Marzena Krawiec

Episodic use of an inhaled corticosteroid or leukotriene receptor antagonist in preschool children with moderate-to-severe intermittent wheezing.

BACKGROUND Acute wheezing illnesses in preschoolers require better management strategies to reduce morbidity. OBJECTIVES We sought to examine the effectiveness of episodic use of an inhaled corticosteroid and a leukotriene receptor antagonist in preschoolers with intermittent wheezing. METHODS In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 12-month trial, 238 children aged 12 to 59 months with moderate-to-severe intermittent wheezing received 7 days of either budesonide inhalation suspension (1 mg twice daily), montelukast (4 mg daily), or placebo in addition to albuterol with each identified respiratory tract illness (RTI). Proportion of episode-free days (EFDs) during the 12-month trial was the primary outcome. RESULTS The 3 treatment groups did not differ in proportions of EFDs, with adjusted mean EFDs of 76% (95% CI, 70% to 81%) for budesonide, 73% (95% CI, 66% to 79%) for montelukast, and 74% (95% CI, 65% to 81%) for conventional therapy (P = .66). The 3 groups did not differ in oral corticosteroid use, health care use, quality of life, or linear growth. However, during RTIs, budesonide and montelukast therapy led to modest reductions in trouble breathing (38% [P = .003] and 37% [P = .003], respectively) and interference with activity scores (32% [P = .01] and 40% [P = .001], respectively) that were most evident in those with positive asthma predictive indices. CONCLUSIONS In preschool children with moderate-to-severe intermittent wheezing, episodic use of either budesonide or montelukast early in RTIs, when added to albuterol, did not increase the proportion of EFDs or decrease oral corticosteroid use over a 12-month period. However, indicators of severity of acute illnesses were reduced, particularly in children with positive asthma predictive indices.

Azithromycin or montelukast as inhaled corticosteroid–sparing agents in moderate-to-severe childhood asthma study

BACKGROUND Clinical trials in children with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma are limited. OBJECTIVE We sought to determine whether azithromycin or montelukast are inhaled corticosteroid sparing. METHODS The budesonide dose (with salmeterol [50 microg] twice daily) necessary to achieve control was determined in children 6 to 17 years of age with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma. After a budesonide-stable period of 6 weeks, children were randomized in a double-masked, parallel, multicenter study to receive once-nightly azithromycin, montelukast, or matching placebos plus the established controlling dose of budesonide (minimum, 400 microg twice daily) and salmeterol twice daily. Primary outcome was time from randomization to inadequate asthma control after sequential budesonide dose reduction. RESULTS Of 292 children screened, only 55 were randomized. Inadequate adherence to study medication (n = 80) and improved asthma control under close medical supervision (n = 49) were the major reasons for randomization failure. A futility analysis was requested by the Data Safety Monitoring Board. In data available for analyses, no differences were noted for either treatment compared with placebo in time to inadequate control status (median: azithromycin, 8.4 weeks [95% confidence limit, 4.3-17.3]; montelukast, 13.9 weeks [95% confidence limit, 4.7-20.6]; placebo, 19.1 weeks [95% confidence limit, 11.7-infinity]), with no difference between the groups (log-rank test, P = .49). The futility analysis indicated that even if the planned sample size was reached, the results of this negative study were unlikely to be different, and the trial was prematurely terminated. CONCLUSION Based on these results, neither azithromycin nor montelukast is likely to be an effective inhaled corticosteroid-sparing alternative in children with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma.

Patient characteristics associated with improved outcomes with use of an inhaled corticosteroid in preschool children at risk for asthma.

BACKGROUND Maintenance inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy in preschool children with recurrent wheezing at high-risk for development of asthma produces multiple clinical benefits. However, determination of baseline features associated with ICS responsiveness may identify children most likely to benefit from ICS treatment. OBJECTIVE To determine if demographic and atopic features predict response to ICS in preschool children at high risk for asthma. METHODS Two years of treatment with an ICS, fluticasone propionate (88 microg twice daily), was compared with matching placebo in a double-masked, randomized, multicenter study of 285 children 2 and 3 years old at high risk for asthma development. Baseline demographic and atopic features were related to clinical outcomes in a post hoc subgroup analysis. RESULTS Multivariate analysis demonstrated significantly greater improvement with fluticasone than placebo in terms of episode-free days among boys, white subjects, participants with an emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization within the past year, and those who experienced more symptomatic days at baseline. Children with aeroallergen sensitization experienced greater benefits in terms of oral corticosteroid use, urgent care and ED visits, and use of supplemental controller medications. CONCLUSIONS More favorable responses to ICS than placebo in high-risk preschool children over a 2-year period were more likely in those with a ED visit or hospitalization for asthma within the past year, children with aeroallergen sensitization, boys, and white subjects.

Natural history of asthma.

For some children, asthma is a disease whose symptoms seem to remit with time. Numerous children, however, develop disease that is persistent throughout their lifetimes and is associated with more severe symptoms, increased airway reactivity, and loss of lung function. These children typically have a family history of asthma and demonstrate increased airways reactivity and atopy in childhood. A clearer picture of the natural history of asthma in the developing child has been derived from the results of several longitudinal studies. Although some questions have been clarified, several questions still remain. Now that the incidence and severity of asthma seem to be increasing, children born in the last 10 years may experience more severe disease or a different pathophysiology than those born 30 to 40 years ago. New cohort studies are needed to assess this possibility. Additional investigations into the genetics of asthma causation will help elucidate the different phenotypic expressions of this complex disease. Once these different phenotypic groups can be identified early in life, further studies can be performed to explore the impact of therapeutic intervention on the severity of asthma symptoms and loss of lung function.

Relationship Between Infant Weight Gain and Later Asthma

Paul IM, Camera L, Zeiger RS, Guilbert TW, Bacharier LB, Taussig LM, Morgan WJ, Covar RA, Krawiec M, Bloomberg GR, Mauger DT, for the Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE) Network. Relationship between infant weight gain and later asthma.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2010: 21: 82–89.
© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S

Leukotriene inhibitors and non-steroidal therapies in the treatment of asthma.

Asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood whose morbidity and mortality continues to rise [1]. Drugs used in the treatment of asthma must be targeted at reversing three principle pathophysiologic features: bronchoconstriction, mucus plugging/hypersecretion and inflammation. In the past two decades, the contribution of airway inflammation to the development and progression of asthma symptoms and airway pathology has become a critical focus. Chronic airway inflammation can lead to the progressive decline and irreversible loss of lung function and airway remodelling [2]. In recent years, therapies aimed at diminishing airway inflammation have been at the forefront of asthma management. Steroids have been extensively studied and used as primary anti-inflammatory agents in the management of the asthmatic patient with persistent symptoms of varying severity. Within the last decade, however, several additional non-steroidal classes of drugs have begun to emerge as anti-inflammatory agents for the treatment of asthma. This article will focus on these non-steroidal drugs which have been developed and investigated within the last 5 years. Particular emphasis will be placed on leukotriene receptor antagonists, but anti-IgE and anti-IL-4 therapies, as well as phosphodiesterase inhibitors will also be discussed. Of these new therapies, only two leukotriene receptor antagonists, montelukast (Singulair™, Merck) and zafirlukast (Accolate™, AstraZeneca) and the 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor, zileuton (Zyflo™, Abbott Laboratories), have been recommended, approved and are currently available for use in the treatment of paediatric patients with asthma in the United States.

Use of leukotriene antagonists in childhood asthma.

Leukotrienes have been shown to cause bronchoconstriction, increased mucus production, and airway inflammation, three critical features in asthma. Antileukotriene drugs were developed to inhibit the effects of these lipid mediators. This class of drugs represents the first new approach to asthma therapy in 25 years. The leukotriene receptor antagonists, montelukast, zafirlukast, and pranlukast, and the 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor, zileuton, are unique in their ability to target specific components of asthmatic inflammation. Although the role of these drugs continues to evolve, the antileukotrienes have demonstrated efficacy against exercise and allergen-induced bronchoconstriction and additive benefit for use in patients with symptomatic, moderate asthma on maintenance-inhaled corticosteroids. Further, they may be considered for primary use in patients with mild, persistent asthma, especially those who are steroid-phobic or who have compliance issues.