Matthieu Boisson

Comparison of Intrapulmonary and Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Colistin Methanesulfonate (CMS) and Colistin after Aerosol Delivery and Intravenous Administration of CMS in Critically Ill Patients

ABSTRACT Colistin is an old antibiotic that has recently gained a considerable renewal of interest for the treatment of pulmonary infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Nebulization seems to be a promising form of administration, but colistin is administered as an inactive prodrug, colistin methanesulfonate (CMS); however, differences between the intrapulmonary concentrations of the active moiety as a function of the route of administration in critically ill patients have not been precisely documented. In this study, CMS and colistin concentrations were measured on two separate occasions within the plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of critically ill patients (n = 12) who had received 2 million international units (MIU) of CMS by aerosol delivery and then intravenous administration. The pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using a population approach and completed by pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling and simulations. The ELF colistin concentrations varied considerably (9.53 to 1,137 mg/liter), but they were much higher than those in plasma (0.15 to 0.73 mg/liter) after aerosol delivery but not after intravenous administration of CMS. Following CMS aerosol delivery, typically, 9% of the CMS dose reached the ELF, and only 1.4% was presystemically converted into colistin. PK-PD analysis concluded that there was much higher antimicrobial efficacy after CMS aerosol delivery than after intravenous administration. These new data seem to support the use of aerosol delivery of CMS for the treatment of pulmonary infections in critical care patients.

Pharmacokinetics of nebulized colistin methanesulfonate in critically ill patients

Objectives: Optimal dosing for nebulized colistin methanesulfonate (CMS), the prodrug of colistin, is unknown. We describe the pulmonary and systemic pharmacokinetics of CMS and colistin following nebulization of 0.5 million IU (MIU) of CMS in ventilated patients. Methods: Twelve critically ill patients received 0.5 MIU of CMS administered every 8 h as 30 min nebulizations. Blood samples were collected immediately before and until 8 h after first nebulization; mini‐bronchoalveolar lavage (mini‐BAL) was performed at 1 and 5 h or 3 and 8 h (six patients each) post‐dose. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed for CMS and colistin plasma concentrations using a non‐compartmental method. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01060891. Results: After nebulization, CMS concentrations in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) were much higher (100‐ to 1000‐fold) than those in plasma. Concentrations of colistin in ELF should be considered with caution because when <6 mg/L in BAL, colistin bound to mini‐BAL devices. Nevertheless, CMS and colistin concentrations in ELF were much lower than expected from previous results with a 2 MIU dose. From CMS plasma pharmacokinetics it was shown that CMS systemic bioavailability was only slightly decreased for the 0.5 MIU dose compared with 2 MIU. Conclusions: This study shows that CMS concentrations were much higher (100‐ to 1000‐fold) in ELF than in plasma after a 0.5 MIU aerosol of CMS, but much lower (10‐fold) than expected from previous results with a 2 MIU dose. Therefore, until new pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments of the treatment of ventilator‐associated pneumonia with nebulized CMS are performed, the 2 MIU dose should be preferred to the 0.5 MIU dose.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and nebulized gentamicin in critically ill patients

Objectives Optimal dosing for nebulized gentamicin is unknown. We compared the pulmonary and systemic pharmacokinetics (PK) of gentamicin following intravenous and nebulized administration in mechanically ventilated patients. Methods Twelve critically ill male patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia received a 30 min intravenous infusion of 8 mg/kg gentamicin , followed 48 h afterwards by the same dose nebulized. Blood samples were collected immediately before and until 24 h after intravenous and nebulized administration; mini-bronchoalveolar lavages (mini-BALs) were performed at 3 and 7 h or 5 and 10 h (six patients each) after each intravenous and nebulized administration. The PK analysis was conducted using a population approach. Results After intravenous administration, concentrations of gentamicin measured in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) were very variable, and overall in the same range of magnitude (from 0.3 to 28 mg/L) as in plasma. After nebulization, gentamicin concentrations were much higher (∼3800-fold) in ELF than in plasma. The average systemic bioavailability of nebulized gentamicin was estimated to be 5%, with considerable inter-individual variability. Compared with intravenous administration, after nebulization the exposure (expressed as AUC) to gentamicin was 276-fold greater in ELF and 18-fold lower in plasma. Conclusions Compared with intravenous administration, nebulization of gentamicin in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia provides higher pulmonary concentrations and lower systemic concentrations but the inter-individual variability is large.