Mary M. Lane

Pulmonary autograft in children: Realized growth potential☆

Pulmonary autograft replacement of the aortic valve has the potential to remain viable and grow in proportion to the somatic growth of the child. Changes in aortic annulus and sinotubular dimensions were compared early and late postoperatively, and related to normal. Eighty-six children, 0.9 to 21 years, were operated on between 1986 and 1993: 42 had a root replacement, 24 an inclusion cylinder, and 20 a scalloped subcoronary implant. Actuarial survival at 7 years was 96.5% +/- 2.0%. Freedom from reoperation for the pulmonary autograft or the homograft reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract was 92% +/- 4%. Freedom from reoperation on the autograft in root replacements was 96% +/- 4%, in the inclusion cylinder was 100%, and in the scalloped subcoronary was 90% +/- 7% (not significant). Aortic annulus and sinotubular junction diameters were compared with normal values predicted by body surface area. In 22 intraaortic implants, early and late postoperative annulus diameter mean Z values are in the normal range. In the 23 root replacements, early annulus diameter was within the normal range, but late Z values were larger than normal (p < 0.02). Intraaortic implant annulus diameter increased proportionally to somatic growth, but the sinotubular junction, which was small, remained small but increased toward normal. In the root replacements, the annulus increased in diameter and became dilated. The sinotubular junction, which was small early, increased and was within the normal range late. Lower operative risk and valve durability without failure suggest improved results with inclusion cylinder technique.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ross operation: 16-year experience

OBJECTIVE We performed a review of a consecutive series of 487 patients undergoing the Ross operation to identify surgical techniques and clinical parameters that affect outcome. METHODS We performed a prospective review of consecutive patients from August 1986 through June 2002 and follow-up through August 2004. Patient age was 2 days to 62 years (median, 24 years), and 197 patients were less than 18 years of age. The Ross operation was performed as a scalloped subcoronary implant in 26 patients, an inclusion cylinder in 54 patients, root replacement in 392 patients, and root-Konno procedure in 15 patients. Clinical follow-up in 96% and echocardiographic evaluation in 77% were performed within 2 years of closure. RESULTS Actuarial survival was 82% +/- 6% at 16 years, and hospital mortality was 3.9%. Freedom from autograft failure (autograft reoperation and valve-related death) was 74% +/- 5%. Male sex and primary diagnosis of aortic insufficiency (no prior aortic stenosis) were significantly associated with autograft failure by means of multivariate analysis. Freedom from autograft valve replacement was 80% +/- 5%. Freedom from endocarditis was 95% +/- 2%. One late thromboembolic episode occurred. Freedom from allograft reoperation or reintervention was 82% +/- 4%. Freedom from all valve-related events was 63% +/- 6%. In children survival was 84% +/- 8%, and freedom from autograft valve failure was 83% +/- 6%. CONCLUSIONS The Ross operation provides excellent survival in adults and children willing to accept a risk of reoperation. Male sex and a primary diagnosis of aortic insufficiency had a negative effect on late results.

The Ross Operation in Children: 10-Year Experience

BACKGROUND The Ross operation, first performed in children in 1968, may be the ideal aortic valve replacement. Technical demands of the operation and two valves at risk have delayed acceptance. A review of our experience to assess midterm and long-term results with the Ross operation is presented. METHODS The records of 150 consecutive patients, aged 7 days to 21 years (median age, 12 years, 75% less than 15 years) were reviewed. Follow-up was complete within the last 12 months (median, 2.8 years; range, 1 month to 10 years). Echocardiographic assessment was available on 116 (71%) within 1 year of closure and in 136 (91%) within 2 years. RESULTS Survival was 97.3% at 8 years. Late autograft valve dysfunction required replacement in 2 and reoperation with restitution of autograft function in 6. Freedom from reoperation for autograft dysfunction is 90% +/- 4% at 8 years. Freedom from reoperation for homograft obstruction is 94% +/- 3% at 8 years. Pulmonary homograft dysfunction (gradient > 40 mm Hg) was present in 4 additional patients. Freedom from reoperation on the homograft or a gradient of 40 mm Hg is 89% +/- 4% at 8 years. All patients have a normal, active lifestyle, without anticoagulants for their aortic valve replacement. CONCLUSIONS The Ross operation is the preferred operative replacement in children requiring aortic valve replacement.

