Matthew Zibelman

Emerging role of immunotherapy in urothelial carcinoma—Advanced disease

Systemic therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma has seen minimal progress and no new approved therapies in the past 20 years. However, with the approval of the checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab in May 2016, immunotherapy inserted itself into the standard clinical dogma. The emergence of systemic immunotherapies, heralded by drugs targeting immune checkpoint blockade, can provide durable remissions in a subset of patients with a favorable toxicity profile. With other similar agents showing promise in early-phase trials, more options may be on the way. Current and ongoing trials are investigating ways to increase response rates with rational combinations as well as to uncover predictive biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit. In this review, we present updated data regarding immunotherapeutic agents in clinical trials as well as ongoing studies investigating novel designs, intriguing combinations, and alternative immunotherapy strategies.

Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma

Opinion statementThe advent of checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized systemic therapy for many malignancies, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC) where multiple PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 inhibitors have demonstrated responses and improved survival for patients in clinical trials. Durable benefit with manageable toxicity can be achieved with these agents—but unfortunately for only a minority of individuals. Efforts are ongoing to understand mechanisms driving the response and resistance to checkpoint inhibitors in order to personalize therapy and extend benefit to more patients. In particular, combination immunotherapy is an area of active study with multiple ongoing trials in RCC. Novel immunotherapeutic agents are being explored as well. Clinically, there are nuances related to the use of immunotherapy that are important to understand in order to provide optimal care to patients. Potential autoimmune toxicities are important to identify early so they can be best mitigated with immunosuppression, and careful review of imaging with clinical correlation is important to ensure responding patients are not taken off treatment prematurely due to “pseudo-progression.” Lastly, although immunotherapy is an important new tool, it exists among other active agents in the treatment of RCC, and further study is needed to understand where it best fits in the treatment paradigm. In this article, we review the most recent data for immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and more broadly discuss the rapidly evolving landscape of immunotherapy in RCC, including combination immunotherapies.

Immune‐Related Adverse Events as a Biomarker in Non‐Melanoma Patients Treated with Programmed Cell Death 1 Inhibitors

BACKGROUND The programmed death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors (CKIs) can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We sought to evaluate whether the development of irAEs correlates with treatment response in non-melanoma malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of patients who received anti-PD-1 CKI monotherapy at Fox Chase Cancer Center. Endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), time to next therapy or death (TTNTD), and overall survival (OS). Fishers exact tests and logistic regression models were used to determine the association between irAE incidence and ORR, and Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests and Cox regression models were used for the comparison of TTNTD and OS. RESULTS Between November 2011 and November 2016, 160 patients were treated with >1 dose of an anti-PD-1 CKI. Seventy-three (46%) were treated on a clinical trial. Immune-related adverse events were noted in 64 patients (40%), with steroids required in 36 (23%). Of the 142 patients evaluable for clinical response, 28 patients (20%) achieved a partial response at first scan. An association between irAEs and ORR was seen in clinical trial patients (p = .007), but not in non-trial patients (p = .13). When controlling for clinical trial participation and cancer type using multivariate analysis, low-grade irAEs had higher ORR (p = .017) and longer TTNTD (p = .008). No association between irAE incidence and OS was seen (p = .827). Immune-related adverse events that required steroid treatment were marginally associated with increased TTNTD (p = .05, hazard ratio 0.62) but were not associated with OS (p = .13). CONCLUSION We demonstrate several positive associations between the development of irAEs and clinical outcomes in non-melanoma patients treated with PD-1 CKIs, for which further validation is required. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This study evaluated whether the development of immune-related adverse events in non-melanoma patients treated with programmed cell death 1 checkpoint inhibitors correlates with improved clinical outcomes. The results indicate that for a subset of patients, in particular those with low-grade immune-related adverse events, immune-related adverse events predicted for an improved response rate and longer time to next therapy or death.

Checkpoint inhibitors for renal cell carcinoma: current landscape and future directions

Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has arrived and begun to change the landscape of clinical oncology, including for patients with renal cell carcinoma. Specifically, drugs targeting the programmed death 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen pathways have demonstrated remarkable responses for patients in clinical trials. In this article, we review the most recent available data for immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with renal cell carcinoma. We discuss potential strategies for rational combination therapies in these patients, some of which are currently being studied, and address important future considerations for use of these novel agents in the years to come.

Autoimmune inner ear disease in a melanoma patient treated with pembrolizumab

BackgroundImmune related adverse events affecting various organ systems are a recognized potential consequence of immune checkpoint inhibition. However, autoimmune inner ear disease is one complication not previously associated with the use of checkpoint inhibitors, though it has been reported after adoptive cell immunotherapy.Case PresentationHere we present what we believe is the first case of autoimmune inner ear disease resulting from treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor in a patient with metastatic melanoma. An 82 year old male presented with widespread metastatic mucosal melanoma and was initially treated with the CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab but had progression of disease after four doses. He was subsequently treated with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab and after two doses the patient noted bilateral hearing loss. Otology evaluation was significant for the development of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and the patient was started on treatment with bilateral intratympanic dexamethasone injections. He experienced significant recovery of his hearing deficit with the intratympanic injections and restaging imaging after 12 weeks of pembrolizumab demonstrated a dramatic reduction in tumor burden.ConclusionAutoimmune inner ear disease has been previously associated with the therapeutic transfer of genetically engineered lymphocytes as an on-target effect of donor T-cells recognizing antigens on cells in the inner ear. It is important for physicians to have a high clinical index of suspicion for the appropriate recognition and management of any potential autoimmune toxicity with checkpoint inhibitors given the variability of presentation and unique aspects of toxicity.

A review of interventional clinical trials in renal cell carcinoma: a status report from the ClinicalTrials.gov WebSite.

INTRODUCTION The treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has undergone a major shift over the past 10 years and continues to evolve. The objective of this study was to assess the current landscape of clinical trials (CTs) in RCC to identify areas of strength and opportunities for improvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS ClinicalTrials.gov was queried using 17 prespecified search criteria. Only open, RCC-dedicated, interventional CTs in adult patients were included. Descriptive statistics and Fisher exact tests were used to compare features of CTs. RESULTS The study cohort consisted of 169 trials. Phase II trials were the most common (67, 39.6%) and 52.7% (89) of CTs examined patients with stage IV disease. Only 26.6% (45) were randomized and 64.5% (109) were single-arm. Targeted therapies (TTs) were studied in 47.9% (81) of CTs overall and 71.1% (81 of 114) of the systemic therapy trials. Immunotherapies (ITs) were the next most common systemic therapy accounting for 5.9% (10) of trials. The primary end point of feasibility or biomarker analysis, progression-free survival, or overall survival was noted in 27.8%, 51.5%, and 2.1% of TT CTs (27, 50, 2 trials, respectively) and 42.9%, 35.7%, and 14.3% of IT CTs (6, 5, 2 trials respectively; P = .037). Biomarkers were assessed in 45% (76) of CTs overall and were more frequently examined in TT and IT CTs (53.6% [52/97] and 64.3% [9/14]) than in surgery and other CTs (22.2% [4/18] and 27.5% [11/40]; P = .002). Sponsorship differed according to treatment type (P = .003). CONCLUSION Clinical trials in RCC are largely nonrandomized, single-arm, with minimal focus on non-clear-cell RCC. Significant differences were noted in the primary end point, sponsorship, and biomarker assessment between treatment types.

Systemic therapy for bladder cancer finally comes into a new age

Systemic therapy for bladder cancer, both localized muscle-invasive disease and metastatic disease, has seen minimal progress over the past two decades. Current approaches rely upon cytotoxic chemotherapy combinations aimed at increasing cure rates or achieving palliation and disease control, but these regimens are fraught with short- and long-term toxicities and outcomes remain suboptimal. The emergence of systemic immunotherapies that can provide durable remissions in subsets of patients with other malignancies has the potential to transform the field, and early phase trials have begun to demonstrate activity in some patients with metastatic bladder cancer. In this article, we review the current state of systemic therapy for bladder cancer and discuss the current literature and ongoing trials utilizing various immunotherapies.

