Matthieu Bruzzi
Paris Descartes University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Matthieu Bruzzi.
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases | 2015
Matthieu Bruzzi; Cédric Rau; Thibault Voron; Martino Guenzi; Anne Berger; Jean-Marc Chevallier
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB) is an alternative to the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), which is considered to be the gold standard in the treatment of morbid obesity. OBJECTIVES Present 5-year results of 175 patients who had undergone a LMGB between October 2006 and October 2008. SETTING University public hospital, France. METHODS Complete follow-up was available in 126 of 175 patients (72%) who had LMGB. Mortality, morbidity, weight loss, co-morbidities, and quality of life were assessed. Weight loss was determined as a change in body mass index (BMI) and percent excess BMI loss (%EBMIL). Quality of life in the treatment group was analyzed using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) and was compared with a retrospectively case matched preoperative control group. RESULTS There were no deaths. Thirteen patients (10.3%) developed major complications. Marginal ulcers occurred in 4% of patients. Incapacitating biliary reflux developed in 2 (1.6%) who required conversion into RYGB. Gastric pouch dilation occurred in 4 patients (3.2%) and inadequate weight loss with severe malnutrition in 2 (1.6%). At 5 years, mean BMI was 31±6 kg/m(2) and mean %EBMIL was 71.5%±26.5%. Postoperative GIQLI score of the treatment group was significantly higher than preoperative score of the control group (110.3±17.4 versus 92.5±15.9, P<.001). Social, psychological, and physical functions were increased significantly. No significant differences were found in gastroesophageal reflux or diarrhea symptoms between the 2 groups. Long-term follow-up showed an improvement in all co-morbidities. CONCLUSIONS At 5 years, LMGB was safe, effective, and provided interesting quality of life results.
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases | 2016
Matthieu Bruzzi; Richard Douard; Thibault Voron; Anne Berger; Franck Zinzindohoue; Jean-Marc Chevallier
BACKGROUND Surgery appears to be the best treatment option for a chronic fistula after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Conservative procedures (conversion into a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, Roux-limb placement) have proven their feasibility and efficacy, but an open total gastrectomy (TG) is sometimes required in challenging situations. OBJECTIVES To assess outcomes from 12 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for a post-sleeve gastrectomy chronic fistula (PSGCF) between January 2004 and February 2012. SETTING University public hospital, France. METHODS Patients with a PSGCF who underwent surgery were included in this retrospective study. Mortality, morbidity (i.e., Clavien-Dindo score), weight loss, and nutritional status were assessed. RESULTS Twelve of 57 patients (21%) with a post-LSG leak developed a PSGCF. There were 3 men (25%). Mean age was 39±9 years and mean preoperative body mass index was 35±5 kg/m2. All 12 patients underwent an open total gastrectomy with an esojejunostomy (TG). Conservative procedures were considered but not possible. The mean follow-up period was 38±11 months. The mean delay between LSG and TG was 12±6 months. Intraoperative discovery of multiple (>2) gastric fistulas was reported in 9 patients (75%). There were no deaths, but morbidity rate was 50%. Early postoperative fistula occurred in 3 patients (anastomosis n = 1, duodenal stump n = 2). None of these patients required further surgery. The median healing time of the fistula was 37 days (range 24-53). Promising results from weight loss and nutritional status were found at the end of the follow-up. CONCLUSION A salvage open TG is a well-tolerated and reproducible salvage procedure for cases of a PSGCF, when conservative procedures are not possible.
Obesity Surgery | 2017
Matthieu Bruzzi; Jean-Marc Chevallier; Sébastien Czernichow
One-anastomosis gastric bypass is an alternative to the “gold-standard” Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. This technique appears to be safe and efficient, but controversy remains regarding the long-term theoretical risk of subsequent biliary reflux and its possible complications, such as cancer. The aim of the present narrative review was to summarize some of the current thoughts on biliary reflux. Research has established that exposure to chronic bile reflux in humans and rats (outside the “bariatric surgery” box) induce esophageal intestinal metaplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Although one-anastomosis gastric bypass can theoretically induce chronic biliary reflux, the incidence of biliary reflux and risk of cancer have not been prospectively evaluated. Clarification of this controversial issue is urgently needed.
Current Atherosclerosis Reports | 2017
Reem Abou Ghazaleh; Matthieu Bruzzi; Karen Bertrand; Leila M’harzi; Franck Zinzindohoue; R. Douard; Anne Berger; Sébastien Czernichow; Claire Carette; Jean-Marc Chevallier
Purpose of ReviewMorbid obesity and type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are both major public health problems. Bariatric surgery is a proven and effective treatment for these conditions; laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is currently the gold-standard treatment. One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is described as a simpler, safer, and non-inferior alternative to RYGB to treat morbid obesity. Concerning T2DM, experts of the OAGB procedure report promising metabolic results with good long-term remission of T2DM; however, heterogeneity within the literature prompted us to analyze this issue.Recent FindingsOAGB has gained popularity given its safety and long-term efficacy. Concerning the effect of OAGB for the treatment of T2DM, most reports involve non-controlled single-arm studies with heterogeneous methodologies and a few randomized controlled trials. However, this available literature supports the efficacy of OAGB for remission of T2DM in obese and non-obese patients. Two years after OAGB, the T2DM remission and improvement rate increased from 67 to 100%. The results were improved and stable in the long term. The 5-year T2DM remission rate increased from 82 to 84.4%. OAGB is non-inferior compared with RYGB and even superior to other accepted bariatric procedures, such as sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric banding.SummaryOAGB is an efficient, safe, simple, and reversible procedure to treat T2DM. The literature reveals interesting results for T2DM remission in non-obese patients. High-level comparative studies are required to support these data.
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases | 2016
Matthieu Bruzzi; Thibault Voron; Franck Zinzindohoue; Anne Berger; Richard Douard; Jean-Marc Chevallier
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy | 2016
A. Patroni; S. Bonnet; C. Bourillon; Matthieu Bruzzi; Franck Zinzindohoue; Jean-Marc Chevallier; R. Douard; Anne Berger
Obesity Surgery | 2017
Matthieu Bruzzi; Henri Duboc; Caroline Gronnier; Dominique Rainteau; Anne Couvelard; Maude Le Gall; André Bado; Jean-Marc Chevallier
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases | 2017
Nathan Beaupel; Matthieu Bruzzi; Thibault Voron; Haydar A. Nasser; R. Douard; Jean-Marc Chevallier
Medicine | 2018
Alina Parvanescu; Matthieu Bruzzi; Thibault Voron; Camille Tilly; Franck Zinzindohoue; Jean-Marc Chevallier; Marco Gucci; Philippe Wind; Anne Berger; Richard Douard
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | 2018
Thibault Voron; Matthieu Bruzzi; Emilia Ragot; Franck Zinzindohoue; Jean-Marc Chevallier; Richard Douard; Anne Berger