Massimiliano Tamborrino
University of Copenhagen
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Massimiliano Tamborrino.
Brain Research | 2012
Laura Sacerdote; Massimiliano Tamborrino; Cristina Zucca
The dynamics of a neuron are influenced by the connections with the network where it lies. Recorded spike trains exhibit patterns due to the interactions between neurons. However, the structure of the network is not known. A challenging task is to investigate it from the analysis of simultaneously recorded spike trains. We develop a non-parametric method based on copulas, that we apply to simulated data according to different bivariate Leaky Integrate and Fire models. The method discerns dependencies determined by the surrounding network, from those determined by direct interactions between the two neurons. Furthermore, the method recognizes the presence of delays in the spike propagation. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Neural Coding.
Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena | 2014
Massimiliano Tamborrino; Laura Sacerdote; Martin Jacobsen
Abstract We consider the multivariate point process determined by the crossing times of the components of a multivariate jump process through a multivariate boundary, assuming to reset each component to an initial value after its boundary crossing. We prove that this point process converges weakly to the point process determined by the crossing times of the limit process. This holds for both diffusion and deterministic limit processes. The almost sure convergence of the first passage times under the almost sure convergence of the processes is also proved. The particular case of a multivariate Stein process converging to a multivariate Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process is discussed as a guideline for applying diffusion limits for jump processes. We apply our theoretical findings to neural network modeling. The proposed model gives a mathematical foundation to the generalization of the class of Leaky Integrate-and-Fire models for single neural dynamics to the case of a firing network of neurons. This will help future study of dependent spike trains.
BioSystems | 2013
Massimiliano Tamborrino; Susanne Ditlevsen; Petr Lansky
Neurons are commonly characterized by spontaneous generation of action potentials (spikes), which appear without any apparent or controlled stimulation. When a stimulus is applied, the spontaneous firing may prevail and hamper identification of the effect of the stimulus. Therefore, for any rigorous analysis of evoked neuronal activity, the presence of spontaneous firing has to be taken into account. If the background signal is ignored, however small it is compared to the response activity, and however large is the delay, estimation of the response latency will be wrong, and the error will persist even when sample size is increasing. The first question is: what is the response latency to the stimulus? Answering this question becomes even more difficult if the latency is of a complex nature, for example composed of a physically implied deterministic part and a stochastic part. This scenario is considered here, where the response time is a sum of two components; the delay and the relative latency. Parametric estimators for the time delay and the response latency are derived. These estimators are evaluated on simulated data and their properties are discussed. Finally, we show that the mean of the response latency is always satisfactorily estimated, even assuming a wrong distribution for the response latency.
BioSystems | 2015
Marie Levakova; Massimiliano Tamborrino; Susanne Ditlevsen; Petr Lansky
Neuronal response latency is usually vaguely defined as the delay between the stimulus onset and the beginning of the response. It contains important information for the understanding of the temporal code. For this reason, the detection of the response latency has been extensively studied in the last twenty years, yielding different estimation methods. They can be divided into two classes, one of them including methods based on detecting an intensity change in the firing rate profile after the stimulus onset and the other containing methods based on detection of spikes evoked by the stimulation using interspike intervals and spike times. The aim of this paper is to present a review of the main techniques proposed in both classes, highlighting their advantages and shortcomings.
Lifetime Data Analysis | 2015
Massimiliano Tamborrino; Susanne Ditlevsen; Peter Lansky
A latent internal process describes the state of some system, e.g. the social tension in a political conflict, the strength of an industrial component or the health status of a person. When this process reaches a predefined threshold, the process terminates and an observable event occurs, e.g. the political conflict finishes, the industrial component breaks down or the person dies. Imagine an intervention, e.g., a political decision, maintenance of a component or a medical treatment, is initiated to the process before the event occurs. How can we evaluate whether the intervention had an effect? To answer this question we describe the effect of the intervention through parameter changes of the law governing the internal process. Then, the time interval between the start of the process and the final event is divided into two subintervals: the time from the start to the instant of intervention, denoted by
Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics | 2016
Laura Sacerdote; Massimiliano Tamborrino; Cristina Zucca
Physical Review E | 2017
Marie Levakova; Massimiliano Tamborrino; Lubomír Košťál; Petr Lánský
S
Neural Computation | 2016
Marie Levakova; Massimiliano Tamborrino; Lubomir Kostal; Petr Lansky
Chinese Journal of Physiology | 2010
Laura Sacerdote; Massimiliano Tamborrino
S, and the time between the intervention and the threshold crossing, denoted by
Chaos | 2018
Giuseppe D’Onofrio; Massimiliano Tamborrino; Petr Lansky