Overview of Current Treatment Options and Investigational Targeted Therapies for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.

Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) typically present with locally advanced (LA) stage III or IV disease and are treated with combined-modality therapy with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery (if resectable). These aggressive, upfront treatment measures are often associated with substantial morbidity, and about half the patients develop locoregional or distant recurrences. Thus, new therapeutic strategies are needed that offer similar efficacy benefits with less toxicity. Current research is focused on selectively targeting signaling pathways involved in the proliferation and malignant transformation of SCCHN cells and the tumor microenvironment. For example, the ErbB receptor pathway has been implicated in the development and progression of SCCHN, and several agents targeting this pathway and downstream effectors are in various phases of clinical investigation. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is the only currently approved targeted therapy for the treatment of LA SCCHN. Additional agents targeting EGFR and other ErbB family members, including monoclonal antibodies (eg, panitumumab, nimotuzumab) and small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (eg, erlotinib, afatinib, lapatinib) are being studied in LA SCCHN with varying results. Other treatment strategies for LA SCCHN include targeting downstream effectors of signaling and resistance mechanisms to EGFR inhibitors (eg, mammalian target of rapamycin, Src family, and Aurora kinase family). Data from ongoing and future clinical trials will continue to refine current treatment paradigms for LA SCCHN and provide new therapeutic options and potential predictive biomarkers to improve patient efficacy and safety and abrogate resistance.

TumorNext: A comprehensive tumor profiling assay that incorporates high resolution copy number analysis and germline status to improve testing accuracy.

The development of targeted therapies for both germline and somatic DNA mutations has increased the need for molecular profiling assays to determine the mutational status of specific genes. Moreover, the potential of off-label prescription of targeted therapies favors classifying tumors based on DNA alterations rather than traditional tissue pathology. Here we describe the analytical validation of a custom probe-based NGS tumor panel, TumorNext, which can detect single nucleotide variants, small insertions and deletions in 142 genes that are frequently mutated in somatic and/or germline cancers. TumorNext also detects gene fusions and structural variants, such as tandem duplications and inversions, in 15 frequently disrupted oncogenes and tumor suppressors. The assay uses a matched control and custom bioinformatics pipeline to differentiate between somatic and germline mutations, allowing precise variant classification. We tested 170 previously characterized samples, of which > 95% were formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue from 8 different cancer types, and highlight examples where lack of germline status may have led to the inappropriate prescription of therapy. We also describe the validation of the Affymetrix OncoScan platform, an array technology for high resolution copy number variant detection for use in parallel with the NGS panel that can detect single copy amplifications and hemizygous deletions. We analyzed 80 previously characterized formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens and provide examples of hemizygous deletion detection in samples with known pathogenic germline mutations. Thus, the TumorNext combined approach of NGS and OncoScan potentially allows for the identification of the “second hit” in hereditary cancer patients.

Approved checkpoint inhibitors in bladder cancer: which drug should be used when?

The treatment of advanced metastatic urothelial carcinoma has recently evolved with the approval of five checkpoint inhibitors. In the second-line setting, in patients who have progressed on cisplatin-based chemotherapy, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab and avelumab are United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved. In cisplatin-ineligible patients, atezolizumab and pembrolizumab are the FDA-approved checkpoint inhibitors. Here we describe the updated clinical efficacy of these checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma and then suggest how they can be sequenced in the context of available chemotherapeutic options. For cisplatin-eligible patients, platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard first-line treatment. For patients progressing on platinum-based therapy, phase III trials have been performed comparing pembrolizumab and atezolizumab separately with standard chemotherapy, and results favor the use of pembrolizumab.