Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mary Knapp is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mary Knapp.


ieee aerospace conference | 2013

CommCube 1 and 2: A CubeSat series of missions to enhance communication capabilities for CubeSat

Alessandra Babuscia; Benjamin Corbin; Rebecca Jensen-Clem; Mary Knapp; Ivan Sergeev; Mark Van de Loo; Sara Seager

CubeSats and small satellites are becoming a way to explore space and to perform science more affordably. As the goals for these spacecraft become more ambitious in terms of physical distance (moving from Low Earth Orbit (LEO) to Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) or further), and of the amount of data to relay back to Earth (from Kbits to Mbits), the communication systems currently implemented will not be able to fully support those missions. Two of the possible strategies to solve this issue are the following: 1. Increasing the time available to communicate to the ground by using existing satellite networks as communication relays. 2. Equipping the satellite with a more powerful antenna compatible with the volume and mass constraints imposed by CubeSats and small satellites.


ieee aerospace conference | 2016

Vector antenna and maximum likelihood imaging for radio astronomy

Mary Knapp; Frank C. Robey; Ryan Volz; Frank D. Lind; Alan J. Fenn; Alex Morris; Mark Silver; Sarah Klein; Sara Seager

Radio astronomy using frequencies less than ~100 MHz provides a window into non-thermal processes in objects ranging from planets to galaxies. Observations in this frequency range are also used to map the very early history of star and galaxy formation in the universe. Much effort in recent years has been devoted to highly capable low frequency ground-based interferometric arrays such as LOFAR, LWA, and MWA. Ground-based arrays, however, cannot observe astronomical sources below the ionospheric cut-off frequency of ~10 MHz, so the sky has not been mapped with high angular resolution below that frequency. The only space mission to observe the sky below the ionospheric cut-off was RAE-2, which achieved an angular resolution of ~60 degrees in 1973. This work presents alternative sensor and algorithm designs for mapping the sky both above and below the ionospheric cutoff. The use of a vector sensor, which measures the full electric and magnetic field vectors of incoming radiation, enables reasonable angular resolution (~5 degrees) from a compact sensor (~4 m) with a single phase center. A deployable version of the vector sensor has been developed to be compatible with the CubeSat form factor. Results from simulation as well as ground testing of the vector sensor are presented. A variety of imaging algorithms, including expectation-maximization (EM), space-alternating generalized expectation-maximization (SAGE), projected gradient ascent maximum likelihood (PGAML), and non-negative least squares (NNLS), have been applied to the data. The results indicate that the vector sensor can map the astronomical sky even in the presence of strong interfering signals. A conceptual design for a spacecraft to map the sky at frequencies below the ionospheric cut-off is presented. Finally, the possibility of using multiple vector sensors to form an interferometer is discussed.


ieee aerospace conference | 2013

Low-mass high-performance deployable optical baffle for CubeSats

Adam Greenbaum; Mary Knapp; Greg Schaalman; Timothy C. Henderson; Sara Seager

An optical moon baffle for stray light attenuation was developed for use on ExoplanetSat, a 3U CubeSat being developed jointly by MIT and Draper Laboratory which aims to detect transiting exoplanets via precision photometry. This paper will discuss the optical and mechanical design of the baffle, as well as the optical performance as demonstrated through the test of a prototype. The baffle collapses to fit into a small volume around ExoplanetSats lens and deploys on orbit to a full length of 12 cm. The baffle is capable of attenuating moonlight by a factor of 105 at a lunar exclusion angle of 30 degrees.


2014 Reinventing Space Conference | 2017

CubeSats to support Mars exploration: Three scenarios for valuable planetary science missions

Sabrina Corpino; Sara Seager; Fabio Nichele; Lorenzo Feruglio; Mary Knapp; Niraj Inamdar

Planetary science originally tended to rely on “flagship” missions characterized by large satellites and expensive resources. Interplanetary CubeSat missions represent a radical new approach enabling high quality and impact science to be achieved with ultra-small and low-cost nanosatellites. Launched as second-class payloads, deployed in swarm-like or constellation configurations, they offer spatially distributed measurements and temporal resolution not achievable by single-monolithic-satellite platforms. Reduced development times, standardization of components and deployment systems, platform modularity have been drivers to the growth of CubeSats’ launches in Earth orbit in the last decade. Constraints in size, volume and available power on-board, still limit their capabilities for independent planetary exploration. Propulsion, communications, radiation environment protection are top three technological areas to empower for this class of small satellite to support science objectives in the near future. A set of scientific objectives for CubeSats to serve astrobiology goals and support to future human exploration on Mars was selected to the purpose of this work. Missions to accomplish orbital and atmospheric measurement, in situ analyses related to biosignatures detection and environmental characterization have been explored. Three set of mission architectures based on surface penetrators, atmosphere scouts and orbiting fleet, have been assessed in the perspective of the science return value. Mission concepts provided metrics and design options to address the stakeholders’ needs and strategic knowledge gaps, as defined by the NASA Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group’s definition of top-level required investigations.


asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers | 2016

Covariance estimation in terms of Stokes parameters with application to vector sensor imaging

Ryan Volz; Mary Knapp; Frank D. Lind; Frank C. Robey

Vector sensor imaging presents a challenging problem in covariance estimation when allowing arbitrarily polarized sources. We propose a Stokes parameter representation of the source covariance matrix which is both qualitatively and computationally convenient. Using this formulation, we adapt the proximal gradient and expectation maximization (EM) algorithms and apply them in multiple variants to the maximum likelihood and least squares problems. We also show how EM can be cast as gradient descent on the Riemannian manifold of positive definite matrices, enabling a new accelerated EM algorithm. Finally, we demonstrate the benefits of the proximal gradient approach through comparison of convergence results from simulated data.


Acta Astronautica | 2013

Inflatable antenna for cubesats: Motivation for development and antenna design

Alessandra Babuscia; Benjamin Corbin; Mary Knapp; Rebecca Jensen-Clem; Mark Van de Loo; Sara Seager


AIAA SPACE 2016 | 2016

HF Vector Sensor for Radio Astronomy: Ground Testing Results

Mary Knapp; Ryan Volz; Frank D. Lind; Frank C. Robey; Alan J. Fenn; Kerry Johnson; Mark Silver; Alex Morris; Sarah Klein


Archive | 2018

On-Orbit Results and Lessons Learned from the ASTERIA Space Telescope Mission

Matthew William Smith; Amanda Donner; Christopher Pong; Mary Knapp; Colin Smith; Jason Luu; Peter Di Pasquale; Brian Campuzano


Archive | 2018

AERO: Auroral Emission Radio Observer

Philip J. Erickson; Geoffrey Crew; Michael H. Hecht; Mary Knapp; Frank D. Lind; Ryan Volz; James LaBelle; Frank C. Robey


Archive | 2017

HERO: a space based low frequency interferometric observatory for heliophysicsenabled by novel vector sensor technology

Frank C. Robey; Mary Knapp; Linda R Fuhrman; Dale Gary; Colin J. Lonsdale; Frank D. Lind; Michael H. Hecht; Chen Bin; Alan J. Fenn; Mark Silver

Collaboration


Dive into the Mary Knapp's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sara Seager

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frank C. Robey

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ryan Volz

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alan J. Fenn

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frank D. Lind

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Silver

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rebecca Jensen-Clem

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alessandra Babuscia

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alex Morris

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benjamin Corbin

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge