Massimiliano Valeriani

Inhibition of motor system excitability at cortical and spinal level by tonic muscle pain

OBJECTIVE To assess whether the motor system excitability can be modified by experimental tonic pain induced either in muscles or in subcutis. METHODS Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left primary motor cortex was used to record motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the right abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle. Recordings were made before, during and after experimental pain induced by (1) injection of hypertonic (5%) saline into the right ADM, the right first dorsal interosseum (FDI) and the left ADM muscles, and (2) injection of hypertonic saline in the subcutaneous region of the right ADM. Both MEPs and H-reflex were recorded also from the right flexor carpi radialis (FCR) before, during and after muscle pain. RESULTS MEPs recorded from the ADM muscle were significantly reduced in amplitude during pain induced in the right ADM and right FDI muscles, but not during pain in the left ADM muscle or during subcutaneous pain. This inhibitory effect was observed during the peak-pain and persisted also after the disappearance of the pain sensation. In the FCR muscle, the MEP inhibition was observed during the peak-pain, while a significant reduction of the H-reflexs amplitude was observed starting 1 min after the peak-pain. CONCLUSIONS Tonic muscle pain can inhibit the motor system. The motor cortex inhibition observed at an early phase is followed by a reduction of the excitability of both cortical and spinal motoneurones.

Scalp topography and dipolar source modelling of potentials evoked by CO2 laser stimulation of the hand.

CO2 laser evoked potentials to hand stimulation recorded using a scalp 19-channel montage in 11 normal subjects consistently showed early N1/P1 dipolar field distribution peaking at a mean latency of 159 ms. The N1 negativity was distributed in the temporoparietal region contralateral to stimulation and the P1 positivity in the frontal region. The N1/P1 response was followed by 3 distinct components: (1) N2a reaching its maximal amplitude at the vertex and ipsilaterally to the stimulated hand, (2) N2b mostly distributed in the frontal region, and (3) P2 with a mid-central topography. Brain electrical source analysis showed that this sequence was explained, with a residual variance below 5%, by a model including two dipoles in the upper bank of the Sylvian fissure of each hemisphere, a frontal dipole close to the midline, and two anterior medial temporal dipoles, thus suggesting a sequential activation of the two second somatosensory areas, anterior cingulate gyrus and the amygdalar nuclei or the hippocampal formations, respectively. This model fitted well with the scalp field topography of grand average responses to stimulation of left and right hand obtained across all subjects as well as when applied to individual data. Our findings suggest that the second somatosensory area contralateral to the stimulation is the first involved in the building of pain-related responses, followed by ipsilateral second somatosensory area and limbic areas receiving noxious inputs from the periphery.

Reduced habituation to experimental pain in migraine patients: a CO2 laser evoked potential study

The habituation to sensory stimuli of different modalities is reduced in migraine patients. However, the habituation to pain has never been evaluated. Our aim was to assess the nociceptive pathway function and the habituation to experimental pain in patients with migraine. Scalp potentials were evoked by CO2 laser stimulation (laser evoked potentials, LEPs) of the hand and facial skin in 24 patients with migraine without aura (MO), 19 patients with chronic tension‐type headache (CTTH), and 28 control subjects (CS). The habituation was studied by measuring the changes of LEP amplitudes across three consecutive repetitions of 30 trials each (the repetitions lasted 5 min and were separated by 5‐min intervals). The slope of the regression line between LEP amplitude and number of repetitions was taken as an index of habituation. The LEPs consisted of middle‐latency, low‐amplitude responses (N1, contralateral temporal region, and P1, frontal region) followed by a late, high‐amplitude, negative–positive complex (N2/P2, vertex). The latency and amplitude of these responses were similar in both patients and controls. While CS and CTTH patients showed a significant habituation of the N2/P2 response, in MO patients this LEP component did not develop any habituation at all after face stimulation and showed a significantly lower habituation than in CS after hand stimulation. The habituation index of the vertex N2/P2 complex exceeded the normal limits in 13 out of the 24 MO patients and in none of the 19 CTTH patients (P<0.0001; Fishers exact test). Moreover, while the N1–P1 amplitude showed a significant habituation in CS after hand stimulation, it did not change across repetitions in MO patients. In conclusion, no functional impairment of the nociceptive pathways, including the trigeminal pathways, was found in either MO or CTTH patients. But patients with migraine had a reduced habituation, which probably reflects an abnormal excitability of the cortical areas involved in pain processing.

Sources of cortical responses to painful CO2 laser skin stimulation of the hand and foot in the human brain

OBJECTIVES To investigate whether the same dipolar model could explain the scalp CO(2) laser evoked potential (LEP) distribution after either hand or foot skin stimulation. METHODS LEPs were recorded in 14 healthy subjects after hand and foot skin stimulation and brain electrical source analysis of responses obtained in each individual was performed. RESULTS A 5 dipolar sources model explained the scalp LEP topography after both hand and foot stimulation. In particular, we showed that the co-ordinates of the two earliest activated dipoles were compatible with source locations in the upper bank of the Sylvian fissure on both sides. These sources did not change their location when the stimulation site was moved from the upper to the lower limb. The other 3 dipoles of our model were activated in the late LEP latency range with a biphasic profile and a location compatible with activation of the cingulate gyrus and deep temporo-insular structures. CONCLUSIONS The dipolar model previously proposed for the hand stimulation LEPs can also satisfactorily explain the LEP distribution obtained after foot stimulation. The earliest activated Sylvian dipolar sources did not change their location when the upper or lower limb was stimulated, as expected from the close projections of hand and foot in the second somatosensory area. No source in the primary somatosensory area was necessary to model the scalp topography of LEPs to hand and foot stimulation.

Learning potentiates neurophysiological and behavioral placebo analgesic responses.

Abstract Expectation and conditioning are supposed to be the two main psychological mechanisms for inducing a placebo response. Here, we further investigate the effects of both expectation, which was induced by verbal suggestion alone, and conditioning at the level of N1 and N2–P2 components of CO2 laser‐evoked potentials (LEPs) and subjective pain reports. Forty‐four healthy volunteers were pseudorandomly assigned to one of three experimental groups: Group 1 was tested with verbal suggestion alone, Group 2 was tested with a conditioning procedure, whereby the intensity of painful stimulation was reduced surreptitiously, so as to make the volunteers believe that the treatment was effective, Group 3 was a control group that allowed us to rule out phenomena of sensitization and/or habituation. Pain perception was assessed according to a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 = no pain sensation to 10 = maximum imaginable pain. Both verbal suggestions (Group 1) and conditioning (Group 2) modified the N2–P2 complex, but not the N1 component of LEPs. However, the suggestion‐induced LEP changes occurred without subjective perception of pain decrease. Conversely, the N2–P2 amplitude changes that were induced by the conditioning procedure were associated with the subjective perception of pain reduction. Compared to natural history, conditioning produced more robust reductions of LEP amplitudes than verbal suggestions alone. Overall, these findings indicate that prior positive experience plays a key role in maximizing both behavioral and neurophysiological placebo responses, emphasizing that the placebo effect is a learning phenomenon which affects the early central nociceptive processing.

Inhibition of the human primary motor area by painful heat stimulation of the skin

OBJECTIVE To prove whether painful cutaneous stimuli can affect specifically the motor cortex excitability. METHODS The electromyographic (EMG) responses, recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle after either transcranial magnetic or electric anodal stimulation of the primary motor (MI) cortex, was conditioned by both painful and non-painful CO2 laser stimuli delivered on the hand skin. RESULTS Painful CO2 laser stimuli reduced the amplitude of the EMG responses evoked by the transcranial magnetic stimulation of both the contralateral and ipsilateral MI areas. This inhibitory effect followed the arrival of the nociceptive inputs to cerebral cortex. Instead, the EMG response amplitude was not significantly modified either when it was evoked by the motor cortex anodal stimulation or when non-painful CO2 laser pulses were used as conditioning stimuli. CONCLUSIONS Since the magnetic stimulation leads to transynaptic activation of pyramidal neurons, while the anodal stimulation activates directly cortico-spinal axons, the differential effect of the noxious stimuli on the EMG responses evoked by the two motor cortex stimulation techniques suggests that the observed inhibitory effect has a cortical origin. The bilateral cortical representation of pain explains why the painful CO2 laser stimuli showed a conditioning effect on MI area of both hemispheres. Non-painful CO2 laser pulses did not produce any effect, thus suggesting that the reduction of the MI excitability was specifically due to the activation of nociceptive afferents.

Abnormal processing of the nociceptive input in Parkinson's disease : A study with CO2 laser evoked potentials

&NA; Since a number of patients with Parkinson’s Disease (PD) complain of painful sensations, we studied whether the central processing of nociceptive inputs is abnormal in PD. To test this hypothesis, we recorded scalp CO2 laser evoked potentials (LEPs) to hand skin stimulation in 18 pain‐free PD patients with unilateral bradykinetic‐rigid syndrome (hemiparkinson) during the off state and in 18 healthy subjects. This technique allows us to explore non‐invasively the functional status of some cerebral structures involved in nociceptive input processing. In both PD patients and control subjects, CO2 laser stimulation gave rise to a main negative N2 potential followed by a positive P2 response at vertex peaking at a latency of about 200 and 300 ms, respectively. These potentials are thought to originate from several brain structures devoted to nociceptive input processing, including the cingulate gyrus and insula. PD patients and normal subjects showed comparable N2 and P2 latencies, whereas the N2/P2 peak‐to‐peak amplitude was significantly lower in PD patients (regardless of the clinically affected body side) than in controls. LEPs were even recorded after acute L‐dopa administration in 7 additional PD patients. L‐dopa administration yielded no significant change in N2/P2 amplitude as compared to the off state. These results suggest an abnormal nociceptive input processing in pain‐free PD patients which appears to be independent of clinical expression of parkinsonian motor signs and is not affected by dopaminergic stimulation.

Dipolar modelling of the scalp evoked potentials to painful contact heat stimulation of the human skin

Contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs) were collected in 12 healthy subjects by stimulating the forearm skin with a couple of thermodes at a painful intensity. The stimulated area was 628 mm(2) and the repetition rate was 0.1 Hz. The electroencephalogram was recorded by 31 electrodes placed on the scalp according to an extended 10-20 System. A dipolar model explaining the scalp CHEP distribution was built by using the brain electrical source analysis. The model includes two dipoles located bilaterally in the perisylvian region, one dipole in the deep midline region and two dipoles located bilaterally in the deep temporal lobe. This dipolar model is very similar to that previously described to explain the topography of evoked potentials to radiant heat stimulation by laser pulses. Since laser stimuli activate the nociceptive fibres, the strong similarity of the cerebral dipoles activated by contact heat stimuli and by laser pulses suggests that only nociceptive inputs are involved in the scalp painful CHEP building. Therefore, CHEP recording can be useful for clinical examination of the nociceptive system.

Clinical and neurophysiological abnormalities before and after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee

Objectives ‐ We aimed to study knee proprioception and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to stimulation of the common peroneal nerve (CPN) in 7 patients with lesion of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) before and after ACL reconstruction. Materials and methods ‐ We recorded the spinal N14 and scalp P27 potentials in 5 patients, while in the remaining 2 patients we calculated scalp SEP maps by 20 electrodes. The knee proprioception was tested by comparing the sensitivity to movement of both the knees. Results ‐ Before surgery, all patients showed decreased knee position sense and lack of the cortical P27 potential on the side of the ACL lesion. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the ligament improved neither the knee proprioception nor the somatosensory central conduction. Conclusion ‐We suggest that the loss of the knee mechanoreceptors can be followed by modifications of the central nervous system, which are not compensated by other nervous structures.

Altered processing of sensory stimuli in patients with migraine

Migraine is a cyclic disorder, in which functional and morphological brain changes fluctuate over time, culminating periodically in an attack. In the migrainous brain, temporal processing of external stimuli and sequential recruitment of neuronal networks are often dysfunctional. These changes reflect complex CNS dysfunction patterns. Assessment of multimodal evoked potentials and nociceptive reflex responses can reveal altered patterns of the brains electrophysiological activity, thereby aiding our understanding of the pathophysiology of migraine. In this Review, we summarize the most important findings on temporal processing of evoked and reflex responses in migraine. Considering these data, we propose that thalamocortical dysrhythmia may be responsible for the altered synchronicity in migraine. To test this hypothesis in future research, electrophysiological recordings should be combined with neuroimaging studies so that the temporal patterns of sensory processing in patients with migraine can be correlated with the accompanying anatomical and functional changes.