Mary Michaeleen Cradock
Washington University in St. Louis
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mary Michaeleen Cradock.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | 2007
Matthew L. Speltz; Kathy Kapp-Simon; Brent R. Collett; Yona Keich; Rebecca Gaither; Mary Michaeleen Cradock; Lauren Buono; Michael L. Cunningham
Background: The hypothesized association between single-suture craniosynostosis and neurodevelopment remains unclear, given the methodologic limitations of previous studies, most notably the absence of control groups. Methods: Standardized measures were used to assess the neurodevelopment of 125 matched case-control pairs shortly after cases were first diagnosed with isolated fusions of the sagittal, metopic, lambdoid, or right or left coronal sutures. Participants varied in age from 2 to 24 months. Results: Cases had significantly lower mean standardized scores than controls on measures of cognitive ability and motor functioning (p < 0.02). These differences were unaffected by the location of synostosis, age of diagnosis, infant sex, and maternal IQ. Measures of early language functions revealed no group differences. Conclusions: Before cranioplasty, single-suture craniosynostosis is associated with modest but reliable neurodevelopmental delays that cannot be attributed to maternal intelligence and family sociodemographic variables. Follow-up of this sample will determine the predictive significance of these delays. In the meantime, routine neurodevelopmental screening of infants with isolated craniosynostosis is recommended.
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal | 2012
Joseph G. McCarthy; Stephen M. Warren; Joseph Bernstein; Whitney Burnett; Michael L. Cunningham; Jane C. Edmond; Alvaro A. Figueroa; Kathleen A. Kapp-Simon; Brian I. Labow; Sally J. Peterson-Falzone; Mark R. Proctor; Marcie S. Rubin; Raymond W. Sze; Terrance A. Yemen; Eric Arnaud; Scott P. Bartlett; Jeffrey P. Blount; Anne Boekelheide; Steven R. Buchman; Patricia D. Chibbaro; Mary Michaeleen Cradock; Katrina M. Dipple; Jeffrey A. Fearon; Ann Marie Flannery; Chin-To Fong; Herbert E. Fuchs; Michelle Gittlen; Barry H. Grayson; Mutaz M. Habal; Robert J. Havlik
Background A multidisciplinary meeting was held from March 4 to 6, 2010, in Atlanta, Georgia, entitled “Craniosynostosis: Developing Parameters for Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management.” The goal of this meeting was to create parameters of care for individuals with craniosynostosis. Methods Fifty-two conference attendees represented a broad range of expertise, including anesthesiology, craniofacial surgery, dentistry, genetics, hand surgery, neurosurgery, nursing, ophthalmology, oral and maxillofacial surgery, orthodontics, otolaryngology, pediatrics, psychology, public health, radiology, and speech-language pathology. These attendees also represented 16 professional societies and peer-reviewed journals. The current state of knowledge related to each discipline was reviewed. Based on areas of expertise, four breakout groups were created to reach a consensus and draft specialty-specific parameters of care based on the literature or, in the absence of literature, broad clinical experience. In an iterative manner, the specialty-specific draft recommendations were presented to all conference attendees. Participants discussed the recommendations in multidisciplinary groups to facilitate exchange and consensus across disciplines. After the conference, a pediatric intensivist and social worker reviewed the recommendations. Results Consensus was reached among the 52 conference attendees and two post hoc reviewers. Longitudinal parameters of care were developed for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of craniosynostosis in each of the 18 specialty areas of care from prenatal evaluation to adulthood. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first multidisciplinary effort to develop parameters of care for craniosynostosis. These parameters were designed to help facilitate the development of educational programs for the patient, families, and health-care professionals; stimulate the creation of a national database and registry to promote research, especially in the area of outcome studies; improve credentialing of interdisciplinary craniofacial clinical teams; and improve the availability of health insurance coverage for all individuals with craniosynostosis.
Neuromuscular Disorders | 2013
Anne M. Connolly; Julaine Florence; Mary Michaeleen Cradock; Elizabeth C. Malkus; Jeanine Schierbecker; Catherine Siener; Charlie Wulf; Pallavi Anand; Paul T. Golumbek; Craig M. Zaidman; J. Philip Miller; Linda Lowes; Lindsay Alfano; Laurence Viollet-Callendret; Kevin M. Flanigan; Craig M. McDonald; E. Goude; Linda Johnson; Alina Nicorici; Peter I. Karachunski; John W. Day; Joline Dalton; Janey M. Farber; Karen K. Buser; Basil T. Darras; Peter B. Kang; Susan Riley; Elizabeth Shriber; Rebecca Parad; Kate Bushby
Therapeutic trials in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) exclude young boys because traditional outcome measures rely on cooperation. The Bayley III Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley III) have been validated in developing children and those with developmental disorders but have not been studied in DMD. Expanded Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale (HFMSE) and North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) may also be useful in this young DMD population. Clinical evaluators from the MDA-DMD Clinical Research Network were trained in these assessment tools. Infants and boys with DMD (n = 24; 1.9 ± 0.7 years) were assessed. The mean Bayley III motor composite score was low (82.8 ± 8; p ≤ .0001) (normal = 100 ± 15). Mean gross motor and fine motor function scaled scores were low (both p ≤ .0001). The mean cognitive comprehensive (p=.0002), receptive language (p ≤ .0001), and expressive language (p = .0001) were also low compared to normal children. Age was negatively associated with Bayley III gross motor (r = -0.44; p = .02) but not with fine motor, cognitive, or language scores. HFMSE (n=23) showed a mean score of 31 ± 13. NSAA (n = 18 boys; 2.2 ± 0.4 years) showed a mean score of 12 ± 5. Outcome assessments of young boys with DMD are feasible and in this multicenter study were best demonstrated using the Bayley III.
Pediatrics | 2015
Matthew L. Speltz; Brent R. Collett; Erin R. Wallace; Jacqueline R. Starr; Mary Michaeleen Cradock; Lauren Buono; Michael J. Cunningham; Kathleen A. Kapp-Simon
OBJECTIVE: We compared the developmental status of school-age children with single-suture craniosynostosis (case group) and unaffected children (control group). Within the case group we compared the performance of children distinguished by location of suture fusion (sagittal, metopic, unicoronal, lambdoid). METHODS: We administered standardized tests of intelligence, reading, spelling, and math to 182 case participants and 183 control participants. This sample represented 70% of those tested during infancy before case participants had corrective surgery. RESULTS: After adjustment for demographics, case participants’ average scores were lower than those of control participants on all measures. The largest observed differences were in Full-Scale IQ and math computation, where case participants’ adjusted mean scores were 2.5 to 4 points lower than those of control participants (Ps ranged from .002 to .09). Adjusted mean case–control differences on other measures of achievement were modest, although case deficits became more pronounced after adjustment for participation in developmental interventions. Among case participants, 58% had no discernible learning problem (score <25th percentile on a standardized achievement test). Children with metopic, unicoronal, and lambdoid synostosis tended to score lower on most measures than did children with sagittal fusions (Ps ranged from <.001 to .82). CONCLUSIONS: The developmental delays observed among infants with single-suture craniosynostosis are partially evident at school age, as manifested by lower average scores than those of control participants on measures of IQ and math. However, case participants’ average scores were only slightly lower than those of control participants on reading and spelling measures, and the frequency of specific learning problems was comparable. Among case participants, those with unicoronal and lambdoid fusions appear to be the most neurodevelopmentally vulnerable.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | 2012
Kathleen A. Kapp-Simon; Brent R. Collett; Michael A. Barr-Schinzel; Mary Michaeleen Cradock; Lauren Buono; Kristen E. Pietila; Matthew L. Speltz
Background: The purpose of this study was to confirm initial reports of elevated behavior problems in children with single-suture craniosynostosis, using multiple informants, longitudinal analyses, and a control group. The authors hypothesized that children with single-suture craniosynostosis would have higher levels of maladjustment than comparison children, particularly at the older age and in selected areas of previously observed vulnerability: attention and social adjustment. Methods: The Child Behavior Checklist was completed by 436 mothers (219 with single-suture craniosynostosis) and 371 fathers (177 with single-suture craniosynostosis) when children were aged approximately 19 months, and by 361 mothers (175 with single-suture craniosynostosis) and 303 fathers (142 with single-suture craniosynostosis) when children were aged approximately 37 months. A minimum of one caregiver/teacher report was available for 169 of these children (74 with single-suture craniosynostosis) using the Caregiver-Teacher Report Form. Results: Average Child Behavior Checklist/Caregiver-Teacher Report Form externalizing, internalizing, and total scores for all informants were consistently higher (worse) for children with single-suture craniosynostosis than for control group children, but most differences were small and statistically nonsignificant. No differences associated with suture site were found. At the oldest age point, both mothers and fathers (but not teachers) generated higher average scores for patients than for controls on scales measuring attention and social problems, with small to medium effect sizes (0.20 to 0.32). Conclusions: On average, toddlers/preschoolers with single-suture craniosynostosis show behavioral development that is largely indistinguishable from same-aged peers of similar socioeconomic background. The predictive significance of small group differences in attention and social adjustment will be assessed in a follow-up of this cohort at age 7. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, I.
Pediatric Neurology | 2014
Anne M. Connolly; Julaine Florence; Mary Michaeleen Cradock; Michelle Eagle; Kevin M. Flanigan; Craig M. McDonald; Peter I. Karachunski; Basil T. Darras; Kate Bushby; Elizabeth C. Malkus; Paul T. Golumbek; Craig M. Zaidman; J. Philip Miller
BACKGROUND The pathogenesis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy starts before birth. Despite this, clinical trials exclude young boys because traditional outcome measures rely on cooperation. We recently used the Bayley-III Scales of Infant and Toddler Development to study 24 infants and boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Clinical evaluators at six centers were trained and certified to perform the Bayley-III. Here, we report 6- and 12-month follow-up of two subsets of these boys. PATIENTS Nineteen boys (1.9 ± 0.8 years) were assessed at baseline and 6 months. Twelve boys (1.5 ± 0.8 years) were assessed at baseline, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS Gross motor scores were lower at baseline compared with published controls (6.2 ± 1.7; normal 10 ± 3; P < 0.0001) and revealed a further declining trend to 5.7 ± 1.7 (P = 0.20) at 6 months. Repeated measures analysis of the 12 boys monitored for 12 months revealed that gross motor scores, again low at baseline (6.6 ± 1.7; P < 0.0001), declined at 6 months (5.9 ± 1.8) and further at 12 months (5.3 ± 2.0) (P = 0.11). Cognitive and language scores were lower at baseline compared with normal children (range, P = 0.002-<0.0001) and did not change significantly at 6 or 12 months (range, P = 0.89-0.09). Fine motor skills, also low at baseline, improved >1 year (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION Development can reliably be measured in infants and young boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy across time using the Bayley-III. Power calculations using these data reveal that motor development may be used as an outcome measure.
Child Neuropsychology | 2008
Karen Toth; Brent R. Collett; Kathleen A. Kapp-Simon; Yona K. Cloonan; Rebecca Gaither; Mary Michaeleen Cradock; Lauren Buono; Michael L. Cunningham; Geraldine Dawson; Jacqueline R. Starr; Matthew L. Speltz
Using two versions of the A-not-B task, memory and response inhibition were assessed in 17- to 24-month-old children with surgically corrected single-suture craniosynostosis (cases) and unaffected children (controls). Childrens development and language were initially assessed on average at 6–7 months of age and again at this second visit. Cases and controls performed at equivalent levels on average, with cases performing slightly better than controls on several of the variables measured. However, fewer cases than controls were able to complete the more challenging of the two tasks, which may have predictive significance for later functioning. Childrens age and cognitive ability were related to successful performance on the A-not-B task. Among cases, age of cranioplastic surgery was unrelated to performance. Our findings suggest that children with single-suture craniosynostosis show normal development of visual memory and response inhibition in the age range studied here.
