Mary Hart

Quality of life and physical performance in land- and water-based pulmonary rehabilitation

PURPOSE: Traditional land-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been shown to provide improvement in physical performance and quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The training effects of a water environment in pulmonary patients have only been briefly investigated. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare quality of life and physical performance in land- and water-based PR. METHODS: The study included participants of a land- or water-based PR program. Twenty land- and water-based participants with stable COPD disease were retrospectively matched within 20 mL of their forced expiratory ventilation in 1 second. A multivariate analysis of variance was performed on each groups 6-minute walk test distance; 6-repetition maximum strength tests for the knee, hip, and shoulder; and mental and physical health summary scores of the Medical Outcomes Short-form 36. RESULTS: Each group significantly improved in all outcome measurements, but there was no difference found in the improvements between the land- or water-based groups. CONCLUSION: Clinicians can consider water-based PR exercise program as another treatment option, if available, for patients with COPD and expect similar benefits to traditional land-based PR programs including improved walk distances, strength, and perception of well-being.

Children With Asthma Miss More School: Fact or Fiction?

BACKGROUND It is widely believed that children with asthma miss considerably more school than children without asthma. Previous surveys have indicated that 49% of children with asthma miss school (Asthma in America, 1998), but only a few studies have attempted to quantify the amount of school missed. Understanding the role of asthma in school attendance will help direct limited health-care resources to the children who need them most. METHODS We investigated school absence rates in fourth- through sixth-grade students in 19 inner-city schools in the Dallas Independent School District (DISD). The sample consisted of 353 students who were identified as possibly having asthma based on responses to a modified Brief Pediatric Screen instrument and who underwent spirometry and/or exercise challenge (EC) testing to confirm the diagnosis of asthma: 25 students were excluded for FEV(1) < 70% and without bronchodilator response, while 157 students had EC-positive test results, and 171 students had EC-negative test results. We compared yearly absences for these students with each other, with all fourth- through sixth-grade students in the 19 study schools, and with all fourth- through sixth-grade students in the district. We also tabulated data from a separate database that included asthma patients identified by the school registered nurse (RN). Absence data by school and by grade level were provided by the school district for the 2002-2003 school year. RESULTS Absence rates were as follows: 2.54% (EC positive), 2.12% (EC negative), 2.59% (abnormal FEV(1)), 2.86% (RN identified), 2.85% (all fourth- through sixth-grade students in study schools), and 2.95% (all fourth- through sixth-grade students in the DISD). CONCLUSION Students with asthma in the DISD miss no more school their classmates without asthma.

Severe Exercise-Induced Hypoxemia

Exercise training is an essential component of pulmonary rehabilitation and is associated with improved function and other important outcomes in persons with chronic lung disease. A subset of pulmonary rehabilitation patients experience hypoxemia that may occur or worsen with exercise. For the purpose of this review, severe exercise-induced hypoxemia is defined as an SpO2 of < 89% during exercise, despite use of supplemental oxygen delivered at up to 6 L/min. There is a paucity of evidence and clinical guidelines that address assessment and management of this important manifestation of chronic lung disease. This review presents background of this topic and suggests strategies for assessment, management, and safety measures for patients with severe exercise-induced hypoxemia.

Validation of Rules of Two™ as a paradigm for assessing asthma control

Assessing asthma control at each patient encounter is an essential task to determine pharmacologic requirements. Rules of Two (Ro2) was created from the original 1991 National Asthma Education Program guidelines to determine the need for controller therapy. This study determined the degree of agreement between Ro2 and the Expert Panel Report (EPR-3) definition of “in control” asthma and compared that value with the Asthma Control Test (ACT) in a group of asthmatics for the purpose of validating this tool. Patients with documented asthma were randomized to complete Ro2 or ACT prior to being assessed for asthma control by certified asthma educators using an EPR-3 template. Assessments occurred in either a specialty asthma clinic or at a local health fair. Patients were also queried for their personal assessment of asthma control. The primary statistical methodology employed was the degree of agreement (kappa) between each survey tool and the EPR-3 template. Of 150 patients, 72% did not have their asthma in control, based on the EPR-3 template. Ro2 identified 58% of patients not in control of their asthma, whereas ACT identified 36%, with kappa scores of 0.41 for Ro2 and 0.37 for ACT compared with the EPR-3 template. These were not significantly different. Of the 150 patients, 75% considered their asthma in control based on self-assessments, with a kappa of 0.23. In 14 of 73 ACT questionnaires, scores were not added or were misadded. Eliminating evaluation of static lung function significantly improved both kappa scores of Ro2 and ACT. In conclusion, Ro2 identifies patients with uncontrolled asthma as well as ACT and may be useful to the primary assessing clinician in determining asthma control.