Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Matias Vikse is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Matias Vikse.


Archive | 2018

Comparison of reformulations of the Duran-Grossmann model for Work and Heat Exchange Network (WHEN) synthesis

Haoshui Yu; Matias Vikse; Truls Gundersen

Abstract Work and Heat Exchange Networks (WHENs) have received increasing attention from both researchers and engineers during the last 5-10 years. The Duran-Grossmann model (Duran and Grossmann, 1986) can deal with heat integration problems with variable process streams. In WHENs, however, the identity of streams (hot/cold) can also change. Therefore, a revised Duran-Grossmann model applied to WHENs without knowing the identity of streams a priori is proposed. The revised Duran-Grossmann model consists of both binary variables and non-smooth functions. To facilitate the solution of the model, the non-smooth functions (max operators) can be reformulated in three ways. The first method is to reformulate the max operator using a Smooth Approximation (Balakrishna and Biegler, 1992). This function incorporates a small parameter, which may lead to either an ill- conditioned approximation or loss of accuracy if poorly chosen. The second method is using Explicit Disjunctions based on principles of the Duran-Grossmann model (Grossmann et al., 1998). To avoid using a max operator, disjunctions explicitly revealing the relationship between the stream inlet/outlet temperatures and pinch candidate temperatures are applied. The last method reformulates the max operator with Direct Disjunctions (Quirante et al., 2017). The max operator picks up the maximum value of two variables, thus it can be straightforward reformulated by a disjunctive programming approach. Even though these three reformulations of the Duran-Grossmann model have been previously investigated, considering uncertain stream identities applied to WHENs has not yet been reported. In this study, all the reformulations and models are implemented in the GAMS (Brooke et al., 1998) modelling framework. For a case study without isothermal streams, Smooth Approximation performs better than the other two formulations.


Computer-aided chemical engineering | 2017

Robust Flash Calculations through Nonsmooth Inside-Out Algorithms

Harry A.J. Watson; Matias Vikse; Truls Gundersen; Paul I. Barton

Abstract The ability to solve many important problems in process systems engineering is dependent on being able to perform vapor-liquid equilibrium (flash) calculations rapidly and consistently. The flash equations are particularly challenging to solve for non-ideal systems with many components, and many process simulators use some version of the inside-out algorithms ( Boston and Britt, 1978 ) for performing such calculations. However, these methods assume that the calculation result is always a two-phase mixture, which is not guaranteed outside of a range of input parameters that is not generally known a priori . This article continues the development of nonsmooth inside-out algorithms ( Watson et al., 2017 ) which retain the benefits of the original algorithms without the possibility of loss of reliability or performance when only a single phase is present. This article shows how this can be accomplished for the fixed pressure-entropy flash through the use of nonsmooth equations that relax the equilibrium constraints when necessary, automatically allowing convergence to either single-phase or two-phase solutions.


Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research | 2017

Reliable Flash Calculations: Part 1. Nonsmooth Inside-Out Algorithms

Harry A.J. Watson; Matias Vikse; Truls Gundersen; Paul I. Barton


Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research | 2017

Reliable Flash Calculations: Part 2. Process Flowsheeting with Nonsmooth Models and Generalized Derivatives

Harry A.J. Watson; Matias Vikse; Truls Gundersen; Paul I. Barton


Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research | 2018

Versatile Simulation Method for Complex Single Mixed Refrigerant Natural Gas Liquefaction Processes

Matias Vikse; Harry A.J. Watson; Truls Gundersen; Paul I. Barton


Energy | 2018

Optimization of single mixed-refrigerant natural gas liquefaction processes described by nondifferentiable models

Harry A.J. Watson; Matias Vikse; Truls Gundersen; Paul I. Barton


Chemical engineering transactions | 2017

Towards the use of mathematical optimization for work and heat exchange networks

Matias Vikse; Chao Fu; Paul I. Barton; Truls Gundersen


Energy | 2018

Work and heat integration: An emerging research area

Chao Fu; Matias Vikse; Truls Gundersen


Chemical engineering transactions | 2017

Challenges in work and heat integration

Chao Fu; Matias Vikse; Truls Gundersen


Processes | 2018

Simulation of Dual Mixed Refrigerant Natural Gas Liquefaction Processes Using a Nonsmooth Framework

Matias Vikse; Harry A.J. Watson; Truls Gundersen; Paul I. Barton

Collaboration


Dive into the Matias Vikse's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Truls Gundersen

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul I. Barton

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Harry A.J. Watson

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chao Fu

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Haoshui Yu

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chang He

Sun Yat-sen University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge