Masashi Soga

Both Direct and Vicarious Experiences of Nature Affect Children's Willingness to Conserve Biodiversity

Children are becoming less likely to have direct contact with nature. This ongoing loss of human interactions with nature, the extinction of experience, is viewed as one of the most fundamental obstacles to addressing global environmental challenges. However, the consequences for biodiversity conservation have been examined very little. Here, we conducted a questionnaire survey of elementary schoolchildren and investigated effects of the frequency of direct (participating in nature-based activities) and vicarious experiences of nature (reading books or watching TV programs about nature and talking about nature with parents or friends) on their affective attitudes (individuals’ emotional feelings) toward and willingness to conserve biodiversity. A total of 397 children participated in the surveys in Tokyo. Children’s affective attitudes and willingness to conserve biodiversity were positively associated with the frequency of both direct and vicarious experiences of nature. Path analysis showed that effects of direct and vicarious experiences on children’s willingness to conserve biodiversity were mediated by their affective attitudes. This study demonstrates that children who frequently experience nature are likely to develop greater emotional affinity to and support for protecting biodiversity. We suggest that children should be encouraged to experience nature and be provided with various types of these experiences.

Gardening is beneficial for health: A meta-analysis

There is increasing evidence that gardening provides substantial human health benefits. However, no formal statistical assessment has been conducted to test this assertion. Here, we present the results of a meta-analysis of research examining the effects of gardening, including horticultural therapy, on health. We performed a literature search to collect studies that compared health outcomes in control (before participating in gardening or non-gardeners) and treatment groups (after participating in gardening or gardeners) in January 2016. The mean difference in health outcomes between the two groups was calculated for each study, and then the weighted effect size determined both across all and sets of subgroup studies. Twenty-two case studies (published after 2001) were included in the meta-analysis, which comprised 76 comparisons between control and treatment groups. Most studies came from the United States, followed by Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. Studies reported a wide range of health outcomes, such as reductions in depression, anxiety, and body mass index, as well as increases in life satisfaction, quality of life, and sense of community. Meta-analytic estimates showed a significant positive effect of gardening on the health outcomes both for all and sets of subgroup studies, whilst effect sizes differed among eight subgroups. Although Eggers test indicated the presence of publication bias, significant positive effects of gardening remained after adjusting for this using trim and fill analysis. This study has provided robust evidence for the positive effects of gardening on health. A regular dose of gardening can improve public health.

Landscape versus local factors shaping butterfly communities in fragmented landscapes: Does host plant diversity matter?

Conversion of terrestrial land for the purposes of agriculture and urban development continues to result in loss and fragmentation of natural habitats. In this study, we focus on butterflies and investigate the relative importance of landscape-level habitat amount (the proportion of woodland area within a landscape), habitat fragmentation (length of woodland edges within a landscape), urbanization (the proportion of urban area within a landscape), and local host plant diversity for butterfly communities in a fragmented landscape in Hokkaido, northern Japan. Butterfly species observed in the field were grouped into woodland and open-land species. The results showed that both landscape and local factors shape the butterfly community. At a landscape-scale, woodland butterflies positively responded to woodland area and negatively to edge density, whereas open-land butterflies showed opposite responses. At a local-scale, positive influences of local host plant diversity on woodland butterflies were evident, but not for open-land species. These results suggest that negative influences of anthropogenic land-use changes on biodiversity could be mitigated by strategies aimed at stopping the spread of woodland edges and providing a wide variety of different host plant species in the landscape. Unfortunately, this study implies that further increases in habitat loss and fragmentation and decline in host plant diversity lead to a homogenization of local biological communities and functions.