Matjaž Šinkovec
University of Ljubljana
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Matjaž Šinkovec.
Slovenian Medical Journal | 2013
Matjaž Šinkovec; Andrej Pernat; Matevž Jan; Bor Antolič
Background : Short-term oucomes of radiofrequency (RF) catheter isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (PAF/PEAF) are encouraging. However, long-term outcomes are not well defined. Therefore, we evaluated 3–5-year outcomes in our series of patients. Freedom from symptomatic AF/flutter/tachycardia recurrences with patients off antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) was considered a treatment success. Methods : Consecutive patients with symptomatic PAF/PEAF and AAD failure, without significant structural heart disease, were prospectively recruited between September 2003 and November 2009. Irrigated-tip RF ablation catheter and Lasso catheter were used after standard trans-septal approach with X-ray fluoroscopic guidance. Ablation endpoints were: complete segmental/circumferential ostial and antral electrical PV isolation, non-PV foci ablation, and bi-directional flutter isthmus (FI) block when indicated. The procedure was repeated if AF/flutter/tachycardia recurred after 3-month blanking period. The suspected arrhythmia recurrences were evaluated by series of ECG/Holter recordings. Data were analyzed by t-, chi-square, and Fisher’s exact tests. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results : In 126 patients, median age 55 years (range 19–75), 94 men (75 %), 86 with PAF and 40 with PEAF (31 %), 207 procedures were performed: single in 63 (50 %), double in 48 (38 %), and multiple in 15. FI was ablated in 53 patients (42 %). Tamponade occurred in 4 (3 %). No PV stenosis, esophageal injury, or stroke were detected clinically in 115 patients (91 %) during 36-month (13–89) follow-up. We achieved treatment success in 69 patients (61 %), partial success with a significant reduction of AF/flutter/tachycardia recurrences on AAD in 13 patients (12 %), and in 33 patients (27 %) the procedure was not successful. Overall, 73 % of our patients had long-term benefit. Outcomes were better in patients with PAF vs. PEAF (84 % vs. 48 %, p < 0,001), in younger age, in those without concomitant diseases, and in those with normal PV anatomy. These results were maintained in the subgroup of 58 patients over 56 months of follow-up: 35 (60 %), 6 (11 %), and 17 (29 %), respectively. Conclusions : Lasso-guided RF irrigated-tip segmental/circumferential PV isolation is a safe and long-term successful treatment of PAF in the majority of our patients. The method needs improvements in patients with PEAF, possibly with the introduction of new technologies.
Slovenian Medical Journal | 2010
Matjaž Šinkovec; Irena Vrečar; Marijan Šustar; Andrej Pernat; Peter Rakovec
Background: Diff erent reentry circuits within A-V node region are able to sustain A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). On this basis, electrophysiological criteria for at least three AVNRT types – slow/fast, fast/slow, and slow/ slow–have been proposed. Th e aim was to reevaluate these criteria in a group of our patients. In addition, clinical profi le and long-term success rate of catheter ablation procedure were studied. Methods: All consecutive patients referred for catheter ablation of AVNRT from September 2004 to December 2006 were prospectively recruited. Th e informed consent was signed by all and the study had been approved by the competent state’s ethics committee. A standard electrophysiological study with programmed single or double extrastimuli or high-rate electrostimulation until the development of refractoriness or tachycardia induction was performed. Orciprenaline i.v. was used to facilitate AVNRT induction and to test the ablation result. Slow-pathway electrograms at inferoposteroseptal right atrium and ablation-induced nodal rhythm were ablation targets. Th e radiofrequency energy of 30–50 W for a duration of at least 20 seconds was used. Non-inducibility of AVNRT and of echo-beats was the procedure end point. In addition, antegrade and retrograde A-V junction conduction times were measured and analysed manually. Patients underwent a detailed re-evaluation aft er at least 1 year of follow-up. Th e descriptive statistic was used to present the data. Results: One hundred and four patients, 72 % female, mean age 53 years, were included. Th ey had their fi rst tachycardia episode at a mean age of 35 years with an average recurrence rate of 1- to 3-times a year. Syncope was experienced in 9.5 % of patients. Familial tachycardias were reported in 4 % of patients. One third (34 %) were hypertensive (≥ 140/90 mmHg). In majority, slow/fast AVNRT type (98/104–94 %) was induced. Th e fast/slow and slow/slow types were rare (3/104 each). Th e mean heart rate of induced AVNRT was 166 beats/min. Measurements were available for 92 patients. Our best diagnostic criteria were: V-A’interval ( 150 fast/slow, 70–120 slow/slow), H-A’interval ( 200 fast/slow; 120–170 slow/ slow), and A’-H/H-A’ ratio (> 2,3 slow/fast, < 1 fast/slow, 1–2,3 slow/slow). Th e slow/fast type was generally induced from the atrium, while the fast/slow and slow/slow also from the ventricle. In the slow/fast type, the earliest retrograde atrial activation was recorded from the His bundle position in 95 % (proximal coronary sinus (CS) in 5 %). Th e earliest retrograde atrial activation was recorded from proximal CS in the fast/slow type, but from CS or His in the slow/slow. A transient A-V block was documented in 6 patients during ablation procedure. None of them needed a permanent pacemaker implantation. Aft er 16 months of follow-up, 96 % of our patients were free of tachycardia recurrences. Conclusions: Electophysiologic criteria for three AVNRT types, clinical characteristics, and AVNRT long-term radiofrequency catheter ablation success rate are consistent with data reported in the literature.
Slovenian Medical Journal | 2009
Matjaž Šinkovec; Andrej Pernat
aims We evaluated clinical outcome of segmental/circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation and linear defragmentation procedure in our first series of patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (PAF/PEAF). The freedom from symptomatic AF/flutter/ tachycardia recurrences with patients off antiarrhythmic treatment (AAD) was primary endpoint of the procedure. methods Consecutive patients with highly symptomatic PAF/PEAF and AAD failure were prospectively recruited from September 2003 to June 2007. Patients 40 % and left atrial diameter 3 months. In patients with PEAF, fast fragmented/complex electrograms were ablated in a linear fashion, connecting upper PV ostia and/or PV ostia with proximal anatomical structures. Only FI line was tested for completeness of block. The irrigated-tip radiofrequency ablation catheter and Lasso catheter (Biosense-Webster) were used after standard transseptal approach with X-ray fluoroscopy guidance. The suspected arrhythmia recurrences were evaluated by series of ECG/Holter recordings. Results. Fifty-eight patients, 43 men, average age 50 years, range 19–69, including 24(41 %) with PEAF, were enrolled. In these patients, 113 procedures were performed: single study in 20, 2 in 24, 3 in 11, and 4 in 3 patients, respectively. Complications occurred in 5 patients including tamponade in 2, acute effusion in 1, and inadvertened pericardial punction in 2. No PV stenosis, esophageal injury, or stroke were detected clinically during 16-month (4–47) follow-up. We achieved primary endpoint in 42 patients (72 %); partial endpoint in 5 patients (9 %) with significant reduction of AF/flutter/tachycardia recurrences on AAD; and in 11 patients (19 %) procedure was not successful. Overall, 81 % of our patients (93 % with PAF, 63 % with PEAF) benefited from the procedure. conclusions Lasso-guided irrigated-tip RF PV isolation and linear defragmentation is safe and long-term successful treatment of PAF/PEAF in majority of middle-aged patients.
Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery | 2011
Andy C. Kiser; Mark Landers; Ker Boyce; Matjaž Šinkovec; Andrej Pernat; Borut Gersak
Europace | 2011
Matjaž Šinkovec; Andrej Pernat; Zoran Rajković; Matevž Jan; Bor Antolič; Peter Rakovec
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift | 2016
Bor Antolič; Andrej Pernat; Marta Cvijić; David Žižek; Matevž Jan; Matjaž Šinkovec
Zdravniski Vestnik-slovenian Medical Journal | 2013
Matjaž Šinkovec; Andrej Pernat; Matevž Jan; Bor Antolič; J. Kovač; K. T. Podkrajšek; M. Debeljak
Slovenian Medical Journal | 2017
Matjaž Šinkovec; Andrej Pernat; Bor Antolič; Luka Klemen
Zdravniski Vestnik-slovenian Medical Journal | 2013
Matevž Jan; Matjaž Šinkovec; Bor Antolič; Andrej Pernat
Slovenian Medical Journal | 2013
Matjaž Šinkovec; Andrej Pernat; Matevž Jan; Bor Antolič; Jernej Kovač; Katarina Trebušak Podkrajšek; Maruša Debeljak