Mary Grace Fitzgerald

Alcohol consumption patterns and predictors of use following liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease

For patients who receive a liver transplant (LTX) for alcoholic liver disease (ALD), investigators are focusing beyond survival to determine specific alcohol use outcomes. Studies suggest the use of alcohol ranges from 8 to 22% for the first post‐transplant year with cumulative rates reaching 30 to 40% by 5 years following transplantation. Yet while investigators are interested in determining specific rates of alcohol use and predictors of use, only three studies since 1990 have been prospective. In 1998, we began a prospective study of post‐LTX alcohol consumption in ALD recipients using multiple repeated measures of alcohol use. After 5 years of follow‐up, we found that 22% had used any alcohol by the first year and 42% had a drink by 5 years. By 5 years, 26% drank at a heavier use (binge) pattern and 20% drank in a frequent pattern. In a univariate model, predictors of alcohol use included pre‐transplant length of sobriety, a diagnosis of alcohol dependence, a history of other substance use, and prior alcohol rehabilitation. Liver Transpl 12:813–820, 2006.

Trajectories of alcohol consumption following liver transplantation.

Any use of alcohol in the years following liver transplantation (LTX) approaches 50% of patients transplanted for alcoholic liver disease (ALD). We collected detailed prospective data on alcohol consumption following LTX for ALD to investigate ongoing patterns of use. Using trajectory modeling we identified four distinct alcohol use trajectories. One group had minimal use over time. Two other groups developed early onset moderate‐to‐heavy consumption and one group developed late onset moderate use. These trajectories demonstrate that alcohol use varies based on timing of onset, quantity and duration. Using discriminant function analysis, we examine characteristics of recipients pre‐LTX alcohol histories and early post‐LTX psychological stressors to identify the profile of those at risk for these specific trajectories. We discuss the relevance of these findings to clinical care and preliminarily to outcomes.

Tobacco use following liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease: An underestimated problem†

Alcohol and tobacco use commonly co‐occur, with at least 90% of those with an alcohol problem also using tobacco. Thus, 3 years ago when we discovered higher rate of late deaths due to lung and oropharyngeal cancer in patients who had received a transplant for alcoholic liver disease (ALD), we hypothesized that these patients were continuing to expose themselves to tobacco after liver transplantation (post‐LTX) and that this behavior was increasing their risk for cancer. We subsequently began a prospective investigation of post‐LTX tobacco use in patients having undergone LTX for ALD (n = 172). For 33 recipients we had data starting from our first assessment at 3 months post‐LTX and for this subgroup we report on the details of the timing of tobacco use resumption and the redevelopment of nicotine addiction. We found that on average more than 40% are smoking across all time periods. ALD recipients resume smoking early post‐LTX, increase their consumption over time, and quickly become tobacco dependent. These data highlight an underrecognized serious health risk for these patients and demonstrate our need for more stringent clinical monitoring and intervention for tobacco use in the pre‐ and post‐LTX periods. (Liver Transpl 2005;11:679–683.)

Early Trajectories of Depressive Symptoms after Liver Transplantation for Alcoholic Liver Disease Predicts Long‐Term Survival

Although it is well known that depression is associated with poorer medical outcomes, the association between depression‐ and liver transplant (LTX)‐specific outcomes has not been investigated. We identified three trajectories of depressive symptoms evolving within the first post‐LTX year in a cohort of 167 patients transplanted for alcoholic cirrhosis: a group with consistently low depression levels at all time points (group 1, n = 95), a group with initially low depression levels that rose over time (group 2, n = 41), and a group with consistently high depression levels (group 3, n = 31). Controlling for medical factors associated with poorer survival, recipients with increasing depression or persisting depression were more than twice as likely to die (all cause mortality) within the subsequent years. At 10 years post‐LTX the survival rate was 66% for the low depression group, but only 46% and 43%, respectively, for the increasing depression and high depression groups. Except for a paradoxically higher percentage of malignancies in the low depression group, the causes of death and other specific LTX outcomes were not different between groups. Whether treatment of depression will improve survival rates is an area for research.

