Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mary Lou Chatterton is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mary Lou Chatterton.


Headache | 2002

Reliability and validity of the migraine therapy assessment questionnaire.

Mary Lou Chatterton; Jennifer H. Lofland; Aaron L. Shechter; Walter Scott Curtice; X. Henry Hu; Jeffrey Lenow; Stanton N. Smullens; David B. Nash; Stephen D. Silberstein

Objective.—To determine the reliability and validity of the Migraine Therapy Assessment Questionnaire (MTAQ).


Early Intervention in Psychiatry | 2015

Economic evaluations of interventions designed to prevent mental disorders: a systematic review

Catherine Mihalopoulos; Mary Lou Chatterton

The prevention of mental disorders is a growing field and there are interventions that have been demonstrated to prevent some disorders, particularly depression, from developing. The aim of the current study is to update two existing reviews of the cost‐effectiveness studies of preventive interventions for mental disorders in order to determine whether such interventions are good value‐for‐money.


PharmacoEconomics | 1999

Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction After the Addition of Lamivudine or Lamivudine plus Loviride to Zidovudine-Containing Regimens in Treatment-Experienced Patients with HIV Infection

Mary Lou Chatterton; J. Scott-Lennox; A.W. Wu; J. Scott

AbstractBackground: Assessments of health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction were conducted as part of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled 52-week trial conducted in Canada, Australia, Europe, and South Africa (CAESAR). The Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) was selfadministered during 3 scheduled clinic visits (baseline, week 28 and the end-of-treatment/withdrawal visit). A single question was used at the end of treatment to assess patient satisfaction with study medications. Methods: Patients were randomly allocated to receive placebo, lamivudine (150mg twice daily) or lamivudine (150mg twice daily) plus loviride (100mg 3 times daily) in addition to their current treatment regimen, which could be either zidovudine monotherapy, or zidovudine in combination with didanosine or zalcitabine at standard dosages. Results: Statistically significant differences across treatment groups were demonstrated for the Physical and Mental Health Summary scores, and for 5 of 10 MOS-HIV subscales (physical functioning, vitality, cognitive functioning, general health perceptions, social functioning). These differences favoured the lamivudine and lamivudine plus loviride groups over the placebo group (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found between the 3 treatment groups with regard to the percentages of patients who were satisfied with their study medication. Conclusion: The results suggest that, for treatment-experienced patients with HIV infection and CD4+ counts <250 cells/mm3, the addition of lamivudine or lamivudine plus loviride to antiretroviral regimens containing zidovudine maintained patient-reported mental and physical health.


Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry | 2015

The population cost-effectiveness of a parenting intervention designed to prevent anxiety disorders in children

Cathrine Mihalopoulos; Theo Vos; Ronald M. Rapee; Jane Pirkis; Mary Lou Chatterton; Yu-Chen Lee; Rob Carter

BACKGROUND Prevention and early intervention for anxiety disorders has lagged behind many other forms of mental disorder. Recent research has demonstrated the efficacy of a parent-focussed psycho-educational programme. The programme is directed at parents of inhibited preschool children and has been shown to reduce anxiety disorders at 1 and 3 years following intervention. The current study assesses the cost-effectiveness of this intervention to determine whether it could provide value-for-money across a population. METHOD A cost-utility economic framework, using Disability-Adjusted-Life-Years (DALYs) as the outcome, was adopted. Economic modelling techniques were used to assess the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the intervention within the Australian population context, which was modelled as add-on to current practice. The perspective was the health sector. Uncertainty was measured using multivariate probabilistic testing and key assumptions were tested using univariate sensitivity analysis. RESULTS The median ICER for the intervention was AUD


PharmacoEconomics | 2012

Cost Effectiveness of Quetiapine in Patients with Acute Bipolar Depression and in Maintenance Treatment after an Acute Depressive Episode

Mattias Ekman; Peter Lindgren; Carolin Miltenburger; Genevieve Meier; Julie C. Locklear; Mary Lou Chatterton

8,000 per DALY averted with 99.8% of the uncertainty iterations falling below the threshold value-for-money criterion of AUD


British Journal of Psychiatry | 2017

Psychosocial therapies for the adjunctive treatment of bipolar disorder in adults: network meta-analysis

Mary Lou Chatterton; Emily Stockings; Michael Berk; Jan J. Barendregt; Rob Carter; Cathrine Mihalopoulos

50,000 per DALY averted. The results were robust to sensitivity testing. CONCLUSIONS Screening young children in a preschool setting for an inhibited temperament and providing a brief intervention to the parents of children with high levels of inhibition appears to provide very good value-for-money and worth considering in any package of preventive care. Further evaluation of this intervention under routine health service conditions will strengthen conclusions. Acceptability issues associated with this intervention, particularly to preschool staff and parents, need to be considered before wide-scale adoption is undertaken.


Psycho-oncology | 2016

Economic evaluation of a psychological intervention for high distress cancer patients and carers: costs and quality-adjusted life years.

Mary Lou Chatterton; Suzanne K. Chambers; Stefano Occhipinti; Afaf Girgis; Jeff Dunn; Rob Carter; Sophy Shih; Catherine Mihalopoulos

BackgroundBipolar disorder has a significant impact upon a patient’s quality of life, imposing a considerable economic burden on the individual, family members and society as a whole. Several medications are indicated for the acute treatment of mania and depression associated with bipolar disorder as well as for maintenance therapy; however, these have varying efficacy, tolerability and costs.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to develop a new discrete-event simulation model to analyse the long-term consequences of pharmacological therapy for the management of bipolar I and II disorders (acute treatment of episodes of mania and depression as well as maintenance therapy).MethodsProbabilities of remission and relapse were obtained from clinical trial data and meta-analyses. Costs (year 2011 values) were assessed from a UK healthcare payer’s perspective, and included pharmacological therapy and resource use associated with the treatment of mood events and selected adverse events. The health effects were measured in terms of QALYs.ResultsFor a patient starting with acute depression or in remission at 40 years of age (which was the average age in the clinical trials), quetiapine 300 mg/day was a cost-effective strategy compared with olanzapine 15 mg/day over a 5-year time frame. With acute bipolar depression as a starting episode, the 5-year medical costs were £323 higher and QALYs were 0.038 higher for quetiapine compared with olanzapine, corresponding to a cost-effectiveness ratio of £8600 per QALY gained.ConclusionCompared with olanzapine, the results suggest that quetiapine is cost effective as a maintenance treatment for bipolar depression.


Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry | 2017

Cost of high prevalence mental disorders: findings from the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing

Yu-Chen Lee; Mary Lou Chatterton; Anne Magnus; Mohammadreza Mohebbi; Long Khanh-Dao Le; Cathrine Mihalopoulos

BackgroundFew trials have compared psychosocial therapies for people with bipolar affective disorder, and conventional meta-analyses provided limited comparisons between therapies.AimsTo combine evidence for the efficacy of psychosocial interventions used as adjunctive treatment of bipolar disorder in adults, using network meta-analysis (NMA).MethodSystematic review identified studies and NMA was used to pool data on relapse to mania or depression, medication adherence, and symptom scales for mania, depression and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF).ResultsCarer-focused interventions significantly reduced the risk of depressive or manic relapse. Psychoeducation alone and in combination with cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) significantly reduced medication non-adherence. Psychoeducation plus CBT significantly reduced manic symptoms and increased GAF. No intervention was associated with a significant reduction in depression symptom scale scores.ConclusionsOnly interventions for family members affected relapse rates. Psychoeducation plus CBT reduced medication non-adherence, improved mania symptoms and GAF. Novel methods for addressing depressive symptoms are required.


JMIR Research Protocols | 2018

Healthy, Wealthy and Wise: Protocol for the CSC (Climate School Combined) study to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of school-based depression, anxiety and alcohol misuse prevention into young adulthood (Preprint)

Louise Birrell; Nicola C. Newton; Tim Slade; Catherine Chapman; Louise Mewton; Nyanda McBride; Leanne Hides; Mary Lou Chatterton; Steve Allsop; Annalise Healy; Marius Mather; Catherine Quinn; Catherine Mihalopoulos; Maree Teesson

This study compared the cost‐effectiveness of a psychologist‐led, individualised cognitive behavioural intervention (PI) to a nurse‐led, minimal contact self‐management condition for highly distressed cancer patients and carers.


Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry | 2018

Efficacy of adjunctive Garcinia mangostana Linn (mangosteen) pericarp for bipolar depression: study protocol for a proof-of-concept trial

Melanie Ashton; Michael Berk; Chee H. Ng; Malcolm Hopwood; Seetal Dodd; Alyna Turner; Ellie Brown; Felice N. Jacka; Sue Cotton; Jon-Paul Khoo; Mary Lou Chatterton; Bianca E. Kavanagh; Sarah E. Nadjidai; Samantha L. Lo Monaco; Brian H. Harvey; Jerome Sarris; Gin S. Malhi; Nathan Dowling; Olivia M. Dean

Objective: The aim of this project was to detail the costs associated with the high prevalence mental disorders (depression, anxiety-related and substance use) in Australia, using community-based, nationally representative survey data. Methods: Respondents diagnosed, within the preceding 12 months, with high prevalence mental disorders using the Confidentialised Unit Record Files of the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing were analysed. The use of healthcare resources (hospitalisations, consultations and medications), productivity loss, income tax loss and welfare benefits were estimated. Unit costs of healthcare services were obtained from the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority, Medicare and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Labour participation rates and unemployment rates were determined from the National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Daily wage rates adjusted by age and sex were obtained from Australian Bureau of Statistics and used to estimate productivity losses. Income tax loss was estimated based on the Australian Taxation Office rates. The average cost of commonly received Government welfare benefits adjusted by age was used to estimate welfare payments. All estimates were expressed in 2013–2014 AUD and presented from multiple perspectives including public sector, individuals, private insurers, health sector and societal. Results: The average annual treatment cost for people seeking treatment was AUD660 (public), AUD195 (individual), AUD1058 (private) and AUD845 from the health sector’s perspective. The total annual healthcare cost was estimated at AUD974m, consisting of AUD700m to the public sector, AUD168m to individuals, and AUD107m to the private sector. The total annual productivity loss attributed to the population with high prevalence mental disorders was estimated at AUD11.8b, coupled with the yearly income tax loss at AUD1.23b and welfare payments at AUD12.9b. Conclusion: The population with high prevalence mental disorders not only incurs substantial cost to the Australian healthcare system but also large economic losses to society.

Collaboration


Dive into the Mary Lou Chatterton's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David B. Nash

Thomas Jefferson University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge