Maryska L.G. Janssen-Heijnen

International Society of Geriatric Oncology Consensus on Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients With Cancer

PURPOSE To update the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) 2005 recommendations on geriatric assessment (GA) in older patients with cancer. METHODS SIOG composed a panel with expertise in geriatric oncology to develop consensus statements after literature review of key evidence on the following topics: rationale for performing GA; findings from a GA performed in geriatric oncology patients; ability of GA to predict oncology treatment–related complications; association between GA findings and overall survival (OS); impact of GA findings on oncology treatment decisions; composition of a GA, including domains and tools; and methods for implementing GA in clinical care. RESULTS GA can be valuable in oncology practice for following reasons: detection of impairment not identified in routine history or physical examination, ability to predict severe treatment-related toxicity, ability to predict OS in a variety of tumors and treatment settings, and ability to influence treatment choice and intensity. The panel recommended that the following domains be evaluated in a GA: functional status, comorbidity, cognition, mental health status, fatigue, social status and support, nutrition, and presence of geriatric syndromes. Although several combinations of tools and various models are available for implementation of GA in oncology practice, the expert panel could not endorse one over another. CONCLUSION There is mounting data regarding the utility of GA in oncology practice; however, additional research is needed to continue to strengthen the evidence base.

The changing epidemiology of lung cancer in Europe.

BACKGROUND Since the incidence and mortality of the histological subtypes of lung cancer in Europe has changed dramatically during the 20th century, we described the variation and changes in incidence, treatment modalities and survival of lung cancer. METHODS For geographical variation and changes in incidence, data of the European cancer incidence and mortality (EUROCIM) database were used, and data on survival were derived from the EUROCARE database. For trends in treatment modalities and survival, according to histology and stage, data of the Eindhoven Cancer registry were used. RESULTS Although the incidence of lung cancer among men in Denmark, Finland, Germany (Saarland), Italy (Varese), the Netherlands, Switzerland and the United Kingdom has been decreasing since the 1980s, the age-adjusted rate for men in other European countries increased at least until the 1990s. Among women the peak in incidence had not been reached in the 1990s. The proportion of adenocarcinoma has been increasing over time; the most likely explanation is the shift to low-tar filter cigarettes. In the 1990s more patients with localised non-small cell lung cancer received surgery than in the 1970s. Among patients with non-localised non-small cell lung cancer and among those with small cell lung cancer there was a trend towards more chemotherapy. There was fairly large variation in survival within Europe. Despite improvement in both the diagnosis and treatment, the overall prognosis for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer hardly improved over time. In contrast, the introduction and improvement of chemotherapy since the 1970s gave rise to an improvement in survival for patients with small-cell lung cancer. CONCLUSION The epidemic of lung cancer is not over yet, especially in southern and eastern Europe. Prevention remains the best policy, but improvement in the management of lung cancer also remains very important.

Prevalence of co-morbidity in lung cancer patients and its relationship with treatment: A population-based study

BACKGROUND With the rising mean age of lung cancer patients, the number of patients with serious co-morbidity at diagnosis is increasing. As a result, co-morbidity may become an important factor in both the choice of treatment and survival. We studied the prevalence of serious co-morbidity among newly diagnosed lung cancer patients and its association with morphology, stage and treatment. PATIENTS A total of 3864 lung cancer patients registered in the population-based registry of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre South between 1993 and 1995. RESULTS During the study period, the mean age of patients was 67 years (range: 29-93). The most frequent concomitant diseases were cardiovascular diseases (23%), chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) (22%) and other malignancies (15%). The prevalence of concomitant diseases was highest for men (60%), patients with squamous-cell carcinoma (64%) and those with a localised tumour (66%). The resection rate for patients < 70 years, with a localised non-small-cell lung tumour, was especially low for those with COPD (67%) or diabetes (64%) compared with patients without concomitant diseases (94%). The association between co-morbidity and chemotherapy for patients with small-cell lung cancer was limited. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of co-morbidity, especially cardiovascular diseases and COPD, among lung cancer patients is about twice as high as in the general population. Co-morbidity seems to be associated with earlier diagnosis of lung cancer, but it may also lead to less accurate staging and less aggressive treatment. Thus, prognosis is likely to be negatively influenced by co-morbidity.

Less aggressive treatment and worse overall survival in cancer patients with diabetes: A large population based analysis

The purpose of this study was to document the prevalence of diabetes among newly diagnosed cancer patients and to evaluate the influence of diabetes on stage at diagnosis, treatment and overall survival. We performed a population‐based analyses of all 58,498 cancer patients newly diagnosed between 1995 and 2002 in the registration area of the Eindhoven Cancer Registry. Stage of cancer, cancer treatment and comorbidities were actively collected by hospital medical records review. Follow‐up of all patients was completed until January 1, 2005. Nine percent of all cancer patients had diabetes at the time of cancer diagnosis. The prevalence of diabetes was highest among patients with cancer of the pancreas (19%), uterus (14%) and among young men with kidney cancer (8%). Colon, breast and ovarian cancer patients with diabetes were more often diagnosed with a higher tumour stage (p < 0.05). Patients with diabetes and cancer of the oesophagus, colon, breast and ovary were treated less aggressively compared to those without diabetes (p < 0.05). During the follow‐up period 3,902 of 5,555 cancer patients with diabetes died and 29,909 of 52,943 cancer patients without diabetes died. For all cancers combined, in a multivariate cox‐regression model, adjusting for age, gender, stage, treatment and cardiovascular disease, patients with diabetes experienced a significant increase in overall mortality (HR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.40–1.49), ranging however from 0 to 40% for different types of cancer, compared to those without diabetes. In conclusion, diabetic cancer patients frequently were treated less aggressively and had a worse prognosis compared to those without diabetes.

Epidemiology of unknown primary tumours; incidence and population-based survival of 1285 patients in Southeast Netherlands, 1984–1992

Patients with an unknown primary tumour (UPT) represent 5-10% of all new cancer patients. Data on survival and prognostic factors of UPTs are based on selected patient series from specialised institutions. Population-based data on incidence, histology and determinants of survival for patients with UPT are not available. All patients diagnosed with UPT between 1984 and 1992 and entered in the population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry for Southeast Netherlands were included. Follow-up of vital status is complete up to 1999. 1285 patients were registered. In 1024 patients, the diagnosis was confirmed histopathologically: 479 (47%) had adenocarcinoma, 453 (44%) poorly differentiated carcinoma (PDC) or adenocarcinoma (PDA), 76 (7%) squamous cell carcinoma and 16 patients (2%) had an undifferentiated malignant neoplasm. In 26% of these patients with UPT, the tumour was already widely disseminated at presentation. The majority of patients (67%) received only supportive treatment. The median survival was 11 weeks and only 15% were still alive 1 year after diagnosis. Favourable subgroups comprised young patients and patients with metastases localised in lymph nodes. In 261 cases, the diagnosis was made clinically. These patients were evaluated separately. They were older than the biopsy-confirmed patients, received less cancer therapy and their prognosis was even worse (median survival of 7 weeks). In a comparison with data from a tertiary referral centre in the United States of America (USA), our patients were older, received less therapy and had a poorer prognosis. Demographics of our favourable subgroup resembled the patients from the American study. The differences were most likely caused by the differences in the patient populations. In conclusion, we have demonstrated in a population-based study that the prognosis for patients with UPT is more unfavourable than suggested in most clinical studies.

Trends in incidence and prognosis of the histological subtypes of lung cancer in North America, Australia, New Zealand and Europe.

BACKGROUND Since the incidence of the histological subtypes of lung cancer in industrialised countries has changed dramatically over the last two decades, we reviewed trends in the incidence and prognosis in North America, Australia, New Zealand and Europe, according to period of diagnosis and birth cohort and summarized explanations for changes in mortality. METHODS Review of the literature based on a computerised search (Medline database 1966-2000). RESULTS Although the incidence of lung cancer has been decreasing since the 1970s/1980s among men in North America, Australia, New Zealand and north-western Europe, the age-adjusted rate continues to increase among women in these countries, and among both men and women in southern and eastern Europe. These trends followed changes in smoking behaviour. The proportion of adenocarcinoma has been increasing over time; the most likely explanation is the shift to low-tar filter cigarettes during the 1960s and 1970s. Despite improvement in both the diagnosis and treatment, the overall prognosis for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer hardly improved over time. In contrast, the introduction and improvement of chemotherapy since the 1970s gave rise to an improvement in - only short-term (<2 years) - survival for patients with small-cell lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS The epidemic of lung cancer is not over yet, especially in southern and eastern Europe. Except for short-term survival of small cell tumours, the prognosis for patients with lung cancer has not improved significantly.

Effect of comorbidity on the treatment and prognosis of elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: With the rising mean age, more patients will be diagnosed with one or more other serious diseases at the time of lung cancer diagnosis. Little is known about the best way to treat elderly patients with comorbidity or the outcome of treatment. This study was undertaken to evaluate the independent effects of age and comorbidity on treatment and prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: All patients with NSCLC diagnosed between 1995 and 1999 in the southern part of the Netherlands (n = 4072) were included. Results: The proportion of patients with localised NSCLC who underwent surgery was 92% in patients younger than 60 years and 9% in those aged 80 years or older. In patients aged 60–79 years this proportion also decreased with comorbidity. In patients with non-localised NSCLC the proportion receiving chemotherapy was considerably higher for those aged less than 60 years (24%) than in those aged 80 or older (2%). The number of comorbid conditions had no significant influence on the treatment chosen for patients with non-localised disease. Multivariable survival analyses showed that age, tumour size, and treatment were independent prognostic factors for patients with localised disease, and stage of disease and treatment for those with non-localised disease. Comorbidity had no independent prognostic effect. Conclusions: It is questionable whether the less aggressive treatment of elderly patients with NSCLC is justified.

Serious Co-morbidity Among Unselected Cancer Patients Newly Diagnosed in the Southeastern Part of The Netherlands in 1993-1996

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of serious concomitant conditions at diagnosis among unselected patients with cancer, increasingly older in industrialized countries. About 34,000 newly diagnosed cancer patients were recorded in the Eindhoven Cancer Registry between 1993 and 1996; subsequently data on serious co-morbidity, classified according to the Charlson scheme (J Chron Dis 1987; 40: 373-383), were collected from the clinical records by registry personnel. Co-morbid conditions were present in 12% of adult patients below 45 years of age, 28% of those 45-59 years, 53% of those 60-74 years, and 63% of patients over 75 years of age, the prevalence being highest for patients with lung (58%), kidney (54%), stomach (53%), bladder (53%), and prostate cancer (51%). Males exhibited a 10% higher prevalence than females with similar tumors. Among patients over 60 years the most frequent conditions were heart and vascular diseases (ranging across the various tumors from 10% to 30%), hypertension (11-25%), another cancer (10-20%), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) (3-25%), and diabetes mellitus (5-25%). Inclusion of frequent co-morbid conditions in prognostic research as well as the development of specific guidelines for patient care seems warranted.

Co-morbidity leads to altered treatment and worse survival of elderly patients with colorectal cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of co‐morbidity on the treatment and prognosis of elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

The cancer survival gap between elderly and middle-aged patients in Europe is widening

The present study is aimed to compare survival and prognostic changes over time between elderly (70-84 years) and middle-aged cancer patients (55-69 years). We considered seven cancer sites (stomach, colon, breast, cervix and corpus uteri, ovary and prostate) and all cancers combined (but excluding prostate and non-melanoma skin cancers). Five-year relative survival was estimated for cohorts of patients diagnosed in 1988-1999 in a pool of 51 European populations covered by cancer registries. Furthermore, we applied the period-analysis method to more recent incidence data from 32 cancer registries to provide 1- and 5-year relative survival estimates for the period of follow-up 2000-2002. A significant survival improvement was observed from 1988 to 1999 for all cancers combined and for every cancer site, except cervical cancer. However, survival increased at a slower rate in the elderly, so that the gap between younger and older patients widened, particularly for prostate cancer in men and for all considered cancers except cervical cancer in women. For breast and prostate cancers, the increasing gap was likely attributable to a larger use of, respectively, mammographic screening and PSA test in middle-aged with respect to the elderly. In the period analysis of the most recent data, relative survival was much higher in middle-aged patients than in the elderly. The differences were higher for breast and gynaecological cancers, and for prostate cancer. Most of this age gap was due to a very large difference in survival after the 1st year following the diagnosis. Differences were much smaller for conditional 5-year relative survival among patients who had already survived the first year. The increase of survival in elderly men is encouraging but the lesser improvement in women and, in particular, the widening gap for breast cancer suggest that many barriers still delay access to care and that enhanced prevention and clinical management remain major issues.