Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Maud J.M. Meijers is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Maud J.M. Meijers.


Geological Society, London, Special Publications | 2017

Progressive orocline formation in the Eastern Pontides–Lesser Caucasus

Maud J.M. Meijers; Brigitte Smith; Daniel Pastor-Galán; Renzo Degenaar; N. Sadradze; Shota Adamia; Lilit Sahakyan; Ara Avagyan; Marc Sosson; Yann Rolland; Cor G. Langereis; Carla Müller

Abstract The Eastern Pontides–Lesser Caucasus fold–thrust belt displays a peculiar northwards arc-shaped geometry that was defined as an orocline in earlier studies. The Lesser Caucasus was affected by two main tectonic events that could have caused orocline formation: (1) Paleocene–Eocene collision of the South Armenian Block with Eurasia; and (2) Oligocene–Miocene Arabia–Eurasia collision. We tested the hypothesis that the Lesser Caucasus is an orocline and aimed to time the formation of this orocline. To determine the vertical axis rotations, 37 sites were sampled for palaeomagnetism in rocks of Upper Cretaceous–Miocene age in Georgia and Armenia. In addition, we compiled a review of c. 100 available datasets. A strike test was applied to the remaining datasets, which were divided into four chronological sub-sets, leading us to conclude that the Eastern Pontides–Lesser Caucasus fold–thrust belt forms a progressive orocline. We concluded that: (1) some pre-existing curvature must have been present before the Late Cretaceous; (2) the orocline acquired part of its curvature after the Paleocene and before the Middle Eocene as a result of South Armenian Block–Eurasia collision; and (3) about 50% of the curvature formed after the Eocene and probably before the Late Miocene, probably as a result of Arabia–Eurasia collision. Supplementary material: Results from rock magnetic experiments, reversal and fold tests and equal area projections of the characteristic remanent magnetizations for each site, as well as biostratigraphic ages and a table with palaeomagnetic results from the literature review (with assigned numbers referred to in the text) are available at http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/SUP18852.


Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems | 2016

Age and paleoenvironmental reconstruction of partially remagnetized lacustrine sedimentary rocks (Oligocene Aktoprak basin, central Anatolia, Turkey)

Maud J.M. Meijers; Becky E. Strauss; Murat Özkaptan; Joshua M. Feinberg; Andreas Mulch; Donna L. Whitney; Nuretdin Kaymakci

The age and paleoenvironmental record of lacustrine deposits in the Aktoprak basin of south-central Turkey provides information about the evolution of topography, including the timing of development of an orographic rain shadow caused by uplift of the mountain ranges fringing the Central Anatolian Plateau. New magnetostratigraphy-based age estimates, in combination with existing biostratigraphic ages, suggest that the partially remagnetized Kurtulmus Tepe section of the basin is Chattian (Upper Oligocene). The mean carbon and oxygen stable isotope ratios (δ18O= 24.6 ± 2.0 ‰, δ13C= −4.9 ± 1.1‰) are largely constant through the section and indicative of a subtropical, open freshwater lake. These isotopic values are also similar to those of the Chattian Mut basin to the south, on the Mediterranean side of the modern orographic barrier (Tauride Mountains), and indicate absence of an orographic barrier during Late Oligocene basin deposition. Post-depositional partial remagnetization occurred after tilting of the basin sequence and was mineralogically controlled, affecting grey, carbonate-rich rocks (average %CaCO3= 82), whereas interlayered pink carbonate-poor rocks (average %CaCO3= 38) carry a primary, pretilt magnetization. The pink rocks are rich in clay minerals that may have reduced the permeability of these rocks that carry a primary magnetization, concentrating basinal fluid flow in the carbonate-rich grey layers and leading to the removal and reprecipitation of magnetic minerals. The normal and reverse polarities recorded by the remagnetized rocks suggest that remagnetization occurred over a protracted period of time.


Geological Society, London, Special Publications | 2017

Onset of Maikop sedimentation and cessation of Eocene arc volcanism in the Talysh Mountains, Azerbaijan

A. van der Boon; Klaudia F. Kuiper; Giuliana Villa; Willem Renema; Maud J.M. Meijers; Cor G. Langereis; E. Aliyeva; Wout Krijgsman

Abstract The Maikop Series forms an important source rock in the former Paratethys. Deposition is often interpreted as anoxic, linked to restriction of the Paratethys. The Pirembel formation in the Talysh Mountains (Azerbaijan) is attributed to the Maikop Series and was deposited above the Eocene volcanic Peshtasar formation. Dating the onset of anoxia could help to distinguish glacio-eustatic from tectonic causes of restriction. We integrated magnetostratigraphy and biostratigraphy to date the onset of Pirembel sedimentation and used geochemistry to characterize the tectonic setting of the Peshtasar volcanic rocks. The onset of Maikop sedimentation in the Talysh was determined to be 37.7 Ma, ruling out a link with the major sea-level drop at the Eocene–Oligocene Transition (33.9 Ma) and favouring a tectonic cause. Extrapolating the average sedimentation rate (34 cm kyr) suggests that the entire Pirembel formation belongs to the Late Eocene. We hypothesize that the end of volcanism is important in the transition to Pirembel sedimentation. The palaeomagnetic and geochemistry results for the volcanic rocks cluster in three groups, suggesting three distinct episodes of volcanism. Volcanic sills within the Eocene Arkevan formation plot exactly on these groups, confirming the relationship between the Arkevan and Peshtasar formations. Volcanic rocks of the Talysh show continental-arc signatures and may be related to an Eocene volcanic belt extending towards southeastern Iran. Supplementary material: The full analytical data of the Ar–Ar dating are available at http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/SUP18851


Geophysical Journal International | 2010

Palaeolatitude and age of the Indo–Asia collision: palaeomagnetic constraints

Guillaume Dupont-Nivet; Peter C. Lippert; Douwe J. J. van Hinsbergen; Maud J.M. Meijers; Paul Kapp


Tectonics | 2010

Late Cretaceous to Paleocene oroclinal bending in the central Pontides (Turkey)

Maud J.M. Meijers; Nuretdin Kaymakci; Douwe J. J. van Hinsbergen; Cor G. Langereis; Randell Stephenson; Jean-Claude Hippolyte


Lithos | 2010

Jurassic arc volcanism on Crimea (Ukraine): Implications for the paleo-subduction zone configuration of the Black Sea region

Maud J.M. Meijers; B. Vrouwe; D.J.J. van Hinsbergen; Klaudia F. Kuiper; Jan R. Wijbrans; G.R. Davies; Randell Stephenson; Nuretdin Kaymakci; Liviu Matenco; A.N. Saintot


Geophysical Journal International | 2011

Pervasive Palaeogene remagnetization of the central Taurides fold-and-thrust belt (southern Turkey) and implications for rotations in the Isparta Angle

Maud J.M. Meijers; Douwe J. J. van Hinsbergen; Mark J. Dekkers; Demir Altiner; Nuretdin Kaymakci; Cor G. Langereis


Tectonophysics | 2013

Late Eocene evolution of the Çiçekdağı Basin (central Turkey): Syn-sedimentary compression during microcontinent–continent collision in central Anatolia

Erhan Gülyüz; Nuretdin Kaymakci; Maud J.M. Meijers; Douwe J. J. van Hinsbergen; Côme Lefebvre; R.L.M. Vissers; Bart Willem Hendrik Hendriks; A. Ahmet Peynircioğlu


Earth and Planetary Science Letters | 2010

New late Paleozoic paleopoles from the Donbas Foldbelt (Ukraine): Implications for the Pangea A vs. B controversy

Maud J.M. Meijers; M. F. Hamers; Douwe J. J. van Hinsbergen; Douwe G. van der Meer; Alexander Kitchka; Cor G. Langereis; Randell Stephenson


Tectonophysics | 2015

A paleolatitude reconstruction of the South Armenian Block (Lesser Caucasus) for the Late Cretaceous : Constraints on the Tethyan realm

Maud J.M. Meijers; Brigitte Smith; Uwe Kirscher; Marily Mensink; Marc Sosson; Yann Rolland; Araik Grigoryan; Lilit Sahakyan; Ara Avagyan; Cor G. Langereis; Carla Müller

Collaboration


Dive into the Maud J.M. Meijers's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nuretdin Kaymakci

Middle East Technical University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andreas Mulch

Goethe University Frankfurt

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ara Avagyan

National Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gilles Brocard

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lilit Sahakyan

National Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael A. Cosca

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge