Marzia Caproni

Human interleukin 17–producing cells originate from a CD161+CD4+ T cell precursor

We demonstrate that CD161 is a highly up-regulated gene in human interleukin (IL) 17 T helper cell (Th17) clones and that all IL-17–producing cells are contained in the CD161+ fraction of CD4+ T cells present in the circulation or in inflamed tissues, although they are not CD1-restricted natural killer T cells. More importantly, we show that all IL-17–producing cells originate from CD161+ naive CD4+ T cells of umbilical cord blood, as well as of the postnatal thymus, in response to the combined activity of IL-1β and IL-23. These findings implicate CD161 as a novel surface marker for human Th17 cells and demonstrate the exclusive origin of these cells from a CD161+CD4+ T cell progenitor.

Expression of cytokines, chemokines and other effector molecules in two prototypic autoinflammatory skin diseases, pyoderma gangrenosum and sweet's syndrome

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) and Sweets syndrome (SS) are two inflammatory skin diseases presenting with painful ulcers and erythematous plaques, respectively; both disorders have a debilitating clinical behaviour and PG is potentially life‐threatening. Recently, PG and SS have been included among the autoinflammatory diseases, which are characterized by recurrent episodes of sterile inflammation, without circulating autoantibodies and autoreactive T cells. However, an autoinflammatory pattern clearly supporting this inclusion has never been demonstrated. We studied 16 patients with PG, six with SS and six controls, evaluating, using a sandwich‐based protein antibody array method, the expression profile of inflammatory effector molecules in PG, SS and normal skin. The expressions of interleukin (IL)‐1 beta and its receptor I were significantly higher in PG (P = 0·0001 for both) and SS (P = 0·004–0·040) than in controls. In PG, chemokines such as IL‐8 (P = 0·0001), chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand (CXCL) 1/2/3 (P = 0·002), CXCL 16 (P = 0·003) and regulated upon activation normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) (P = 0·005) were over‐expressed. In SS, IL‐8 (P = 0·018), CXCL 1/2/3 (P = 0·006) and CXCL 16 (P = 0·036) but not RANTES were over‐expressed, suggesting that chemokine‐mediated signals are lower than in PG. Fas/Fas ligand and CD40/CD40 ligand systems were over‐expressed in PG (P = 0·0001 for Fas, P = 0·009 for Fas ligand, P = 0·012 for CD40, P = 0·0001 for CD40 ligand), contributing to tissue damage and inflammation, while their role seems to be less significant in SS. Over‐expression of cytokines/chemokines and molecules amplifying the inflammatory network supports the view that PG and SS are autoinflammatory diseases. The differences in expression profile of inflammatory effectors between these two disorders may explain the stronger local aggressiveness in PG than SS.

Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

AbstractCutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) includes a variety of lupus erythematosus (LE)-specific skin lesions that are subdivided into three categories — chronic CLE (CCLE), subacute CLE (SCLE) and acute CLE (ACLE) — based on clinical morphology, average duration of skin lesions and routine histopathologic examination.This paper describes our personal experience in the management of CLE over the last 30 years, with details on preferential therapeutic options related to clinical, histologic and immunopathologic aspects of each clinical subset of the disease.Effective sunscreening and sun protection are considered the first rule in the management of CLE because of the high degree of photosensitivity of the disease. Antimalarial agents are crucial in the treatment of CLE and are the first-line systemic agents, particularly in discoid LE (DLE) and SCLE.Dapsone is the drug of choice for bullous systemic LE (BSLE) as well as for LE in small dermal vessels (e.g. leukocytoclastic vasculitis). Retinoids, known as second-line drugs for systemic therapy, are sometimes used to treat chronic forms of CLE and are particularly successful in treating hypertrophic LE. Systemic immunosuppressive agents are required to manage the underlying systemic LE disease activity in patients with ACLE. These drugs, especially azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine, together with corticosteroids, constitute third-line systemic therapy of CLE. In our experience, oral prednisone or parenteral ‘pulsed’ methylprednisolone are useful in exacerbations of disease activity. Thalidomide provides one of the most useful therapeutic alternatives for chronic refractory DLE, although its distribution is limited to a few countries because of the risk of teratogenicity and polyneuropathy.However, medical treatment with local corticosteroids remains the mainstay of CLE treatment, especially for DLE. Patient education regarding the disease is also important in the management of CLE, because it helps relieve undue anxiety and to recruit the patient as an active participant in the treatment regimen.

The spectrum of cutaneous manifestations in lupus erythematosus—the Italian experience:

We have evaluated the incidence of lupus erythematosus (LE)-specific skin disease in 186 patients with LE, seen retrospectively over a 1 0-year period at our Dermatology Department and determined the correlation of LE-nonspecific skin disease in patients with systemic involvement. Chronic cutaneous LE (CCLE) with classical discoid lesions (localized, 70%; generalized, 30%) was the most common cutaneous manifestation (72.5%). Subacute cutaneous LE (SCLE) represented only 8% of LE skin disease (annular-polycyclic type, 73%; papulo-squamous type, 27%). Acute cutaneous LE (ACLE) was detected in 15% of our patients: the butterfly erythema was the most frequent skin lesion (96%) while only one case of bullous LE and one case of widespread maculo-papular eruption in association with malar erythema were demonstrated. In 8 patients no LE-specific skin lesions (lupus sine lupo) were found. LE-nonspecific skin lesions were found in 31% of our patients with systemic LE (SLE): Raynauds phenomenon was found in 23/58 (39.6%), cutaneous small vessel leukocytoclastic vasculitis in 8/58 (13.7%), nonscarring alopecia in 18/58 (31%), lupus pernio in 6/58 (10.3%), hemorrhagic lesions in 4/58 (6.8%), livedo reticularis in 5/58 (8.6%), mucosal ulcers in 3/58 (5.1%) and periungual telangiectasia in 12/58 (20.6%) SLE patients. LE-nonspecific skin lesions are detected only in patients with SLE and usually in the active phases of the disease.

Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dermatitis herpetiformis

Dermatitis herpetiformis is a rare disease that should be considered the cutaneous expression of a gluten‐sensitive enteropathy indistinguishable from celiac disease. Dermatitis herpetiformis is often misdiagnosed and to date no guidelines for the management of dermatitis herpetiformis have been published in Literature. The present guidelines have been prepared for dermatologists by the Group for Cutaneous Immunopathology of the Italian Society of Dermatology and Venereology. They reflect the best data available at the time of preparation and the clinical experience of the authors and the members of the Italian Group for Cutaneous Immunopathology. The diagnosis of dermatitis herpetiformis is established clinically, histologically, immunopathologically and serologically. A gluten‐free diet (GFD) is the treatment of choice for patients with dermatitis herpetiformis. Dapsone and/or other drugs should be used during the period until the GFD is effective. In conclusion, the present guidelines provide evidence‐based guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of dermatitis herpetiformis.

Regulatory T cells in the skin lesions and blood of patients with systemic sclerosis and morphoea

Background  Systemic sclerosis (SSc) and morphoea are connective tissue diseases characterized by fibrosis of the skin. Although to date their pathogenesis has not been clearly defined, it is thought that autoimmunity may play a role in the development of the skin lesions observed in both these diseases. As regulatory T cells (Tregs) play a key role in the modulation of immune responses, it has recently been suggested that Treg impairment may lead to the development of autoimmune diseases.

Expression of cytokines and chemokine receptors in the cutaneous lesions of erythema multiforme and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis

Background  Erythema multiforme (EM) and Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) are caused by a dysregulation of cellular immunity.

Clinical, Histological and Immunopathological Features of 58 Patients with Subacute Cutaneous Lupus erythematosus

Background: Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) is a distinct subset of cutaneous lupus erythematosus clinically characterized by psoriasiform and/or annular lesions and by a mild or absent systemic involvement. Objective: The Italian Group of Immunodermatology of the Italian Society of Dermatology and Venereology reviewed the cases of SCLE seen in 10 years (1987–1996). Patients: Forty-six women and 12 men have been retrospectively studied, 42% had annular lesions, 39% psoriasiform ones and 16% both. Results: Lesions were mainly localized on the neck and face and relapsed in spring and autumn. Seventeen patients had 4 or more American College of Rheumatology criteria and could be classified as having systemic lupus erythematosus. The most frequent histopathological alterations were epidermal atrophy, hydropic degeneration of the basal layer and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate. Deposits of immunoglobulins and C3 at the dermo-epidermal junction on the clinically involved skin were present in 86% of the patients. Dust-like particles in the epidermis were only found in 3% of cases. Anti-Ro/SSA antibodies were found in 71% of the cases and anti-dsDNA only in 5% of cases. Conclusions: SCLE is a particular subset of cutaneous lupus erythematosus with peculiar clinical and immunopathological features.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: First multicenter database analysis of 1002 patients from the European Society of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (EUSCLE)

In this prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study, we assessed clinical and laboratory characteristics from patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) using the Core Set Questionnaire of the European Society of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (EUSCLE). 1002 (768 females, 234 males) patients with different subtypes of CLE, such as acute CLE (ACLE, 304 patients), subacute CLE (SCLE, 236 patients), chronic CLE (CCLE, 397 patients), and intermittent CLE (ICLE, 65 patients), from 13 European countries were collected and statistically analyzed by an SPSS database. The main outcome measures included gender, age at onset of disease, LE-specific and LE-nonspecific skin lesions, photosensitivity, laboratory features, and the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. The mean age at onset of disease was 43.0±15.7 years and differed significantly between the CLE subtypes. In 347 (34.6%) of the 1002 patients, two or more CLE subtypes were diagnosed during the course of the disease and 453 (45.2%) presented with LE-nonspecific manifestations. Drug-induced CLE and Sjögrens Syndrome had the highest prevalence in SCLE patients (13.1% and 14.0%, respectively). Photosensitivity was significantly more frequent in patients with ACLE, SCLE, and ICLE compared with those with CCLE. The detection of antinuclear antibodies such as anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB antibodies revealed further significant differences between the CLE subtypes. In summary, the EUSCLE Core Set Questionnaire and its database facilitate the analysis of clinical and laboratory features in a high number of patients with CLE and will contribute to standardized assessment and monitoring of the disease in Europe.

Chronic Idiopathic and Chronic Autoimmune Urticaria: Clinical and Immunopathological Features of 68 Subjects

Skin tests with autologous serum elicit an immediate wheal-and-flare response in about 30-50% of chronic idiopathic urticaria subjects, suggesting that an autoimmune mechanism might be involved in the pathogenesis of this disease. The aim of the present work, involving 68 subjects with chronic idiopathic urticaria, was to distinguish between the serum-positive and serum-negative cases and highlight the clinical differences between the two groups on the basis of the Breneman scale score. We also tried to correlate the finding of a positive response to the autologous serum skin test with other autoimmune diatheses or fully developed autoimmune disorders. Our results did not demonstrate any significant differences between the two groups with regard to mean age, sex distribution, angioedema and mucosal/cutaneous atopy. However, all subjects with positive autologous serum skin test presented more severe clinical features than serum-negative subjects. We found no differences between the two groups in the incidence of autoimmune disease.