE amputation was identified in 308 (10.3%) service members in the sample. The delayed and no amputation groups did not differ in age and service branch. The majority of injury episodes were blast-related and with an Injury Severity Score ≥9. The most frequent fractures were tibia (34.4%) and fibula (29.3%), but the highest rates of delayed amputation were in those with navicular (36.2%), talus (30.0%), or calcaneus (28.1%) fractures. Odds of amputation were highest among service members with the calcaneus fracture and LE nerve injury (odds ratio [OR]: 41.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14.70, 118.55; p < 0.001), calcaneal fracture and LE vessel injury (OR: 17.99; 95% CI: 10.53, 30.74; p < 0.001), and calcaneus and tibia fractures (OR: 15.12; 95% CI: 9.54, 23.96; p < 0.001) combinations.nnnCONCLUSIONSnOdds of delayed amputation increased substantially with specific injury combinations. These findings may guide clinical decision-making in the acute care period.

Preliminary study of hearing protection and non-impact, blast-induced concussion in US military personnel

ABSTRACT Primary objective: To examine the relationship between hearing protection and non-impact, blast-induced concussion in US military personnel. Research design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods and procedures: A total of 501 US service members from the Expeditionary Medical Encounter Database with hearing protection status reported either ‘worn’ or ‘not worn’ were eligible for analysis. Clinical records were reviewed for concussion diagnoses. Univariate and multiple logistic regressions were performed. Main outcomes and results: Overall, 270 (53.9%) service members sustained non-impact, blast-induced concussion and 231 (46.1%) sustained other blast injuries. Only 39.6% (107 of 270) of service members with concussion wore hearing protection at the point of injury compared with 61.0% (141 of 231) of those with other injuries (p < 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, service members wearing hearing protection had significantly lower odds of concussion compared with those not wearing hearing protection (odds ratio = 0.42, 95% confidence interval = 0.29–0.62). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this preliminary study is the first to demonstrate that hearing protection is associated with lower odds of non-impact, blast-induced concussion. The benefits of using hearing protection in terms of force readiness could be significant since many service members wounded in recent conflicts were diagnosed with concussion.

Impact of Blast Injury on Hearing in a Screened Male Military Population

Exposure to hazardous intensity levels of combat noise, such as blast, may compromise a persons ability to detect and recognize sounds and communicate effectively. There is little previous examination of the onset of hearing health outcomes following exposure to blast in representative samples of deployed US military personnel. Data from the prospective Blast-Related Auditory Injury Database were analyzed. We included only those participants with qualified hearing tests within a period of 12 months prior to, and following, injury (n = 1,574). After adjustment for relevant covariates and potential confounders, those who sustained a blast injury had significantly higher odds of postinjury hearing loss (odds ratio = 2.21; 95% confidence interval: 1.42, 3.44), low-frequency hearing loss (odds ratio = 1.95; 95% confidence interval: 1.01, 3.78), high-frequency hearing loss (odds ratio = 2.45; 95% confidence interval: 1.43, 4.20), and significant threshold shift compared with a group with non-blast-related injury. An estimated 49% of risk for hearing loss in these blast-injured, deployed military members could be attributed to the blast-related injury event. This study reinforced that it is imperative to identify at-risk populations for early intervention and prevention, as well as to consistently monitor the effects of blast injury on hearing outcomes.