Matthew R. Weir

MYH9 is associated with nondiabetic end-stage renal disease in African Americans

As end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has a four times higher incidence in African Americans compared to European Americans, we hypothesized that susceptibility alleles for ESRD have a higher frequency in the West African than the European gene pool. We carried out a genome-wide admixture scan in 1,372 ESRD cases and 806 controls and found a highly significant association between excess African ancestry and nondiabetic ESRD (lod score = 5.70) but not diabetic ESRD (lod = 0.47) on chromosome 22q12. Each copy of the European ancestral allele conferred a relative risk of 0.50 (95% CI = 0.39–0.63) compared to African ancestry. Multiple common SNPs (allele frequencies ranging from 0.2 to 0.6) in the gene encoding nonmuscle myosin heavy chain type II isoform A (MYH9) were associated with two to four times greater risk of nondiabetic ESRD and accounted for a large proportion of the excess risk of ESRD observed in African compared to European Americans.

Clinical Course of Polyoma Virus Nephropathy in 67 Renal Transplant Patients

Polyoma virus (PV) can cause interstitial nephritis and lead to graft failure in renal transplant recipients. The clinical course of patients with polyoma virus nephritis (PVN) is not well understood, partially due to its relatively low incidence. This study is a retrospective analysis of our experience over 4 yr. The specific purpose is to outline the clinical course and outcome of patients with PVN and to study the relationship between immunosuppression and the disease process. Between June 1997 and March 2001, 67 patients with graft dysfunction were found to have biopsy-proven PVN. The diagnosis was made at a mean of 12.8 +/- 9.9 mo posttransplantation. The majority of patients were men (79%) with a mean age of 54 +/- 14 yr (range, 28 to 75). All patients received immunosuppression with a calcineurin inhibitor (tacrolimus in 89% of patients). All patients except two received mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone. After the diagnosis of PVN, maintenance immunosuppression was reduced in 52 patients and remained unchanged in 15 patients. After reduction of immunosuppression, eight patients (15.3%) developed acute rejection and six (11.5%) became negative for PV in biopsy and urine. After a mean observation period of 12.6 mo (mean of 26 mo posttransplantation), 16.4% of patients had lost their grafts (8 of 52 in the reduction group and 3 of 15 in the no change group). In comparison to a case-matched polyoma virus-negative control group, the PVN patients were older (P =.0004) and there was a predominance of men (P = 0.02). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients with PVN had reduced graft survival compared with negative controls (P =.0004). It is concluded that PVN is a serious hazard for renal transplant recipients and contributes directly to graft loss. Antiviral drugs are needed, as the reduction of immunosuppression alone may not significantly improve graft function in patients with already established PVN. Although multiple factors probably play a role in the development of PVN, judicious use of immunosuppressive agents is indicated to minimize the occurrence of this infection.

Renal outcomes with different fixed-dose combination therapies in patients with hypertension at high risk for cardiovascular events (ACCOMPLISH): a prespecified secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND The Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through Combination Therapy in Patients Living with Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) trial showed that initial antihypertensive therapy with benazepril plus amlodipine was superior to benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We assessed the effects of these drug combinations on progression of chronic kidney disease. METHODS ACCOMPLISH was a double-blind, randomised trial undertaken in five countries (USA, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland). 11 506 patients with hypertension who were at high risk for cardiovascular events were randomly assigned via a central, telephone-based interactive voice response system in a 1:1 ratio to receive benazepril (20 mg) plus amlodipine (5 mg; n=5744) or benazepril (20 mg) plus hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg; n=5762), orally once daily. Drug doses were force-titrated for patients to attain recommended blood pressure goals. Progression of chronic kidney disease, a prespecified endpoint, was defined as doubling of serum creatinine concentration or end-stage renal disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or need for dialysis). Analysis was by intention to treat (ITT). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00170950. FINDINGS The trial was terminated early (mean follow-up 2.9 years [SD 0.4]) because of superior efficacy of benazepril plus amlodipine compared with benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide. At trial completion, vital status was not known for 143 (1%) patients who were lost to follow-up (benazepril plus amlodipine, n=70; benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide, n=73). All randomised patients were included in the ITT analysis. There were 113 (2.0%) events of chronic kidney disease progression in the benazepril plus amlodipine group compared with 215 (3.7%) in the benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide group (HR 0.52, 0.41-0.65, p<0.0001). The most frequent adverse event in patients with chronic kidney disease was peripheral oedema (benazepril plus amlodipine, 189 of 561, 33.7%; benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide, 85 of 532, 16.0%). In patients with chronic kidney disease, angio-oedema was more frequent in the benazepril plus amlodipine group than in the benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide group. In patients without chronic kidney disease, dizziness, hypokalaemia, and hypotension were more frequent in the benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide group than in the benazepril plus amlodipine group. INTERPRETATION Initial antihypertensive treatment with benazepril plus amlodipine should be considered in preference to benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide since it slows progression of nephropathy to a greater extent. FUNDING Novartis.

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: a specific target for hypertension management

Angiotensin II plays a central role in the regulation of systemic arterial pressure through its systemic synthesis via the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone cascade. It acts directly on vascular smooth muscle as a potent vasoconstrictor. In addition, it affects cardiac contractility and heart rate through its action on the sympathetic nervous system. Angiotensin II also alters renal sodium and water absorption through its ability to stimulate the zona glomerulosa cells of the adrenal cortex to synthesize and secrete aldosterone. Furthermore, it enhances thirst and stimulates the secretion of the antidiuretic hormone. Consequently, angiotensin II plays a critical role in both the acute and chronic regulation of blood pressure through its systemic endocrine regulation. A potent neurohormone that regulates systemic arterial pressure, angiotensin II also affects vascular structure and function via paracrine and autocrine effects of local tissue-based synthesis. This alternate pathway of angiotensin II production is catalyzed in tissues via enzymes such as cathepsin G, chymostatin-sensitive angiotensin II-generating enzyme, and chymase. Intratissue formation of angiotensin II plays a critical role in cardiovascular remodeling. Upregulation of these alternate pathways may occur through stretch, stress, and turbulence within the blood vessel. Similar processes within the myocardium and glomeruli of the kidney may also lead to restructuring in these target organs, with consequent organ dysfunction. Additionally, angiotensin II may increase receptor density and sensitivity for other factors that modulate growth of vascular smooth muscle, such as fibroblast growth factor, transforming growth factor beta-1, platelet-derived growth factor, and insulin-like growth factors. Atherosclerosis may also be related, in part, to excessive angiotensin II effect on the vessel wall, which causes smooth muscle cell growth and migration. It also activates macrophages and increases platelet aggregation. Angiotensin II stimulates plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 and directly causes endothelial dysfunction. Other postulated effects of angiotensin II on vascular structure that could promote atherogenesis include inhibition of apoptosis, increase in oxidative stress, promotion of leukocyte adhesion and migration, and stimulation of thrombosis. Inhibition of angiotensin II synthesis with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor has been demonstrated to be beneficial in modifying human disease progression. This is clearly apparent in clinical trials involving patients with diabetic nephropathy, postmyocardial infarction, or advanced degrees of systolic heart failure. Thus, angiotensin II is an excellent target for pharmacologic blockade. Not only does it play a pivotal role in both the acute and chronic regulation of systemic arterial pressure, but it also is an important modulator of cardiovascular structure and function and may be specifically involved in disease progression. Modification of angiotensin II effect may therefore serve a dual purpose. Not only will blood pressure reduction occur with less stretch, stress, and turbulence of the vascular wall, but there will also be less stimulation, either directly or indirectly, for restructuring and remodeling of the cardiovascular tree.

The frequency of hyperkalemia and its significance in chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND Hyperkalemia is a potential threat to patient safety in chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study determined the incidence of hyperkalemia in CKD and whether it is associated with excess mortality. METHODS This retrospective analysis of a national cohort comprised 2 103 422 records from 245 808 veterans with at least 1 hospitalization and at least 1 inpatient or outpatient serum potassium record during the fiscal year 2005. Chronic kidney disease and treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and/or angiotensin II receptor blockers (blockers of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system [RAAS]) were the key predictors of hyperkalemia. Death within 1 day of a hyperkalemic event was the principal outcome. RESULTS Of the 66 259 hyperkalemic events (3.2% of records), more occurred as inpatient events (n = 34 937 [52.7%]) than as outpatient events (n = 31 322 [47.3%]). The adjusted rate of hyperkalemia was higher in patients with CKD than in those without CKD among individuals treated with RAAS blockers (7.67 vs 2.30 per 100 patient-months; P < .001) and those without RAAS blocker treatment (8.22 vs 1.77 per 100 patient-months; P < .001). The adjusted odds ratio (OR) of death with a moderate (potassium, >or=5.5 and <6.0 mEq/L [to convert to mmol/L, multiply by 1.0]) and severe (potassium, >or=6.0 mEq/L) hyperkalemic event was highest with no CKD (OR, 10.32 and 31.64, respectively) vs stage 3 (OR, 5.35 and 19.52, respectively), stage 4 (OR, 5.73 and 11.56, respectively), or stage 5 (OR, 2.31 and 8.02, respectively) CKD, with all P < .001 vs normokalemia and no CKD. CONCLUSIONS The risk of hyperkalemia is increased with CKD, and its occurrence increases the odds of mortality within 1 day of the event. These findings underscore the importance of this metabolic disturbance as a threat to patient safety in CKD.

Risk for posttransplant diabetes mellitus with current immunosuppressive medications

With improvements in the practice of transplantation and the introduction of new immunosuppressive medications, there has been a substantial increase in 1-year allograft survival rates. Consequently, the pool of potential candidates for organ transplants continues to grow and a greater preponderance of older patients with more comorbidities are undergoing transplantation. As a result, there is interest in such medical complications as posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) that develop after the transplantation of a successful allograft. PTDM is an undesirable consequence of transplantation because of its associated morbidity and impairment of both patient and graft survival. Although some controversy exists, it is likely that glucose intolerance after transplantation results in both macrovascular and microvascular disease, and there is an increasing risk for infectious and cardiovascular diseases, to which transplant recipients are already at increased susceptibility. Both experimental and clinical observations have shown that immunosuppressive agents currently used in transplantation account for a large degree of the increased risk for PTDM. Consequently, improved understanding of the effects of currently used immunosuppressive medicines on glycemic tolerance is of interest in clinical transplantation.

Albuminuria Is a Target for Renoprotective Therapy Independent from Blood Pressure in Patients with Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy: Post Hoc Analysis from the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) Trial

Albuminuria reduction could be renoprotective in hypertensive patients with diabetic nephropathy. However, the current use of renin-angiotensin-system intervention is targeted to BP only. Therefore, this study investigated the adequacy of this approach in 1428 patients with hypertension and diabetic nephropathy from the placebo-controlled Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study. Investigated were the extent of discordance in treatment effects on systolic BP (SBP) and albuminuria and its association with renal outcome in a multivariate Cox model. Among patients with a reduced SBP during treatment, a lack of albuminuria reduction was observed in 37, 26, and 51% (total, losartan, and placebo, respectively) at month 6. SBP or albuminuria reduction was associated with a lower risk for ESRD, whereas combined SBP and albuminuria reduction was associated with the lowest risk for events. Across all categories of SBP change, a progressively lower ESRD hazard ratio was observed with a larger albuminuria reduction. A lower residual level of albuminuria was also associated with lower ESRD risk. In conclusion, changes in albuminuria are not concordant in a substantial proportion of patients when titrated for BP. Meanwhile, the ESRD risk showed a clear dependence on albuminuria reduction. The ESRD risk also showed dependence on the residual level of albuminuria, even in patients who reached the current SBP target. Antihypertensive treatment that is aimed at improving renal outcomes in patients with diabetic nephropathy may therefore require a dual strategy, targeting both SBP and albuminuria reduction.

Microalbuminuria and Cardiovascular Disease

To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD), management strategies are increasingly focusing on preventive measures following early detection of markers of atherosclerosis. This review focuses on microalbuminuria, which is gaining recognition as a simple marker of an atherogenic milieu. Prospective and epidemiologic studies have found that microalbuminuria is predictive, independently of traditional risk factors, of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and CVD events within groups of patients with diabetes or hypertension, and in the general population. The pathophysiologic mechanism underlying the association between albumin excretion and CVD is not fully defined. One hypothesis is that microalbuminuria may be a marker of CVD risk because it reflects subclinical vascular damage in the kidneys and other vascular beds. It may also signify systemic endothelial dysfunction that predisposes to future cardiovascular events. Based on this theory, periodic screening for microalbuminuria could allow early identification of vascular disease and help stratify overall cardiovascular risk, especially in patients with risk factors such as hypertension or diabetes. A positive test for urinary albumin excretion could signify the need for an intensive multifactorial intervention strategy, including behavior modification and targeted pharmacotherapy, aimed at preventing further renal deterioration and improving the overall CVD risk factor profile. Data from intervention studies suggest that treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, statins, and/or strict glycemic control (in diabetics) offer significant reductions in cardiovascular and/or renal morbidity in patients with albuminuria. Use of this (old) marker may allow improved use of medications and strategies for secondary prevention.

A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy.

Background. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (laparoNx) has the potential to increase living kidney donation rates by reducing the pain and suffering of the donor. However, renal function outcomes of a large series of recipients of laparoNx have not been studied. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 132 recipients of laparoNx done at our center between 3/96 and 11/97 and compared them to 99 recipients of kidneys procured by the open technique (openNx) done between 10/93 and 3/96. Results. Significantly more patients in the laparoNx group (25.2%) were taking tacrolimus within the first month than those in the openNx group (2.1%). Mean serum creatinine was higher in laparoNx compared with openNx at 1 week (2.860.3 and 1.860.2 mg/dl, respectively; P50.005) and at 1 month (2.060.1 and 1.660.1 mg/dl, P50.05) after transplant. However, by 3 and 6 months, the mean serum creatinine was similar in the two groups (1.760.1 versus 1.560.05 mg/dl, and 1.760.1 versus 1.760.1, respectively). By 1 year posttransplant, the mean serum creatinine for laparoNx was actually less than that for openNx (1.460.1 and 1.760.1 mg/dl, P50.03). Although patients in the laparoNx compared to the openNx group were more likely to have delayed graft function (7.6 versus 2.0%) and ureteral complications (4.5 versus 1.0%), the rate of other complications, as well as hospital length of stay, patient and graft survival rates were similar in the two groups. Conclusion. Although laparoNx allografts have slower initial function compared with openNx, there was no significant difference in longer term renal function. Kidney transplantation is considered to be the treatment of choice for end-stage renal failure. Insufficient supply of organs for donation has produced long waiting times for many patients who may benefit from transplantation (1). During this period patients accumulate the morbidity of renal failure, they must endure the lifestyle limitations of dialysis, and they often die while waiting for the organ sharing system to grant them this resource. Live donor renal transplantation represents a large potential supply of organs that may relieve much of this shortage. Additionally, recipients of live renal transplants may reap benefits of improved patient and allograft survival that have been clearly demonstrated in this population (2,3). Although unilateral nephrectomy has proven to be safe and the solitary kidney state has been found to be well tolerated in a carefully chosen candidate for donation (4,5), substantial disincentives to donation exist. These include a significant hospitalization, prolonged convalescence period with time away from jobs, intractable perioperative pain, and, for some, cosmetic concerns of the resulting

Patiromer in Patients with Kidney Disease and Hyperkalemia Receiving RAAS Inhibitors

BACKGROUND Hyperkalemia increases the risk of death and limits the use of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in high-risk patients. We assessed the safety and efficacy of patiromer, a nonabsorbed potassium binder, in a multicenter, prospective trial. METHODS Patients with chronic kidney disease who were receiving RAAS inhibitors and who had serum potassium levels of 5.1 to less than 6.5 mmol per liter received patiromer (at an initial dose of 4.2 g or 8.4 g twice a day) for 4 weeks (initial treatment phase); the primary efficacy end point was the mean change in the serum potassium level from baseline to week 4. Eligible patients at the end of week 4 (those with a baseline potassium level of 5.5 to <6.5 mmol per liter in whom the level decreased to 3.8 to <5.1 mmol per liter) entered an 8-week randomized withdrawal phase in which they were randomly assigned to continue patiromer or switch to placebo; the primary efficacy end point was the between-group difference in the median change in the serum potassium level over the first 4 weeks of that phase. RESULTS In the initial treatment phase, among 237 patients receiving patiromer who had at least one potassium measurement at a scheduled visit after day 3, the mean (±SE) change in the serum potassium level was -1.01±0.03 mmol per liter (P<0.001). At week 4, 76% (95% confidence interval, 70 to 81) of the patients had reached the target potassium level (3.8 to <5.1 mmol per liter). Subsequently, 107 patients were randomly assigned to patiromer (55 patients) or placebo (52 patients) for the randomized withdrawal phase. The median increase in the potassium level from baseline of that phase was greater with placebo than with patiromer (P<0.001); a recurrence of hyperkalemia (potassium level, ≥5.5 mmol per liter) occurred in 60% of the patients in the placebo group as compared with 15% in the patiromer group through week 8 (P<0.001). Mild-to-moderate constipation was the most common adverse event (in 11% of the patients); hypokalemia occurred in 3%. CONCLUSIONS In patients with chronic kidney disease who were receiving RAAS inhibitors and who had hyperkalemia, patiromer treatment was associated with a decrease in serum potassium levels and, as compared with placebo, a reduction in the recurrence of hyperkalemia. (Funded by Relypsa; OPAL-HK ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01810939.).