Mary Whitehouse

A Comparison of Arthropod Communities in Transgenic Bt and Conventional Cotton in Australia

Abstract Transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton has had a major impact on the Australian cotton industry by largely controlling lepidopteran pests. However, it also may have other impacts on the invertebrate community that need to be identified. We compared the canopy invertebrate community in sprayed conventional, unsprayed conventional, and unsprayed Bt cotton over three seasons using suction sampling methods. We found that the diversity or species richness of the beneficial communities was reduced in the sprayed crops at two sites. Although spraying had the strongest effect on the community, there was a slight difference between the total community in unsprayed conventional and Bt crops, with crop type accounting for 4.5% of the variance between these communities. Out of over 100 species groups examined, the most consistent differences between unsprayed Bt and conventional communities were higher numbers of Helicoverpa in conventional crops (as would be expected) and slightly higher numbers of Chloropidae and Drosopillidae (Diptera), damsel bugs (Hemiptera, Nabidae), and jassids (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae) in conventional crops. With the advent of Bollgard II and the possibility that 80% of the cotton crop in Australia could be transgenic, the effects of these small differences in the transgenic and conventional communities should be monitored over the long-term to assess if any modifications to cotton management practices need to be made.

Target and non-target effects on the invertebrate community of Vip cotton, a new insecticidal transgenic

A new transgenic cotton producing the Vegetative Insecticidal Protein (Vip) is being developed to control Lepidopteran pests, especially Helicoverpa larvae. Before its introduction its efficacy against Helicoverpa larvae under field conditions needs to be confirmed, and any non-target effects it may have on the arthropod community need to be identified. We conducted field trials to compare the arthropod community in unsprayed conventional (Sicala 40) and Vip (Coker 312 Vip3A, event 102) cotton using visual searches, beatsheets, and suction samplers at 2 sites in Australia. At both sites, Vip controlled Helicoverpa larvae leading to much higher boll counts. There were no major differences in either species richness or diversity of the beneficial and non-target communities between Vip and conventional cotton, although cotton cultivar accounted for 2–7% of the variance in arthropod communities. There was no detrimental effect of Vip cotton on egg parasitoids. The number of predatory beetles and the pest mirid Creotiades dilutus (Stal) was higher in the Vip, although the increase in mirids was probably the result of more food (bolls) in the Vip crop. In a small plot experiment, we found higher numbers of whitefly in Vip, but this may be driven by differences in leaf hair between the cotton cultivars. Vip cotton appeared to have little effect on the arthropod community other than on Helicoverpa. As such it has the potential to be a useful tool in the management of Helicoverpa and may relieve resistance pressure on existing Bt cultivars (transgenic cotton containing genes for insecticidal Cry proteins), thereby increasing the durability of both technologies.

IPM in the transgenic era: a review of the challenges from emerging pests in Australian cotton systems

Abstract. The Cotton Catchment Communities Cooperative Research Centre began during a period of rapid uptake of Bollgard II® cotton, which contains genes to express two Bt proteins that control the primary pests of cotton in Australia, Helicoverpa armigera and H. punctigera. The dramatic uptake of this technology presumably resulted in strong selection pressure for resistance in Helicoverpa spp. against the Bt proteins. The discovery of higher than expected levels of resistance in both species against one of the proteins in Bollgard II® cotton (Cry2Ab) led to significant re-evaluation of the resistance management plan developed for this technology, which was a core area of research for the Cotton CRC. The uptake of Bollgard II® cotton also led to a substantial decline in pesticide applications against Helicoverpa spp. (from 10–14 to 0–3 applications per season). The low spray environment allowed some pests not controlled by the Bt proteins to emerge as more significant pests, especially sucking species such as Creontiades dilutus and Nezara viridula. A range of other minor pests have also sporadically arisen as problems. Lack of knowledge and experience with these pests created uncertainty and encouraged insecticide use, which threatened to undermine the gains made with Bollgard II® cotton. Here we chronicle the achievements of the Cotton CRC in providing the industry with new knowledge and management strategies for these pests.

Argyrodes: Phylogeny, sociality and interspecific interactions: A report on the Argyrodes Symposium, Badplaas 2001

