Matthew S. Davenport

Contrast Material–induced Nephrotoxicity and Intravenous Low-Osmolality Iodinated Contrast Material: Risk Stratification by Using Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate

PURPOSE To determine the effect of intravenous (IV) low-osmolality iodinated contrast material (LOCM) on the development of post-computed tomography (CT) acute kidney injury (AKI), stratified by pre-CT estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), in patients with stable renal function. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval was obtained and patient consent waived for this HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study. CT examinations performed over a 10-year period on unique adult inpatients with sufficient serum creatinine (SCr) data and stable renal function (difference between baseline and pre-CT SCr within 0.3 mg/dL and 50% of baseline) were identified. A 1:1 propensity score matched cohort analysis with multivariate analysis of effects was performed with post-CT AKI as the primary outcome measure (8826 nonenhanced and 8826 IV contrast agent-enhanced CT studies in 17 652 patients). Propensity matching was performed with respect to likelihood of receiving IV contrast material (19 tested covariates). Post-CT AKI with Acute Kidney Injury Network SCr criteria was the primary endpoint. A stepwise multivariate conditional logistic regression model was performed to identify the effect of IV LOCM on post-CT AKI. RESULTS After 1:1 propensity matching, IV LOCM had a significant effect on the development of post-CT AKI (P = .04). This risk increased with decreases in pre-CT eGFR (≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2): odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval: 0.86, 1.16; 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m(2): odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval: 0.82, 1.38; 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m(2): odds ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval: 1.00, 1.97; <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2): odds ratio, 2.96; 95% confidence interval: 1.22, 7.17). CONCLUSION IV LOCM is a nephrotoxic risk factor in patients with a stable eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2), with a trend toward significance at 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m(2). IV LOCM does not appear to be a nephrotoxic risk factor in patients with a pre-CT eGFR of 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or greater.

Comparison of Acute Transient Dyspnea after Intravenous Administration of Gadoxetate Disodium and Gadobenate Dimeglumine: Effect on Arterial Phase Image Quality

PURPOSE To determine whether acute transient dyspnea and/or arterial phase image degradation occurs more or less often after intravenous administration of gadoxetate disodium than with intravenous administration of gadobenate dimeglumine. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval and patient consent were obtained for this prospective observational study. One hundred ninety-eight gadolinium-based contrast media administrations (99 with gadoxetate disodium [10 mL, n = 97; 8 mL, n = 1; 16 mL, n = 1] and 99 with gadobenate dimeglumine [0.1 mmol per kilogram of body weight, maximum dose, 20 mL]) for hepatobiliary indications were assessed in 192 patients. Subjective patient complaints were assessed. Objective respiratory motion degradation on T1-weighted precontrast and dynamic postcontrast (arterial, venous, or late dynamic or extracellular) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging datasets were independently assessed in a randomized, blinded fashion by five readers using a five-point scale, with mean scores of 4 or greater indicating severe motion. Comparisons between agents were made by using χ(2) or Fisher exact test, where appropriate. RESULTS Significantly more patient complaints of acute transient dyspnea occurred after gadoxetate disodium administration than gadobenate dimeglumine (14% [14 of 99] vs 5% [five of 99], P = .05). There were significantly more severely degraded arterial phase data sets for gadoxetate disodium than for gadobenate dimeglumine for both the general population (17% [17 of 99] vs 2% [two of 99], P = .0007) and the subpopulation with cirrhosis (19% [14 of 72] vs 3% [one of 37], P = .02). This effect did not extend to venous (1% [one of 99] vs 2% [two of 99], P > .99 [overall population]) or late dynamic or extracellular (2% [two of 99] vs 0% [zero of 99], P = .5 [overall population]) phases. No patient required treatment for self-limited dyspnea. CONCLUSION Intravenous gadoxetate disodium can result in acute self-limiting dyspnea that can have a deleterious effect on arterial phase MR image quality and occurs significantly more often than with intravenous gadobenate dimeglumine.

Contrast Material–induced Nephrotoxicity and Intravenous Low-Osmolality Iodinated Contrast Material

PURPOSE To determine whether intravenous low-osmolality iodinated contrast material is associated with post-computed tomography (CT) acute kidney injury (AKI). MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval was obtained and patient consent waived for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. CT examinations performed over a 10-year period in adult inpatients with sufficient serum creatinine (SCr) data were identified. A one-to-one propensity-matched matched cohort analysis with multivariate analysis of effects was performed with post-CT AKI as the primary outcome measure (10,121 unenhanced and 10,121 intravenous contrast-enhanced CT examinations in 20,242 patients). Propensity matching was performed with respect to likelihood of patient receiving intravenous contrast material (36 tested covariates). The primary endpoint was post-CT AKI by using Acute Kidney Injury Network SCr criteria; the secondary endpoint was post-CT AKI by using traditional SCr criteria for contrast material-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN; SCr increase ≥0.5 mg/dL [44.20 μmol/L] or ≥25%). Multivariate subgroup threshold analysis was performed (SCr <1.5 [<132.60 μmol/L]; ≥1.5 to ≥2.0 mg/dL [≥132.60 to ≥176.80 μmol/L]) and adjusted for assigned propensity scores. RESULTS Intravenous low-osmolality iodinated contrast material had a significant effect on the development of post-CT AKI for patients with pre-CT SCr levels of 1.6 mg/dL (141.44 μmol/L) or greater (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11, 1.89;P = .007). This effect strengthened as pre-CT SCr increased. Patients with stable SCr less than 1.5 mg/dL (132.60 μmol/L) were not at risk for developing CIN (P = .25, power > 95%). Both endpoints demonstrated similar results (eg, SCr ≥1.6 mg/dL [141.44 μmol/L] by using traditional CIN criteria: odds ratio, 1.64; 95% CI: 1.18, 2.28; P = .003). Post-CT AKI was prevalent in both the unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT subgroups, and it increased with increases in pre-CT SCr. Many risk factors contributed to development of post-CT AKI, regardless of iodinated contrast material. CONCLUSION Intravenous low-osmolality iodinated contrast material is a nephrotoxic risk factor, but not in patients with a stable SCr level less than 1.5 mg/dL. Many factors other than contrast material can affect post-CT AKI rates.

Repeat Contrast Medium Reactions in Premedicated Patients: Frequency and Severity

PURPOSE To determine the frequency, type, and severity of breakthrough and repeat breakthrough reactions to iodinated low-osmolality contrast medium (LOCM) in patients who were premedicated with corticosteroids and antihistamines. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval was obtained, and informed consent was waived for this retrospective HIPAA-compliant analysis. One hundred ninety breakthrough allergic-like reactions to intravenous LOCM in 175 patients with a history of contrast medium reactions were reviewed. The repeat breakthrough reactions that resulted from 197 additional LOCM-enhanced examinations performed in 58 patients after the initial breakthrough reaction were also reviewed. The Fisher exact test was used to determine if certain risk factors were associated with an increased risk of a moderate or severe breakthrough reaction. Subgroup analysis was performed to determine if the contrast medium type, contrast medium volume, and/or time between the initial (index) and breakthrough reactions affected the breakthrough reaction severity. RESULTS Of 128 breakthrough reactions in which the index reaction severity was known, 103 (81%) were of a severity similar to that of the index reaction, 15 (12%) were less severe, and 10 (8%) were more severe. The severity of the breakthrough reactions in the patients with a mild index reaction was usually (in 94 [91%] of 103 reactions) mild. When the index reaction was severe, the breakthrough reaction was usually moderate or severe (in eight [42%] of 19 cases and four [67%] of six cases, respectively). The majority (174 [88%] of 197) of LOCM injections after the initial breakthrough reaction did not result in a repeat breakthrough reaction. Breakthrough reactions were significantly more likely to be moderate or severe in patients with a history of chronic oral corticosteroid use (P = .01), drug (P = .04) or severe (P < .001) allergies, or allergies to four or more allergens (P = .01). CONCLUSION Breakthrough reactions are usually similar in severity to the index reaction, and subsequent contrast medium injections usually do not induce repeat breakthrough reactions. Breakthrough reactions are more likely to be moderate or severe in patients with certain risk factors.

Repeatability of Diagnostic Features and Scoring Systems for Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Using MR Imaging

PURPOSE To determine for expert and novice radiologists repeatability of major diagnostic features and scoring systems (ie, Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System [LI-RADS], Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network [OPTN], and American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases [AASLD]) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval was obtained and patient consent was waived for this HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study. The LI-RADS discussed in this article refers to version 2013.1. Ten blinded readers reviewed 100 liver MR imaging studies that demonstrated observations preliminarily assigned LI-RADS scores of LR1-LR5. Diameter and major HCC features (arterial hyperenhancement, washout appearance, pseudocapsule) were recorded for each observation. LI-RADS, OPTN, and AASLD scores were assigned. Interreader agreement was assessed by using intraclass correlation coefficients and κ statistics. Scoring rates were compared by using McNemar test. RESULTS Overall interreader agreement was substantial for arterial hyperenhancement (0.67 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.65, 0.69]), moderate for washout appearance (0.48 [95%CI: 0.46, 0.50]), moderate for pseudocapsule (0.52 [95% CI: 050, 0.54]), fair for LI-RADS (0.35 [95% CI: 0.34, 0.37]), fair for AASLD (0.39 [95% CI: 0.37, 0.42]), and moderate for OPTN (0.53 [95% CI: 0.51, 0.56]). Agreement for measured diameter was almost perfect (range, 0.95-0.97). There was substantial agreement for most scores consistent with HCC. Experts agreed significantly more than did novices and were significantly more likely than were novices to assign a diagnosis of HCC (P < .001). CONCLUSION Two of three major features for HCC (washout appearance and pseudocapsule) have only moderate interreader agreement. Experts and novices who assigned scores consistent with HCC had substantial but not perfect agreement. Expert agreement is substantial for OPTN, but moderate for LI-RADS and AASLD. Novices were less consistent and less likely to diagnose HCC than were experts.

Reproducibility of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging. Part I. Perfusion Characteristics in the Female Pelvis by Using Multiple Computer-aided Diagnosis Perfusion Analysis Solutions

PURPOSE To test the reproducibility of model-derived quantitative and semiquantitative pharmacokinetic parameters among various commercially available perfusion analysis solutions for dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant, with waiver of informed consent granted. The study group consisted of 15 patients (mean age, 44 years; range, 28-60 years), with 15 consecutive 1.5-T DCE MR imaging studies performed between October 1, 2010, and December 27, 2010, prior to uterine fibroid embolization. Studies were conducted by using variable-flip-angle T1 mapping and four-dimensional, time-resolved MR angiography with interleaved stochastic trajectories. Images from all DCE MR imaging studies were postprocessed with four commercially available perfusion analysis solutions by using a Tofts and Kermode model paradigm. Five observers measured pharmacokinetic parameters (volume transfer constant [K(trans)], v(e) [extracellular extravascular volume fraction], k(ep)[K(trans)/v(e)], and initial area under the gadolinium curve [iAUGC]) three times for each imaging study with each perfusion analysis solution (between March 13, 2011, and September 8, 2011) by using two different region-of-interest methods, resulting in 1800 data points. RESULTS After normalization of data output, significant differences in mean values were found for the majority of perfusion analysis solution combinations. The within-subject coefficient of variation among perfusion analysis solutions was 48.3%-68.8% for K(trans), 37.2%-60.3% for k(ep), 27.7%-74.1% for v(e), and 25.1%-61.2% for iAUGC. The intraclass correlation coefficient revealed only poor to moderate consistency among pairwise perfusion analysis solution comparisons (K(trans), 0.33-0.65; k(ep), 0.02-0.81; v(e), -0.03 to 0.72; and iAUGC, 0.47-0.78). CONCLUSION A considerable variability for DCE MR imaging pharmacokinetic parameters (K(trans), k(ep), v(e), iAUGC) was found among commercially available perfusion analysis solutions. Therefore, clinical comparability across perfusion analysis solutions is currently not warranted. Agreement on a postprocessing standard is paramount prior to establishing DCE MR imaging as a widely incorporated biomarker.

Matched within-Patient Cohort Study of Transient Arterial Phase Respiratory Motion–related Artifact in MR Imaging of the Liver: Gadoxetate Disodium versus Gadobenate Dimeglumine

PURPOSE To compare frequency and severity of arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact following gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine in matched patients administered both contrast media at different times. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval was obtained, with patient consent waived, for this retrospective, HIPAA-compliant study. Ninety patients underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced abdominal magnetic resonance (MR) followed by gadoxetate disodium-enhanced abdominal MR and were matched to 90 patients who were administered the same contrast media in reverse order (180 patients). Matching was based on length of time between paired examinations. Gadobenate dimeglumine dose was weight based (0.1 mmol per kilogram body weight). Gadoxetate disodium dose was typically fixed (10 or 20 mL [off label]). Three readers blinded to contrast agent assigned a respiratory motion-related artifact score (1 [none] to 5 [nondiagnostic]) for nonenhanced, arterial, venous, and late dynamic phases. Frequency of greater new arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact in each within-patient pair and aggregate rate of new severe transient arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact (scores ≤ 2, nonenhanced and venous and/or late dynamic phases; ≥ 4, arterial phase) were compared (McNemar test). RESULTS For groups 1 and 2, respectively, mean dose (gadoxetate disodium, 16.6 mL vs 16.6 mL, P = .99; gadobenate dimeglumine, 18.0 mL vs 17.8 mL, P = .77) and mean time between examinations (191 days vs 191 days, P = .99) were not significantly different between matched populations. Gadoxetate disodium was associated with significantly higher incidence of new arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact compared with gadobenate dimeglumine (39% vs 10%, P < .0001) and of new severe transient arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact (18% vs 2%, P < .0001) in patients administered both agents at different times. CONCLUSION Fixed off-label dose (10 or 20 mL) of gadoxetate disodium is associated with arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact that is sometimes severe and occurs significantly more often than after gadobenate dimeglumine in patients who received both contrast media.

Reproducibility of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging. Part II. Comparison of Intra- and Interobserver Variability with Manual Region of Interest Placement versus Semiautomatic Lesion Segmentation and Histogram Analysis

PURPOSE To compare the inter- and intraobserver variability with manual region of interest (ROI) placement versus that with software-assisted semiautomatic lesion segmentation and histogram analysis with respect to quantitative dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging determinations of the volume transfer constant (K(trans)). MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA. The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. Fifteen DCE MR imaging studies of the female pelvis defined the study group. Uterine fibroids were used as a perfusion model. Three varying types of lesion measurements were performed by five readers on each study by using DCE MR imaging perfusion analysis software with manual ROI placement and a semiautomatic lesion segmentation and histogram analysis solution. Intra- and interreader variability of measurements of K(trans) with the different measurement types was calculated. RESULTS The overall interobserver variability of K(trans) with manual ROI placement (mean, 28.5% ± 9.3) was reduced by 42.5% when the semiautomatic, software-assisted lesion measurement method was used (16.4% ± 6.2). Whole-lesion measurement showed the lowest interobserver variability with both measurement methods (20.1% ± 4.3 with the manual method vs 10.8% ± 2.6 with the semiautomatic method). The overall intrareader variability with the manual ROI method (7.6% ± 10.6) was not significantly different from that with the semiautomatic method (7.3% ± 10.8), but the intraclass correlation coefficient for intrareader reproducibility improved from 0.86 overall with the manual method to 0.99 with the semiautomatic method. CONCLUSION A semiautomatic lesion segmentation and histogram analysis approach can provide a significant reduction in interobserver variability for DCE MR imaging measurements of K(trans) when compared with manual ROI methods, whereas intraobserver reproducibility is improved to some extent.

Differentiation of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes on CT and MRI

OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to determine the frequency of atypical papillary renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and identify imaging differences between type 1 and type 2 papillary RCCs once atypical papillary RCC tumors have been excluded. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty-two papillary RCC tumors were classified at pathology as type 1, type 2, or atypical. The CT and MRI examinations of these tumors were reviewed. Imaging features such as tumor size, margins, heterogeneity, and enhancement were assessed and the findings in type 1 and type 2 tumors were compared. RESULTS There were 43 type 1 and 13 type 2 tumors. Atypical histologic features (i.e., tumors containing both type 1 and type 2 components, clear cells, or components with atypically high nuclear grade [in type 1 tumors] or low nuclear grade [in type 2 tumors]) were seen in 26 tumors. On CT, type 2 tumors more commonly had infiltrative margins (p = 0.05) and were more likely to have calcifications (p = 0.04) than type 1 tumors, although these features were seen in all tumor types. Type 2 tumors were also more heterogeneous than type 1 tumors (p = 0.04). On CT, 11 papillary RCCs showed enhancement of less than 20 HU, seven of which showed enhancement of less than 10 HU. On MRI, all tumors showed enhancement on subtraction images. CONCLUSION Nearly one third of papillary RCCs in our patient population had atypical features at histology. On CT and MRI, there are some significant differences in imaging features between type 1 and type 2 tumors; however, substantial overlap precludes categorization on a per-patient basis. On CT, many papillary RCCs do not enhance, indicating that assessment of enhancement alone is insufficient for differentiating papillary RCCs from hyperdense cysts.

MRI and CT characteristics of successfully ablated renal masses: Imaging surveillance after radiofrequency ablation

OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to evaluate the evolution of the appearances of successfully ablated renal masses on CT and MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of 28 solid renal masses in 25 patients who underwent percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) between July 2003 and July 2006 in whom there was no evidence of residual tumor during at least 1 year of imaging follow-up and there was postablation biopsy proof of nonviable tissue within the ablation cavity. Three radiologists assessed the size, morphology, and CT or MRI characteristics of the initial tumor and of the ablated tumor or ablation cavity at imaging follow-up 1-2, 3-5, 6-11, and 12-24 months after RFA. RESULTS The mean initial tumor volume was 5.5 cm(3) (range, 0.3-22.3 cm(3)). Within 1-2 months, the postablation beds of small masses (< or = 3 cm(3)) were larger than the volume of the initial tumor. Large masses (> 3 cm(3)) did not show this increase in volume. At 12 months after RFA, the postablation beds had decreased in size but had not disappeared. On CT, the postablation beds did not show enhancement at any time. On MRI, the postablation beds often showed a thin rim of peripheral enhancement. Imaging follow-up often revealed local stranding in the perinephric fat adjacent to the ablation site. Exophytic tumors were more likely to separate from the renal parenchyma as they contracted toward their epicenter and were more likely to reveal a complete halo of soft-tissue attenuation in the adjacent perinephric fat, which became more apparent on the longer-term follow-up imaging studies. CONCLUSION Successfully ablated tumors show predictable imaging features that can be used to guide interpretation of CT and MRI surveillance examinations.