Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mary Porteous is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mary Porteous.


Nature Genetics | 1996

Mutations in the activin receptor–like kinase 1 gene in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia type 2

David W. Johnson; Jonathan Berg; Melanie A. Baldwin; Carol J. Gallione; Ivonne Marondel; S.-J. Yoon; Timothy T. Stenzel; Marcy C. Speer; Margaret A. Pericak-Vance; A. Diamond; Alan E. Guttmacher; Charles E. Jackson; L. Attisano; Raju Kucherlapati; Mary Porteous; Douglas A. Marchuk

Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia, or Osler–Rendu–Weber (ORW) syndrome, is an autosomal dominant vascular dysplasia. So far, two loci have been demonstrated for ORW. Linkage studies established an ORW locus at chromosome 9q3; endoglin was subsequently identified as the ORW1 gene. A second locus, designated ORW2, was mapped to chromosome 12. Here we report a new 4 cM interval for ORW2 that does not overlap with any previously defined. A 1.38–Mb YAC contig spans the entire interval. It includes the activin receptor like kinase 1 gene (ACVRLK1 or ALKI), a member of the serine–threonine kinase receptor family expressed in endothelium. We report three mutations in the coding sequence of the ALK1 gene in those families which show linkage of the ORW phenotype to chromosome 12. Our data suggest a critical role for ALK1 in the control of blood vessel development or repair.


BMJ | 1998

Integrated care pathways

Harry Campbell; Rona Hotchkiss; Nicola Bradshaw; Mary Porteous

Integrated care pathways are structured multidisciplinary care plans which detail essential steps in the care of patients with a specific clinical problem. They have been proposed as a way of encouraging the translation of national guidelines into local protocols and their subsequent application to clinical practice. They are also a means of improving systematic collection and abstraction of clinical data for audit and of promoting change in practice. The degree to which they succeed in realising this potential for improving patient care is still uncertain, but enough evidence exists in their favour to justify more widespread evaluation of their impact. Here we describe integrated care pathways, show how to create and use them, and review the evidence of their effectiveness. Many initiatives have been introduced in the past two decades to improve clinical effectiveness and thereby patient care. Foremost among these have been clinical guidelines and clinical audit. Concern is regularly expressed, however, that the commitment and enthusiasm of the groups publishing their experience is a major determinant of their success. There are also related concerns about the opportunity costs of audit and guidelines projects. Guidelines development—literature review, critical appraisal, multidisciplinary consultation, and grading of recommendations by level of evidence—is labour intensive. Support is now available from several sources,1 2 but less attention and support is given to translating established guidelines into local management protocols and their subsequent implementation.3 even though the impact of clinical guidelines in improving clinical practice will largely be determined by progress in these areas. Audit projects often fail to realise their potential because the improved practice identified by the audit is not implemented or, if implemented, its effect is not evaluated. Integrated care pathways—also known as coordinated care pathways, care maps, or anticipated recovery pathways—are task orientated care plans which detail essential steps …


Nature Genetics | 2007

Genome-wide association scan identifies a colorectal cancer susceptibility locus on chromosome 8q24

Brent W. Zanke; Celia M. T. Greenwood; Jagadish Rangrej; Rafal Kustra; Albert Tenesa; Susan M. Farrington; James Prendergast; Sylviane Olschwang; Theodore Chiang; Edgar Crowdy; Vincent Ferretti; Philippe Laflamme; Saravanan Sundararajan; Stéphanie Roumy; Jean François Olivier; Frédérick Robidoux; Robert Sladek; Alexandre Montpetit; Peter J. Campbell; Stéphane Bézieau; Anne Marie O'Shea; George Zogopoulos; Michelle Cotterchio; Polly A. Newcomb; John R. McLaughlin; Ban Younghusband; Roger C. Green; Jane Green; Mary Porteous; Harry Campbell

Using a multistage genetic association approach comprising 7,480 affected individuals and 7,779 controls, we identified markers in chromosomal region 8q24 associated with colorectal cancer. In stage 1, we genotyped 99,632 SNPs in 1,257 affected individuals and 1,336 controls from Ontario. In stages 2–4, we performed serial replication studies using 4,024 affected individuals and 4,042 controls from Seattle, Newfoundland and Scotland. We identified one locus on chromosome 8q24 and another on 9p24 having combined odds ratios (OR) for stages 1–4 of 1.18 (trend; P = 1.41 × 10−8) and 1.14 (trend; P = 1.32 × 10−5), respectively. Additional analyses in 2,199 affected individuals and 2,401 controls from France and Europe supported the association at the 8q24 locus (OR = 1.16, trend; 95% confidence interval (c.i.): 1.07–1.26; P = 5.05 × 10−4). A summary across all seven studies at the 8q24 locus was highly significant (OR = 1.17, c.i.: 1.12–1.23; P = 3.16 × 10−11). This locus has also been implicated in prostate cancer.


Nature Genetics | 2008

Genome-wide association scan identifies a colorectal cancer susceptibility locus on 11q23 and replicates risk loci at 8q24 and 18q21.

Albert Tenesa; Susan M. Farrington; James Prendergast; Mary Porteous; Marion Walker; Naila Haq; Rebecca A. Barnetson; Evropi Theodoratou; Roseanne Cetnarskyj; Nicola Cartwright; Colin A. Semple; Andy Clark; Fiona Reid; Lorna Smith; Thibaud Koessler; Paul Pharoah; Stephan Buch; Clemens Schafmayer; Jürgen Tepel; Stefan Schreiber; Henry Völzke; Carsten Schmidt; Jochen Hampe; Jenny Chang-Claude; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner; Stefan Wilkening; Federico Canzian; Gabriel Capellá; Victor Moreno

In a genome-wide association study to identify loci associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, we genotyped 555,510 SNPs in 1,012 early-onset Scottish CRC cases and 1,012 controls (phase 1). In phase 2, we genotyped the 15,008 highest-ranked SNPs in 2,057 Scottish cases and 2,111 controls. We then genotyped the five highest-ranked SNPs from the joint phase 1 and 2 analysis in 14,500 cases and 13,294 controls from seven populations, and identified a previously unreported association, rs3802842 on 11q23 (OR = 1.1; P = 5.8 × 10−10), showing population differences in risk. We also replicated and fine-mapped associations at 8q24 (rs7014346; OR = 1.19; P = 8.6 × 10−26) and 18q21 (rs4939827; OR = 1.2; P = 7.8 × 10−28). Risk was greater for rectal than for colon cancer for rs3802842 (P < 0.008) and rs4939827 (P < 0.009). Carrying all six possible risk alleles yielded OR = 2.6 (95% CI = 1.75–3.89) for CRC. These findings extend our understanding of the role of common genetic variation in CRC etiology.


Nature Genetics | 2008

Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies four new susceptibility loci for colorectal cancer

Richard S. Houlston; Emily L. Webb; Peter Broderick; Alan Pittman; Maria Chiara Di Bernardo; Steven Lubbe; Ian Chandler; Jayaram Vijayakrishnan; Kate Sullivan; Steven Penegar; Luis Carvajal-Carmona; Kimberley Howarth; Emma Jaeger; Sarah L. Spain; Axel Walther; Ella Barclay; Lynn Martin; Maggie Gorman; Enric Domingo; Ana Teixeira; David Kerr; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; Iina Niittymäki; Sari Tuupanen; Auli Karhu; Lauri A. Aaltonen; Ian Tomlinson; Susan M. Farrington; Albert Tenesa; James Prendergast

Genome-wide association (GWA) studies have identified multiple loci at which common variants modestly influence the risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC). To enhance power to identify additional loci with similar effect sizes, we conducted a meta-analysis of two GWA studies, comprising 13,315 individuals genotyped for 38,710 common tagging SNPs. We undertook replication testing in up to eight independent case-control series comprising 27,418 subjects. We identified four previously unreported CRC risk loci at 14q22.2 (rs4444235, BMP4; P = 8.1 × 10−10), 16q22.1 (rs9929218, CDH1; P = 1.2 × 10−8), 19q13.1 (rs10411210, RHPN2; P = 4.6 × 10−9) and 20p12.3 (rs961253; P = 2.0 × 10−10). These findings underscore the value of large sample series for discovery and follow-up of genetic variants contributing to the etiology of CRC.


Journal of Medical Genetics | 2011

International guidelines for the diagnosis and management of hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia

Marie E. Faughnan; V A Palda; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; U W Geisthoff; Jamie McDonald; Deborah D. Proctor; J Spears; D H Brown; E Buscarini; M S Chesnutt; Vincent Cottin; Arupa Ganguly; James R. Gossage; A E Guttmacher; R H Hyland; S Kennedy; Joshua R. Korzenik; Johannes Jurgen Mager; A P Ozanne; Jay F. Piccirillo; Daniel Picus; H Plauchu; Mary Porteous; Reed E. Pyeritz; Ross Da; C Sabba; Karen L. Swanson; P Terry; M C Wallace; Cornelius J.J. Westermann

Background HHT is an autosomal dominant disease with an estimated prevalence of at least 1/5000 which can frequently be complicated by the presence of clinically significant arteriovenous malformations in the brain, lung, gastrointestinal tract and liver. HHT is under-diagnosed and families may be unaware of the available screening and treatment, leading to unnecessary stroke and life-threatening hemorrhage in children and adults. Objective The goal of this international HHT guidelines process was to develop evidence-informed consensus guidelines regarding the diagnosis of HHT and the prevention of HHT-related complications and treatment of symptomatic disease. Methods The overall guidelines process was developed using the AGREE framework, using a systematic search strategy and literature retrieval with incorporation of expert evidence in a structured consensus process where published literature was lacking. The Guidelines Working Group included experts (clinical and genetic) from eleven countries, in all aspects of HHT, guidelines methodologists, health care workers, health care administrators, HHT clinic staff, medical trainees, patient advocacy representatives and patients with HHT. The Working Group determined clinically relevant questions during the pre-conference process. The literature search was conducted using the OVID MEDLINE database, from 1966 to October 2006. The Working Group subsequently convened at the Guidelines Conference to partake in a structured consensus process using the evidence tables generated from the systematic searches. Results The outcome of the conference was the generation of 33 recommendations for the diagnosis and management of HHT, with at least 80% agreement amongst the expert panel for 30 of the 33 recommendations.


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2013

Cancer Risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Results From Prospective Analysis of EMBRACE

Nasim Mavaddat; Susan Peock; Debra Frost; Steve Ellis; Radka Platte; Elena Fineberg; D. Gareth Evans; Louise Izatt; Rosalind Eeles; Julian Adlard; Rosemarie Davidson; Diana Eccles; Trevor Cole; Jackie Cook; Carole Brewer; Marc Tischkowitz; Fiona Douglas; Shirley Hodgson; Lisa Walker; Mary Porteous; Patrick J. Morrison; Lucy Side; M. John Kennedy; Catherine Houghton; Alan Donaldson; Mark T. Rogers; Huw Dorkins; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; Helen Gregory; Jacqueline Eason

BACKGROUND Reliable estimates of cancer risk are critical for guiding management of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. The aims of this study were to derive penetrance estimates for breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and contralateral breast cancer in a prospective series of mutation carriers and to assess how these risks are modified by common breast cancer susceptibility alleles. METHODS Prospective cancer risks were estimated using a cohort of 978 BRCA1 and 909 BRCA2 carriers from the United Kingdom. Nine hundred eighty-eight women had no breast or ovarian cancer diagnosis at baseline, 1509 women were unaffected by ovarian cancer, and 651 had been diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer. Cumulative risks were obtained using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Associations between cancer risk and covariables of interest were evaluated using Cox regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS The average cumulative risks by age 70 years for BRCA1 carriers were estimated to be 60% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 44% to 75%) for breast cancer, 59% (95% CI = 43% to 76%) for ovarian cancer, and 83% (95% CI = 69% to 94%) for contralateral breast cancer. For BRCA2 carriers, the corresponding risks were 55% (95% CI = 41% to 70%) for breast cancer, 16.5% (95% CI = 7.5% to 34%) for ovarian cancer, and 62% (95% CI = 44% to 79.5%) for contralateral breast cancer. BRCA2 carriers in the highest tertile of risk, defined by the joint genotype distribution of seven single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with breast cancer risk, were at statistically significantly higher risk of developing breast cancer than those in the lowest tertile (hazard ratio = 4.1, 95% CI = 1.2 to 14.5; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS Prospective risk estimates confirm that BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers are at high risk of developing breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer. Our results confirm findings from retrospective studies that common breast cancer susceptibility alleles in combination are predictive of breast cancer risk for BRCA2 carriers.


Nature Genetics | 2011

Germline mutations in RAD51D confer susceptibility to ovarian cancer

Chey Loveday; Clare Turnbull; Emma Ramsay; Deborah Hughes; Elise Ruark; Jessica Frankum; Georgina Bowden; Bolot Kalmyrzaev; Margaret Warren-Perry; Katie Snape; Julian Adlard; Julian Barwell; Jonathan Berg; Angela F. Brady; Carole Brewer; G Brice; Cyril Chapman; Jackie Cook; Rosemarie Davidson; Alan Donaldson; Fiona Douglas; Lynn Greenhalgh; Alex Henderson; Louise Izatt; Ajith Kumar; Fiona Lalloo; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; Patrick J. Morrison; Joan Paterson; Mary Porteous

Recently, RAD51C mutations were identified in families with breast and ovarian cancer. This observation prompted us to investigate the role of RAD51D in cancer susceptibility. We identified eight inactivating RAD51D mutations in unrelated individuals from 911 breast-ovarian cancer families compared with one inactivating mutation identified in 1,060 controls (P = 0.01). The association found here was principally with ovarian cancer, with three mutations identified in the 59 pedigrees with three or more individuals with ovarian cancer (P = 0.0005). The relative risk of ovarian cancer for RAD51D mutation carriers was estimated to be 6.30 (95% CI 2.86–13.85, P = 4.8 × 10−6). By contrast, we estimated the relative risk of breast cancer to be 1.32 (95% CI 0.59–2.96, P = 0.50). These data indicate that RAD51D mutation testing may have clinical utility in individuals with ovarian cancer and their families. Moreover, we show that cells deficient in RAD51D are sensitive to treatment with a PARP inhibitor, suggesting a possible therapeutic approach for cancers arising in RAD51D mutation carriers.


Cell | 1994

Isolation and characterization of the faciogenital dysplasia (Aarskog-Scott syndrome) gene: a putative Rho/Rac guanine nucleotide exchange factor.

N.German Pasteris; Amy B. Cadle; Lindsay J. Logie; Mary Porteous; Charles E. Schwartz; Roger E. Stevenson; Thomas W. Glover; R. Sid Wilroy; Jerome L. Gorski

Faciogenital dysplasia (FGDY), also known as Aarskog-Scott syndrome, is an X-linked developmental disorder characterized by disproportionately short stature and by facial, skeletal, and urogenital anomalies. Molecular genetic analyses mapped FGDY to chromosome Xp11.21. To clone this gene, YAC clones spanning an FGDY-specific translocation breakpoint were isolated. An isolated cDNA, FGD1, is disrupted by the breakpoint, and FGD1 mutations cosegregate with the disease. FGD1 codes for a 961 amino acid protein that has strong homology to Rho/Rac guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), contains a cysteine-rich zinc finger-like region, and, like the RasGEF mSos, contains two potential SH3-binding sites. These results provide compelling evidence that FGD1 is responsible for FGDY and suggest that FGD1 is a Rho/RacGEF involved in mammalian development.


American Journal of Human Genetics | 2005

Germline susceptibility to colorectal cancer due to base-excision repair gene defects.

Susan M. Farrington; Albert Tenesa; Rebecca A. Barnetson; Alice Wiltshire; James Prendergast; Mary Porteous; Harry Campbell; Malcolm G. Dunlop

DNA repair is a key process in the maintenance of genome integrity. Here, we present a large, systematically collected population-based association study (2,239 cases; 1,845 controls) that explores the contribution to colorectal cancer incidence of inherited defects in base-excision repair (BER) genes. We show that biallelic MUTYH defects impart a 93-fold (95% CI 42-213) excess risk of colorectal cancer, which accounts for 0.8% of cases aged <55 years and 0.54% of the entire cohort. Penetrance for homozygous carriers was almost complete by age 60 years. Significantly more biallelic carriers had coexisting adenomatous polyps. However, notably, 36% of biallelic carriers had no polyps. Three patients with heterozygous MUTYH defects carried monoallelic mutations in other BER genes (OGG1 and MTH1). Recessive inheritance accounted for the elevated risk for those aged <55 years. However, there was also a 1.68-fold (95% CI 1.07-2.95) excess risk for heterozygous carriers aged >55 years, with a population attributable risk in this age group of 0.93% (95% CI 0%-2.0%). These data provide the strongest evidence to date for a causative role of BER defects in colorectal cancer etiology and show, to our knowledge for the first time, that heterozygous MUTYH mutations predispose to colorectal cancer later in life. These findings have clinical relevance for BER gene testing for patients with colorectal cancer and for genetic counseling of their relatives.

Collaboration


Dive into the Mary Porteous's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan Holloway

Western General Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge