Mary H. Bowman
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mary H. Bowman.
Stroke | 2013
Edward Taub; Gitendra Uswatte; Victor W. Mark; David M. Morris; Joydip Barman; Mary H. Bowman; Camille Bryson; Adriana Delgado; Staci Bishop-McKay
Background and Purpose— Constraint-induced movement therapy is a set of treatments for rehabilitating motor function after central nervous system damage. We assessed the roles of its 2 main components. Methods— A 2×2 factorial components analysis with random assignment was conducted. The 2 factors were type of training and presence/absence of a set of techniques to facilitate transfer of therapeutic gains from the laboratory to the life situation (Transfer Package; TP). Participants (N=40) were outpatients ≥1-year after stroke with hemiparesis. The different treatments, which in each case targeted the more affected arm, lasted 3.5 hours/d for 10 weekdays. Spontaneous use of the more affected arm in daily life and maximum motor capacity of that arm in the laboratory were assessed with the Motor Activity Log and the Wolf Motor Function Test, respectively. Results— Use of the TP, regardless of the type of training received, resulted in Motor Activity Log gains that were 2.4 times as large as the gains in its absence (P<0.01). These clinical results parallel previously reported effects of the TP on neuroplastic change. Both the TP and training by shaping enhanced gains on the Wolf Motor Function Test (P<0.05). The Motor Activity Log gains were retained without loss 1 year after treatment. An additional substudy (N=10) showed that a single component of the TP, weekly telephone contact with participants for 1 month after treatment, doubled Motor Activity Log scores at 6-month follow-up. Conclusions— The TP is a method for enhancing both spontaneous use of a more affected arm after chronic stroke and its maximum motor capacity. Shaping enhances the latter.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | 2013
Victor W. Mark; Edward Taub; Gitendra Uswatte; Khurram Bashir; Gary Cutter; Camille Bryson; Staci Bishop-McKay; Mary H. Bowman
OBJECTIVE To evaluate in a preliminary manner the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of Constraint-Induced Movement therapy (CIMT) of persons with impaired lower extremity use from multiple sclerosis (MS). DESIGN Clinical trial with periodic follow-up for up to 4 years. SETTING University-based rehabilitation research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS A referred sample of ambulatory adults with chronic MS (N=4) with at least moderate loss of lower extremity use (average item score ≤6.5/10 on the functional performance measure of the Lower Extremity Motor Activity Log [LE-MAL]). INTERVENTIONS CIMT was administered for 52.5 hours over 3 consecutive weeks (15 consecutive weekdays) to each patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the LE-MAL score at posttreatment. Secondary outcomes were posttreatment scores on laboratory assessments of maximal lower extremity movement ability. RESULTS All the patients improved substantially at posttreatment on the LE-MAL, with smaller improvements on the laboratory motor measures. Scores on the LE-MAL continued to improve for 6 months afterward. By 1 year, patients remained on average at posttreatment levels. At 4 years, half of the patients remained above pretreatment levels. There were no adverse events, and fatigue ratings were not significantly changed by the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS This initial trial of lower extremity CIMT for MS indicates that the treatment can be safely administered, is well tolerated, and produces substantially improved real-world lower extremity use for as long as 4 years afterward. Further trials are needed to determine the consistency of these findings.
Stroke | 2013
Edward Taub; Gitendra Uswatte; Victor W. Mark; David M. Morris; Joydip Barman; Mary H. Bowman; Camille Bryson; Adriana Delgado; Staci Bishop-McKay
Background and Purpose— Constraint-induced movement therapy is a set of treatments for rehabilitating motor function after central nervous system damage. We assessed the roles of its 2 main components. Methods— A 2×2 factorial components analysis with random assignment was conducted. The 2 factors were type of training and presence/absence of a set of techniques to facilitate transfer of therapeutic gains from the laboratory to the life situation (Transfer Package; TP). Participants (N=40) were outpatients ≥1-year after stroke with hemiparesis. The different treatments, which in each case targeted the more affected arm, lasted 3.5 hours/d for 10 weekdays. Spontaneous use of the more affected arm in daily life and maximum motor capacity of that arm in the laboratory were assessed with the Motor Activity Log and the Wolf Motor Function Test, respectively. Results— Use of the TP, regardless of the type of training received, resulted in Motor Activity Log gains that were 2.4 times as large as the gains in its absence (P<0.01). These clinical results parallel previously reported effects of the TP on neuroplastic change. Both the TP and training by shaping enhanced gains on the Wolf Motor Function Test (P<0.05). The Motor Activity Log gains were retained without loss 1 year after treatment. An additional substudy (N=10) showed that a single component of the TP, weekly telephone contact with participants for 1 month after treatment, doubled Motor Activity Log scores at 6-month follow-up. Conclusions— The TP is a method for enhancing both spontaneous use of a more affected arm after chronic stroke and its maximum motor capacity. Shaping enhances the latter.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair | 2018
Victor W. Mark; Edward Taub; Gitendra Uswatte; David M. Morris; Gary Cutter; Terrie L. Adams; Mary H. Bowman; Staci McKay
Background. Constraint-Induced Movement therapy (CIMT) has controlled evidence of efficacy for improving real-world paretic limb use in non-progressive physically disabling disorders (stroke, cerebral palsy). Objective. This study sought to determine whether this therapy can produce comparable results with a progressive disorder such as multiple sclerosis (MS). We conducted a preliminary phase II randomized controlled trial of CIMT versus a program of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) treatments for persons with MS, to evaluate their effect on real-world disability. Methods. Twenty adults with hemiparetic MS underwent 35 hours of either CIMT or CAM over 10 consecutive weekdays. The primary clinical outcome was change from pretreatment on the Motor Activity Log (MAL). Results. The CIMT group improved more on the MAL (2.7 points, 95% confidence interval 2.2-3.2) than did the CAM group (0.5 points, 95% confidence interval −0.1 to 1.1; P < .001). These results did not change at 1-year follow-up, indicating long-term retention of functional benefit for CIMT. The treatments were well tolerated and without adverse events. Conclusion. These results suggest that CIMT can increase real-world use of the more-affected arm in patients with MS for at least 1 year. Clinical Trial Registration. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01081275.
Archive | 2015
Mary H. Bowman; Victor W. Mark; Edward Taub
Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is a research-originated, behavioral approach to neurorehabilitation of limb function after neurologic damage. The intervention utilizes a combination of motor training elements and psychological concepts to facilitate increased use of the affected limb as well as improved movement quality and control. Importantly, CIMT is designed to achieve real-world improvements by behavioral methods, which facilitate the incorporation of regained abilities into the person’s spontaneous behavior. CIMT is composed of four primary elements: (1) repetitive, unilateral training procedures; (2) training by the behavioral technique termed shaping; (3) a set of behavioral techniques, termed the “transfer package,” that promote transfer of therapeutic gains to the life situation; and (4) constraining use of the more-affected hand by one of several techniques including restraint of the less-affected hand, discouragement for exclusive reliance on the less-affected hand for unimanual and bimanual tasks, and purposeful design of the CIMT treatment activities to encourage use of the more-affected hand. Evidence shows that CIMT improves the functional use and occupational performance of the more-affected upper extremity by reversing learned nonuse and facilitating use-dependent brain plasticity.
Stroke | 2013
Edward Taub; Gitendra Uswatte; Victor W. Mark; David M. Morris; Joydip Barman; Mary H. Bowman; Camille Bryson; Adriana Delgado; Staci Bishop-McKay
Background and Purpose— Constraint-induced movement therapy is a set of treatments for rehabilitating motor function after central nervous system damage. We assessed the roles of its 2 main components. Methods— A 2×2 factorial components analysis with random assignment was conducted. The 2 factors were type of training and presence/absence of a set of techniques to facilitate transfer of therapeutic gains from the laboratory to the life situation (Transfer Package; TP). Participants (N=40) were outpatients ≥1-year after stroke with hemiparesis. The different treatments, which in each case targeted the more affected arm, lasted 3.5 hours/d for 10 weekdays. Spontaneous use of the more affected arm in daily life and maximum motor capacity of that arm in the laboratory were assessed with the Motor Activity Log and the Wolf Motor Function Test, respectively. Results— Use of the TP, regardless of the type of training received, resulted in Motor Activity Log gains that were 2.4 times as large as the gains in its absence (P<0.01). These clinical results parallel previously reported effects of the TP on neuroplastic change. Both the TP and training by shaping enhanced gains on the Wolf Motor Function Test (P<0.05). The Motor Activity Log gains were retained without loss 1 year after treatment. An additional substudy (N=10) showed that a single component of the TP, weekly telephone contact with participants for 1 month after treatment, doubled Motor Activity Log scores at 6-month follow-up. Conclusions— The TP is a method for enhancing both spontaneous use of a more affected arm after chronic stroke and its maximum motor capacity. Shaping enhances the latter.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | 2013
Edward Taub; Gitendra Uswatte; Mary H. Bowman; Victor W. Mark; Adriana Delgado; Camille Bryson; David M. Morris; Staci Bishop-McKay
NeuroRehabilitation | 2006
Mary H. Bowman; Edward Taub; Gitendra Uswatte; Adriana Delgado; Camille Bryson; David M. Morris; Staci McKay; Victor W. Mark
American Journal of Speech-language Pathology | 2014
Margaret L. Johnson; Edward Taub; Leslie H. Harper; Jamie T. Wade; Mary H. Bowman; Staci Bishop-McKay; Michelle M. Haddad; Victor W. Mark; Gitendra Uswatte
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | 2008
Gitendra Uswatte; Mary H. Bowman; Edward Taub; Camille Bryson; David M. Morris; Staci McKay; Joydip Barman; Victor W. Mark