Journal of Neurosurgery | 2016
Kathleen A. Kapp-Simon; Erin R. Wallace; Brent R. Collett; Mary Michaeleen Cradock; Canice E. Crerand; Matthew L. Speltz
OBJECTIVE The language and memory functions of children with and without single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC) were compared at school age (mean 7.45 years, standard deviation [SD] 0.54 years). The children in this cohort were originally recruited in infancy and prior to cranial surgery for those with SSC. METHODS Individual evaluations of 179 school-aged children with SSC and 183 controls were conducted (70% of the original cohort) using standardized measures of language, learning, and memory. Parents participated in an interview about specialized education interventions and school progress. Parents and teachers completed questionnaires about language development. RESULTS Children with SSC (cases) obtained lower scores than controls on all measures. The adjusted differences in language, learning, and memory scores were modest, with SD ranging from 0.0 to -0.4 (p values ranged from 0.001 to 0.99). Censored normal regression was used to account for intervention services received prior to the school-age evaluation; this increased case-control differences (SD range 0.1 to -0.5, p value range 0.001 to 0.50). Mean scores for cases in each SSC diagnostic group were lower than those for controls, with the greatest differences observed among children with unilateral coronal craniosynostosis. CONCLUSIONS Children with SSC continue to show poorer performance than controls on language, learning, and memory tasks at early elementary school age, even when controlling for known confounders, although mean differences are small. Multidisciplinary care, including direct psychological assessment, for children with SSC should extend through school age with a specific focus on language and conceptual learning, as these are areas of potential risk. Future research is needed to investigate language, memory, and learning for this population during the middle to high school years.
Child Neuropsychology | 2017
Brent R. Collett; Kathleen A. Kapp-Simon; Erin R. Wallace; Mary Michaeleen Cradock; Lauren Buono; Matthew L. Speltz
Children with single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC) have higher rates of learning disabilities and related neurocognitive problems than unaffected peers. Executive function (EF) and attention are thought to be areas of particular vulnerability, though studies to date have been limited by small sample sizes and a lack of control groups. We evaluated 179 school-aged children with SSC (cases) and 183 unaffected controls at an average age of 7 years using clinician-administered and parent and teacher report measures of EF and attention. Among children with SSC, we examined differences as a function of suture location (sagittal, metopic, unicoronal, or lambdoid) and age of corrective surgery. We used linear regression analyses, adjusted for potential confounders, to compare the two groups on all outcome measures. Cases scored lower than controls on most measures, though the magnitude of these differences was small and most were statistically insignificant. The largest relative deficit was on a measure of inhibitory control. Results changed little in sensitivity analyses adjusting for potential attrition bias and for the effects of developmental and academic interventions. Among cases, there were few differences in relation to the location of suture fusion or timing of surgery. Overall, we found limited evidence of broad deficits in EF or attention in children with SSC relative to unaffected controls. Neurocognitive development for children with SSC appears to be variable, across affected children and outcomes assessed. Further research is needed to understand the potential sources of this variability.
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal | 2015
Kristen E. Gray; Mary Michaeleen Cradock; Kathleen A. Kapp-Simon; Brent R. Collett; Lynette D. Pullmann; Matthew L. Speltz
Objective To examine longitudinal differences in reported stress between parents of children with and without single-suture craniosynostosis and to compare the stress reports of mothers and fathers. Design Multi-site, nonrandomized prospective study. Setting/Participants Children with single-suture craniosynostosis (cases) were identified via referral of the treating surgeon or physician at the time of diagnosis, and those without single-suture craniosynostosis (controls) were recruited from pediatric practices, birthing centers, and announcements in print media. When children were aged 6, 18, and 36 months (on average), mothers and fathers of children with and without single-suture craniosynostosis completed the Parenting Stress Index. For cases, 247 mothers and 211 fathers completed the Parenting Stress Index at the first visit; corresponding numbers for controls were 254 and 220, respectively. Main Outcome Measures The Parenting Stress Index Parent and Child Domains and subscales scores. Results We found few differences between parents of infants with and without single-suture craniosynostosis, regardless of parent gender. Irrespective of case status, mothers consistently reported higher stress than fathers on the Parent Domain. Within the Parent Domain, mothers reported more stress than fathers on the Role Restriction and Spousal Support subscales. Conclusions The parents of children with single-suture craniosynostosis reported levels of stress similar to those reported by parents of same-aged, unaffected children. Mothers reported greater stress than fathers, and these differences remained remarkably stable over time. This may reflect widely held perceptions of gender differences in parenting roles.