Mary Kay White

Work tolerance and subjective responses to wearing protective clothing and respirators during physical work

This study examined work tolerance and subjective responses while performing two levels of work and wearing four types of protective ensembles. Nine males (mean age = 24.8 years, weight = 75.3 kg, VO2 max = 44.6 ml/kg min) each performed a series of eight experimental tests in random order, each lasting up to 180 min in duration. Work was performed on a motor-driven treadmill at a set walking speed and elevation which produced work intensities of either 30% or 60% of each subjects maximum aerobic capacity. Work/rest intervals were established based on anticipated SCBA refill requirements. Environmental temperature averaged 22.6 degrees C and average relative humidity was 55%. The four protective ensembles were: a control ensemble consisting of light work clothing (CONTROL); light work clothing with an open circuit self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA); firefighters turnout gear with SCBA (FF); and chemical protective clothing with SCBA (CHEM). Test duration (tolerance time) was determined by physiological responses reaching a predetermined indicator of high stress or by a 180-min limit. Physiological and subjective measurements obtained every 2.5 min included: heart rate, skin temperature, rectal temperature, and subjective ratings of perceived exertion, thermal sensation, and perspiration. The mean tolerance times were 155, 130, 26, and 73 min, respectively, for the CONTROL, SCBA, FF, and CHEM conditions during low intensity work; and 91, 23, 4, and 13 min, respectively, during high intensity work. Differences between ensemble and work intensity were significant. FF and CHEM heart rate responses did not reach a steady state, and rose rapidly compared to CONTROL and SCBA values. SCBA heart rates remained approximately 15 beats higher than the CONTROL ensemble during the tests. At the low work intensity, mean skin temperatures at the end of the test were 32.7, 33.1, 36.7, and 36.3 degrees C, while mean core temperatures were 37.6, 37.9, 37.9, and 38.5 degrees C, respectively. The subjective data indicated that, in general, subjects were able to perceive relative degrees of physiologic strain under laboratory conditions. Wearing protective clothing and respirators results in significant and potentially dangerous thermoregulatory and cardiovascular stress to the wearer even at low work intensities in a neutral environment. Physiologically and subjectively, firefighters turnout gear (the heaviest ensemble) produced the most stress, followed by the CHEM, SCBA, and CONTROL protective ensembles.

Reduced Work Tolerance Associated with Wearing Protective Clothing and Respirators

This study examined worker tolerance and physiological responses to two levels of work while subjects wore various types of protective clothing and respirators. Nine healthy men (mean age = 24.8 years, weight = 75.3 kg, max VO2 = 44.6 mL/kg/min), experienced with the use of respirators, each performed a randomized series of eight experimental tests, each test scheduled to last 180 min. Work was performed on a motor-driven treadmill at a set walking speed and elevation indicative of either 30% (low work intensity) or 60% (high work intensity) of maximum work capacity for each individual. Four protective clothing ensembles were examined: light work clothing (LIGHT), light work clothing with SCBA (SCBA), firefighters turnout gear with SCBA (FF) and chemical protective clothing with SCBA (CHEM). Physiological measurements included heart rate, skin and rectal temperature, and minute ventilation. Measurements were obtained every 2.5 min until test termination (tolerance time). If less than 180 min, tolerance time was defined by subjective or objective signs of near maximal stress. Mean tolerance times at the low work intensity were 167, 130, 26 and 73 min, respectively, for the LIGHT, SCBA, FF and CHEM ensembles. At the high intensity, mean tolerance times were 91, 23, 4 and 13 min, respectively. At the low work intensity, heart rate with SCBA rose very slowly during the tests and remained approximately 15 beats/min higher than the heart rate for subjects wearing the LIGHT ensemble. In contrast, heart rate with the FF and CHEM ensembles rose sharply and did not approach steady-state values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Tethered swimming forces in the crawl, breast and back strokes and their relationship to competitive performance

Abstract Forces developed during fully tethered swimming by 18 male athletes were measured uding a load call in the tether cable. Three competitive strokes were studied: crawl, breast and back. Arm and leg components of the crawl and breast stroke were observed separately. Attempts were made to correlate peak and mean tether forces with competitive velocities. A positive correlation was observed between mean tether force and velocity in the crawl, particularly among distance specialists. A negative correlation was found between crawl velocity and the peak/mean force ratio. The data also suggest that the kick contributes significant force in both the crawl and breaststroke. In neither case, however, does the whole stroke produce as much force as the sum of the arm and leg components would indicate.

A simple analytical model for the crawl stroke

Abstract A simple analytical model for the crawl stroke is described. The swimmer is modelled as a torso with arms rotating like paddle wheels; for simplicity the kick is ignored. Starting with theoretical and experimental estimates for drag coefficents and anatomical data from a male collegiate swimming team, the model was adjusted to fit certain tethered and free swimming data. Its behavior was then compared to that of real swimmers in five different experimental situations and good general agreement was observed. The model was found to require much lower drag forces than are measured experimentally, however, perhaps because the kick was not considered. The model provides insight into several aspects of swimming research, including the relationship between tethered swimming forces and actual propulsive forces during free swimming.

