Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Matthew J. Helmers is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Matthew J. Helmers.


Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems | 2014

Targeting perennial vegetation in agricultural landscapes for enhancing ecosystem services

Heidi Asbjornsen; V. Hernandez-Santana; Matt Liebman; J. Bayala; Jiquan Chen; Matthew J. Helmers; C. K. Ong; Lisa A. Schulte

Over the past century, agricultural landscapes worldwide have increasingly been managed for the primary purpose of producing food, while other diverse ecosystem services potentially available from these landscapes have often been undervalued and diminished. The incorporation of relatively small amounts of perennial vegetation in strategic locations within agricultural landscapes dominated by annual crops—or perennialization—creates an opportunity for enhancing the provision of a wide range of goods and services to society, such as water purification, hydrologic regulation, pollination services, control of pest and pathogen populations, diverse food and fuel products, and greater resilience to climate change and extreme disturbances, while at the same time improving the sustainability of food production. This paper synthesizesthe current scientific theoryand evidence for the role of perennial plants in balancing conservation with agricultural production, focusing on the Midwestern USA as a model system, while also drawing comparisons with other climatically diverse regions of the world. Particular emphasis is given to identifying promising opportunities for advancement and critical gaps in our knowledge related to purposefully integrating perennial vegetation into agroecosystems as a management tool for maximizing multiple benefits to society.


Agroforestry Systems | 2009

Methods to prioritize placement of riparian buffers for improved water quality.

Mark D. Tomer; Michael G. Dosskey; Michael R. Burkart; David E. James; Matthew J. Helmers; Dean E. Eisenhauer

Agroforestry buffers in riparian zones can improve stream water quality, provided they intercept and remove contaminants from surface runoff and/or shallow groundwater. Soils, topography, surficial geology, and hydrology determine the capability of forest buffers to intercept and treat these flows. This paper describes two landscape analysis techniques for identifying and mapping locations where agroforestry buffers can effectively improve water quality. One technique employs soil survey information to rank soil map units for how effectively a buffer, when sited on them, would trap sediment from adjacent cropped fields. Results allow soil map units to be compared for relative effectiveness of buffers for improving water quality and, thereby, to prioritize locations for buffer establishment. A second technique uses topographic and streamflow information to help identify locations where buffers are most likely to intercept water moving towards streams. For example, the topographic wetness index, an indicator of potential soil saturation on given terrain, identifies where buffers can readily intercept surface runoff and/or shallow groundwater flows. Maps based on this index can be useful for site-specific buffer placement at farm and small-watershed scales. A case study utilizing this technique shows that riparian forests likely have the greatest potential to improve water quality along first-order streams, rather than larger streams. The two methods are complementary and could be combined, pending the outcome of future research. Both approaches also use data that are publicly available in the US. The information can guide projects and programs at scales ranging from farm-scale planning to regional policy implementation.


Journal of Environmental Quality | 2012

Sediment removal by prairie filter strips in row-cropped ephemeral watersheds

Matthew J. Helmers; Xiaobo Zhou; Heidi Asbjornsen; Randy Kolka; Mark D. Tomer; Richard M. Cruse

Twelve small watersheds in central Iowa were used to evaluate the effectiveness of prairie filter strips (PFS) in trapping sediment from agricultural runoff. Four treatments with PFS of different size and location (100% rowcrop, 10% PFS of total watershed area at footslope, 10% PFS at footslope and in contour strips, 20% PFS at footslope and in contour strips) arranged in a balanced incomplete block design were seeded in July 2007. All watersheds were in bromegrass ( L.) for at least 10 yr before treatment establishment. Cropped areas were managed under a no-till, 2-yr corn ( L.)-soybean [ (L.) Merr.] rotation beginning in 2007. About 38 to 85% of the total sediment export from cropland occurred during the early growth stage of rowcrop due to wet field conditions and poor ground cover. The greatest sediment load was observed in 2008 due to the initial soil disturbance and gradually decreased thereafter. The mean annual sediment yield through 2010 was 0.36 and 8.30 Mg ha for the watersheds with and without PFS, respectively, a 96% sediment trapping efficiency for the 4-yr study period. The amount and distribution of PFS had no significant impact on runoff and sediment yield, probably due to the relatively large width (37-78 m) of footslope PFS. The findings suggest that incorporation of PFS at the footslope position of annual rowcrop systems provides an effective approach to reducing sediment loss in runoff from agricultural watersheds under a no-till system.


Transactions of the ASABE | 2008

Nitrogen Application Rate Effect on Nitrate-Nitrogen Concentration and Loss in Subsurface Drainage for a Corn-Soybean Rotation

Peter A. Lawlor; Matthew J. Helmers; James L. Baker; Stewart W. Melvin; Dean W. Lemke

Excess precipitation in Midwest agricultural production areas is often removed artificially via subsurface drainage systems that intercept and divert it to surface waters. Nitrogen (N), either applied as fertilizer or manure or derived from soil organic matter, can be carried as nitrate with the excess water in quantities that may have deleterious effects downstream. A field study was initiated in 1989 in Pocahontas County, Iowa, on 0.05 ha plots of glacially derived clay loams. The objective of this three-phase study was to determine the effect of N application rate on NO3-N concentration and loss in a corn-soybean rotation over a wide range of weather conditions. Nitrogen-rate treatment phases with five seasons each (six for phase II) were imposed on subsurface-drained, continuous-flow-monitored plots over a 16-year period. Phase I N rates ranged from 0 to 168 kg N ha-1 in 56 kg N ha-1 increments. Separate plots were used for each crop in phase I, and significant NO3-N concentration differences were not observed between corn or soybean plots; this led to combining both crops in a split-plot configuration for phases II and III to study system effects. Phase II N rates ranged from 45 to 179 kg N ha-1 in 45 kg N ha-1 increments. Phase III was limited to two rates, 168 and 252 kg N ha-1. Average yearly flow-weighted NO3-N concentrations ranged from 3.9 mg L-1 (45 kg N ha-1, 1995) to 28.7 mg L-1 (252 kg N ha-1, 2001). Average flow-weighted NO3-N concentrations (in mg L-1) ranked by N rate were: 23.4 (252), 13.2 (179), 15.5 (168), 11.9 (134), 11.7 (112), 8.1 (90), 9.5 (56), 5.7 (45), and 8.9 (0). Losses were precipitation dependent and were reflective of individual seasons and rates imposed. Average flow-weighted NO3-N losses (kg ha-1) ranked by N rate and by phase were: 58 (168), 68 (112), 48 (56), 50 (no N) for phase I; 8 (179), 15 (134), 19 (90), 7 (45) for phase II; and 49 (252), 32 (168) for phase III. Results indicate that concentrations generally increased with rate; the effect on losses was variable due to disparity in drainage volumes among years. Corn yield during all periods showed a strong correlation between N rate and yield. As N rate increased, yield increased. It should be noted that at least 50% of the years showed limited yield response to N application above the next to the highest rates. To achieve average NO3-N concentrations less than 10 mg L-1 (USEPA drinking water standard) in subsurface drainage at this site, N application rates would need to be less than 112 kg N ha-1. Rates currently recommended for this area range from 112 to 168 kg N ha-1. Results from this study have significant implications for N fertilizer management and subsurface drainage NO3-N loss to surface waters in the state, the Mississippi River, and the Gulf of Mexico.


Journal of Soil and Water Conservation | 2013

Drought impact on crop production and the soil environment: 2012 experiences from Iowa

Mahdi Al-Kaisi; Roger W. Elmore; Jose Guzman; H. Mark Hanna; Chad E. Hart; Matthew J. Helmers; Erin W. Hodgson; Andrew W. Lenssen; Antonio P. Mallarino; A. E. Robertson; John E. Sawyer

Enormous challenges were presented by the 2012 drought. Poor water availability and high temperatures resulted in significant stress during critical phases of corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) development. These stress factors lead to management challenges with insects, diseases, and reduced nutrient availability and uptake by plants. The drought triggered soil changes, particularly in conventional tillage systems, such as increased fracturing, crusting, and deterioration of soil structure and aggregation. All this reinforced the need for soil conservation planning, especially its necessary role in buffering against unpredictable conditions and the impacts of dry and wet events on production and soil quality. In 2011, the USDAs National Drought Mitigation Center reported that 43% of Iowa experienced moderate-drought conditions and nearly 10% experienced severe-drought conditions. In 2012, 100% of Iowa experienced severe-drought conditions, while 65% experienced extreme-drought conditions by October. This article addresses several effects of drought on soil and crop production and lessons learned that will help develop appropriate drought mitigation strategies for future soil and crop management practices. The 2012 drought created unfavorable soil conditions for plant development and growth and changes in soil structure in many areas in the Midwest. These changes in soil structure included fracturing…


Transactions of the ASABE | 2012

Performance Evaluation of Four Field-Scale Agricultural Drainage Denitrification Bioreactors in Iowa

Laura E. Christianson; Alok Bhandari; Matthew J. Helmers; Keegan J. Kult; Todd Sutphin; Roger R. Wolf

Recently, interest in denitrification bioreactors to reduce the amount of nitrate in agricultural drainage has led to increased installations across the U.S. Midwest. Despite this recent attention, there are few peer-reviewed, field-scale comparative performance studies investigating the effectiveness of these denitrification bioreactors. The object of this work was to analyze nitrate removal performance from four existing bioreactors in Iowa, paying particular attention to potential performance-affecting factors including retention time, influent nitrate concentration, temperature, flow rate, age, length-to-width ratio, and cross-sectional shape. Based on a minimum of two years of water quality data from each of the four bioreactors, annual removal rates ranged from 0.38 to 7.76 g N m-3 bioreactor volume d-1. Bioreactor and total (including bypass flow) nitrate-nitrogen load reductions ranged from 12% to 76% (mean 45%) and from 12% to 57% (mean 32%), respectively, removing from 0.5 to 15.5 kg N ha-1 drainage area. Multiple regression analyses showed that temperature and influent nitrate concentration were the most important factors affecting percent bioreactor nitrate load reduction and nitrate removal rate, respectively. This analysis also indicated that load reductions within the bioreactor were significantly impacted by retention time at three of the four reactors. More field-scale performance data from bioreactors of different designs and from multiple locations around the Midwest are necessary to further enhance understanding of nitrate removal in these systems and their potential to positively impact water quality.


Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems | 2013

Using biodiversity to link agricultural productivity with environmental quality: Results from three field experiments in Iowa

Matt Liebman; Matthew J. Helmers; Lisa A. Schulte; Craig Chase

Agriculture in the US Corn Belt is under increasing pressure to produce greater quantities of food, feed and fuel, while better protecting environmental quality. Key environmental problems in this region include water contamination by nutrients and herbicides emitted from cropland, a lack of non-agricultural habitat to support diverse communities of native plants and animals, and a high level of dependence on petrochemical energy in the dominant cropping systems. In addition, projected changes in climate for this region, which include increases in the proportion of precipitation coming from extreme events could make soil and water conservation in existing cropping systems more difficult. To address these challenges we have conducted three cropping systems projects in central Iowa: the Marsden Farm Cropping Systems experiment, the Science-based Trials of Row-crops Integrated with Prairies (STRIPs) experiment, and the Comparison of Biofuel Systems (COBS) experiment. Results from these experiments indicate that (1) diversification of the dominant corn–soybean rotation with small grains and forage legumes can permit substantial reductions in agrichemical and fossil hydrocarbon use without compromising yields or profitability; (2) conversion of small amounts of cropland to prairie buffer strips can provide disproportionately large improvements in soil and water conservation, nutrient retention, and densities of native plants and birds; and (3) native perennial species can generate large amounts of biofuel feedstocks and offer environmental benefits relative to corn- and soybean-based systems, including greater carbon inputs to soil and large reductions in nitrogen emissions to drainage water. Increasing biodiversity through the strategic integration of perennial plant species can be a viable strategy for reducing reliance on purchased inputs and for increasing agroecosystem health and resilience in the US Corn Belt.


Journal of Environmental Quality | 2011

Nitrate-Nitrogen Losses through Subsurface Drainage under Various Agricultural Land Covers

Zhiming Qi; Matthew J. Helmers; Reid D. Christianson; Carl H. Pederson

Nitrate-nitrogen (NO₃-N) loading to surface water bodies from subsurface drainage is an environmental concern in the midwestern United States. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of various land covers on NO₃-N loss through subsurface drainage. Land-cover treatments included (i) conventional corn ( L.) (C) and soybean [ (L.) Merr.] (S); (ii) winter rye ( L.) cover crop before corn (rC) and before soybean (rS); (iii) kura clover ( M. Bieb.) as a living mulch for corn (kC); and (iv) perennial forage of orchardgrass ( L.) mixed with clovers (PF). In spring, total N uptake by aboveground biomass of rye in rC, rye in rS, kura clover in kC, and grasses in PF were 14.2, 31.8, 87.0, and 46.3 kg N ha, respectively. Effect of land covers on subsurface drainage was not significant. The NO₃-N loss was significantly lower for kC and PF than C and S treatments (p < 0.05); rye cover crop did not reduce NO₃-N loss, but NO₃-N concentration was significantly reduced in rC during March to June and in rS during July to November (p < 0.05). Moreover, the increase of soil NO₃-N from early to late spring in rS was significantly lower than the S treatment (p < 0.05). This study suggests that kC and PF are effective in reducing NO₃-N loss, but these systems could lead to concerns relative to grain yield loss and change in farming practices. Management strategies for kC need further study to achieve reasonable corn yield. The effectiveness of rye cover crop on NO-N loss reduction needs further investigation under conditions of different N rates, wider weather patterns, and fall tillage.


Journal of Soil and Water Conservation | 2008

A design aid for determining width of filter strips

Michael G. Dosskey; Matthew J. Helmers; Dean E. Eisenhauer

Watershed planners need a tool for determining width of filter strips that is accurate enough for developing cost-effective site designs and easy enough to use for making quick determinations on a large number and variety of sites. This study employed the process-based Vegetative Filter Strip Model to evaluate the relationship between filter strip width and trapping efficiency for sediment and water and to produce a design aid for use where specific water quality targets must be met. Model simulations illustrate that relatively narrow filter strips can have high impact in some situations, while in others even a modest impact cannot be achieved at any practical width. A graphical design aid was developed for estimating the width needed to achieve target trapping efficiencies for different pollutants under a broad range of agricultural site conditions. Using the model simulations for sediment and water, a graph was produced containing a family of seven lines that divide the full range of possible relationships between width and trapping efficiency into fairly even increments. Simple rules guide the selection of one line that best describes a given field situation by considering field length and cover management, slope, and soil texture. Relationships for sediment-bound and dissolved pollutants are interpreted from the modeled relationships for sediment and water. Interpolation between lines can refine the results and account for additional variables, if needed. The design aid is easy to use, accounts for several major variables that determine filter strip performance, and is based on a validated, process-based, mathematical model. This design aid strikes a balance between accuracy and utility that fills a wide gap between existing design guides and mathematical models.


Transactions of the ASABE | 2005

FLOW PATHWAYS AND SEDIMENT TRAPPING IN A FIELD-SCALE VEGETATIVE FILTER

Matthew J. Helmers; Dean E. Eisenhauer; Mike Dosskey; Thomas G. Franti; Mary Carla McCullough

Vegetative filters (VF) are a best management practice installed in many areas to control sediment movement to water bodies. It is commonly assumed that runoff proceeds perpendicularly across a VF as sheet flow. However, there is little research information on natural pathways of water movement and performance of field-scale VF. The objectives of this study were: (1) to quantify the performance of a VF where the flow path is not controlled by artificial borders and flow path lengths are field-scale, and (2) to develop methods to detect and quantify overland flow convergence and divergence in a VF. Our hypothesis is that flow converges and diverges in field-scale VF and that flow pathways that define flow convergence and divergence areas can be predicted using high-resolution topography (i.e., maps). Overland flow and sediment mass flow were monitored in two 13 × 15 m subareas of a 13 × 225 m grass buffer located in Polk County in east-central Nebraska. Monitoring included a high-resolution survey to 3 cm resolution, dye tracer studies to identify flow pathways, and measurement of maximum flow depths at 51 points in each subarea. Despite relatively planar topography (a result of grading for surface irrigation), there were converging and diverging areas of overland flow in the buffer subareas. Convergence ratios ranged from -1.55 to 0.34. Predicted flow pathways using the high-resolution topography (i.e., map) closely followed actual flow paths. Overland flow was not uniformly distributed, and flow depths were not uniform across the subareas. Despite converging and diverging flow, the field-scale VF trapped approximately 80% of the incoming sediment.

Collaboration


Dive into the Matthew J. Helmers's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dean E. Eisenhauer

University of Nebraska–Lincoln

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Heidi Asbjornsen

University of New Hampshire

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark D. Tomer

Agricultural Research Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael G. Dosskey

United States Forest Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge