Mary K. Allen

Immediate versus Delayed Fluid Resuscitation for Hypotensive Patients with Penetrating Torso Injuries

Background Fluid resuscitation may be detrimental when given before bleeding is controlled in patients with trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of delaying fluid resuscitation until the time of operative intervention in hypotensive patients with penetrating injuries to the torso. Methods We conducted a prospective trial comparing immediate and delayed fluid resuscitation in 598 adults with penetrating torso injuries who presented with a prehospital systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mm Hg. The study setting was a city with a single centralized system of prehospital emergency care and a single receiving facility for patients with major trauma. Patients assigned to the immediate-resuscitation group received standard fluid resuscitation before they reached the hospital and in the trauma center, and those assigned to the delayed-resuscitation group received intravenous cannulation but no fluid resuscitation until they reached the operating room. Results Among the 289 patients who received...

Causes and patterns of missed injuries in trauma

Missed injuries have a bad reputation and are sometimes associated with serious morbidity for the patient and personal embarrassment for the surgeon. During a 10-year period, 123 missed injuries in 117 patients requiring re-operation were encountered in one trauma center. A retrospective review of causes and patterns was undertaken. The most common presentation was delayed hemorrhage (64 injuries). The colon, thoracic vasculature, chest wall arteries, and diaphragm were the most frequently involved sites. Forty-six injuries were overlooked during the diagnostic work-up, and 43 were missed during surgery. Technical problems with diagnosis and surgery accounted for 62% of missed injuries, whereas decision and judgment errors accounted for the rest. Further insight was provided by the classification of missed injuries into three types. Type I (20%) occurred outside the body area of clinical focus, whereas type II (69%) occurred within it. Type III (11%) resulted when instability of the patient necessitated interruption of the diagnostic work-up or exploration. Each type represents a different clinical pattern and dictates a specific preventive strategy.

Double Jeopardy: Thoracoabdominal Injuries Requiring Surgical Intervention in Both Chest and Abdomen

The critical decisions in patients with thoracoabdominal trauma are establishing the need to explore either or both cavities and determining appropriate sequencing. The causes and patterns of management difficulties were analyzed in 82 consecutive patients with penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries. Nine thoracotomies (11%) and 16 laparotomies (22%) were negative, with the major causes being misleading chest tube outputs, bullet trajectories, and abdominal tenderness. Inappropriate sequencing occurred in 19 patients (23%), and 15% required reoperation within 24 hours. Pitfalls and misjudgements in management of penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries occur in distinct patterns. The unreliability of chest tube output and abdominal examination must be kept in mind, and intraoperative clues of ongoing hemorrhage outside the operative field must be sought.

Emergency thoracotomy for injury

Emergency thoracotomy is required in 10-15 per cent of all patients with thoracic injury. Nine specific indications for emergency thoracotomy have been described for injured persons. A variety of incisions is available to the surgeon, and selection of the appropriate incision is based on radiographic and clinical findings. Thoracotomy in the emergency room is occasionally indicated, but it should be performed only by surgically trained individuals. Patients requiring emergency thoracotomy who are not dead on arrival have a greater than 75 per cent chance of survival.

Penetrating wounds of the thorax

While penetrating wounds of the thorax are rather uncommon in The Netherlands, they are frequently encountered in the emergency centres of the United States. Thoracic wall penetration may occur during times of warfare, during social altercations or as a result of industrial accidents. In civilian practice, such wounds are most often the result of injury with guns, knives or other sharp objects. Patients with penetrating thoracic wounds should be expeditiously transported to a trauma centre. Pre-hospital intravenous fluids, pleural decompression and anti-shock garments are contraindicated. On arrival in the emergency room, establishment of a patent airway, administration of intravenous fluids, pleural decompression and early X-ray examination of the chest are mandatory.

Suspecting thoracic aortic transection.

Deceleration accidents produce a complex of potentially fatal thoracic injuries. Because early detection is the key to successful management of blunt trauma to the great vessels, emergency physicians must be knowledgeable of signs indicative of these complex injuries. Among more than 10,000 patients presenting to the Ben Taub Emergency Center over an 11-year period with thoracic injuries, 100 had clinical or radiographic clues suggestive of blunt trauma decelerative injury to the great vessels. Of these 100 patients, 23 had transection of the descending thoracic aorta and five had avulsion of the innominate artery. One patient had a double transection. Six patients died in the Emergency Center before proximal control could be achieved.

Laparotomy in the emergency department

Reports of advancements in emergency department operative resuscitative skills have included craniotomy, thoracotomy, cardiorrhaphy and even cardiopulmonary bypass. The efficacy and advisability of laparotomy in the emergency department remain in question. Between July, 1972, and July, 1977, adhering to an established protocol, resuscitative laparotomy was performed on 51 patients in the emergency department. All 51 patients underwent emergency thoracotomy also. Twenty-four patients were victims of gunshot wounds, 24 had sustained blunt trauma, and three had abdominal stab wounds. Injuries to the liver, major vessels, and spleen were most common. Control of hemorrhage by clamps, packs or pressure was the primary objective of laparotomy. Control of exsanguinating hemorrhage with precise application of vascular clamps was possible in all but 15 patients. Because of extensive multiple injuries and inability to achieve cardiovascular stability, only 11 patients reached the operating room, and none survived to leave the hospital. Although technically possible, laparotomy in the emergency center did not alter the fatal outcome of moribund patients in this series.

Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries

BACKGROUND Fluid resuscitation may be detrimental when given before bleeding is controlled in patients with trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of delaying fluid resuscitation until the time of operative intervention in hypotensive patients with penetrating injuries to the torso. METHODS We conducted a prospective trial comparing immediate and delayed fluid resuscitation in 598 adults with penetrating torso injuries who presented with a pre-hospital systolic blood pressure of < or = 90 mm Hg. The study setting was a city with a single centralized system of pre-hospital emergency care and a single receiving facility for patients with major trauma. Patients assigned to the immediate-resuscitation group received standard fluid resuscitation before they reached the hospital and in the trauma center, and those assigned to the delayed-resuscitation group received intravenous cannulation but no fluid resuscitation until they reached the operating room. RESULTS Among the 289 patients who received delayed fluid resuscitation, 203 (70 percent) survived and were discharged from the hospital, as compared with 193 of the 309 patients (62 percent) who received immediate fluid resuscitation (P = 0.04). The mean estimated intraoperative blood loss was similar in the two groups. Among the 238 patients in the delayed-resuscitation group who survived to the postoperative period, 55 (23 percent) had one or more complications (adult respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis syndrome, acute renal failure, coagulopathy, wound infection, and pneumonia), as compared with 69 of the 227 patients (30 percent) in the immediate-resuscitation group (P = 0.08). The duration of hospitalization was shorter in the delayed-resuscitation group. CONCLUSIONS For hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries, delay of aggressive fluid resuscitation until operative intervention improves the outcome.