Mary K. Miller

Churg-Strauss Syndrome in Patients Treated With Omalizumab

BACKGROUND Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS) is a rare systemic vasculitis associated with asthma, eosinophilia, sinusitis, and pulmonary infiltrates. CSS has been reported in association with asthma therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS The objective is to describe the characteristics of CSS in patients treated with the anti-IgE antibody omalizumab (Xolair; Genentech Inc; South San Francisco, CA). A retrospective review of available data to identify cases of CSS was performed using the Novartis Argus global drug safety database for omalizumab in asthma patients. RESULTS We identified 34 potential cases of CSS. Of these, 13 cases fulfilled at least four of the six criteria identified in the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria. Eight of the patients in these 13 definite or probable cases (62%) had CSS symptoms prior to receiving omalizumab or described symptom onset just after corticosteroid weaning. Six of the 13 patients (46%) were confirmed as having been treated with corticosteroids for what was perceived to be severe asthma; when corticosteroids were tapered in conjunction with omalizumab treatment, CSS symptoms appeared just after the tapering. There were 4 other cases of possible CSS, and the remaining 17 patients were judged to not have CSS. CONCLUSIONS CSS may develop in patients receiving asthma medications who have an underlying eosinophilic disorder that is unmasked by the withdrawal of therapy with corticosteroids, or in patients who delay therapy in favor of other medications. Omalizumab treatment may unmask CSS due to the weaning of corticosteroids in some asthma patients or may delay corticosteroid treatment allowing for CSS to manifest. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00252135.

Adult Asthma and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease, Cerebrovascular Disease, and Heart Failure: A Prospective Study of 2 Matched Cohorts

Asthma has been associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The authors ascertained the association of asthma with CVD and the roles that sex, concurrent allergy, and asthma medications may play in this association. They assembled a cohort of 203,595 Northern California adults with asthma and a parallel asthma-free referent cohort (matched 1:1 on age, sex, and race/ethnicity); both cohorts were followed for incident nonfatal or fatal CVD and all-cause mortality from January 1, 1996, through December 31, 2008. Each cohort was 66% female and 47% white. After adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, cardiac risk factors, and comorbid allergy, asthma was associated with a 1.40-fold (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.35, 1.45) increased hazard of coronary heart disease, a 1.20-fold (95% CI: 1.15, 1.25) hazard of cerebrovascular disease, a 2.14-fold (95% CI: 2.06, 2.22) hazard of heart failure, and a 3.28-fold (95% CI: 3.15, 3.41) hazard of all-cause mortality. Stronger associations were noted among women. Comorbid allergy predicted CVD but did not synergistically increase the CVD risk associated with asthma. Only asthma patients using asthma medications (particularly those on oral corticosteroids alone or in combination) were at enhanced risk of CVD. In conclusion, asthma was prospectively associated with increased risk of major CVD. Modifying effects were noted for sex and asthma medication use but not for comorbid allergy.

Asthma and the prospective risk of anaphylactic shock and other allergy diagnoses in a large integrated health care delivery system

BACKGROUND The association between asthma and anaphylaxis remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE To ascertain, in a managed care organization in northern California, the association of asthma and asthma severity with future risk of anaphylactic shock and other selected allergy diagnoses. METHODS Using electronic data and validated algorithms, we assembled a cohort of 526,406 patients who met the criteria for asthma between 1996 and 2006 and a referent cohort (with no utilization for asthma) individually matched on age, sex, and race/ethnicity. In each cohort, 54% of patients were female and 55% were white; their mean (SD) age was 24 (20) years. The main outcome measures were anaphylactic shock (caused by an adverse food reaction, caused by serum, or other/idiopathic), allergic urticaria, anaphylaxis after sting(s), and angioedema. RESULTS The incidence of anaphylactic shock was 109.0 per 100,000 person-years in the asthma cohort and 19.9 per 100,000 person-years in the referent cohort. After adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, and immunotherapy, asthma was associated with a 5.2-fold (95% confidence interval, 4.7- to 5.6-fold) increased hazard of anaphylactic shock. Asthma was also significantly associated with an increased risk of the 3 selected allergy diagnoses, with hazard ratios of 1.4 to 1.9. A significant trend by severity of asthma was apparent for food-related and other/idiopathic anaphylactic shock and for anaphylaxis after sting(s). CONCLUSIONS In this insured population, asthma was prospectively associated with increased risk of anaphylactic shock and other allergy diagnoses. However, the effect of asthma severity was not consistent across outcome measures.

