Matthijs L. Hendriks

Prediction of long-term outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy by acute pressure-volume loop measurements.

Invasive assessment of acute haemodynamic response to biventricular pacing has been proposed as a tool to determine individual response and to optimize the effects of CRT. However, the long‐term results of this approach have been poorly studied. The present study relates acute haemodynamic effects of CRT to long‐term outcome.

Scar tissue–guided left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: An acute pressure-volume loop study

BACKGROUND Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is hampered by the extent and location of left ventricular (LV) scar tissue. It is commonly advised to avoid scar tissue while placing the LV lead. However, whether individual patients benefit from this strategy remains unclear. METHODS Thirty-two CRT candidates with ischemic cardiomyopathy were enrolled from 2 successive clinical trials (TBS and E-pot study). Magnetic resonance imaging with late contrast enhancement was performed to assess location, degree and transmurality of LV scar tissue. Patients underwent invasive pressure-volume loop measurements to assess acute LV pump function changes during pacing at posterolateral (PL) and anterolateral LV sites. RESULTS In the study population (26 [81%] men, ejection fraction [EF] 22% ± 8%, QRS 149 ± 20 milliseconds), baseline mean stroke work (SW) and dP/dtmax were 4.4 ± 2.2 L∙mmHg and 849 ± 212 mmHg/s, respectively. The extent of scar tissue was inversely related to the acute increase in SW during pacing (R = -0.53, P = .002). Stimulating PL scar tissue resulted in deterioration of pump function (∆SW -17% ± 17%, P = .018), whereas pacing PL viable tissue led to an increase in pump function (∆SW +62% ± 51%, P < .001). Switching from pacing at the location of scar tissue, irrespective of the scar location, to viable tissue showed a significant increase in SW (-8% ± 20% vs +20 ± 40, P = .004). CONCLUSIONS The extent of LV scar tissue is inversely related to acute pump function improvement during CRT. Pacing at the location of (transmural) scar tissue at any site of the LV will generally deteriorate LV pump function. Placing the LV lead over viable myocardium significantly improves pump function as compared with pacing at the location of scar tissue in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Effects of QRS Duration and Pacing Location on Pressure-Volume Loop Evaluation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in End-Stage Heart Failure

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) decreases the morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage heart failure. However, patient selection remains challenging, because a considerable 30% to 50% do not respond. Controversy exists on the cutoff values for the QRS duration and the optimal lead location. The present study relates these parameters on an individual basis to acute pump function improvement using invasively obtained pressure-volume loops. Fifty-seven patients with symptomatic end-stage heart failure were included in our temporary biventricular stimulation study and were grouped according to the QRS duration (QRS <20 ms, QRS ≥120 ms but <150 ms, and QRS ≥150 ms). All patients underwent pressure-volume loop assessment of the response to biventricular pacing, comparing the baseline measurements to both right ventricular apex pacing combined with a left ventricular lead in the posterolateral and anterolateral region of the LV. Group analysis during conventional (posterolateral and right ventricular apex) CRT did not show improvement in stroke work and dP/dt(max) (-2%, p = NS; and -7%; p <0.001) in the narrow QRS group but a significant increase in the intermediate (+27%, p = 0.020, and +5%, p = 0.044) and wide (+48%, p = 0.002, and +18%, p <0.001) QRS groups. CRT using the anterolateral and right ventricular apex configuration evoked a consistently lower response compared to posterolateral and right ventricular apex, resulting in a significant hemodynamic deterioration in the narrow QRS group. However, analysis on an individual basis identified 25% of patients with narrow QRS duration showing possible hemodynamic benefit from CRT compared to 83% of patients with intermediate and wide QRS combined. In contrast, 15% of patients had deterioration by conventional (posterolateral right ventricular apex) CRT in the intermediate and wide QRS groups compared to 31% in the narrow QRS group; 19% of patients could be improved by lead placement in the anterolateral rather than the posterolateral region. In conclusion, the acute hemodynamic response to CRT is generally in line with the long-term results from large randomized trials; however, the individual variation is large. The temporary biventricular stimulation protocol might aid in individual patient selection and in research aiming at a reduction of nonresponders and improvement in lead positioning.

Usefulness of a pacing guidewire to facilitate left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Background: Intraoperative measurements of left ventricular (LV) pacing and sensing values were assessed using a novel 0.014‐inch guidewire (Visionwire®, Biotronik GmbH, Berlin, Germany) enabling pacing and sensing at the distal tip before final LV lead implantation.

Bifocal left ventricular stimulation or the optimal left ventricular stimulation site in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a pressure–volume loop study

AIMS Several implantation strategies have been proposed to improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), including bifocal left ventricular (LV) stimulation and optimal single-LV lead placement. This study aimed to compare these two strategies during invasive pressure-volume (PV) loop measurements. METHODS AND RESULTS Thirty-three patients eligible for CRT were included [21 (64%) men, 20 (61%) ischaemic aetiology, QRS 155 ± 23 ms], and underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and invasive PV loop measurements. Left ventricular pump function was characterized by stroke work (SW) and dP/dtmax (5.1 ± 3.4 L mmHg and 856 ± 190 mmHg/s, respectively). Haemodynamic response was assessed during stimulation at single-LV sites and during bifocal LV [anterolateral and posterolateral (PL)] stimulation. Response during bifocal LV stimulation was not significantly higher compared with standard PL pacing (SW; β = 9.4 ± 5.4, P = 0.080; dP/dtmax, β = 0.2 ± 1.9, P = 0.922). However, mean pump function improvement was significantly higher during stimulation at the optimal LV site compared with bifocal LV stimulation (SW; β = 12.7 ± 5.1, P = 0.012; dP/dtmax, β = 3.3 ± 1.2, P = 0.020). Myocardial tissue properties were assessed by CMR tissue tagging. Mechanical activation at the optimal LV site was significantly more delayed compared with the worst LV site (431 ± 93 ms vs. 326 ± 127 ms; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION Stimulation at the optimal LV site showed a significantly higher pump function improvement compared with bifocal LV stimulation. Mechanical activation at the optimal LV site was significantly more delayed compared with the non-optimal LV site. In general, these results suggest that implantation of a second LV lead yields no additional benefit over implantation of one optimally placed LV lead. However, a bifocal approach might be beneficial in the individual patient.

THE INFLUENCE OF RIGHT VENTRICULAR PACING ON RESPONSE TO BIVENTRICULAR PACING: AN ACUTE PRESSURE-VOLUME LOOP STUDY

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established therapy for end-stage heart failure. It is currently recommended to position the left ventricular (LV) lead at the postero-lateral (PL) wall. However, the position of the right ventricular (RV) lead remains controversial, since it may be associated with adverse hemodynamic effects. This may partly explain non-response to CRT. We hypothesized that RV pacing during biventricular pacing signiicantly modulates response. We studied the acute invasive hemodynamic response of RV, LV and biventricular pacing.

Premature ventricular contractions in the failing heart: Not always a bad thing

D A F t ntroduction premature ventricular contraction (PVC) usually is conidered hemodynamically inferior to a normal conducted ontraction. A PVC induces a contraction that has a short iastolic filling time and lacks an atrial contraction to optiize left ventricular (LV) filling (“atrial kick”). In addition, bnormal LV depolarization is associated with an abnormal yssynchronous contraction that will further decrease stroke olume. We present the case of a heart failure patient with hort coupled PVCs who showed a substantial improvement n hemodynamic parameters.