Mary K. Baylies

Ras Pathway Specificity Is Determined by the Integration of Multiple Signal-Activated and Tissue-Restricted Transcription Factors

Ras signaling elicits diverse outputs, yet how Ras specificity is generated remains incompletely understood. We demonstrate that Wingless (Wg) and Decapentaplegic (Dpp) confer competence for receptor tyrosine kinase-mediated induction of a subset of Drosophila muscle and cardiac progenitors by acting both upstream of and in parallel to Ras. In addition to regulating the expression of proximal Ras pathway components, Wg and Dpp coordinate the direct effects of three signal-activated (dTCF, Mad, and Pointed-functioning in the Wg, Dpp, and Ras/MAPK pathways, respectively) and two tissue-restricted (Twist and Tinman) transcription factors on a progenitor identity gene enhancer. The integration of Pointed with the combinatorial effects of dTCF, Mad, Twist, and Tinman determines inductive Ras signaling specificity in muscle and heart development.

Myogenesis: A View from Drosophila

The view of myogenesis that emerges from these studies is that while components of a conserved network of genes establish a population of muscle-forming cells, myogenesis itself cannot proceed without the segregation of specific subtypes of myoblasts (Figure 3Figure 3). There are several elements to this model of the myogenic pathway. (1) Founders and fusion-competent cells are distinct cell populations in muscle-forming mesoderm. It is likely that the differences between them depend on the activation of distinct genetic pathways as a result of the lateral inhibition event that segregates muscle progenitors from surrounding cells. However, the nature of the differences between these cell types and the way they are implemented are not understood. (2) In the absence of founders, fusion-competent myoblasts do not fuse with each other. Founder cells do not fuse with each other, even when duplicated (e.g., in Numb overexpression experiments). This suggests that the formation of two distinct types of myoblasts is a prerequisite for cell fusion. Whether this is a general feature of myogenesis in all organisms is not clear. (3) Fusion-competent myoblasts do not differentiate to form muscle in the absence of founder cells, although founders alone will form miniature muscles. This suggests that founders uniquely express genes that are generally required for myogenesis as well as genes specifically required for the formation of particular muscles. Taken together, these points lead to the important general conclusion that because founders are required both for fusion and for completing myogenesis, they gate the process of muscle formation. Thus, distinctive patterns of gene expression in these cells dictate unique properties to the muscles whose formation they initiate. It remains to be shown how these distinctive properties are integrated with the general pathway of myogenesis.This model provides us with the clearest framework for thinking about the local control of myogenesis and muscle patterning in any organism. Even so, our understanding is still very incomplete. We need a more complete description of how muscle progenitor cells are specified at particular locations in somatic mesoderm. We need to know whether the requirement for myoblast diversification is a general one or a peculiarity of the Drosophila embryo. We also need to understand how the function of specific transcription factors in founder cells is integrated with the general pathway of muscle differentiation. Most importantly we need to understand at a molecular level how myoblast diversification is controlled and implemented.

A Twist in fate: evolutionary comparison of Twist structure and function

The general requirement to induce mesoderm and allocate cells into different mesodermal tissues such as body muscle or heart is common in many animal embryos. Since the discovery of the twist gene, there has been great progress toward unraveling the molecular mechanisms that control mesoderm specification and differentiation. Twist was first identified in Drosophila as a gene crucial for proper gastrulation and mesoderm formation. In the fly embryo, Twist continues to play additional roles, allocating mesodermal cells into the body wall muscle fate and patterning a subset of these muscles. Twist is also required for proper differentiation of the adult musculature. Twist homologues have been identified in a great variety of organisms, which span the phylogenetic tree. These organisms include other invertebrates such as jellyfish, nematode, leech and lancelet as well as vertebrates such as frog, chick, fish, mouse and human. The Twist family shares both homology in structure across the basic helix-loop-helix domain and in expression during mesoderm and muscle development in most species. Here we review the current state of knowledge of the Twist family and consider how Twist functions during development. Moreover, we highlight experimental evidence that shows common themes that Twist employs during specification and patterning of the mesoderm among evolutionarily distant organisms. Conserved principles and the molecular mechanisms underlying them are discussed.

SCAR/WAVE and Arp2/3 are crucial for cytoskeletal remodeling at the site of myoblast fusion

Myoblast fusion is crucial for formation and repair of skeletal muscle. Here we show that active remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton is essential for fusion in Drosophila. Using live imaging, we have identified a dynamic F-actin accumulation (actin focus) at the site of fusion. Dissolution of the actin focus directly precedes a fusion event. Whereas several known fusion components regulate these actin foci, others target additional behaviors required for fusion. Mutations in kette/Nap1, an actin polymerization regulator, lead to enlarged foci that do not dissolve, consistent with the observed block in fusion. Kette is required to positively regulate SCAR/WAVE, which in turn activates the Arp2/3 complex. Mutants in SCAR and Arp2/3 have a fusion block and foci phenotype, suggesting that Kette-SCAR-Arp2/3 participate in an actin polymerization event required for focus dissolution. Our data identify a new paradigm for understanding the mechanisms underlying fusion in myoblasts and other tissues.

MAP and kinesin-dependent nuclear positioning is required for skeletal muscle function

The basic unit of skeletal muscle in all metazoans is the multinucleate myofibre, within which individual nuclei are regularly positioned. The molecular machinery responsible for myonuclear positioning is not known. Improperly positioned nuclei are a hallmark of numerous diseases of muscle, including centronuclear myopathies, but it is unclear whether correct nuclear positioning is necessary for muscle function. Here we identify the microtubule-associated protein ensconsin (Ens)/microtubule-associated protein 7 (MAP7) and kinesin heavy chain (Khc)/Kif5b as essential, evolutionarily conserved regulators of myonuclear positioning in Drosophila and cultured mammalian myotubes. We find that these proteins interact physically and that expression of the Kif5b motor domain fused to the MAP7 microtubule-binding domain rescues nuclear positioning defects in MAP7-depleted cells. This suggests that MAP7 links Kif5b to the microtubule cytoskeleton to promote nuclear positioning. Finally, we show that myonuclear positioning is physiologically important. Drosophila ens mutant larvae have decreased locomotion and incorrect myonuclear positioning, and these phenotypes are rescued by muscle-specific expression of Ens. We conclude that improper nuclear positioning contributes to muscle dysfunction in a cell-autonomous fashion.

Genetic basis of cell–cell fusion mechanisms

Cell-cell fusion in sexually reproducing organisms is a mechanism to merge gamete genomes and, in multicellular organisms, it is a strategy to sculpt organs, such as muscle, bone, and placenta. Moreover, this mechanism has been implicated in pathological conditions, such as infection and cancer. Studies of genetic model organisms have uncovered a unifying principle: cell fusion is a genetically programmed process. This process can be divided in three stages: competence (cell induction and differentiation); commitment (cell determination, migration, and adhesion); and cell fusion (membrane merging and cytoplasmic mixing). Recent work has led to the discovery of fusogens, which are cell fusion proteins that are necessary and sufficient to fuse cell membranes. Two unrelated families of fusogens have been discovered, one in mouse placenta and one in Caenorhabditis elegans (syncytins and F proteins, respectively). Current research aims to identify new fusogens and determine the mechanisms by which they merge membranes.

Causative role of oxidative stress in a Drosophila model of Friedreich ataxia

Friedreich ataxia (FA), the most common form of hereditary ataxia, is caused by a deficit in the mitochondrial protein frataxin. While several hypotheses have been suggested, frataxin function is not well understood. Oxidative stress has been suggested to play a role in the pathophysiology of FA, but this view has been recently questioned, and its link to frataxin is unclear. Here, we report the use of RNA interference (RNAi) to suppress the Drosophila frataxin gene (fh) expression. This model system parallels the situation in FA patients, namely a moderate systemic reduction of frataxin levels compatible with normal embryonic development. Under these conditions, fh‐RNAi flies showed a shortened life span, reduced climbing abilities, and enhanced sensitivity to oxidative stress. Under hyperoxia, fh‐RNAi flies also showed a dramatic reduction of aconitase activity that seriously impairs the mitochondrial respiration while the activities of succinate dehydrogenase, respiratory complex I and II, and indirectly complex III and IV are normal. Remarkably, frataxin overexpression also induced the oxidative‐mediated inactivation of mitochondrial aconitase. This work demonstrates, for the first time, the essential function of frataxin in protecting aconitase from oxidative stress‐dependent inactivation in a multicellular organism. Moreover our data support an important role of oxidative stress in the progression of FA and suggest a tissue‐dependent sensitivity to frataxin imbalance. We propose that in FA, the oxidative mediated inactivation of aconitase, which occurs normally during the aging process, is enhanced due to the lack of frataxin.—Llorens, J. V., Navarro, J. A., Martínez‐Sebastián, M. J., Baylies, M. K., Schneuwly, S., Botella, J. A., Moltó, M. D. Causative role of oxidative stress in a Drosophila model of Friedreich ataxia. FASEB J. 21, 333–344 (2007)

Invertebrate myogenesis: looking back to the future of muscle development.

Recent studies in invertebrates have provided important mechanistic insights into several general aspects of muscle development. Two new genes have been identified that are involved in muscle fusion in Drosophila and a novel maternal component was shown to be responsible for myogenic determination in an ascidian. In addition, genetic analyses of nematode and Drosophila homologues of factors known to be myogenic regulators in other species yielded surprising findings about both the evolutionary conservation and divergence of these functions. Drosophila myogenesis has become a highly informative model for understanding the interplay between the signaling and transcriptional networks that underlie cell-fate specification during embryonic development.

Dual origin of the renal tubules in Drosophila: mesodermal cells integrate and polarize to establish secretory function.

Organs are made up of cells from separate origins, whose development and differentiation must be integrated to produce a physiologically coherent structure. For example, during the development of the kidney, a series of interactions between the epithelial mesonephric duct and the surrounding metanephric mesenchyme leads to the formation of renal tubules. Cells of the metanephric mesenchyme first induce branching of the mesonephric duct to form the ureteric buds, and they then respond to signals derived from them. As a result, mesenchymal cells are recruited to the buds, where they undergo a mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition as they condense to form nephrons. In contrast, the simple renal tubules of invertebrates, such as insect Malpighian tubules (MpTs), have always been thought to arise from single tissue primordia, epithelial buds that grow by cell division and enlargement and from which a range of specialized subtypes differentiate. Here, we reveal unexpected parallels between the development of Drosophila MpTs and vertebrate nephrogenesis by showing that the MpTs also derive from two cell populations: ectodermal epithelial buds and the surrounding mesenchymal mesoderm. The mesenchymal cells are recruited to the growing tubules, where they undergo a mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition as they integrate and subsequently differentiate as a physiologically distinctive subset of tubule cells, the stellate cells. Strikingly, the normal incorporation of stellate cells and the later physiological activity of the mature tubules depend on the activity of hibris, an ortholog of mammalian NEPHRIN.

Repression by Notch is required before Wingless signalling during muscle progenitor cell development in Drosophila

The larval muscles of Drosophila arise from the fusion of muscle founder cells, which give each individual muscle its identity, with myoblasts (reviewed in [1]). Muscle founder cells arise from the asymmetric division of muscle progenitor cells, each of which develops from a group of cells in the somatic mesoderm that express lethal of scute [2]. All the cells in a cluster can potentially form muscle progenitors, but owing to lateral inhibition, only one or two develop as such [2] [3] [4] [5]. Muscle progenitors, and the subsequent founder cells, then express transcription factors such as Krüppel, S59 and Even-skipped, which confer identity on the muscle [6] [7] [8]. Definition of some muscle progenitors, including three groups that express S59, depends on Wingless signalling [9]. Lateral inhibition requires Delta signalling through Notch and the transcription factor Suppressor of Hairless [3] [4] [5]. As the Wingless and lateral-inhibition signals are sequential [8], one might expect that muscle progenitors would fail to develop in the absence of Wingless signalling, regardless of the presence or absence of lateral-inhibition signalling. Here, we examine the development of the S59-expressing muscle progenitor cells in mutant backgrounds in which both Wingless signalling and lateral inhibition are disrupted. We show that progenitor cells failed to develop when both these processes were disrupted. Our analysis also reveals a repressive function of Notch, required before or concurrently with Wingless signalling, which is unrelated to its role in lateral inhibition.