Mary E. Harrington

The ventral lateral geniculate nucleus and the intergeniculate leaflet: Interrelated structures in the visual and circadian systems

The ventral lateral geniculate nucleus (vLGN) and the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) are retinorecipient subcortical nuclei. This paper attempts a comprehensive summary of research on these thalamic areas, drawing on anatomical, electrophysiological, and behavioral studies. From the current perspective, the vLGN and IGL appear closely linked, in that they share many neurochemicals, projections, and physiological properties. Neurochemicals commonly reported in the vLGN and IGL are neuropeptide Y, GABA, enkephalin, and nitric oxide synthase (localized in cells) and serotonin, acetylcholine, histamine, dopamine and noradrenalin (localized in fibers). Afferent and efferent connections are also similar, with both areas commonly receiving input from the retina, locus coreuleus, and raphe, having reciprocal connections with superior colliculus, pretectum and hypothalamus, and also showing connections to zona incerta, accessory optic system, pons, the contralateral vLGN/IGL, and other thalamic nuclei. Physiological studies indicate species differences, with spectral-sensitive responses common in some species, and varying populations of motion-sensitive units or units linked to optokinetic stimulation. A high percentage of IGL neurons show light intensity-coding responses. Behavioral studies suggest that the vLGN and IGL play a major role in mediating non-photic phase shifts of circadian rhythms, largely via neuropeptide Y, but may also play a role in photic phase shifts and in photoperiodic responses. The vLGN and IGL may participate in two major functional systems, those controlling visuomotor responses and those controlling circadian rhythms. Future research should be directed toward further integration of these diverse findings.

Visualizing jet lag in the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus and peripheral circadian timing system

Circadian rhythms regulate most physiological processes. Adjustments to circadian time, called phase shifts, are necessary following international travel and on a more frequent basis for individuals who work non‐traditional schedules such as rotating shifts. As the disruption that results from frequent phase shifts is deleterious to both animals and humans, we sought to better understand the kinetics of resynchronization of the mouse circadian system to one of the most disruptive phase shifts, a 6‐h phase advance. Mice bearing a luciferase reporter gene for mPer2 were subjected to a 6‐h advance of the light cycle and molecular rhythms in suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), thymus, spleen, lung and esophagus were measured periodically for 2 weeks following the shift. For the SCN, the master pacemaker in the brain, we employed high‐resolution imaging of the brain slice to describe the resynchronization of rhythms in single SCN neurons during adjustment to the new light cycle. We observed significant differences in shifting kinetics among mice, among organs such as the spleen and lung, and importantly among neurons in the SCN. The phase distribution among all Period2‐expressing SCN neurons widened on the day following a shift of the light cycle, which was partially due to cells in the ventral SCN exhibiting a larger initial phase shift than cells in the dorsal SCN. There was no clear delineation of ventral and dorsal regions, however, as the SCN appear to have a population of fast‐shifting cells whose anatomical distribution is organized in a ventral–dorsal gradient. Full resynchronization of the SCN and peripheral timing system, as measured by a circadian reporter gene, did not occur until after 8 days in the advanced light cycle.

Neuropeptide Y and glutamate block each other's phase shifts in the suprachiasmatic nucleus in vitro

The suprachiasmatic nuclei contain a circadian clock whose activity can be recorded in vitro for several days. Photic information is conveyed to the nuclei primarily via a direct projection from the retina, the retinohypothalamic tract, utilizing an excitatory amino acid neurotransmitter. Photic phase shifts may be mimicked by application of glutamate in vitro. A second, indirect pathway to the suprachiasmatic nuclei via the geniculohypothalamic tract utilizes neuropeptide Y as a transmitter. Phase shifts to neuropeptide Y in vitro are similar to those seen to non-photic stimuli in vivo. We have used the hypothalamic slice preparation to examine the interactions of photic and non-photic stimuli in the suprachiasmatic nuclei. Coronal hypothalamic slices containing the suprachiasmatic nuclei were prepared from Syrian hamsters and 3 min recordings of the firing rate of individual cells were performed throughout a 12 h period. Control slices receiving either no application or application of artificial cerebrospinal fluid to the suprachiasmatic nucleus showed a consistent daily peak in their rhythms. Glutamate produces phase shifts of the circadian clock in the hamster hypothalamic slice preparation during the subjective night but not during the subjective day. These phase shifts were similar in timing and direction to the photic phase response curve in vivo confirming previous work with the rat slice preparation. Neuropeptide Y produces phase shifts of the circadian clock during the subjective day but not during the subjective night. The phase shifts are similar in timing and direction to the non-photic phase response curve in vivo, confirming previous in vitro work. We then examined the interaction of these neurochemicals with each other at various times during the circadian cycle. We found that both advances and delays to glutamate in the slice are blocked by application of neuropeptide Y. We also found that phase shifts to neuropeptide Y in the slice are blocked by application of glutamate. These results indicate that photic and non-photic associated neurochemicals can block each others phase shifting effects within the suprachiasmatic nucleus in vitro. These experiments demonstrate the ability of photic and non-photic associated neurochemicals to interact at the level of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. It is clear that neuropeptide Y antagonizes the effect of glutamate during the subjective night, and that glutamate antagonizes the effect of neuropeptide Y during the subjective day. Great care must be taken when devising treatments where photic and non-photic signals may interact.

