Maud N. Vissers

Statin treatment in children with familial hypercholesterolemia - The younger, the better

Background— We previously demonstrated in a randomized placebo-controlled trial that 2-year pravastatin treatment induced a significant regression of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in 8- to 18-year-old children with familial hypercholesterolemia. Subsequently, we continued to follow up these children to explore the relation between the age of statin initiation and carotid IMT after follow-up on statin treatment. We also examined safety aspects of statin therapy during this long-term follow-up. Methods and Results— All 214 children who initially participated in the previous placebo-controlled study were eligible for the follow-up study. After completion of the placebo-controlled study, all children continued treatment with pravastatin 20 or 40 mg, depending on their age. Blood samples were taken on a regular basis for lipids and safety parameters, and a carotid IMT measurement was performed after an average treatment period of 4.5 years. Follow-up data for 186 children were available for the statistical analyses. Multivariate analyses revealed that age at statin initiation was an independent predictor for carotid IMT after follow-up with adjustment for carotid IMT at initiation of statin treatment, sex, and duration of treatment. Early initiation of statin treatment was associated with a subsequently smaller IMT. Furthermore, no serious laboratory adverse events were reported during follow-up, and statin treatment had no untoward effects on sexual maturation. Conclusions— These data indicate that early initiation of statin treatment delays the progression of carotid IMT in adolescents and young adults. The present study shows for the first time that early initiation of statin therapy in children with familial hypercholesterolemia might be beneficial in the prevention of atherosclerosis in adolescence.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Statin Therapy in Children With Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Objective—Functional and morphological changes of the arterial wall already present in young children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) suggest that treatment should be initiated early in life to prevent premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and particularly safety of statin therapy in children with HeFH. Methods and Results—We performed a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials evaluating statin therapy in children aged 8 to 18 years with HeFH. Six studies (n=798 children) with 12 to 104 weeks of treatment were included. Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B were significantly reduced, whereas HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A1 were significantly increased by statin therapy. No statistically significant differences were found between statin- and placebo-treated children with respect to the occurrence of adverse events (RR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.79 to 1.25), sexual development (RR of advancing ≥1 stage in Tanner classification 0.96; 95% CI: 0.79 to 1.17), muscle toxicity (RR of CK ≥10 times the upper limit of normal [ULN] 1.38; 95% CI: 0.18 to 10.82), or liver toxicity (RR of ≥3 times the ULN for ASAT 0.98; 95% CI: 0.23 to 4.26 and for ALAT 2.03; 95% CI: 0.24 to 16.95). We found a minimal difference in growth in favor of the statin group (0.33 cm; 95% CI: 0.03 cm to 0.63 cm). Conclusion—In addition to the fact that statin treatment is efficacious, our results support the notion that statin treatment in children with HeFH is safe. Thus, even though further studies are required to assess lifelong safety, statin treatment should be considered for all children aged 8 to 18 with HeFH.

Plasma levels of plant sterols and the risk of coronary artery disease: the prospective EPIC-Norfolk Population Study

Some studies have suggested that a modest increase of plant sterol levels is a risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). We studied the relationship between plant sterol levels and CAD risk in a prospective nested case-control study consisting of 373 cases and 758 controls. Sitosterol and campesterol concentrations did not differ between cases and controls [sitosterol, 0.21 vs. 0.21 mg/dl (P = 0.1); campesterol, 0.31 vs. 0.32 mg/dl (P = 0.5)]. The sitosterol-to-cholesterol ratio was significantly lower in cases than in controls (1.19 vs. 1.29 μg/mg; P = 0.008), whereas the campesterol-to-cholesterol ratio did not differ significantly (1.78 vs. 1.88 μg/mg; P = 0.1). Plant sterol concentrations correlated positively with cholesterol levels and inversely with body mass index and triglyceride and lathosterol concentrations. Among individuals in the highest tertile of the sitosterol concentration, the unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for future CAD was 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.56–1.01]. After adjustment for traditional risk factors, the OR was 0.79 (95% CI = 0.56–1.13). For the campesterol concentration, the unadjusted OR was 0.95 (95% CI = 0.71–1.29) and the adjusted OR was 0.97 (95% CI = 0.68–1.39). In this large prospective study, higher levels of plant sterols, at least in the physiological range, do not appear to be adversely related to CAD in apparently healthy individuals.

Two Years after Molecular Diagnosis of Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Majority on Cholesterol-Lowering Treatment but a Minority Reaches Treatment Goal

Background The risk of premature cardiovascular disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) can be profoundly reduced by cholesterol-lowering therapy, and current guidelines for FH advocate ambitious low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. In the present study, we determined whether these goals are reflected in current clinical practice once FH has been diagnosed. Methodology/Principal Findings In 2008, we sent questionnaires to all subjects (aged 18–65 years) who were molecularly diagnosed with FH in the year 2006 through the screening program in the Netherlands. Of these 1062 subjects, 781 completed the questionnaire (46% males; mean age: 42±12 years; mean LDL-C at molecular diagnosis (baseline): 4.1±1.3 mmol/L). The number of persons that used cholesterol-lowering therapy increased from 397 (51%) at baseline to 636 (81%) after diagnosis. Mean treated LDL-C levels decreased significantly to 3.2±1.1 mmol/L two years after diagnosis. Only 22% achieved the LDL-C target level of ≤2.5 mmol/L. Conclusions/Significance The proportion of patients using cholesterol-lowering medication was significantly increased after FH diagnosis through genetic cascade screening. The attained LDL-C levels were lower than those reported in previous surveys on medication use in FH, which could reflect the effect of more stringent lipid target levels. However, only a minority of the medication users reached the LDL-C target.

