Masahiro Uenishi

The effect of metabolic syndrome on heart rate turbulence in non-diabetic patients.

BACKGROUND Metabolic syndrome (MetS), which includes a cluster of risk factors, is being increasingly recognized as a new risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Heart rate turbulence (HRT) is a Holter-based non-invasive method for detecting cardiac autonomic imbalance and is an independent, powerful predictor of cardiac arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in different patient groups. This study evaluated the effect of MetS on HRT in non-diabetic patients. METHODS This study included 80 non-diabetic MetS subjects and 50 healthy subjects. All 130 subjects underwent a 24-h ambulatory Holter electrocardiogram recording. Two indices of HRT were analyzed: turbulence onset (TO) and turbulence slope (TS). HRT values were classified into 3 categories for risk stratification: 1) Category 0, TO and TS were normal; 2) Category 1, either TO or TS was abnormal; 3) Category 2, both TO and TS were abnormal. RESULTS When we compared MetS rates in the HRT risk stratification groups, there were significant differences for all groups as compared with the controls (Category 0 = MetS 28.8%, n = 15, Control 71.2%, n = 37, p 〈 0.001; Category 1 = MetS 80.8%, n = 42, Control 19.2%, n = 10, p 〈 0.001; Category 2 = MetS 88.5%, n = 23, Control 11.5%, n = 3, p 〈 0.001). In addition, TO and TS abnormalities were correlated with the number of MetS components (r = 0.608, p 〈 0.001; r = -0.388, p 〈 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first study to establish a relationship between HRT and MetS. These findings suggest that MetS adversely affects HRT scores. In addition, the number of MetS components is related to impaired HRT scores.

Cardiac Autonomic Function Measured by Heart Rate Variability and Turbulence in Pre-hypertensive Subjects

Non-dipping blood pressure pattern was shown to be associated with increased cardiovascular events. In addition, cardiac autonomic dysfunction was found to be associated with non-dipper phenomenon. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the cardiac autonomic functions in dipper and non-dipper pre-hypertensive subjects. A total of 65 pre-hypertensive subjects were enrolled in this study. They were divided into two groups as non-dippers (40 subjects, 52% female) and dippers (25 subjects, 52.5% female). Cardiac autonomic functions of the two groups were compared with the aid of heart rate variability, heart rate turbulence (HRT), atrial premature contractions (APCs), ventricular premature contractions (VPCs), and mean heart rate (MHR). There was no significant difference between non-dippers and dippers in basal characteristics. The two parameters of HRT, turbulence onset and turbulence slope, were found to be significantly abnormal in non-dippers than in dippers (P < .011 and P < .002, respectively). Heart rate variability parameters, including SDNN, SDANN, RMSSD, and pNN50, were found to be similar in dipper and non-dipper pre-hypertensive subjects (P < .998, P < .453, P < .205, and P < .788, respectively). APCs, VPCs, and MHR were compared, and there were statistical differences between the groups (APCs 5.80 ± 4.55, 9.14 ± 7.33, P < .024; VPCs 8.48 ± 8.83, 13.23 ± 9.68, P < .044; and MHR 70.16 ± 11.08, 76.26 ± 11.31, P < .035; respectively). This study demonstrated a possible cardiac autonomic dysfunction in pre-hypertensive subjects with non-dipper pattern. This may be a basis for future studies related to pre-hypertension and non-dipping BP pattern.

Novel method to evaluate the conduction velocity and conducting area during isthmus-dependent atrial flutter.

OBJECTIVE The difference of the conduction velocity (CV) around the tricuspid valve annulus between the counter-clockwise (CCW) atrial flutter and the clockwise (CW) atrial flutter has not been well clarified. This study was undertaken to evaluate the CV and the conducting area (CA) per millisecond around the tricuspid valve annulus using the electroanatomical mapping. METHODS The electroanatomical mapping was performed during the tachycardia for 30 consecutive patients (mean age: 61±16 years) with isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (CCW, 25; CW, 5). We measured the CV and the CA of five divided areas of the right atrium, that is, upper septum (US), lower septum (LS), isthmus (I), upper lateral wall (UL) and lower lateral wall (LL) using the novel measurement method in the isochronal map. Statistical differences of these data between the two groups were assessed by the Students t-test and one-way analysis of variance methods. RESULTS In total, the CV of the LS was significantly slower than other areas (m/sec: US, 0.57±0.18; LS, 0.43±0.18; UL, 0.60±0.26; LL, 0.53±0.20; I, 0.50±0.17; p<0.05) and the CA of the US and UL were significantly larger than other areas (mm2/sec: US, 34.5±16.2; LS, 16.2±9.5; UL, 40.0±14.1; LL, 27.0±17.0; I, 16.8±8.5; p<0.0001). There was no significant difference between the CCW and the CW atrial flutters in terms of the CV and the CA of equally divided five areas. CONCLUSION In both of the CCW and the CW atrial flutters, the CV of the LS was significantly slower than other areas and the CA of the lower atrium was significantly smaller than the upper atrium.