Dexras1 Potentiates Photic and Suppresses Nonphotic Responses of the Circadian Clock

Circadian rhythms of physiology and behavior are generated by biological clocks that are synchronized to the cyclic environment by photic or nonphotic cues. The interactions and integration of various entrainment pathways to the clock are poorly understood. Here, we show that the Ras-like G protein Dexras1 is a critical modulator of the responsiveness of the master clock to photic and nonphotic inputs. Genetic deletion of Dexras1 reduces photic entrainment by eliminating a pertussis-sensitive circadian response to NMDA. Mechanistically, Dexras1 couples NMDA and light input to Gi/o and ERK activation. In addition, the mutation greatly potentiates nonphotic responses to neuropeptide Y and unmasks a nonphotic response to arousal. Thus, Dexras1 modulates the responses of the master clock to photic and nonphotic stimuli in opposite directions. These results identify a signaling molecule that serves as a differential modulator of the gated photic and nonphotic input pathways to the circadian timekeeping system.

Neuropeptide Y applied in vitro can block the phase shifts induced by light in vivo

&NA; The mammalian suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) can be synchronized by light, with direct glutamatergic input from the retina. Input to the SCN from the intergeniculate leaflet contains neuropeptide Y (NPY) and can modulate photic responses. NPY can reduce the phase‐resetting effect of light or glutamate. We investigated the effect of NPY applied in vitro on light‐induced phase shifts of the SCN neural activity rhythm. Light pulses delivered in vivo induced phase shifts in brain slice preparations similar to those as measured by behavioral activity rhythms. NPY applied after the light pulse blocked the phase shifts during both the early and late subjective night. NPY applied 30 min after the light pulse could block the phase delay induced by light. Our results show that NPY can inhibit photic resetting of the clock during the subjective night. The time course of this inhibitory effect suggests a mechanism downstream of the glutamate receptor.The mammalian suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) can be synchronized by light, with direct glutamatergic input from the retina. Input to the SCN from the intergeniculate leaflet contains neuropeptide Y (NPY) and can modulate photic responses. NPY can reduce the phase-resetting effect of light or glutamate. We investigated the effect of NPY applied in vitro on light-induced phase shifts of the SCN neural activity rhythm. Light pulses delivered in vivo induced phase shifts in brain slice preparations similar to those as measured by behavioral activity rhythms. NPY applied after the light pulse blocked the phase shifts during both the early and late subjective night. NPY applied 30 min after the light pulse could block the phase delay induced by light. Our results show that NPY can inhibit photic resetting of the clock during the subjective night. The time course of this inhibitory effect suggests a mechanism downstream of the glutamate receptor.

Neuropeptide Y phase shifts the circadian clock in vitro via a Y2 receptor

The suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) contain a circadian clock whose activity can be recorded in vitro for several days. This clock can be reset by the application of neuropeptide Y. In this study, we focused on determination of the receptor responsible for neuropeptide Y phase shifts of the hamster circadian clock in vitro. Coronal hypothalamic slices containing the SCN were prepared from Syrian hamsters housed under a 14 h:10 h light:dark cycle. Tissue was bathed in artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF), and the firing rates of individual cells were sampled throughout a 12 h period. Control slices received either no application or application of 200 nl ACSF to the SCN at zeitgeber time 6 (ZT6; ZT12 was defined as the time of lights off). Application of 200 ng/200 nl of neuropeptide Y at ZT6 resulted in a phase advance of 3.4 h. Application of the Y2 receptor agonist, neuropeptide Y (3-36), induced a similar phase advance in the rhythm, while the Y1 receptor agonist, [Leu31, Pro34]-neuropeptide Y had no effect. Pancreatic polypeptide (rat or avian) also had no measurable phase-shifting effect. Neuropeptide Y applied at ZT20 or 22 had no detectable phase-shifting effect. These results suggest that the phase-shifting effects of neuropeptide Y are mediated through a Y2 receptor, similar to results found in vivo.

Ghrelin Effects on the Circadian System of Mice

The orexigenic peptide ghrelin stimulates both food intake and growth hormone release and is synthesized in the stomach and in hypothalamic areas involved in feeding control. The suprachiasmatic nuclei of the hypothalamus (SCN) control most circadian rhythms, although there is evidence that some oscillators, such as food-entrainable oscillators, can drive activity rhythms even after SCN ablation. Ghrelin levels exhibit a circadian rhythm and closely follow feeding schedules, making this peptide a putative candidate for food-related entraining signals. We examined the response of the SCN to ghrelin treatments in vitro, by means of electrophysiological and bioluminescence recordings, and in vivo, by assessing effects on the phase of locomotor activity rhythms. Ghrelin applied at circadian time 6 in vitro to cultured SCN slices induced an ∼3 h phase advance. In addition, ghrelin phase advanced the rhythm of PER2::LUC (Period2::Luciferase) expression in cultured SCN explants from mPer2Luc transgenic mice. In vivo, intraperitoneal administration of ghrelin or a synthetic analog, growth hormone-releasing protein-6 (GHRP-6), to ad libitum fed animals failed to alter circadian phase. When injected after 30 h of food deprivation, GHRP-6 induced a phase advance compared with saline-injected animals. These results indicate that ghrelin may play a role in the circadian system by exerting a direct action on the SCN and that the system as a whole may become sensitive to ghrelin and other feeding-related neuropeptides under conditions of food restriction.

Neuropeptide Y rapidly reduces Period 1 and Period 2 mRNA levels in the hamster suprachiasmatic nucleus

The mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) contains the main circadian clock. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) that is released from the intergeniculate leaflet of the lateral geniculate body to the SCN, acts in the SCN to advance circadian phase in the subjective day via the NPY Y2 receptor. We used semi-quantitative in situ hybridization to determine the effect of NPY on circadian clock genes, Period 1 (Per1) and Period 2 (Per2), expression in SCN slices. Addition of NPY to the brain slices in the subjective day resulted in reduction of Per1 and Per2 mRNA levels 0.5 and 2 h after treatment. NPY Y1/Y5 and Y2 agonists decreased Per1 within 0.5 h. These results suggest that NPY may induce phase shifts by mechanisms involving or resulting in reduction of Per1 and Per2 mRNA levels.

Geniculo-hypothalamic tract lesions block chlordiazepoxide-induced phase advances in Syrian hamsters

Administration of the benzodiazepine triazolam at the appropriate time in the circadian cycle has been shown to induce phase shifts in hamster circadian rhythms. These phase shifts can be blocked by geniculo-hypothalamic tract (GHT) ablation or by restraint of activity. The present study examined the effects of the benzodiazepine chlordiazepoxide on running-wheel activity rhythms of hamsters. The phase-advancing effect of intraperitoneal injections of chlordiazepoxide administered at circadian time 6 (CT 6) was dose-dependent. Average shifts ranged from 6 min at a dose of 0.05 mg/kg to 135 min at a dose of 200 mg/kg. Four of twenty hamsters did not show a phase shift to any dose tested. Phase advance shifts to chlordiazepoxide (CT 6; 100 mg/kg) were blocked by GHT lesions. Chlordiazepoxide injections at doses which induced phase shifts were often followed by sedation. These results indicate that chlordiazepoxide is similar to triazolam, in that its ability to induce phase shifts at circadian time 6 is blocked by GHT lesions.

The effects of GABA and benzodiazepines on neurones in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of Syrian hamsters

Administration of benzodiazepines at appropriate times in the circadian cycle induce phase-shifts in circadian locomotor activity. The possibility that benzodiazepine-induced shifts are mediated at the level of the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), identified as the circadian pacemaker in mammals, was examined electrophysiologically. Extracellular recordings were made from Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) hypothalamic SCN neurones in vitro to assess (1) the effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) on SCN neuronal activity and (2) the effects of benzodiazepines (chlordiazepoxide and flurazepam) on GABA-evoked responses. Of 93 SCN cells tested, 86 were suppressed by iontophoresed GABA (20 mM) in a current(dose)-dependent manner, while 6 were unaffected; suppression was found during both the projected light and dark phases of the circadian cycle. Application of bicuculline methiodide alone elevated mean discharge activity, while GABA-evoked suppressions were blocked by bicuculline (n = 9/11 cells). Iontophoresis of chlordiazepoxide or flurazepam (20 mM; 1-10 nA) alone produced a current(dose)-dependent prolonged suppression of cell firing which was antagonised by bicuculline. These results indicate that benzodiazepine/GABA-evoked responses are at least partially mediated by GABAA receptors within the SCN and suggest that SCN may be a possible locus for the action of benzodiazepines in their induction of phase-shifts in circadian function.