Masahiro Inada
Kindai University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Masahiro Inada.
PLOS ONE | 2018
Masakazu Otsuka; Hajime Monzen; Kenji Matsumoto; Mikoto Tamura; Masahiro Inada; Noriyuki Kadoya; Yasumasa Nishimura
Background Four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) ventilation is an emerging imaging modality. Functional avoidance of regions according to 4D-CT ventilation may reduce lung toxicity after radiation therapy. This study evaluated associations between 4D-CT ventilation-based dosimetric parameters and clinical outcomes. Methods Pre-treatment 4D-CT data were used to retrospectively construct ventilation images for 40 thoracic cancer patients retrospectively. Fifteen patients were treated with conventional radiation therapy, 6 patients with hyperfractionated radiation therapy and 19 patients with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Ventilation images were calculated from 4D-CT data using a deformable image registration and Jacobian-based algorithm. Each ventilation map was normalized by converting it to percentile images. Ventilation-based dosimetric parameters (Mean Dose, V5 [percent lung volume receiving ≥5 Gy], and V20 [percent lung volume receiving ≥20 Gy]) were calculated for highly and poorly ventilated regions. To test whether the ventilation-based dosimetric parameters could be used predict radiation pneumonitis of ≥Grade 2, the area under the curve (AUC) was determined from the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results For Mean Dose, poorly ventilated lung regions in the 0–30% range showed the highest AUC value (0.809; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.663–0.955). For V20, poorly ventilated lung regions in the 0–20% range had the highest AUC value (0.774; 95% [CI], 0.598–0.915), and for V5, poorly ventilated lung regions in the 0–30% range had the highest AUC value (0.843; 95% [CI], 0.732–0.954). The highest AUC values for Mean Dose, V20, and V5 were obtained in poorly ventilated regions. There were significant differences in all dosimetric parameters between radiation pneumonitis of Grade 1 and Grade ≥2. Conclusions Poorly ventilated lung regions identified on 4D-CT had higher AUC values than highly ventilated regions, suggesting that functional planning based on poorly ventilated regions may reduce the risk of lung toxicity in radiation therapy.
Journal of Radiation Research | 2018
Masahiro Inada; Hajime Monzen; Kenji Matsumoto; Mikoto Tamura; Takafumi Minami; Kiyoshi Nakamatsu; Yasumasa Nishimura
Abstract Tungsten functional paper (TFP) is a paper-based radiation-shielding material, which is lead-free and easy to cut. We developed a radiation protection undergarment using TFP for prostate cancer patients treated with permanent 125I seed implantation (PSI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the shielding ability of the undergarment with respect to household contacts and members of the public. Between October 2016 and April 2017, a total of 10 prostate cancer patients treated with PSI were enrolled in this prospective study. The external radiation exposure from each patient 1 day after PSI was measured with and without the undergarment. Measurements were performed using a survey meter at 100 cm from the surface of the patient’s body. The exposure rates were measured from five directions: anterior, anteriorly oblique, lateral, posteriorly oblique, and posterior. The measured radiation exposure rates without the undergarment, expressed as mean ± standard deviation, from the anterior, anteriorly oblique, lateral, posteriorly oblique, and posterior directions were 1.28 ± 0.43 μSv/h, 0.70 ± 0.34 μSv/h, 0.21 ± 0.062 μSv/h, 0.65 ± 0.33 μSv/h and 1.24 ± 0.41 μSv/h, respectively. The undergarment was found to have (mean ± standard deviation) shielding abilities of 88.7 ± 5.8%, 44.0 ± 42.1%, 50.6 ± 15.9%, 72.9 ± 27.0% and 90.4 ± 10.7% from the anterior, anteriorly oblique, lateral, posteriorly oblique, and posterior directions, respectively. In conclusion, this shielding undergarment is a useful device that has the potential to reduce radiation exposure for the general public and the patient’s family.
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy | 2017
Masahiro Inada; Masaki Yokokawa; Takafumi Minami; Kiyoshi Nakamatsu; Yasumasa Nishimura
Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the implant quality between intraoperatively built custom-linked seeds (IBCL) and loose seeds (LS) retrospectively. Material and methods This study included 74 prostate cancer patients who were treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) using IBCL (n = 37) or LS (n = 37) between July 2014 and June 2016. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters, seed migration, and operation time were compared between the IBCL and LS groups. In addition to the standard target volume of the whole prostate gland, DVH parameters for prostate plus a 3 mm margin (CTV) were evaluated. Results In intraoperative planning, prostate V150 was lower (54.8% vs. 59.6%, p = 0.027), and CTV V100 (88.1% vs. 85.6%, p = 0.019) and D90 (98.5% vs. 92.6%, p = 0.0033) were higher in the IBCL group compared with in the LS group. In post-implant dosimetry, prostate V100 (96.9% vs. 95.2%, p = 0.020), CTV V100 (85.6% vs. 81.7%, p = 0.046), and CTV D90 (94.2% vs. 86.5%, p < 0.001) were higher, and prostate V150 (57.1% vs. 64.5%, p = 0.0051) and CTV V150 (31.5% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.046) were lower in the IBCL group compared with in the LS group. Regarding DVH changes between intraoperative planning and post-implant dosimetry, the decrease in prostate D90 was significantly lower in the IBCL group than in the LS group (–1.16% vs. –4.17%, p < 0.001). For the IBCL group, the operation time was slightly but significantly longer than that for the LS group (50.5 minutes vs. 43.7 minutes, p = 0.011). However, the seed migration rate was significantly lower in the IBCL group than in the LS group (5% vs. 41%, p < 0.001). Conclusions Intraoperatively built custom-linked is more advantageous than LS in terms of dosimetric parameters and migration.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2015
Izumi Tachibana; Makoto Hosono; Masahiro Inada; K. Fukuda; H. Tatebe; K. Ishikawa; Masaki Yokokawa; Kiyoshi Nakamatsu; Shuichi Kanamori; Yasumasa Nishimura
Radiation Oncology | 2018
Mikoto Tamura; Hajime Monzen; Kenji Matsumoto; Kazuki Kubo; Masakazu Otsuka; Masahiro Inada; Hiroshi Doi; K. Ishikawa; Kiyoshi Nakamatsu; Iori Sumida; Hirokazu Mizuno; Do-Kun Yoon; Yasumasa Nishimura
International Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2018
Izumi Tachibana; Yasumasa Nishimura; Masahiro Inada; K. Fukuda; K. Ishikawa; T. Nishikawa; Masaki Yokokawa; Kiyoshi Nakamatsu; Shuichi Kanamori; Jin-ichi Hida
Anticancer Research | 2018
Izumi Tachibana; Yasumasa Nishimura; Kohei Hanaoka; Masahiro Inada; K. Fukuda; H. Tatebe; K. Ishikawa; Kiyoshi Nakamatsu; Shuichi Kanamori; Makoto Hosono
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2017
M. Otsuka; Hajime Monzen; Noriyuki Kadoya; Masahiro Inada; Kenji Matsumoto; Yasumasa Nishimura
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2017
Masahiro Inada; Kiyoshi Nakamatsu; K. Ishikawa; Yasumasa Nishimura
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2017
K. Ishikawa; Masahiro Inada; K. Fukuda; H. Tatebe; Kiyoshi Nakamatsu; Shuichi Kanamori; Yasumasa Nishimura