Abstract Argyrodes Simon 1864 is a large, cosmopolitan theridiid genus whose members exhibit a wide range of foraging techniques which usually involve exploiting other spiders, either by using their webs, stealing their food, or preying on them directly. We held a symposium on this genus at the 15th International Congress of Arachnology, Badplaas, South Africa in order to obtain a clearer perspective on the relationship between the phylogeny of the genus and the different foraging techniques. We concluded that Argyrodes forms a monophyletic group within the Theridiidae, and that there are clear monophyletic clades within the genus (already identified as species groups) that appear to share behavioral characteristics. We found no clear indication that foraging behaviors such as kleptoparasitism (stealing food) evolved from araneophagy (eating spiders) or vice versa. However, it appears that species that specialize in either kleptoparasitism or araneophagy use additional techniques in comparison to species that readily use both foraging modes. During our examination of Argyrodes/host interactions we noted the importance of Nephila species as hosts of Argyrodes species around the world and the impact of Argyrodes on Nephila. We also noted the fluid nature of the relationship between Argyrodes and the spiders with which they interact. For example, an Argyrodes/host relationship can change to an Argyrodes/prey relationship, and the type of kleptoparasitic behavior employed by an Argyrodes can change when it changes host species. The importance of eating silk was also noted and identified as an area for further research. We concluded that more work involving international collaboration is needed to fully understand the phylogeny of the genus and the relationships between the different types of foraging behaviors.

Food consumption rates and competition in a communally feeding social spider, Stegodyphus dumicola (Eresidae).

Abstract A major factor which affects an animals consumption rate is competition for food items. Competition usually results in a drop in consumption rate; however, this may be counteracted if the animals can exploit the foraging efforts of others, as could occur in social spiders when feeding on the same prey item. Spiders digest prey extra-orally and might utilize the enzymes or digesta produced by other individuals feeding from the same prey item. We investigated prey consumption in the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola to determine if the rate of consumption of individual spiders changed in the presence of competitors. We found that when one spider fed on small prey, food consumption rate decreased with feeding duration. When the prey was larger in relation to the spider there was an initial delay in consumption. There was no apparent advantage for a second spider to feed on a prey item already being consumed: the second spider fed for less time and gained less mass. These results indicate that social spiders compete during the process of food ingestion and the presence of another spider reduces the value of the prey item to a subsequent forager.

Transgenic Cotton for Sustainable Pest Management: A Review

Transgenic cotton has significantly altered pest control in this crop during the last decade. Cotton was one of the first widely cultivated Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant (Ht) transgenic plants. Over 300 transgenic cotton varieties expressing single or dual Bt proteins targeting lepidopteron larvae, as well as pyramided varieties with herbicide tolerance, are available to growers. Potential negative impacts of transgenic plants, however, have generated concerns over deploying these plants over extensive crop areas, such as those occupied by cotton. Nearly 8% of 33.8 million hectares has been cultivated with Bt cotton with the trend to increase in future seasons. Hence, weediness, gene flow, and impact on nontarget organisms by Bt and Ht cotton have been closely studied during the past decade. Despite justifiable concerns over potential risks, the data show neither a significant negative impact nor the development of field resistance by cotton pests. Results of nontarget impact registered four negative impacts on natural enemies, which are discussed here. No weediness and gene flow have been shown in over 333 published results, although little data exist for the risks of gene flow. Regarding insect resistance, several factors underline resistance appearance in field population, including species biology and interactions with the environmental conditions population. Modeling of the evolution of resistance in a field population to Bt proteins has been conducted and the use of single or dual Bt protein varieties might reach some failure due to resistance depending on gene frequency-conferring resistance in the population. Planting transgenic cotton, therefore, requires effort and vigilance to ensure sustainability of the system, including the planting of mandatory refuges and monitoring insect and weed resistance. This article presents and discusses seven sections beyond an introductory section: What is a transgenic plant, conventional and transgenic plant breeding methods in insect-resistant cotton, how transgenic cottons were developed (Bollgard®, WideStrike®, VipCot® and herbicide tolerant cottons), potential nontarget effects of Bt cottons, resistance and resistance management, Bt cotton perspective in Brazil, and the future of transgenic and pest management in cotton.

Target and Nontarget Effects of Novel “Triple-Stacked” Bt-Transgenic Cotton 1: Canopy Arthropod Communities

ABSTRACT Transgenic cotton varieties (Bollgard II) expressing two proteins (Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab) from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) have been widely adopted in Australia to control larvae of Helicoverpa. A triple-stacked Bt-transgenic cotton producing Cry1Ac, Cry2Ab, and Vip3A proteins (Genuity Bollgard III) is being developed to reduce the chance that Helicoverpa will develop resistance to the Bt proteins. Before its introduction, nontarget effects on the agro-ecosystem need to be evaluated under field conditions. By using beatsheet and suction sampling methods, we compared the invertebrate communities of unsprayed non-Bt-cotton, Bollgard II, and Bollgard III in five experiments across three sites in Australia. We found significant differences between invertebrate communities of non-Bt and Bt (Bollgard II and Bollgard III) cotton only in experiments where lepidopteran larval abundance was high. In beatsheet samples where lepidopterans were absent (Bt crops), organisms associated with flowers and bolls in Bt-cotton were more abundant. In suction samples, where Lepidoptera were present (i.e., in non-Bt-cotton), organisms associated with damaged plant tissue and frass were more common. Hence in our study, Bt- and non-Bt-cotton communities only differed when sufficient lepidopteran larvae were present to exert both direct and indirect effects on species assemblages. There was no overall significant difference between Bollgard II and III communities, despite the addition of the Vip gene in Bollgard III. Consequently, the use of Bollgard III in Australian cotton provides additional protection against the development of resistance by Helicoverpa to Bt toxins, while having no additional effect on cotton invertebrate communities.

Consumptive and non‐consumptive effects of wolf spiders on cotton bollworms

Larvae of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) that survive on genetically modified Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L., Malvaceae) contribute to the risk of widespread resistance to Bt toxins. Current resistance management techniques include pupae busting, which involves deep tilling of the soil to kill overwintering pupae. Unfortunately, pupae busting runs counter to soil and water conserving techniques, such as minimum tillage. This problem could be relieved with biological control methods, whereby predators attack either larvae going to ground to pupate or moths emerging from the ground. We found that the wolf spider Tasmanicosa leuckartii (Thorell) (Araneae: Lycosidae), a common inhabitant of Australian cotton agroecosystems, is an effective predator of H. armigera, attacking and killing most larvae (66%) and emerging moths (77%) in simple laboratory arenas. Tasmanicosa leuckartii also reduced the number of emerging moths by 66% on average in more structurally complex glasshouse arenas. Males, females, and late‐instar juveniles of T. leuckartii were similarly effective. Tasmanicosa leuckartii also imposed non‐consumptive effects on H. armigera, as when a spider was present larvae in the laboratory areas spent less time on the cotton boll and more time on the soil and more mass was lost from the cotton boll. Increased loss of boll mass likely reflects changes in H. armigera foraging behavior induced by the presence of spiders (indirect non‐consumptive effects). Helicoverpa armigera spent more time as pupae when the spider was present in simple laboratory arenas, but not in more complex glasshouse enclosures. Overall, results indicate that T. leuckartii spiders can be effective predators of H. armigera late instars and moths but also suggest that, under some conditions, the presence of spiders could increase the damage to individual cotton bolls.

Influence of Crop Management and Environmental Factors on Wolf Spider Assemblages (Araneae: Lycosidae) in an Australian Cotton Cropping System

ABSTRACT Wolf spiders (Lycosidae) are the most abundant ground-hunting spiders in the Australian cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) agroecosystems. These spiders have potential in controlling pest bollworms, Helicoverpa spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in minimum-tilled fields. A study was carried out during a wet growing season (2011–2012) in Narrabri, New South Wales, Australia, to determine how different crop rotations and tillage affect wolf spider assemblages in cotton fields. Spider abundance and species richness did not differ significantly between simple plots (no winter crop) and complex plots (cotton—wheat Triticum aestivum L.—vetch Vicia benghalensis L. rotation). However, the wolf spider biodiversity, as expressed by the Shannon—Weaver and Simpsons indices, was significantly higher in complex plots. Higher biodiversity reflected a more even distribution of the most dominant species (Venatrix konei Berland, Hogna crispipes Koch, and Tasmanicosa leuckartii Thorell) and the presence of more rare species in complex plots. T. leuckartii was more abundant in complex plots and appears to be sensitive to farming disturbances, whereas V. konei and H. crispipes were similarly abundant in the two plot types, suggesting higher resilience or recolonizing abilities. The demographic structure of these three species varied through the season, but not between plot types. Environmental variables had a significant effect on spider assemblage, but effects of environment and plot treatment were overshadowed by the seasonal progression of cotton stages. Maintaining a high density and even distribution of wolf spiders that prey on Helicoverpa spp. should be considered as a conservation biological control element when implementing agronomic and pest management strategies.

The Management of Insect Pests in Australian Cotton: An Evolving Story

The Australian cotton industry progressively embraced integrated pest management (IPM) to alleviate escalating insecticide resistance issues. A systems IPM approach was used with core principles that were built around pest ecology/biology and insecticide resistance management; together, these were integrated into a flexible, year-round approach that facilitated easy incorporation of new science, strategies, and pests. The approach emphasized both strategic and tactical elements to reduce pest abundance and rationalize decisions about pest control, with insecticides as a last resort. Industry involvement in developing the approach was vital to embedding IPM within the farming system. Adoption of IPM was facilitated by the introduction of Bt cotton, availability of selective insecticides, economic validation, and an industry-wide extension campaign. Surveys indicate IPM is now embedded in industry, confirming the effectiveness of an industry-led, backed-by-science approach. The amount of insecticide active ingredient applied per hectare against pests has also declined dramatically. Though challenges remain, pest management has transitioned from reactively attempting to eradicate pests from fields to proactively managing them year-round, considering the farm within the wider landscape.