Matthew Reed
Yale University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Matthew Reed.
Nature | 2010
L. DiCarlo; Matthew Reed; Luyan Sun; Blake Johnson; Jerry M. Chow; Jay Gambetta; Luigi Frunzio; S. M. Girvin; Michel H. Devoret; R. J. Schoelkopf
Traditionally, quantum entanglement has been central to foundational discussions of quantum mechanics. The measurement of correlations between entangled particles can have results at odds with classical behaviour. These discrepancies grow exponentially with the number of entangled particles. With the ample experimental confirmation of quantum mechanical predictions, entanglement has evolved from a philosophical conundrum into a key resource for technologies such as quantum communication and computation. Although entanglement in superconducting circuits has been limited so far to two qubits, the extension of entanglement to three, eight and ten qubits has been achieved among spins, ions and photons, respectively. A key question for solid-state quantum information processing is whether an engineered system could display the multi-qubit entanglement necessary for quantum error correction, which starts with tripartite entanglement. Here, using a circuit quantum electrodynamics architecture, we demonstrate deterministic production of three-qubit Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger (GHZ) states with fidelity of 88 per cent, measured with quantum state tomography. Several entanglement witnesses detect genuine three-qubit entanglement by violating biseparable bounds by 830 ± 80 per cent. We demonstrate the first step of basic quantum error correction, namely the encoding of a logical qubit into a manifold of GHZ-like states using a repetition code. The integration of this encoding with decoding and error-correcting steps in a feedback loop will be the next step for quantum computing with integrated circuits.
Nature | 2012
Matthew Reed; L. DiCarlo; Simon E. Nigg; Luyan Sun; Luigi Frunzio; S. M. Girvin; R. J. Schoelkopf
Quantum computers could be used to solve certain problems exponentially faster than classical computers, but are challenging to build because of their increased susceptibility to errors. However, it is possible to detect and correct errors without destroying coherence, by using quantum error correcting codes. The simplest of these are three-quantum-bit (three-qubit) codes, which map a one-qubit state to an entangled three-qubit state; they can correct any single phase-flip or bit-flip error on one of the three qubits, depending on the code used. Here we demonstrate such phase- and bit-flip error correcting codes in a superconducting circuit. We encode a quantum state, induce errors on the qubits and decode the error syndrome—a quantum state indicating which error has occurred—by reversing the encoding process. This syndrome is then used as the input to a three-qubit gate that corrects the primary qubit if it was flipped. As the code can recover from a single error on any qubit, the fidelity of this process should decrease only quadratically with error probability. We implement the correcting three-qubit gate (known as a conditional-conditional NOT, or Toffoli, gate) in 63 nanoseconds, using an interaction with the third excited state of a single qubit. We find 85 ± 1 per cent fidelity to the expected classical action of this gate, and 78 ± 1 per cent fidelity to the ideal quantum process matrix. Using this gate, we perform a single pass of both quantum bit- and phase-flip error correction and demonstrate the predicted first-order insensitivity to errors. Concatenation of these two codes in a nine-qubit device would correct arbitrary single-qubit errors. In combination with recent advances in superconducting qubit coherence times, this could lead to scalable quantum technology.
Nature Physics | 2010
Blake Johnson; Matthew Reed; Andrew Houck; David Schuster; Lev S. Bishop; Eran Ginossar; Jay Gambetta; L. DiCarlo; Luigi Frunzio; S. M. Girvin; R. J. Schoelkopf
Quantum non-demolition (QND) measurements interrogate a quantum state without disturbing it. A QND scheme that uses a superconducting circuit to investigate microwave photons trapped in a cavity is now shown. The measurement answers the question: are there exactly N photons in the cavity?
Applied Physics Letters | 2010
Matthew Reed; Blake Johnson; Andrew Houck; L. DiCarlo; Jerry Chow; David Schuster; Luigi Frunzio; R. J. Schoelkopf
Spontaneous emission through a coupled cavity can be a significant decay channel for qubits in circuit quantum electrodynamics. We present a circuit design that effectively eliminates spontaneous emission due to the Purcell effect while maintaining strong coupling to a low-Q cavity. Excellent agreement over a wide range in frequency is found between measured qubit relaxation times and the predictions of a circuit model. Using fast (nanosecond time-scale) flux biasing of the qubit, we demonstrate in situ control of qubit lifetime over a factor of 50. We realize qubit reset with 99.9% fidelity in 120 ns.
Physical Review Letters | 2012
Luyan Sun; L. DiCarlo; Matthew Reed; Gianluigi Catelani; Lev S. Bishop; David Schuster; Blake Johnson; Ge A. Yang; Luigi Frunzio; Leonid I. Glazman; Michel H. Devoret; R. J. Schoelkopf
We have engineered the band gap profile of transmon qubits by combining oxygen-doped Al for tunnel junction electrodes and clean Al as quasiparticle traps to investigate energy relaxation due to quasiparticle tunneling. The relaxation time T1 of the qubits is shown to be insensitive to this band gap engineering. Operating at relatively low-E(J)/E(C) makes the transmon transition frequency distinctly dependent on the charge parity, allowing us to detect the quasiparticles tunneling across the qubit junction. Quasiparticle kinetics have been studied by monitoring the frequency switching due to even-odd parity change in real time. It shows the switching time is faster than 10 μs, indicating quasiparticle-induced relaxation has to be reduced to achieve T1 much longer than 100 μs.
Physical Review Letters | 2010
Matthew Reed; L. DiCarlo; Blake Johnson; Luyan Sun; David Schuster; Luigi Frunzio; R. J. Schoelkopf
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2015
Matthew Reed
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2016
Matthew Reed
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2014
Matthew Reed; Zack Smith; A. Dewan; S L. Rolston
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2013
Matthew Reed; Kevin Chou; Nissim Ofek; Jacob Blumoff; Brian Vlastakis; Gerhard Kirchmair; Zaki Leghtas; Simon E. Nigg; Luigi Frunzio; S. M. Girvin; Mazyar Mirrahimi; R. J. Schoelkopf