TENOR risk score predicts healthcare in adults with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma

The aim of the present study was to predict which patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma are at highest risk for healthcare utilisation can be predicted so as to optimise clinical management. Data were derived from 2,821 adults with asthma enrolled in The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) study. Multiple potential predictors were assessed at baseline using a systematic algorithm employing stepwise logistic regression. Outcomes were asthma-related hospitalisations or emergency department (ED) visits within 6 months following baseline. Overall, 239 subjects (8.5%) reported hospitalisation or ED visits at follow-up. Predictors retained after multivariate analysis were as follows: younger age; female sex; non-white race; body mass index ≥35 kg·m-2; post-bronchodilator per cent predicted forced vital capacity <70%; history of pneumonia; diabetes; cataracts; intubation for asthma; and three or more steroid bursts in the prior 3 months. A final risk score derived from the logistic regression model ranged from 0–18 and was highly predictive (c-index: 0.78) of hospitalisation or ED visits. This tool was re-tested in a prospective validation using outcomes at 12- to 18-months follow-up among the same cohort (c-index: 0.77). The risk score derived is a clinically useful tool for assessing the likelihood of asthma-related hospitalisation or emergency department visits in adults with severe and difficult-to-treat asthma.

Baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in EXCELS: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND The Epidemiologic Study of Xolair (omalizumab): Evaluating Clinical Effectiveness and Long-term Safety in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Asthma (EXCELS) is a unique opportunity to evaluate the prospective, long-term clinical safety and effectiveness of the anti-IgE antibody omalizumab (Xolair) in real-world clinical practice. OBJECTIVES To describe the study design and study cohorts of EXCELS at baseline and to compare the characteristics of this population with other large asthma cohorts. METHODS Patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma and a positive skin test result or in vitro reactivity to a perennial aeroallergen were eligible for EXCELS. Two cohorts of patients with asthma were enrolled: those treated with omalizumab and those not treated with omalizumab. We analyzed baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, including asthma history and control and allergy history. RESULTS Large proportions of patients enrolled in EXCELS had historically severe and poorly or not well-controlled asthma at the time of enrollment, objective evidence of airway obstruction, a history of long-term oral corticosteroid use, and/or other allergic disorders. Minor differences were observed between the omalizumab and nonomalizumab cohorts. Our total patient cohort was generally similar to other large cohorts. In a subgroup analysis, patients who had received omalizumab within 7 days before enrollment had more severe asthma and greater degrees of impairment at baseline than nonomalizumab patients. CONCLUSIONS This study of baseline characteristics in EXCELS offers a unique opportunity to better understand the history of allergic patients with moderate-to-severe asthma in a real-world treatment setting. This analysis of EXCELS baseline data sets the foundation for long-term assessment of the safety and effectiveness of omalizumab.

Longitudinal Changes in Asthma Control with Omalizumab: 2-Year Interim Data from the EXCELS Study

Background. Asthma guidelines emphasize the importance of achieving and maintaining asthma control; however, many patients with moderate to severe asthma fail to achieve adequate control. Objective. This 2-year interim analysis evaluated the longitudinal effects of omalizumab on asthma control in patients treated in real-world clinical practice settings. Methods. EXCELS is an ongoing observational cohort study of approximately 5000 omalizumab-treated and 2500 non-omalizumab-treated patients aged ≥12 years with moderate to severe asthma. Asthma control was measured using the Asthma Control Test (ACT) every 6 months. Results. Subgroups of the omalizumab cohort included those who initiated omalizumab at baseline (new starts, n = 549) and those treated with omalizumab >7 days before baseline (established users, n = 4421). For reference, data are also presented for patients who were not receiving omalizumab prior to or at the time of enrolment (non-omalizumab, n = 2867). Over half of the new starts (54%) achieved improvement in ACT consistent with the minimally important difference (MID, defined as ≥3-point improvement) by Month 6 and this proportion increased throughout the follow-up period, reaching 62% at Month 24. Similar results were observed in patients stratified by moderate and severe asthma. Established users of omalizumab maintained asthma control throughout the observation period. Conclusion. Over a 2-year period, patients initiating omalizumab therapy experienced clinically relevant improvements in asthma control, which were maintained during 2 years of longitudinal follow-up. Established users of omalizumab maintained asthma control over the 2-year period with a small improvement similar to that seen in non-omalizumab users.

