Mathijs D. Blikkendaal

Predictors of successful surgical outcome in laparoscopic hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate, after correction for patient factors, to what extent blood loss, operative time, and adverse events are decisive factors for the successful outcome of laparoscopic hysterectomy. A secondary objective was to estimate to what extent a successful outcome can be predicted from surgical experience or other measures of surgical skill. METHODS: A nationwide multivariate 1-year cohort analysis was conducted with gynecologists who perform laparoscopic hysterectomy. The primary outcomes were blood loss, operative time, and adverse events. The procedures were corrected for multiple covariates in a mixed-effects logistic regression model. Furthermore, all primary outcomes were related to experience and the influence of individual surgical skills factors. RESULTS: One thousand five hundred thirty-four laparoscopic hysterectomies were analyzed for 79 surgeons. The success of the surgical outcome was significantly influenced by uterus weight, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification, previous abdominal surgeries, and the type of laparoscopic hysterectomy. Surgical experience also predicted the successful outcome of laparoscopic hysterectomy with respect to blood loss and adverse events (P=.048 and .036, respectively). A significant improvement in surgical outcomes tends to continue up to approximately 125 procedures. Independently from surgical experience, an individual surgical skills factor was identified as odds ratio 1.67 and 3.60 for blood loss and operative time, respectively. CONCLUSION: After adjusting for risk factors, it was shown that an increase in experience positively predicted a successful outcome in laparoscopic hysterectomy with respect to blood loss and adverse events. However, the independent surgical skills factor shows a large variation in proficiency between individuals. The fact that a surgeon has performed many laparoscopic hysterectomies does not necessarily guarantee good surgical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II

An Alternative Approach for Removal of Placental Remnants: Hysteroscopic Morcellation

STUDY OBJECTIVE To evaluate our initial experience with hysteroscopic morcellation for removal of placental remnants. DESIGN Retrospective case series (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING University hospital and 2 teaching hospitals. PATIENTS Women with histologic confirmation of placental remnants after miscarriage, termination of pregnancy, or delivery. INTERVENTION From January 2005 to May 2010, hysteroscopic morcellation was used for removal of placental remnants. Retrospective review of medical records was performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Analysis of 105 procedures was performed. In 99 procedures (94.3%), placental remnants were removed successfully at the first approach, and 90 procedures (85.7%) were without any adverse events. In 6 patients (5.7%), uterine perforation occurred, in 4 during cervical dilation and in 2 during the hysteroscopic procedure. Postoperatively, 3 patients had fever, 1 had hemorrhage, and 1 had abdominal pain. Routine second-look hysteroscopy in 23 patients revealed mild intrauterine adhesions in 1 patient (4.4%). CONCLUSION Hysteroscopic morcellation seems to be an effective technique for management of placental remnants. Future studies comparing various surgical treatment methods are needed to define factors that influence the ability to obtain the safest and most complete removal of placental remnants because this remains a challenging pregnancy-related condition.

Implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy: maintenance of skills after a mentorship program.

Background: To evaluate the implementation and maintenance of advanced laparoscopic skills after a structured mentorship program in laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). Methods: Cohort retrospective analysis of 104 successive LHs performed by two gynecologists during and after a mentorship program. LHs were compared for indication, patient characteristics and intraoperative characteristics. As a frame of reference, 94 LHs performed by the mentor were analyzed. Results: With regard to indication, blood loss and adverse outcomes, both trainees performed LHs during their mentorship program comparable with the LHs performed by the mentor. The difference in mean operating time between trainees and mentor was not clinically significant. Both trainees progressed along a learning curve, while operating time remained statistically constant and comparable to that of the mentor. After completing the mentorship program, both gynecologists maintained their acquired skills as blood loss, adverse outcome rates and operating time were comparable with the results during their traineeship. Conclusion: A mentorship program is an effective and durable tool for implementing a new surgical procedure in a teaching hospital with respect to patient safety aspects, as indications, operating time and adverse outcome rates are comparable to those of the mentor in his own hospital during and after completing the mentorship program.

A dynamic quality assessment tool for laparoscopic hysterectomy to measure surgical outcomes

BACKGROUND The current health care system has an urgent need for tools to measure quality. A wide range of quality indicators have been developed in an attempt to differentiate between high-quality and low-quality health care processes. However, one of the main issues of currently used indicators is the lack of case-mix correction and improvement possibilities. Case-mix is defined as specific (patient) characteristics that are known to potentially affect (surgical) outcome. If these characteristics are not taken into consideration, comparisons of outcome among health care providers may not be valid. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to develop and test a quality assessment tool for laparoscopic hysterectomy, which can serve as a new outcome quality indicator. STUDY DESIGN This is a prospective, international, multicenter implementation study. A web-based application was developed with 3 main goals: (1) to measure the surgeons performance using 3 primary outcomes (blood loss, operative time, and complications); (2) to provide immediate individual feedback using cumulative observed-minus-expected graphs; and (3) to detect consistently suboptimal performance after correcting for case-mix characteristics. All gynecologists who perform laparoscopic hysterectomies were requested to register their procedures in the application. A patient safety risk factor checklist was used by the surgeon for reflection. Thereafter a prospective implementation study was performed, and the application was tested using a survey that included the System Usability Scale. RESULTS A total of 2066 laparoscopic hysterectomies were registered by 81 gynecologists. Mean operative time was 100 ± 39 minutes, blood loss 127 ± 163 mL, and the complication rate 6.1%. The overall survey response rate was 75%, and the mean System Usability Scale was 76.5 ± 13.6, which indicates that the application was good to excellent. The majority of surgeons reported that the application made them more aware of their performance, the outcomes, and patient safety, and they noted that the application provided motivation for improving future performance. CONCLUSION We report the development and test of a real-time, dynamic, quality assessment tool for measuring individual surgical outcome for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Importantly, this tool provides opportunities for improving surgical performance. Our study provides a foundation for helping clinicians develop evidence-based quality indicators for other surgical procedures.

Measuring surgical safety during minimally invasive surgical procedures: a validation study

BackgroundDuring the implementation of new interventions (i.e., surgical devices and technologies) in the operating room, surgical safety might be compromised. Current safety measures are insufficient in detecting safety hazards during this process. The aim of the study was to observe whether surgical teams are capable of measuring surgical safety, especially with regard to the introduction of new interventions.MethodsA Surgical Safety Questionnaire was developed that had to be filled out directly postoperative by three surgical team members. A potential safety concern was defined as at least one answer between (strongly) disagree and indifferent. The validity of the questionnaire was assessed by comparison with the results from video analysis. Two different observers annotated the presence and effect of surgical flow disturbances during 40 laparoscopic hysterectomies performed between November 2010 and April 2012.ResultsThe surgeon reported a potential safety concern in 16% (85/520 questions). With respect to the scrub nurse and anesthesiologist, this was both 9% (46/520). With respect to the preparation, functioning, and ease of use of the devices in 37.5–47.5% (15–19/40 procedures) a potential safety concern was reported by one or more team members. During procedures after which a potential safety concern was reported, surgical flow disturbances lasted a higher percentage of the procedure duration [9.3 ± 6.2 vs. 2.9 ± 3.7% (mean ± SD), p < .001]. After procedures during which a new instrument or device was used, more potential safety concerns were reported (51.2 vs. 23.1%, p < .001).ConclusionsPotential safety concerns were especially reported during procedures in which a relatively high percentage of the duration consisted of surgical flow disturbances and during procedures in which a new instrument or device was used. The Surgical Safety Questionnaire can act as a validated tool to evaluate and maintain surgical safety during minimally invasive procedures, especially during the introduction of a new intervention.