Physiological Responses to the Wearing of Fire Fighter's Turnout Gear with Neoprene and GORE-TEX® Barrier Liners

This study examined the physiological effects of performing moderate and high intensity work while wearing fire fighters turnout gear with either a neoprene or GORE-TEX barrier liner. Eight healthy men, experienced with the use of respirators and protective clothing, each performed moderate and high intensity treadmill exercise (44% and 71% of maximum work capacity) in a double-blind study at 27.6 degrees C (50% RH) while wearing complete fire fighters turnout gear (weighing 23 kg) with either a neoprene or GORE-TEX barrier liner. Physiological measurements obtained included minute ventilation, heart rate, skin temperature, rectal temperature and sweat rate. Subjective evaluations of perceived exertion, comfort, clothing breathability, temperature and perspiration also were obtained. Tests were terminated (tolerance time) when objective or subjective signs of near maximal stress were observed (i.e., 90% of the maximum heart rate, rectal temperature of 39 degrees C, dizziness, etc.). Mean tolerance times for the moderate intensity exercise were 27.4 (+/- 7.3 S.D.) and 30.9 (+/- 7.9) min, respectively, for the neoprene and GORE-TEX barrier liners and at the high intensity were 7.2 (+/- 2.1) and 7.5 (+/- 2.3) min, respectively. Analysis of variance indicated that significant differences caused by liner were observed in skin temperature (0.6 degrees C higher with the neoprene ensemble). No significant differences caused by liner were seen in tolerance time, heart rate, sweat rate or subjective ratings.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The effectiveness of ice- and freon®-based personal cooling systems during work in fully encapsulating suits in the heat

The use of cooling garments in conjunction with fully encapsulating suits offers the potential for reducing the heat strain for workers at hazardous waste sites and chemical emergencies. This study examined the use of ice- and Freon-based cooling garments during exercise in the heat while wearing a U.S. Coast Guard chemical response suit (CRS), a fully encapsulating, Teflon-coated, Nomex suit. Responses of nine healthy men (mean age 28.8 yr) were measured during moderate exercise at 30% of their maximal oxygen consumption in an environmental chamber maintained at 33.9 degrees C (93 degrees F) and 82% relative humidity. The four randomly assigned experimental conditions were (1) the CONTROL, consisting of a self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) worn in conjunction with shorts, shirt, helmet, and shoes; (2) the CRS, consisting of the Coast Guard CRS worn with shorts, shirt, SCBA, helmet, gloves, and boots; (3) the ICE, which was identical to the CRS ensemble, with the addition of an ice and water cooling system; and (4) the FREON, which was also identical to the CRS ensemble, with the addition of a Freon-based cooling system. To the authors knowledge, this paper is the first to quantify and compare a Freon-based system with a circulating ice water system. The subjects performed repeated rest/work intervals for 45 min, followed by a 10-min recovery period. Measured physiological responses, including heart rate, skin, rectal, and axillary temperatures, were recorded at 1-min intervals during the tests.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Physiological and Subjective Responses to Working in Disposable Protective Coveralls and Respirators Commonly Used by the Asbestos Abatement Industry

The physiological and subjective effects of working with different respirators while wearing lightweight disposable (Tyvek 1412 polyolefin) coveralls commonly used by the asbestos abatement industry were studied. Nine healthy men (mean age = 27.3 yr, weight = 76.9 kg) each performed a series of four exercise tests with four different respirator ensembles in counterbalanced order. Treadmill work was performed at a set walking speed of 4 kph (2.5 mph), 0 percent elevation (220 kcal/hr), a controlled environmental temperature of 33.9 degrees C, and 50% relative humidity. Each test continued up to 120 min, with repeated work/rest intervals of 26 min of work and 4 min of rest. Tyvek disposable coveralls and hoods were worn with each of these four different respirator ensembles: (1) control--a lightweight, low resistance mask; (2) HEPA--an air purifying, full facepiece respirator with dual high efficiency filters; (3) SAR--a supplied-air, pressure-demand respirator with escape filter; (4) SCBA--an open circuit, pressure-demand, self-contained breathing apparatus. Physiological measurements obtained every minute during each test included heart rate and skin and rectal temperatures. Subjective evaluations of clothing, respirator, and facepiece comfort, ease of breathing, temperature and perspiration in the mask and clothing, and respirator load also were measured at the end of the test. Data were analyzed using an analysis of variance. Results indicated that heart rate at the end of the test differed by less than 8 BPM between the control condition and the SCBA (heaviest) condition.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hydrogen sulfide and the probabilities of inhalation through a tympanic membrane defect

We conclude that workers with tympanic membrane defects (perforated eardrums) should not be excluded from working in atmospheres containing concentrations of hydrogen sulfide (H2S). Several existing requirements and recommendations exclude workers with perforated eardrums from working in or around H2S. Such protective measures stem from the belief that H2S can enter the body through the perforation in sufficient measure to compromise the wearers respiratory protection. However, based on calculations of anticipated leakage of H2S for a variety of eustachian tube conditions and in the absence of either medical literature or personal reports documenting H2S poisoning due to eardrum perforation, the recommendation for excluding workers with such a condition from working in or around H2S is not supported. The anatomy, physiology, and pathology of the eustachian tube are discussed, including the effects such devices as tympanomaxillary shunts might have on contaminant leakage. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) criteria for respirator tests and sources of respirator leakage are examined and NIOSH recommendations for respiratory protection against H2S are outlined.