Matthieu Foissac

Characterization of the mechanical properties of backpacks and their influence on the energetics of walking

The objectives of the experiment were (i) to characterize the mechanical properties of backpacks and (ii) to study the influence of a flexible backpack on the energetics and kinematics of walking. Twelve subjects walked at different speeds on a treadmill with each of two backpacks loaded with 25% bodyweight, with either a rigid or a flexible link between the body attachment and the suspended loads. A single degree of freedom linear model of the link between the pack and the trunk was used to calculate the stiffness and damping coefficient of the two backpacks. The oxygen consumption (VO2) and the vertical acceleration of both the backpack and trunk were measured. The vertical excursion of the pack given by the model was significantly correlated with that actually measured (R=0.87, p<0.001). At 3.7 and 4.5 km h(-1) the flexible pack induced lower acceleration peaks (respectively -22% and -8%; p<0.05) and tended to reduce VO2 (p=0.055 at 4.5 km h(-1)) compared with the rigid one. At 5.2 and 6 km h(-1) both the accelerative forces and VO2 increased with the flexible pack (p<0.05) mainly because of the high vertical movement of the pack. It was concluded that a simple model can be used to predict the vertical excursion of the pack and that a flexible backpack can provide energetic benefits when its oscillations are nearly in phase with those of the trunk. However, any resonance effect can lead to a modified walking pattern and an increased metabolic cost.

Effects of Hiking Pole Inertia on Energy and Muscular Costs During Uphill Walking

INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of using hiking poles with different inertia on oxygen cost (V O2) and muscular activity. METHODS Eleven subjects walked at 3 km.h on a treadmill inclined at 20% grade. Three mass (240, 300, and 360 g), load distribution, and walking frequency (preferred, -20% and +20%) conditions were tested. Each subject also walked without poles and carried a 360-g mass. V[spacing dot above]O2 and average EMG (aEMG) of nine muscles from lower (soleus, gastrocnemius lateralis, vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, gluteus maximus) and upper (latissimus dorsi, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, and anterior deltoid) limbs were recorded. RESULTS Using poles significantly reduced lower limb muscle aEMG values (P < 0.001) by about 15% and increased upper limb muscle aEMG values (P < 0.001) by about 95%. Hand-masses of 360 g did not result in an increased V[spacing dot above]O2, and the only modification in terms of muscular activation was greater biceps brachii activity (+55%, P = 0.006). Biceps brachii and anterior deltoid activity were also influenced by pole mass and load distribution (P < 0.01). Walking at high frequency increased both aEMG and V[spacing dot above]O2, whereas walking at low frequency redistributed the muscular work from the thigh muscles to calf and upper limb muscles although this did not lead to an increased V[spacing dot above]O2 compared with that at preferred frequency. No interaction between mass and frequency was found for aEMG or V[spacing dot above]O2. CONCLUSION Using poles and changing frequency have important effects on muscle recruitment, whereas the effects of mass were limited when considering poles available on the market.

The role of engineering in fatigue reduction during human locomotion - a review

The purpose of this review is to discuss how an athlete’s fatigue can be limited by using recent innovations in sports engineering. The review focuses on human locomotion, i.e. mainly fatigue during endurance sports. First, through a general definition and illustrations of means of locomotion such as running, cycling, walking/hiking or speed skating, several aspects of fatigue reduction will be presented. With regards to the mechanical stress, it has been shown that (i) contrary to ‘invitro’ experiments and, in comparison with hard shoes, soft shoes do not appear to reduce impact forces during running and (ii) too much cushioning can have side effects in terms of energy cost and thus in terms of fatigue in running and mountain biking. On the contrary, the equipment weight-that also depends on the weight repartition may have dramatic effects in terms of fatigue. Any equipment allowing better mechanical efficiency (e.g. chainrings, klapskate) or work distribution (e.g. walking with poles) can potentially reduce an athlete’s fatigue under similar conditions without this equipment. However, among elite athletes, the use of technical innovation does not seem to affect fatigueper se but provides performance improvement with similar fatigue occurrence. It appears that fatigue-related improvements caused by technical innovations only occur among sportsmen exercising for leisure. In the second part of this review, recent textile innovations aimed at decreasing fatigue by the use of elastic compression stockings or at regulating temperature will be discussed. Finally, two methods designed to improve recovery after training or competition (elastic compression and electromyostimulation) will be discussed. Both these techniques are widely used by elite athletes despite relatively poor scientific evidence of their efficiency, with the exception of recovery after eccentric exercise.