Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Matthew Anstey is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Matthew Anstey.


Globalization and Health | 2013

Climate change and health - what's the problem?

Matthew Anstey

The scientific consensus is that global warming is occurring and is largely the result of greenhouse gas emissions from human activity. This paper examines the health implications of global warming, the current socio-political attitudes towards action on climate change and highlight the health co-benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, policy development for climate change and health should embrace health systems strengthening, commencing by incorporating climate change targets into Millennium Development Goal 7.


Critical Care | 2015

Perceptions of the appropriateness of care in California adult intensive care units.

Matthew Anstey; John L. Adams; Elizabeth A. McGlynn

IntroductionIncreased demand for expensive intensive care unit (ICU) services may contribute to rising health-care costs. A focus on appropriate use may offer a clinically meaningful way of finding the balance. We aimed to determine the extent and characteristics of perceived inappropriate treatment among ICU doctors and nurses, defined as an imbalance between the amount or intensity of treatments being provided and the patient’s expected prognosis or wishes.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study of doctors and nurses providing care to patients in 56 adult ICUs in California between May and August 2013. In total, 1,363 doctors and nurses completed an anonymous electronic survey.ResultsThirty-eight percent of 1,169 respondents (95% confidence interval (CI) 35% to 41%, 51.1% of physicians and 35.8% of nurses) identified at least one patient as receiving inappropriate treatment. Respondents most commonly reported that the amount of treatment provided was disproportionate to the patient’s expected prognosis or wishes—325 out of 429 (76%, 95% CI 72% to 80%)—and that treatment was ‘too much’ in 93% of cases. Factors associated with perceived inappropriateness of treatment were the belief that death in their ICU is seen as a failure (odds ratio (OR) 5.75, 95% CI 2.28 to 14.53, P = 0.000), profession (doctors more than nurses) (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.97, P = 0.000), lack of collaboration between doctors and nurses (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.80, P = 0.004), intent to leave their job (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.55, P = 0.005), and the perceived responsibility to control health-care costs (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.33, P = 0.026). Providers supported formal communication training (90%, 95% CI 88% to 92%) and mandatory family meetings (89%, 95% CI 87% to 91%) as potential solutions to reduce the provision of inappropriate treatment.ConclusionsDoctors and nurses working in California ICUs frequently perceive treatment to be inappropriate. They also identified measures that could reduce the provision of inappropriate treatment.


The Medical Journal of Australia | 2014

Do outlier inpatients experience more emergency calls in hospital? An observational cohort study

John D. Santamaria; Antony Tobin; Matthew Anstey; Roger J Smith; David A Reid

Objective: To determine the effect of spending time as an outlier (ie, an inpatient who spends time away from his or her “home” ward) on the frequency of emergency calls for patients admitted to a tertiary referral hospital.


Trials | 2017

REstricted Fluid REsuscitation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension (REFRESH): Study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

Stephen Pj Macdonald; David Taylor; Gerben Keijzers; Glenn Arendts; Daniel M Fatovich; Frances B. Kinnear; Simon G. A. Brown; Rinaldo Bellomo; Sally Burrows; John F. Fraser; Edward Litton; Juan Carlos Ascencio-Lane; Matthew Anstey; David McCutcheon; Lisa Smart; Ioana Vlad; James Winearls; Bradley Wibrow

BackgroundGuidelines recommend an initial intravenous (IV) fluid bolus of 30 ml/kg isotonic crystalloid for patients with sepsis and hypotension. However, there is a lack of evidence from clinical trials to support this. Accumulating observational data suggest harm associated with the injudicious use of fluids in sepsis. There is currently equipoise regarding liberal or restricted fluid-volume resuscitation as first-line treatment for sepsis-related hypotension. A randomised trial comparing these two approaches is, therefore, justified.Methods/designThe REstricted Fluid REsuscitation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension trial (REFRESH) is a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase II clinical feasibility trial. Participants will be patients presenting to the emergency departments of Australian metropolitan hospitals with suspected sepsis and a systolic blood pressure of < 100 mmHg, persisting after a 1000-ml fluid bolus with isotonic crystalloid. Participants will be randomised to either a second 1000-ml fluid bolus (standard care) or maintenance rate fluid only, with the early commencement of a vasopressor infusion to maintain a mean arterial pressure of > 65 mmHg, if required (restricted fluid). All will receive further protocolised fluid boluses (500 ml or 250 ml, respectively), if required during the 6-h study period. The primary outcome measure is total volume administered in the first 6 h. Secondary outcomes include fluid volume at 24 h, organ support ‘free days’ to day 28, 90-day mortality, and a range of feasibility and process-of-care measures. Participants will also undergo serial measurement, over the first 24 h, of biomarkers of inflammation, endothelial cell activation and glycocalyx degradation for comparison between the groups.DiscussionThis is the first randomised trial examining fluid volume for initial resuscitation in septic shock in an industrialised country. A pragmatic, open-label design will establish the feasibility of undertaking a large, international, multicentre trial with sufficient power to assess clinical outcomes. The embedded biomarker study aims to provide mechanistic plausibility for a larger trial by defining the effects of fluid volume on markers of systemic inflammation and the vascular endothelium.Trial registrationAustralia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ID: ACTRN12616000006448. Registered on 12 January 2016.


Journal of Critical Care | 2014

Teaching and practicing cost-awareness in the intensive care unit: A TARGET to aim for☆ , ☆☆ ,★

Matthew Anstey; Steven E. Weinberger; David H. Roberts

Intensive care is one of the main contributors to rising inpatient hospital costs due to frequent use of expensive diagnostics and therapies. With successful track records of team- and protocol-based care, intensive care units are ideal sites to take the lead in reducing overuse and misuse of diagnostic tests and prescribing. We offer a framework for practicing and teaching cost-awareness in the intensive care unit based on the acronym TARGET. The components of the care are as follows: Talk to patients about their preferences for care, Ask for outside tests, avoid Routine and/or Repeated tests, prescribe Generic medications, Educate about costs, and Transfuse appropriately.


Australian Health Review | 2013

The hidden cost of private health insurance in Australia

Davinia Seah; Timothy Z. Cheong; Matthew Anstey

The provision of health services in Australia currently is primarily financed by a unique interaction of public and private insurers. This commentary looks at a loophole in this framework, namely that private insurers have to date been able to avoid funding healthcare for some of their policy holders, as it is not a requirement to use private insurance when treatment occurs in Australian public hospitals.


Australian Health Review | 2012

Sleep Faster! (Somebody else needs your blanket...)

Matthew Anstey; Stephen P. Gildfind; Eugene Litvak

One of the elements of the health reform plan, as agreed to by Australian state and federal governments, is to introduce a 4-h National Access Target, to reduce emergency department (ED) waiting times. This article highlights the flawed rationale behind the 4-h rule, the UK experience of this rule and discusses the potential dangers it poses to Australian patients. An alternative solution proposed is the separation of elective and emergency surgical streams to reduce the variability in demand for inpatient services.


Critical Care Medicine | 2017

Quantifying the Mortality Impact of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in the ICU

Lior Fuchs; Matthew Anstey; Mengling Feng; Ronen Toledano; Slava Kogan; Michael D. Howell; Peter Clardy; Leo Celli; Daniel Talmor; Victor Novack

Objectives: We quantified the 28-day mortality effect of preexisting do-not-resuscitate orders in ICUs. Design: Longitudinal, retrospective study of patients admitted to five ICUs at a tertiary university medical center (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, BIDMC, Boston, MA) between 2001 and 2008. Intervention: None. Patients: Two cohorts were defined: patients with do not resuscitate advance directives on day 1 of ICU admission and a control group comprising patients with no limitations of level of care on ICU day 1 (full code). Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was mortality at 28 days after ICU admission. Of 19,007 ICU patients, 1,239 patients (6.5%) had a do-not-resuscitate order on the first day of ICU admission and survived 48 hours in the ICU. We matched those do-not-resuscitate patients with 2,402 patients with full-code status. Twenty-eight day and 1-year mortality were both significantly higher in the do-not-resuscitate group (33.9% vs 18.4% and 60.7% vs 40.2%; p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Do-not-resuscitate status is an independent risk factor for ICU mortality. This may reflect severity of illness not captured by other clinical factors, but the perceptions of the treating team related to do-not-resuscitate status could also be causally responsible for increased mortality in patients with do-not-resuscitate status.


Critical Care Medicine | 2017

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients Admitted to Intensive Care in Australia and New Zealand: A Multicenter Cohort Analysis of In-Hospital Mortality Over 15 Years

Andrew A. Udy; Chelsey Vladic; Edward Robert Saxby; Jeremy Cohen; Anthony Delaney; Oliver Flower; Matthew Anstey; Rinaldo Bellomo; David James Cooper; David Pilcher

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to describe in-hospital mortality in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients requiring ICU admission. Secondary aims were to identify clinical characteristics associated with inferior outcomes, to compare subarachnoid hemorrhage mortality with other neurological diagnoses, and to explore the variability in subarachnoid hemorrhage standardized mortality ratios. Design: Multicenter, binational, retrospective cohort study. Setting: Data were extracted from the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation Adult Patient Database. Patients: All available records for the period January 2000 to June 2015. Interventions: Nil. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 11,327 subarachnoid hemorrhage patients were identified in the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation Adult Patient Database. The overall case fatality rate was 29.2%, which declined from 35.4% in 2000 to 27.2% in 2015 (p = 0.01). Older age, nonoperative admission, mechanical ventilation, higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III scores, lower Glasgow Coma Scale, and admission prior to 2004 were all associated with lower hospital survival in multivariable analysis (p < 0.05). In comparison with other neurological diagnoses, subarachnoid hemorrhage patients had significantly greater risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.79–2.00]). Utilizing data from the 5 most recent complete years (2010–2014), three sites had higher and four (including the two largest centers) had lower standardized mortality ratios than might be expected due to chance. Conclusions: Subarachnoid hemorrhage patients admitted to ICU in Australia and New Zealand have a high mortality rate. Year of admission beyond 2003 did not impact risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality. Significant variability was noted between institutions. This implies an urgent need to systematically evaluate many aspects of the critical care provided to this patient group.


Journal of Critical Care | 2016

Determinants of 6-month survival of critically ill patients with an active hematologic malignancy

Stephen Richards; Bradley Wibrow; Matthew Anstey; Hasib Sidiqi; Ashlyn Chee; Kwok M. Ho

PURPOSE This study assessed the determinants of 6-month survival of critically ill patients with an active hematologic malignancy (HM). METHODS All patients with an active HM defined by either receiving ongoing or due to receive antineoplastic therapy, admitted to 2 tertiary intensive care units between 2010 and 2015, were included in this retrospective cohort study. RESULTS Of the 273 patients included in the study (median age, 63[interquartile range, 54-71] years; 40.7% female), 116 (42.5%; 95% confidence interval, 36.8-48.4) died in hospital. The 6-month mortality was 56.4% (95% confidence interval, 50.5-62.2). Mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission source, and the type of active HM were significantly associated with hospital mortality and 6-month survival, after adjusting for severity of acute illness. The type of active HM was the most important prognostic factor, with over a 10-fold difference in 6-month survival between HM with the best and worst prognosis. In addition, recent hematopoietic stem cell transplant (<30 days) was associated with a better 6-month survival. CONCLUSION Differences in 6-month survival between critically ill patients with different types of active HM were substantial. Recent hematopoietic stem cell transplant, severity of illness, and use of mechanical ventilation were additional important determinants of 6-month survival in patients with an active HM.

Collaboration


Dive into the Matthew Anstey's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bradley Wibrow

Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brigit Roberts

Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Imogen Mitchell

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew H. Ford

University of Western Australia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anthony Delaney

Royal North Shore Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hasib Sidiqi

Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge