Mary M. Donaldson

TopBP1 Regulates Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E2 Interaction with Chromatin

ABSTRACT Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) E2 regulates transcription from and replication of the viral genome, in association with viral and cellular factors. HPV16 E2 interacts functionally with TopBP1, a cellular protein essential for the initiation of cellular, and potentially viral, DNA replication. This report demonstrates that the absence of TopBP1 results in the redistribution of HPV16 E2 into an alternative cellular protein complex, resulting in enhanced affinity for chromatin. This redistribution does not significantly alter the ability of HPV16 E2 to either activate or repress transcription. We also show colocalization of both proteins on chromatin at late stages of mitosis, suggesting that TopBP1 could be the mitotic chromatin receptor for HPV16 E2. The possible significance of the results for the regulation of the viral life cycle is discussed.

Aberrant expression of TopBP1 in breast cancer.

Aims:  The TopBP1 protein includes eight BRCT domains (originally identified in BRCA1) and has homology with BRCA1 over the carboxyl terminal half of the protein. The aim of this study was to determine whether TopBP1 is aberrantly expressed in breast cancer.

Evidence supporting a role for TopBP1 and Brd4 in the initiation but not continuation of human papillomavirus 16 E1/E2 mediated DNA replication

ABSTRACT To replicate the double-stranded human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) DNA genome, viral proteins E1 and E2 associate with the viral origin of replication, and E2 can also regulate transcription from adjacent promoters. E2 interacts with host proteins in order to regulate both transcription and replication; TopBP1 and Brd4 are cellular proteins that interact with HPV16 E2. Previous work with E2 mutants demonstrated the Brd4 requirement for the transactivation properties of E2, while TopBP1 is required for DNA replication induced by E2 from the viral origin of replication in association with E1. More-recent studies have also implicated Brd4 in the regulation of DNA replication by E2 and E1. Here, we demonstrate that both TopBP1 and Brd4 are present at the viral origin of replication and that interaction with E2 is required for optimal initiation of DNA replication. Both cellular proteins are present in E1-E2-containing nuclear foci, and the viral origin of replication is required for the efficient formation of these foci. Short hairpin RNA (shRNA) against either TopBP1 or Brd4 destroys the E1-E2 nuclear bodies but has no effect on E1-E2-mediated levels of DNA replication. An E2 mutation in the context of the complete HPV16 genome that compromises Brd4 interaction fails to efficiently establish episomes in primary human keratinocytes. Overall, the results suggest that interactions between TopBP1 and E2 and between Brd4 and E2 are required to correctly initiate DNA replication but are not required for continuing DNA replication, which may be mediated by alternative processes such as rolling circle amplification and/or homologous recombination. IMPORTANCE Human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) is causative in many human cancers, including cervical and head and neck cancers, and is responsible for the annual deaths of hundreds of thousands of people worldwide. The current vaccine will save lives in future generations, but antivirals targeting HPV16 are required for the alleviation of disease burden on the current, and future, generations. Targeting viral DNA replication that is mediated by two viral proteins, E1 and E2, in association with cellular proteins such as TopBP1 and Brd4 would have therapeutic benefits. This report suggests a role for these cellular proteins in the initiation of viral DNA replication by HPV16 E1-E2 but not for continuing replication. This is important if viral replication is to be effectively targeted; we need to understand the viral and cellular proteins required at each phase of viral DNA replication so that it can be effectively disrupted.

Mutations in mákos, a Drosophila gene encoding the Cdc27 subunit of the anaphase promoting complex, enhance centrosomal defects in polo and are suppressed by mutations in twins/aar, which encodes a regulatory subunit of PP2A

The gene mákos (mks) encodes the Drosophila counterpart of the Cdc27 subunit of the anaphase promoting complex (APC/C). Neuroblasts from third-larval-instar mks mutants arrest mitosis in a metaphase-like state but show some separation of sister chromatids. In contrast to metaphase-checkpoint-arrested cells, such mutant neuroblasts contain elevated levels not only of cyclin B but also of cyclin A. Mutations in mks enhance the reduced ability of hypomorphic polo mutant alleles to recruit and/or maintain the centrosomal antigens γ-tubulin and CP190 at the spindle poles. Absence of the MPM2 epitope from the spindle poles in such double mutants suggests Polo kinase is not fully activated at this location. Thus, it appears that spindle pole functions of Polo kinase require the degradation of early mitotic targets of the APC/C, such as cyclin A, or other specific proteins. The metaphase-like arrest of mks mutants cannot be overcome by mutations in the spindle integrity checkpoint gene bub1, confirming this surveillance pathway has to operate through the APC/C. However, mutations in the twins/aar gene, which encodes the 55kDa regulatory subunit of PP2A, do suppress the mks metaphase arrest and so permit an alternative means of initiating anaphase. Thus the APC/C might normally be required to inactivate wild-type twins/aar gene product.

An Interaction between Human Papillomavirus 16 E2 and TopBP1 Is Required for Optimum Viral DNA Replication and Episomal Genome Establishment

ABSTRACT In human papillomavirus DNA replication, the viral protein E2 forms homodimers and binds to 12-bp palindromic DNA sequences surrounding the origin of DNA replication. Via a protein-protein interaction, it then recruits the viral helicase E1 to an A/T-rich origin of replication, whereupon a dihexamer forms, resulting in DNA replication initiation. In order to carry out DNA replication, the viral proteins must interact with host factors that are currently not all known. An attractive cellular candidate for regulating viral replication is TopBP1, a known interactor of the E2 protein. In mammalian DNA replication, TopBP1 loads DNA polymerases onto the replicative helicase after the G1-to-S transition, and this process is tightly cell cycle controlled. The direct interaction between E2 and TopBP1 would allow E2 to bypass this cell cycle control, resulting in DNA replication more than once per cell cycle, which is a requirement for the viral life cycle. We report here the generation of an HPV16 E2 mutant compromised in TopBP1 interaction in vivo and demonstrate that this mutant retains transcriptional activation and repression functions but has suboptimal DNA replication potential. Introduction of this mutant into a viral life cycle model results in the failure to establish viral episomes. The results present a potential new antiviral target, the E2-TopBP1 interaction, and increase our understanding of the viral life cycle, suggesting that the E2-TopBP1 interaction is essential.

Human papillomavirus E1 and E2 mediated DNA replication is not arrested by DNA damage signalling

Integration of human papillomaviruses into that of the host promotes genomic instability and progression to cancer; factors that promote integration remain to be fully identified. DNA damage agents can promote double strand breaks during DNA replication providing substrates for integration and we investigated the ability of DNA damage to regulate HPV E1 and E2 mediated DNA replication. Results demonstrate that HPV E1 and E2 replication is not arrested following DNA damage, both in vivo and in vitro, while replication by SV40 Large T antigen is arrested and ATR is the candidate kinase for mediating the arrest. LTAg is a target for PIKK DNA damage signalling kinases, while E1 is not. We propose that the failure of E1 to be targeted by PIKKs allows HPV replication in the presence of DNA damaging agents. Such replication will result in double strand breaks in the viral genome ultimately promoting viral integration and cervical cancer.

TopBP1 contains a transcriptional activation domain suppressed by two adjacent BRCT domains.

TopBP1 has eight BRCT [BRCA1 (breast-cancer susceptibility gene 1) C-terminus] domains and is involved in initiating DNA replication, and DNA damage checkpoint signalling and repair. Several BRCT-domain-containing proteins involved in mediating DNA repair have transcriptional regulatory domains, and as demonstrated for BRCA1 these regulatory domains are important in mediating the functions of these proteins. These transcriptional regulatory processes involve modification of chromatin, and recent evidence has clearly demonstrated that the ability to modify chromatin plays an important role in regulating DNA damage signalling and repair. Here we report the identification of a TopBP1 transcriptional activation domain that is rich in hydrophobic residues, interspersed with acidic amino acids, characteristics that are typical of transcriptional activation domains identified previously. Two adjacent repressor domains encoded by BRCT2 and BRCT5 silence this activator and experiments suggest that these repressors actively recruit repressor complexes. Both the activator and BRCT2 repressor domains function in yeast. The present study identifies several chromatin modification domains encoded by TopBP1, and the implications of these findings are discussed in the context of the DNA damage response and the understanding of TopBP1 function.

Human papillomavirus 16 E2 stability and transcriptional activation is enhanced by E1 via a direct protein-protein interaction.

Human papillomavirus 16 E1 and E2 interact with cellular factors to replicate the viral genome. E2 forms homodimers and binds to 12 bp palindromic sequences adjacent to the viral origin and recruits E1 to the origin. E1 forms a di-hexameric helicase complex that replicates the viral genome. This manuscript demonstrates that E1 stabilises the E2 protein, increasing the half life in both C33a and 293 T cells respectively. This stabilisation requires a direct protein--protein interaction. In addition, the E1 protein enhances E2 transcription function in a manner that suggests the E1 protein itself can contribute to transcriptional regulation not simply by E2 stabilisation but by direct stimulation of transcription. This activation of E2 transcription is again dependent upon an interaction with E1. Overall the results suggest that in the viral life cycle, co-expression of E1 with E2 can increase E2 stability and enhance E2 function.

Regulation of human genome expression and RNA splicing by human papillomavirus 16 E2 protein

Human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) is causative in human cancer. The E2 protein regulates transcription from and replication of the viral genome; the role of E2 in regulating the host genome has been less well studied. We have expressed HPV16 E2 (E2) stably in U2OS cells; these cells tolerate E2 expression well and gene expression analysis identified 74 genes showing differential expression specific to E2. Analysis of published gene expression data sets during cervical cancer progression identified 20 of the genes as being altered in a similar direction as the E2 specific genes. In addition, E2 altered the splicing of many genes implicated in cancer and cell motility. The E2 expressing cells showed no alteration in cell growth but were altered in cell motility, consistent with the E2 induced altered splicing predicted to affect this cellular function. The results present a model system for investigating E2 regulation of the host genome.

TopBP1 contains transcriptional regulatory domains and regulates gene pathways involved in breast cancer

TopBP1 is a nuclear protein with eight BRCT domains and is involved in many aspects of nucleic acid metabolism: it is involved in the initiation of DNA replication in the Xenopus in vitro replication system by assisting loading of polymerase onto the replication complex; it is a substrate for ATM/ATR and is essential for the ATR DNA damage signalling pathway, and is also probably involved in the actual DNA repair process; it acts as a transcriptional cofactor for E2F1 where it regulates the apoptotic function of this protein. In addition, the yeast homologues of TopBP1, Dbp11 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and Cut5 (Schizo-saccharomyces pombe), are also involved in replication and repair processes. TopBP1 also shares functions with BRCA1; both are involved in regulating an intact G2/M checkpoint, they colocalise to sites of DNA damage, they share sequence homology (even outside the BRCT domains), they are substrates for ATM/ATR, and they can regulate expression of the c-myc gene. All of these properties of TopBP1 led to us investigating whether TopBP1 plays a role in breast cancer. There is a polymorphism in TopBP1 that gives an increased risk of breast cancer [1], and work from our laboratory has demonstrated that TopBP1 is aberrantly expressed in a significant number of human breast cancers [2]. Clearly the role of TopBP1 in replication and genome maintenance would mean that disturbance of expression could result in genomic instability contributing towards cancer. Our studies have focused on an additional aspect of TopBP1 that could contribute to the transformed phenotype; gene regulation. We have identified several chromatin modification domains on TopBP1 that could contribute not only to transcriptional regulation but also to the replication and repair functions of this protein [3]. Using siRNA knockdown of TopBP1 in MCF7 cells, we identified genes that are regulated by TopBP1. Following knockdown of TopBP1, the short-term growth of the MCF7 cells was not affected. This was surprising as it has been predicted that TopBP1 is essential for DNA replication and our results demonstrate that this is not the case in all cell lines (we have tested other lines in which TopBP1 is essential for S phase). However, even though these cells cycled for several days, they did not survive long term, presumably due to accumulated damage following replication in the absence of TopBP1. Using this MCF7 system we carried out microarray experiments that revealed the absence of TopBP1 alters the expression of genes involved in many cellular pathways implicated in breast cancer, including the oestrogen signalling pathway, and the mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling network. Future work will focus on determining how TopBP1 regulates these pathways and what cellular interacting partners TopBP1 requires for chromatin modification. Such studies will increase our understanding of breast cancer and assist in developing diagnostic and prognostic gene profiling for breast cancer management.