Antimalarial chemoprophylaxis and the risk of neuropsychiatric disorders

BACKGROUND Case reports and epidemiological studies have associated the use of mefloquine with neuropsychiatric adverse events. METHODS We used the General Practice Research Database to conduct a follow-up study with a nested case-control analysis. We assessed the risk of developing first-time anxiety, stress-related disorders/psychosis, depression, epilepsy or peripheral neuropathies in patients using mefloquine, chloroquine and/or proguanil, or atovaquone/proguanil for malaria chemoprophylaxis, as compared to unexposed travelers. RESULTS Compared to non-users of antimalarials, the adjusted odds ratio in the nested case-control analysis for users of mefloquine, chloroquine and/or proguanil, or atovaquone/proguanil were 0.71 (95% CI 0.56-0.90), 1.04 (95% CI 0.74-1.46), and 0.73 (95% CI 0.61-0.86) for anxiety or stress-related disorders combined, 0.54 (95% CI 0.41-0.71), 1.06 (95% CI 0.71-1.59), and 0.75 (95% CI 0.62-0.91) for depression, 0.69 (95% CI 0.35-1.36), 1.41 (95% CI 0.54-3.67), and 0.75 (95% CI 0.42-1.36) for epilepsy, and 1.22 (95% CI 0.50-2.99), 1.59 (95% CI 0.41-6.15), and 1.05 (95% CI 0.54-2.03) for neuropathies, respectively. The risk of all outcomes was higher in females than in males across all exposure categories. CONCLUSIONS The risk of neuropsychiatric disorders was similar for users and for non-users of anti-malarial chemoprophylaxis, with evidence for elevated risks in some subgroups.

Use of anti-malarial drugs and the risk of developing eye disorders

BACKGROUND Ocular toxicity was described in the late 1950s for some anti-malarial drugs, but only limited information is available on the comparison of ocular toxicity of different anti-malarials. METHODS We conducted a follow-up study with a nested case-control analysis using the General Practice Research Database to compare the risk of developing a first-time diagnosis of an eye disorder during exposure of mefloquine, chloroquine and/or proguanil or atovaquone/proguanil use to non-users. We calculated incidence rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and odds ratios using multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses. RESULTS We included 83,148 patients and identified 652 cases with an incident eye disorder. The incidence rates with 95% CI of all eye disorders combined in users of mefloquine, chloroquine and/or proguanil, atovaquone/proguanil or travellers not using anti-malarials were 5.3 (4.3-6.5), 7.1 (5.0-9.9), 6.3 (5.6-7.2) and 5.1 (4.6-5.7), per 1000 person-years, respectively. As compared to non-users of anti-malarials, the adjusted odds ratio with 95% CI in the nested case-control analysis for users of mefloquine, chloroquine and/or proguanil, or atovaquone/proguanil were 1.33 (1.01-1.75), 1.61 (1.06-2.45), and 1.25 (1.03-1.52), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The study provides evidence that there was an increased risk of eye disorders in users of all anti-malarials compared to non-users of anti-malarials.

Measurements of birth defect prevalence: Which is most useful as a comparator group for pharmaceutical pregnancy registries?†

Pharmaceutical pregnancy registries document birth defects and other complications reported in pregnancies exposed to specific medications or diseases. A baseline estimate of birth defect prevalence is necessary for comparison. To identify potential teratogenic signals, the pregnancy registry must have a comparator that most closely matches the exposed population and data collection methodology, which are characteristics that vary among the multiplicity of birth defect surveillance systems. The system that yields the most accurate prevalence data may be different from that most closely matching the pregnancy registry methods. State public health programs have highly accurate and precise statistics, but their populations are broader than those of a pharmaceutical pregnancy registry. Large collaborative databases may have a more useful covered population, but there are secondary problems related to data precision. Health care databases enroll large numbers of patients and have good information about exposures and health problems, but the data can be difficult to access and lack useful detail. Exposure-related databases are closer in population definition and collection methods, though the presence of different diseases and exposures can be problematic. Internal comparators are likely to be most useful in formal statistical analysis, but added cost and management burden and may require significantly increased registry enrollment. There is no ideal comparator, and this must be taken into account when planning a single-exposure or single-disease pregnancy registry.

A prospective observational study of oseltamivir safety and tolerability in infants and young children ≤24 months

Infants and young children are at elevated risk of influenza‐associated complications, but information on the safety of antiviral therapies is limited in this age group.