Mary Erickson

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonism improves metabolic, biochemical, and histopathological indices of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in mice

These preclinical studies aimed to 1) increase our understanding the dietary induction of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and, 2) further explore the utility and mechanisms of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonism in NASH. We compared the effects of a high trans-fat (HTF) or high lard fat (HLF) diet on key facets of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/NASH in Lep(ob)/Lep(ob) and C57BL6J (B6) mice. Although HLF-fed mice experienced overall greater gains in weight and adiposity, the addition of trans-fat better mirrored pathophysiological features of NASH (e.g., hepatomegaly, hepatic lipid, and fibrosis). Administration of AC3174, an exenatide analog, and GLP-1R agonist to Lep(ob)/Lep(ob) and B6 ameliorated hepatic endpoints in both dietary models. Next, we assessed whether AC3174-mediated improvements in diet-induced NASH were solely due to weight loss in HTF-fed mice. AC3174-treatment significantly reduced body weight (8.3%), liver mass (14.2%), liver lipid (12.9%), plasma alanine aminotransferase, and triglycerides, whereas a calorie-restricted, weight-matched group demonstrated only modest nonsignificant reductions in liver mass (9%) and liver lipid (5.1%) relative to controls. Treatment of GLP-1R-deficient (GLP-1RKO) mice with AC3174 had no effect on body weight, adiposity, liver or plasma indices pointing to the GLP-1R-dependence of AC3174s effects. Interestingly, the role of endogenous GLP-1Rs in NASH merits further exploration as the GLP-1RKO model was protected from the deleterious hepatic effects of HTF. Our pharmacological data further support the clinical evaluation of the utility of GLP-1R agonists for treatment of NASH.

GLP‐1R and amylin agonism in metabolic disease: complementary mechanisms and future opportunities

The discoveries of the incretin hormone glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) and the β‐cell hormone amylin have translated into hormone‐based therapies for diabetes. Both classes of molecules also exhibit weight‐lowering effects and have been investigated for their anti‐obesity potential. In the present review, we explore the mechanisms underlying the physiological and pharmacological actions of GLP‐1 and amylin agonism. Despite their similarities (e.g. both molecular classes slow gastric emptying, decrease glucagon and inhibit food intake), there are important distinctions between the central and/or peripheral pathways that mediate their effects on glycaemia and energy balance. We suggest that understanding the similarities and differences between these molecules holds important implications for the development of novel, combination‐based therapies, which are increasingly the norm for diabetes/metabolic disease. Finally, the future of GLP‐1‐ and amylin agonist‐based therapeutics is discussed.