Outcome of liver transplantation in critically ill patients with alcoholic cirrhosis : Survival according to medical variables and sobriety

BACKGROUND At our center from August 1989 to December 1992, 834 adults underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) using tacrolimus as the primary immunosuppressive agent. A total of 183 adults (22%) had alcohol-related liver disease. Patients with alcoholic cirrhosis had a better though not statistically significant 5-year survival rate compared with all other patients. We were interested in specific predictors of survival, particularly for alcoholic cirrhotics who were gravely ill at the point of transplantation. METHODS For the 78 patients with alcohol-related liver disease who were United Network for Organ Sharing status IIA (critically ill) at the point of transplantation, variables of length of sobriety, alcohol rehabilitation, and medical variables (ventilator support, dialysis, vasopressor support, degree of encephalopathy, and infection) were assessed for contribution to survival. RESULTS Although there was a trend toward poorer survival in patients with the shortest length of sobriety (< or =1 month), pre-OLT length of sobriety or alcohol rehabilitation did not predict survival. However, these patients tended to be in multiorgan failure and encephalopathic. Nevertheless, pre-OLT dialysis requirement was the only variable that predicted poorer survival (P < 0.002). This study was not designed to evaluate recidivism. However, we know that 24% of these patients have used alcohol at some point after OLT. CONCLUSIONS Short pre-OLT length of sobriety may not predict which patients are likely to resume alcohol consumption after OLT, but it may identify patients in whom there will exist a variety of poor outcome variables. In our study, in these patients, post-OLT survival was associated with medical rather than alcohol history variables.

Motives and Decision Making of Potential Living Liver Donors: Comparisons Between Gender, Relationships and Ambivalence

The motives and decision making of potential living liver donors are critical areas for transplant clinicians evaluating these candidates to understand, yet these topics remain relatively unstudied. Thus, we surveyed 77 prospective living liver donors at the point of donation evaluation using structured instruments to gather more information on their approach to and concerns about donation. We collected information on donation decision making, motives for donation and anticipated social and physical concerns about postdonation outcomes. We examined three additional characteristics of donors: gender, the relationship of the donor to the intended recipient and the presence of ambivalence about donation. Women had more concerns about their family/social responsibilities. Those donating to nonimmediate family were more likely to have been asked to donate but less likely to feel they had to donate. However, ambivalent donors were the most distinct having difficulties and concerns across most areas from their motivations for donating, to deciding to be tested and to donate, to concerns about the postdonation outcomes. We discuss the clinical relevance of these findings to donor evaluation and preparation.

Clusters of Alcohol Use Disorders Diagnostic Criteria and Predictors of Alcohol Use After Liver Transplantation for Alcoholic Liver Disease

BACKGROUND Establishing the correct alcohol use disorder diagnosis is clinically relevant because several reports of post-transplant alcohol use suggest that a pre-transplant diagnosis of alcohol dependence (rather than abuse) predicts relapse to alcohol use. Numerous combinations of specific symptoms are possible to achieve diagnostic significance. OBJECTIVE The authors hypothesized that there would be distinct clusters of liver transplant recipients who showed specific combinations of alcohol-related symptoms and that these clusters would be predictive of alcohol-abuse outcome after transplant. METHOD A group of 120 ALD liver transplant recipients received the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) module for alcohol abuse/dependence, and a cluster analysis was performed. RESULTS Within the clusters of those with alcohol dependence, cluster assignment did not predict those more likely to drink. However, those assigned to the alcohol abuse cluster were significantly less likely to drink than those with alcohol dependence. CONCLUSION Results therefore suggest that the prognosis regarding continued abstinence posttransplant is much more positive for individuals with a diagnosis of abuse than for those who meet criteria for alcohol dependence.

Psychiatric evaluations of small intestine transplantation patients

We are gaining experience in small intestine transplantation, however, the procedure is still experimental. Morbidity and mortality can be significant with frequent rehospitalizations. The indications for small intestine transplantation are varied though most patients have developed short gut syndrome requiring total parenteral nutrition (TPN) for nutritional support. Patients may present with a chronic illness (such as Crohns disease), chronic pain, and psychiatric comorbidity that may need to be addressed during the perioperative period. Faced with the complicated postoperative course, transplant recipients develop a range of endogenous and organic psychiatric disorders. Psychiatric treatment may be complicated by these factors in addition to the nutritional, biochemical, and metabolic abnormalities of a transplanted small intestine.