Matthew J. Jackson
Freeman Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Matthew J. Jackson.
European Urology | 2011
Matthew J. Jackson; John Sciberras; Altaf Mangera; Andrew Brett; Nick Watkin; James N'Dow; Christopher R. Chapple; Daniela E. Andrich; Robert Pickard; Anthony R. Mundy
BACKGROUND A systematic literature review did not identify a formally validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for urethral stricture surgery. OBJECTIVE Devise a PROM for urethral stricture surgery and evaluate its psychometric properties in a pilot study to determine suitability for wider implementation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Constructs were identified from existing condition-specific and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments. Men scheduled for urethroplasty were prospectively enrolled at five centres. INTERVENTION Participants self-completed the draft PROM before and 6 mo after surgery. MEASUREMENTS Question sets underwent psychometric assessment targeting criterion and content validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, acceptability, and responsiveness. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 85 men completed the preoperative PROM, with 49 also completing the postoperative PROM at a median of 146 d; and 31 the preoperative PROM twice at a median interval of 22 d for test-retest analysis. Expert opinion and patient feedback supported content validity. Excellent correlation between voiding symptom scores and maximum flow rate (r = -0.75), supported by parallel improvements in EQ-5D visual analogue and time trade-off scores, established criterion validity. Test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.83 to 0.91 for the total voiding score and 0.93 for the construct overall; Cronbachs α was 0.80, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 with any one item deleted. Item-total correlations ranged from 0.44 to 0.63. These values surpassed our predefined thresholds for item inclusion. Significant improvements in condition-specific and HRQoL components following urethroplasty demonstrated responsiveness to change (p < 0.0001). Wider implementation and review of the PROM will be required to establish generalisability across different disease states and for more complex interventions. CONCLUSIONS This pilot study has defined a succinct, practical, and psychometrically robust PROM designed specifically to quantify changes in voiding symptoms and HRQoL following urethral stricture surgery.
Current Opinion in Urology | 2010
Matthew J. Jackson; James N'Dow; Robert Pickard
Purpose of review Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are now recognised as the most appropriate instruments to assess the effectiveness of healthcare interventions from the patients perspective. The purpose of this review was to identify recent publications describing the use of PROMs following reconstructive urological surgery. Recent findings A wide systematic search identified only three original articles published in the last 2 years that prospectively assessed effectiveness using a patient-completed condition-specific or generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument. These publications illustrate the need to administer PROMs at a postoperative interval relevant to the anticipated recovery phase of individual procedures. They also highlight the difference in responsiveness of generic HRQoL instruments to symptomatic improvement between straightforward conditions such as pelviureteric junction obstruction and complex multidimensional conditions such as meningomyelocele. Summary PROMs uptake and awareness is increasing in reconstructive urology but more work is required to demonstrate the effectiveness of surgical procedures for patients and healthcare funders alike. Healthcare policy-makers now rely on these measures to determine whether specific treatments are worth financing and to compare outcomes between institutions.
International Journal of Urology | 2010
Rakesh Heer; Matthew J. Jackson; Amira El-Sherif; David Thomas
Leydig cell tumors are the most common interstitial neoplasm of the testes. Metastatic progression is historically quoted at over 10%, fuelling uncertainty as to the safety of testis sparing surgery. Between June 1998 and March 2009, 29 patients underwent surgery for Leydig cell tumor of the testis in our cancer network. We reviewed their histological features and clinical outcomes. Four patients with sub‐5 millimetre lesions underwent testis sparing surgery and 25 were treated with radical orchidectomy. Histopathological characteristics that have been linked with risk of malignant progression were seen infrequently in our cohort: diameter greater than 50 mm, 0%; nuclear atypia, 14%; >3 mitoses per 10 high‐power fields, 3%; infiltrative borders, 10%; necrosis, 3%; and vascular invasion 0%. No patient developed local or distant recurrent disease over a median follow up of 49 months, including seven and four patients disease‐free at 5 and 10 years, respectively. The rate of metastatic progression is likely to be significantly less than 10%. Our data suggest that, in the absence of high‐risk histopathological features, this tumor can be safely regarded as benign, pending a longer‐term follow‐up evaluation.
Neurourology and Urodynamics | 2016
Stella Ivaz; Rajan Veeratterapillay; Matthew J. Jackson; Christopher Harding; Trevor J. Dorkin; Daniela E. Andrich; Anthony R. Mundy
Intermittent self‐dilatation (ISD) may be recommended to reduce the risk of recurrent urethral stricture. Level one evidence to support the use of this intervention is lacking.
Current Opinion in Urology | 2015
Matthew J. Jackson; Stella Ivaz
Purpose of review This article walks through some of the ideas behind patient-reported outcome measurement and quality of life research against the backdrop of urethral stricture disease and conditions of the lower urinary tract more generally, why measurement matters at all, future areas for research and development and potential opportunities for misuse and manipulation. Recent findings It is the authors’ opinion that only one published study has substantially advanced our understanding of the way men with urethral stricture disease manage this condition in the real world, and, in turn, the outcomes those men seek when they consent to surgery and its associated risks. There is, however, almost certainly greater acceptance now by reconstructive urologists of the utility of patient-reported outcome measures in audit; surgical performance evaluation; clinical research; and fair, logical and transparent healthcare resource allocation at a population level. This is evidenced by the recent proliferation of studies incorporating patient-reported outcomes, which appear today to be on parity at least with those that surgeons historically gave priority to. Summary The next frontier in urethral stricture disease outcomes research is a better understanding of the impact of this condition on mens daily lives. That level of insight is likely to be gained through a mixture of qualitative and quantitative research methods applied to collaborative research ventures with men with the condition who, as those that have the most to gain and lose, must be majority stakeholders in this process.
British Journal of Medical and Surgical Urology | 2011
Matthew J. Jackson; Rakesh Heer; Amira El-Sherif; Petros Perros; Andrew Thorpe
n 1992 a 73-year-old woman underwent subtoal cystectomy and ileocystoplasty for refractory nterstitial cystitis. In 2004 cystoscopic surveillance etected a five millimetre polypoid lesion with a auliflower-like appearance at the centre of the clam’ segment. A pinch biopsy was sent for analyis. Cross-sectional imaging suggested thickening f the ‘clam’ segment and involvement of he perivesical fat, but there were no distant etastases and urinary 24-h 5-HIAA levels (a etabolite of serotonin which may be elevated
European Urology | 2013
Matthew J. Jackson; Ishaan Chaudhury; Altaf Mangera; Andrew Brett; Nick Watkin; Christopher R. Chapple; Daniela E. Andrich; Robert Pickard; Anthony R. Mundy
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 2014
Matthew J. Jackson; Rajan Veeratterapillay; Christopher Harding; Trevor J. Dorkin
Trials | 2015
Rachel Stephenson; Sonya Carnell; Nicola Johnson; Robbie Brown; Jennifer Wilkinson; Anthony R. Mundy; Steven Payne; Nick Watkin; James N'Dow; Andrew Sinclair; Rowland Rees; Stewart Barclay; Jonathan Cook; Beatriz Goulão; Graeme MacLennan; Gladys McPherson; Matthew J. Jackson; Tim Rapley; Jing Shen; Luke Vale; John Norrie; Elaine McColl; Robert Pickard
The Journal of Urology | 2016
Angus Campbell; Richard Akiboye; Saheel Mukhtar; Matthew J. Jackson; Tet Yap; Nicholas A. Watkin