MaryAnne Aitken

Use of community genetic screening to prevent HFE-associated hereditary haemochromatosis

HFE-associated hereditary haemochromatosis is a recessive, iron-overload disorder that affects about one in 200 north Europeans and that can be easily prevented. However, genetic screening for this disease is controversial, and so we assessed whether such screening was suitable for communities. Cheek-brush screening for the Cys282Tyr HFE mutation was offered to individuals in the workplace. Outcomes were assessed by questionnaires before and after testing. 11,307 individuals were screened. We recorded no increase in anxiety in individuals who were homozygous for the Cys282Tyr mutation or non-homozygous. Self-reported tiredness before testing was significantly higher in homozygous participants than in non-homozygous participants (chi2 test, p=0.029). Of the 47 homozygous individuals identified, 46 have taken steps to treat or prevent iron accumulation. Population genetic screening for HFE-associated hereditary haemochromatosis can be practicable and acceptable.

Evaluation of a Tay‐Sachs Disease screening program

Tay‐Sachs Disease (TSD) is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder. TSD is prevalent in the Ashkenazi Jewish population, and carrier screening programs have been implemented worldwide in these communities. A screening program initiated in 1997 involving the Melbourne Jewish community (Australia) incorporated education, counselling and carrier testing of high‐school students aged 15 to 18 years. This study aimed to assess the participation rates, level of knowledge obtained and predicted feelings and attitudes of the students involved. Seven hundred and ten students participated, there was a 67% uptake for testing with a carrier rate of 1 in 28 determined. The level of knowledge of the students following education was high and of relative importance in regard to decision making, as were their feelings and attitudes about genetic testing for carrier status. A significant impediment to test uptake was the need for blood sampling, resulting in a recommendation for the introduction of DNA analysis on cheek brush samples. The evaluation of this program has given a wider scope for further development as well as providing valuable information for the implementation of community screening programs.

Genetics and public health - evolution, or revolution?

During the 19th and early 20th century, public health and genetics shared common ground through similar approaches to health promotion in the population. By the mid-20th century there was a division between public health and genetics, with eugenicists estranged and clinical genetics focused on single gene disorders, usually only relevant to small numbers of people. Now through a common interest in the aetiology of complex diseases such as heart disease and cancer, there is a need for people working in public health and genetics to collaborate. This is not a comfortable convergence for many, particularly those in public health. Nine main concerns are reviewed: fear of eugenics; genetic reductionism; predictive power of genes; non-modifiable risk factors; rights of individuals compared with populations; resource allocation; commercial imperative; discrimination; and understanding and education. This paper aims to contribute to the thinking and discussion about an evolutionary, multidisciplinary approach to understanding, preventing, and treating complex diseases.

‘It is not in my world’: an exploration of attitudes and influences associated with cystic fibrosis carrier screening

Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis has been recommended for pregnant women and their partners, individuals and couples prior to conception, and for people with a family history. Many pilot programmes offering cystic fibrosis carrier screening, most commonly in the prenatal setting, have shown that uptake and acceptability are high. This article explores perspectives of the Victorian community regarding carrier screening for cystic fibrosis prior to offering screening. In particular whether or not such carrier screening should be offered, the best time for offering carrier screening, the information required for making a decision about carrier screening, and how this information can best be provided. A qualitative approach was taken to enable exploration of the views of stakeholders. Four focus groups and 32 interviews were conducted with a total of 68 participants. Participants were in agreement that cystic fibrosis carrier screening should be made available to everyone. However, potential consumers viewed cystic fibrosis carrier screening as ‘not in my world’ and were unlikely to request such screening unless it was offered by a health professional, or they had a family history. The best time for carrier screening was seen to be an individual preference and an information brochure was perceived to be useful when considering carrier screening. Lack of knowledge around the irrelevance of family history is a barrier to cystic fibrosis carrier screening. This study highlights the importance of community consultation, with stakeholders, prior to implementation of carrier screening programmes.

Implementation of HaemScreen, a workplace‐based genetic screening program for hemochromatosis

There is debate as to whether community genetic screening for the mutation(s) causing hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) should be implemented, due to issues including disease penetrance, health economic outcomes, and concerns about community acceptance. Hemochromatosis is a common preventable iron overload disease, due in over 90% of cases to C282Y homozygosity in the HFE gene. We are, therefore, piloting C282Y screening to assess understanding of genetic information and screening acceptability in the workplace setting. In this program, HaemScreen, education was by oral or video presentation in a group setting. C282Y status was assessed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and melt‐curve analysis on DNA obtained by cheek‐brush sampling. Of eligible participants, 5.8% (1.5–15.8%) attended information and screening sessions, of whom 97.7% (5571 individuals) chose to be tested. Twenty‐two C282Y (1 : 253) homozygotes were identified and offered clinical follow‐up. There were 638 heterozygotes (1 : 8.7). The determinants for participation have been analyzed in terms of the principles outlined in the Health Belief Model. Widespread screening for HH is readily accepted in a workplace setting, and a one‐to‐many education program is effective. The level of participation varies greatly and the advertizing and session logistics should be adapted to the specific features of each workplace.

Uptake of carrier testing in families after cystic fibrosis diagnosis through newborn screening

Newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) provides the opportunity for cascade carrier testing of relatives. Uptake of testing by adult non-parent relatives of children diagnosed with CF through NBS has not been previously described, and this study describes uptake by both parents and adult non-parent relatives in Victoria, Australia. Pedigrees were taken from parents of children who were born in 2000–2004 and diagnosed with CF. A total of 40 families were eligible for the study and 30 (75%) were recruited. In all, 716 non-parent relatives were identified from the pedigrees as eligible for carrier testing, and 82 (adjusted uptake percentage: 11.8%; 95% confidence interval 8.0–15.7) have had carrier testing by March 2009. On average, 2.7 non-parent relatives per family had CF carrier testing after diagnosis through NBS. The odds of being tested were greater for females than males (adjusted odds ratio 1.61; 95% confidence interval 1.11–2.33; P=0.01) and greater for those more closely related to the child with CF (adjusted odds ratio 5.17; 95% confidence interval 2.38–11.24; P<0.001). Most relatives who undergo testing are tested immediately after the babys diagnosis; however, some testing is undertaken up to 8 years later. These results indicate that in a clinical setting, the diagnosis of a baby with CF by NBS does not lead to carrier testing for the majority of the babys non-parent relatives. We suggest re-contact with parents to offer cascade carrier testing.

Educating Genetic Counselors in Australia: Developing an International Perspective

The demand for genetic counseling services is increasing worldwide. This paper highlights the Australian experience of genetic counselor education and the history of the profession. The relevance of local factors, including the healthcare system, the education system and the small population in the evolution of the 1-year training programs are considered as an alternative model for emerging programs. The development of the education and training processes compared to that of other countries namely the United States of America (USA), the United Kingdom (UK) and Canada is discussed. The importance of international collaborations between the programs, to facilitate academic discussion and possible curriculum innovations, and to maintain professional understanding between genetic counselors is emphasized. Core genetic counseling competencies have been published for the UK and USA and an Australian set is proposed. In conclusion future directions are considered, including international issues around genetic counseling certification, reciprocity, and the potential for an Australian role in training genetic counselors in South East Asia.

Evaluation of a multi‐disease carrier screening programme in Ashkenazi Jewish high schools

Ioannou L, Massie J, Lewis S, Petrou V, Gason A, Metcalfe S, Aitken MA, Bankier A, Delatycki MB. Evaluation of a multi‐disease carrier screening programme in Ashkenazi Jewish high schools.

Genetic susceptibility screening in schools: attitudes of the school community towards hereditary haemochromatosis.

Carrier screening to provide reproductive options has been offered to students in the school setting for a number of years; however, genetic susceptibility screening for disease predisposition has not been introduced to the school community. Experience has shown that the success of a population‐based programme relies on the communitys acceptance. Therefore, we sought to establish the Australian secondary school communitys attitudes towards genetic susceptibility screening in schools, with hereditary haemochromatosis as the model condition with an available prevention. School students, aged 15–18 (n = 748), completed a questionnaire immediately before and following an oral educational presentation. Their parents (n = 179) and staff (n = 89) received written information and returned a questionnaire by post. Semi‐structured interviews were with Government representatives. Attitudes towards genetic screening in schools and knowledge of genetic and clinical features of haemochromatosis, as well as the likelihood of accepting a genetic susceptibility test for haemochromatosis, were all measured. Participants were positive about genetic screening for disease susceptibility in schools. Their knowledge was high following education with no significant differences between participants of each group. Sixty‐eight percent of students would be likely to have the test if it were offered, with parents and staff, indicating that they would like the students to be offered a test, on average. Genetic susceptibility screening in schools is a novel concept. The results of our study indicate that it could be a public health success with the support of the community.

The Importance of Program Evaluation: How Can it be Applied to Diverse Genetics Education Settings?

The role of a genetic counselor often entails providing education to patient, community and/or health professional groups. While counseling supervision assists genetic counselors to be reflective about their clinical work and to enhance clinical skills, evaluation is a rather analogous process in the provision of education. Program evaluation of education activities can be applied to provide information about the needs of the target group (needs assessment), the delivery of the program (process evaluation) as well as determining the extent to which the education activity has met its intended aims (summative evaluation). Evaluation assists the educator to assess the impact of their program and provides an evidence base about genetics education. Although program evaluation can be a complex activity, the tools are ones that can be used by individuals to evaluate single or simple education activities. The components of evaluation are discussed with reference to genetic counseling practice and three very different examples of actual evaluations are provided to illustrate the diversity of evaluation strategy and programs to which it can be applied.