Matthew L. Osher

Epidural Balloon Placement for Protection of the Spinal Canal During Cryoablation of Paraspinal Lesions

Ablation of paraspinal lesions close to the spinal canal and neuroforamina requires protective measures in order to protect the spinal cord and nerve roots. Various methods of protection have been previously described including infusion of saline and CO2. Regardless, neuromonitoring should be adjunctively performed when ablating spinal lesions close to neuronal structures. Balloon protection has been previously described during ablation of renal masses. The benefit of balloon protection in paraspinal mass ablation is it physically displaces the nerve roots as opposed to CO2 or saline which has the potential to insulate but because of its aerosolized or fluid nature may or may not provide definitive continuous protection throughout an ablation. This report details three paraspinal lesions, two of which were successfully ablated with the use of a balloon placed in the epidural space to provide protection to the spinal cord and nerve roots.

Correction to: Epidural Balloon Placement for Protection of the Spinal Canal During Cryoablation of Paraspinal Lesions

In the published article the first sentence under the section heading Case Reports (“This study was conducted with the institutional review board approval and complied with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.”) is incorrect. That sentence should be replaced with: “Case reports are exempt from IRB approval at the authors’ institution. This study complied with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.”

Percutaneous transgastric interventional radiology-operated duodenoscopy for the identification of duodenal perforation and Graham patch dehiscence

Patients with a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass may be challenging diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas for gastroenterologists and endoscopists due to anatomic considerations. Pancreaticobiliary limb pathology is particularly difficult to diagnose from standard endoscopic approaches as it often requires double balloon enteroscopy. Percutaneous access and gastrostomy placement into the gastric remnant, however, is a commonly performed procedure by interventional radiology. This report describes the identification of duodenal perforation and Graham patch dehiscence in the pancreaticobiliary limb of a patient with a prior Roux-en-Y gastric bypass who had failed traditional endoscopic measures, using transgastric remnant interventional duodenoscopy and confirmed with methylene blue injection into a periduodenal abscess.

Endolymphatic Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Abdominal Lymphangiography (BORAL) and Embolization (BORALE) for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chylous Ascites: Approach, Technical Success, and Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE To describe endolymphatic balloon-occluded retrograde abdominal lymphangiography (BORAL) and embolization (BORALE) for diagnosis and treatment of chylous ascites in patients with previously unidentifiable leakage site or failed lymphatic embolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two (66%) men and one (33%) woman with mean age of 52 years (range: range: 14-79 years) presented with chylous ascites and underwent BORAL or BORALE between March 2016 and February 2017. Patients presented with renal cell carcinoma status post left nephrectomy and lymph node dissection (n=1), metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma status post left nephrectomy and adrenalectomy (n=1), and heart transplantation after failed Fontan procedure (n=1). Pelvic lymphangiography technical success, BORAL and BORALE technical successes, complications, clinical response, and follow-up were recorded. RESULTS Pelvic lymphangiography and BORAL was technically successful in 3 (100%) patients. BORALE was attempted in 2 (65%) patients and was technically successful in both patients (100%). No minor or major complications occurred. Mean radiation dose was 1,037 mGy (range: 391-2,264 mGy). Mean contrast was 83 mL (range: 25-150 mL). Mean blood loss was 15 mL (range: 5-30 mL). Chylous ascites resolved in all 3 (100%) patients. CONCLUSION BORAL and BORALE provide a rational and effective approach for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with chylous ascites and previously unidentifiable leakage site or failed lymphatic embolization.

Radiographic Findings of Distressed Venous Stents and Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Clinical Implications

OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to describe an association between the radiographic appearance of distressed intravascular implants and venous stenosis or occlusion and to determine the success of reparative endovascular procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seventy-eight patients with distressed stents or inferior vena cava (IVC) filters characterized by pursing (short-axis contracture), straightening, longitudinal contraction (long-axis contracture), or fracture were identified from retrospective review of a venous registry for the period from February 2004 to October 2016. Patients originally presented with superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome (n = 25), arm swelling (n = 16), iliocaval thrombosis (n = 21), and lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (n = 16), and stents were initially placed in 65 and filters in 13. Implants were located in the IVC (n = 24), subclavian vein (n = 16), brachiocephalic vein (n = 15), common iliac vein (n = 10), multiple veins (n = 4), axillary vein (n = 4), common femoral vein (n = 3), SVC (n = 1), and internal jugular vein (n = 1). Implants included Wallstents in 63 patients; Smart stents in two patients; and Celect Platinum, Denali, Greenfield, and Trapease IVC filters in two, three, two, and six patients, respectively. Venographic indication, distress type, time from initial normal placement to identification of distress, venographic finding (patent, mild stenosis, high-grade stenosis, or occlusion), treatment, revascularization outcome, and complications were recorded. RESULTS The mean time to distress was 23 months. Fifty-two (67%) patients underwent venography for symptoms and 26 (33%) for surveillance. Forty-five (58%) implants were pursed; 19 (24%), straightened; nine (12%), contracted; and five (6%), fractured. Venography depicted 48 (62%) high-grade stenoses, 19 (24%) complete occlusions, and six (8%) mild stenoses. Of the 73 patients who underwent an intervention, 29 (40%) underwent angioplasty, 15 (21%) underwent angioplasty and stenting, 15 (21%) underwent sharp recanalization, and five (7%) underwent thrombolysis. Revascularization was successful in 67 (92%). Three minor complications occurred. CONCLUSION Distressed intravascular implants are associated with high-grade venous stenosis or occlusion. Reparative interventions are usually technically successful.