Advantage of autograft and homograft valve replacement for complex aortic valve endocarditis

BACKGROUND There are advantages to using homografts and autografts as aortic valve replacements, particularly in patients with infective endocarditis. To better define these advantages, we reviewed our 13-year experience with the surgical management of infective endocarditis involving the aortic valve and root. METHODS From 1986 through 1998, 81 adults with aortic valve endocarditis underwent valve replacement (AVR). The mean age of the 65 men and 16 women was 44 +/- 14 years. Sixty-three (78%) patients had active endocarditis at the time of operation. Non-native valve endocarditis was present in 29 (36%) patients, in 9 of whom the infection was a recurrence. Aortic valve replacements were performed with 46 homografts (homo-AVR), 25 autografts (Ross-AVR), and 10 prosthetic valves (prosth-AVR). Among Ross-AVR and homo-AVR patients, 11 required mitral valve replacement or repair (homo-Ross DVR). Follow-up was 90% complete within 2 years of the end of the study with a mean of 3.7 +/- 3.4 years. RESULTS Early mortality was 16% (13 of 81 patients). This was 12% (3 of 25 patients) for Ross-AVR, 17% (8 of 46 patients) for homo-AVR, and 20% (2 of 10 patients) for prosth-AVR. Overall late mortality was 10% (7 of 68 patients) with a valve-related late mortality of 7% (5 of 68 patients). Actuarial survival at 5 years was 88% +/- 9% in Ross-AVR, 69% +/- 11% in homo-AVR, and 29% +/- 22% in prosth-AVR (p = 0.03). Endocarditis recurred in 12.5% (1 of 8 patients) with prosth-AVR and 3% (2 of 60 patients) in homo-Ross AVR. CONCLUSIONS Valve replacement in the presence of native and prosthetic endocarditis remains a formidable challenge. Autografts and homografts are the preferred replacement aortic valves for these patients even if concomitant mitral valve replacement is required, and risk of valve-related death or recurrent endocarditis is low at medium-term follow-up.

A 26-year experience with surgical management of tetralogy of fallot: risk analysis for mortality or late reintervention

BACKGROUND Over the past decade repair of tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) in infancy has gained favor. It is still uncertain what effect early complete repair will have on survival or late reoperation on the right ventricular outflow tract. METHODS To assess these outcomes, we reviewed our experience (1971-1997) with 294 patients undergoing operation at one institution. Median follow-up was 10.6 years (range, 0.1 to 26 years), and was complete for 90.2% patients. RESULTS Primary complete repair was done in 199 patients (68%), and a staged repair in 62 patients (21%). Thirty-three patients had only a palliative procedure. Sixty-eight patients (23.1%) had complex pathologic processes, including pulmonary atresia in 53. Hospital mortality for primary repair was 11.1% (22/199), for staged repair was 17.7% (11/62), and for palliative procedures was 15.5% (16/103 procedures). Since 1990 mortality has been 2.1%, 11.8%, and 0% respectively (p < 0.001), despite younger age at repair (0.6+/-0.1 versus 2.1+/-0.2 years; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified longer period of hypothermic circulatory arrest, pulmonary artery patch angioplasty, earlier year of operation, and closure of the foramen ovale as risk factors for hospital death. For hospital survivors 20-year survival was 98%+/-3% for TOF with pulmonary stenosis and 88%+/-9% for TOF with pulmonary atresia (p=0.09). Reintervention on the right ventricular outflow tract was needed in 14.1% (37/261) patients. Freedom from reintervention on the right ventricular outflow tract at 20 years was 86%+/-4% for TOF with pulmonary stenosis and 43%+/-16% for TOF with pulmonary atresia (p=0.001). For the subgroup TOF with pulmonary stenosis, this was 85%+/-5% after primary repair and 91%+/-8% after staged repair (not significant). At 15-year follow-up, this was 78%+/-10% for patients not older than 1 year at operation compared with 88%+/-4% for older patients (not significant). CONCLUSIONS Early mortality after primary repair of TOF has significantly improved and late survival is excellent. Primary repair in infancy does not increase risk for reintervention on the right ventricular outflow tract.

Prognosis after aortic root replacement with cryopreserved allografts in adults

BACKGROUND Aortic root replacement with cryopreserved allografts is associated with excellent hemodynamics, little endocarditis, low thromboembolic event rates, and no need for anticoagulation. There is, however, concern regarding the long-term durability of this valve substitute, especially in younger patients. Meta-analysis and microsimulation were used to calculate age-specific long-term prognosis after allograft aortic root replacement based on current evidence. METHODS Our centers experience with cryopreserved allograft aortic root replacement in 165 adult patients was combined in a meta-analysis with reported and individual results from four other hospitals. Using this information, the microsimulation model predicted age- and gender-specific total and reoperation-free and event-free life expectancy. RESULTS The pooled results comprised 629 patients with a total follow-up of 1860 patient-years (range 0 to 12.8 years). Annual risks were 0.6% for thromboembolism, 0.05% for bleeding, 0.5% for endocarditis, and 0.5% for nonstructural valve failure. Structural allograft failure requiring reoperation occurred in 15 patients, and a patient age-specific Weibull function was constructed accordingly. Calculated total life expectancy varied from 27 years in a 25-year-old to 12 years in a 65-year-old male; corresponding actual lifetime risk of reoperation was 89% and 35%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Cryopreserved aortic allografts have an age-related limited durability. This results in a considerable lifetime risk of reoperation, especially in young patients. The combination of meta-analysis and microsimulation provides an appropriate tool for estimating individualized long-term outcome after aortic valve replacement and can be useful both for patient counseling and prognostic research purposes.

Medium-term follow-up of pulmonary autograft replacement of aortic valves in children

Pulmonary autograft replacement (PAG) of the aortic valve in children has been shown to be safe and effective with a low incidence of late valve dysfunction. Relief of all types of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction using the pulmonary root has been possible. Concern about the durability of the pulmonary root in the aortic position, and the potential for growth of the pulmonary autograft used either as a root replacement or intraaortic implant, has been questioned. Sixty-five consecutive patients, aged 1.8 to 21 years (mean 12 years) operated on between September 1986 and January 1993, 35 with an intra-aortic implant (IA) and 30 with root replacement (RR), were evaluated by clinical and serial echocardiographic studies (ECHO) up to 6.5 years post-operatively. The hospital mortality rate was 3.0% (70% CL 2.1-5.1%). Two patients required reoperation for PAG insufficiency (AI), one for technical malalignment necessitating replacement at 6 months, and one with progressive leaflet prolapse due to adherence of the valve leaflet to a ventricular septal defect (VSD) patch. Freedom from significant aortic regurgitation at 6-year follow-up was 100% for RR and 91 +/- 6% for IA, and freedom from all valve-related complications including reoperation was 92 +/- 5% at 6 years. Significant enlargement of the aortic annulus which parallels somatic growth has been measured by ECHO in 17 IA implants (P < 0.001) and 17 RR patients (P < 0.01) by 1 year, and in 10 IA (P = 0.007) and 6 RR (P < 0.05) by 2 years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Homograft replacement of the aortic valve and root as a functional unit

Homograft replacement of the aortic valve has inherent advantages for the patient in terms of decreased incidence of thromboembolism, endocarditis, and anticoagulation-related complications. Limitations in its use stem from a significant incidence of postoperative aortic regurgitation, related to difficulty with consistent commissural and sinotubular geometry when inserted in the subcoronary position. To minimize this complication, we used a homograft as a functional unit in 71 patients between 1986 and May 1993, either as a root replacement (n = 58) or as an intraaortic inclusion cylinder (n = 13). There were 4 pulmonary and 67 aortic homografts. Mean age of the 16 female and 55 male patients was 42 +/- 19 years (range, 0.6 to 84 years). Thirty patients had predominantly aortic regurgitation, 19 aortic stenosis, 18 mixed aortic valve disease, and 4 primary aneurysmal disease. Eighteen (25.4%) had infective endocarditis. Thirty-five patients (49%) had a previous operation on the aortic valve. Hospital mortality was 14.1% (10/71), 0% for inclusion cylinders and 17.2% (10/58) for root replacements (p = not significant). Recent follow-up was obtained in all hospital survivors. Mean follow-up period was 35 months (range, 1 to 81 months). There were six late deaths, 1/13 for inclusion cylinders and 5/48 for root replacements. Actuarial survival at 5 years was 74.9% +/- 5.6%. Reoperation was required in 3 patients (all with root replacements), 1 for postoperative endocarditis, 1 for left coronary ostial obstruction, and 1 for late onset of aortic dilatation and regurgitation (pulmonary homograft used as a root replacement). Two patients currently have asymptomatic greater than 2/4 aortic regurgitation. Freedom from significant aortic regurgitation was 88% +/- 7% at 6-year follow-up. More consistent maintenance of the sinotubular and commissural geometry of the aortic homograft may be achieved with the root replacement or the inclusion cylinder techniques. This may reduce the incidence of postoperative aortic regurgitation and further benefit the patient by reducing the need for reoperation in the future.

Normal left ventricular function following pulmonary autograft replacement of the aortic valve in children.

To assess growth potential and hemodynamic sequelae of pulmonary autograft valves implanted into aortic outflow tracts of children, we reviewed our experience with 37 patients (2‐21 years) from August 1986 to December 1990. Twenty patients had predominantly aortic stenosis (AS), and 17 had aortic insufficiency (AI). Operative mortality was 3%. Two technical failures required reoperation. Of survivors, six (18%) have moderate AI. Pre‐ and postoperative echocardiograms were reviewed. The AS group showed increased left ventricular (LV) cavity size by > 1‐year follow‐up, and decreased LV wall and Interventricular septal thickness. In the AI group, wall and septal thickness increased by 10 days and LV cavity decreased by 10 days, 60 days, and > 1 year. Root replacements (n = 14) showed mean increases of 4.3 mm and 5.3 mm, respectively, in diameters of the aortic annulus and aortic sinuses at > 1 year. Intraaortic implants increased 3.1 mm (annulus) and 3.9 mm (sinuses) at > 1 year. The pulmonary autograft procedure is safe, and successful implantation normalizes LV dimensions and function rapidly. The autograft valve shows evidence of growth at > 1 year postoperative. The pulmonary autograft may be the ideal valve replacement in children.

Aortic valve replacement: comparison of late survival between autografts and homografts.

BACKGROUND Autografts (AG) and homografts (HG) are currently considered the best choices for replacement of the diseased aortic valve in young adults, although few data exist comparing their late outcome. Nonhomogeneous populations and evolving operative techniques confound existing comparisons. METHODS To help clarify these issues, we reviewed our results with 238 hospital survivors (aged 17 to 82 years) undergoing operation between 1986 and 1999. All operations were done as root replacements, and patients needing concomitant valve replacement were excluded. RESULTS Mean age of the 145 AGs and 93 HGs was 35 +/- 13 years and 49 +/- 17 years, respectively (p < 0.001). Previous aortic valve replacement was done in 12 (8%) AG and 32 (34%) HG patients (p = 0.001), and active endocarditis was present at time of current operation in 10 (7%) AG and 25 (27%) HG patients (p = 0.001). Maximum follow-up was 12.2 years for AGs and 12.8 years for HGs. Late survival at 10 years was 77% +/- 11% for AGs and 67% +/- 9% for HGs (p = 0.13). Freedom from AG or HG degeneration at 10 years was 97% +/- 2% and 79% +/- 10% (p = 0.63). Freedom from valve-related complications at 10 years was 73% +/- 10% and 64% +/- 10% (p = 0.93), respectively. Freedom from all reoperations at 10 years was 88% +/- 5% for AG and 72% +/- 11% for HG (p = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS Autografts and HGs have comparable late survival. The incidence of valve degeneration is low for both AG and HG up to about 8 years at which point there may be a trend toward an advantage for AG over the HG, suggesting benefit for the younger patient.