Inhibition of cholesterol absorption by the combination of dietary plant sterols and ezetimibe: effects on plasma lipid levels

Consumption of plant sterols and treatment with ezetimibe both reduce cholesterol absorption in the intestine. However, the mechanism of action differs between the two treatments, and the consequences of combination treatment are unknown. Therefore, we performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study for the plant sterol component with open-label ezetimibe treatment. Forty mildly hypercholesterolemic subjects were randomized to the following treatments for 4 weeks each: 10 mg/day ezetimibe combined with 25 g/day control spread; 10 mg/day ezetimibe combined with 25 g/day spread containing 2.0 g of plant sterols; 25 g/day spread containing 2.0 g of plant sterols; and placebo treatment consisting of 25 g/day control spread. Combination treatment of plant sterols and ezetimibe reduced low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 1.06 mmol/l (25.2%; P < 0.001) compared with 0.23 mmol/l (4.7%; P = 0.006) with plant sterols and 0.94 mmol/l (22.2%; P < 0.001) with ezetimibe monotherapy. LDL-C reduction conferred by the combination treatment did not differ significantly from ezetimibe monotherapy (−0.12 mmol/l or −3.5%; P = 0.13). Additionally, the plasma lathosterol-to-cholesterol ratio increased with all treatments. Sitosterol and campesterol ratios increased after plant sterol treatment and decreased upon ezetimibe and combination therapy. Our results indicate that the combination of plant sterols and ezetimibe has no therapeutic benefit over ezetimibe monotherapy in subjects with mild hypercholesterolemia.

Efficacy and safety of coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin in adolescents with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

OBJECTIVES The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of long-term coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin in adolescents with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH). BACKGROUND Aggressive intervention to achieve lipid goals for adolescents with HeFH is recommended to reduce risk of premature cardiovascular disease. METHODS In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 248 male and female subjects ages >or=10 and <or=17 years with HeFH were randomized to receive: step 1: simvastatin 10, 20, or 40 mg/day plus ezetimibe 10 mg/day or placebo for 6 weeks, followed by step 2: simvastatin 40 mg/day plus ezetimibe 10 mg/day or placebo for 27 weeks; followed by step 3: all subjects received open-label simvastatin 10 or 20 mg/day (titrated to maximum 40 mg/day) plus ezetimibe 10 mg/day for 20 weeks. Safety was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS Coadministered ezetimibe and simvastatin for 6 weeks (step 1) resulted in significantly greater mean reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (49.5%) compared with simvastatin monotherapy (34.4%; p < 0.01) in pooled dose groups and in individual dose groups (46.7% vs. 30.4%, 49.5% vs. 34.3%, 52.1% vs. 38.6%, respectively; p < 0.01). At 33 weeks (step 2), ezetimibe-simvastatin subjects had a mean 54.0% reduction in LDL-C compared with a mean 38.1% reduction in simvastatin monotherapy subjects (p < 0.01). At 53 weeks (step 3), the pooled reduction in LDL-C was 49.1%. All treatment regimens were well tolerated throughout 53 weeks. CONCLUSIONS Coadministration of ezetimibe with simvastatin was safe, well tolerated, and provided higher LDL-C reduction compared with simvastatin alone in adolescents with HeFH studied up to 53 weeks. (Effects of Ezetimibe With Simvastatin in the Therapy of Adolescents With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia; NCT00129402).

Molecular Basis of Autosomal Dominant Hypercholesterolemia Assessment in a Large Cohort of Hypercholesterolemic Children

Background— Autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia (ADH) is characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and premature cardiovascular disease. Mutations in the genes encoding for low-density lipoprotein receptor ( LDLR ), apolipoprotein B ( APOB ), and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 ( PCSK9 ) underlie ADH. Nevertheless, a proportion of individuals who exhibit the ADH phenotype do not carry mutations in any of these 3 genes. Estimates of the percentage of such cases among the ADH phenotype vary widely. We therefore investigated a large pediatric population with an unequivocal ADH phenotype to assess the molecular basis of hereditary hypercholesterolemia and to define the percentage of individuals with unexplained dyslipidemia. Methods and Results— We enrolled individuals with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels above the 95th percentile for age and gender and an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern of hypercholesterolemia from a large referred pediatric cohort of 1430 children. We excluded children with thyroid dysfunction, nephrotic syndrome, autoimmune disease, liver disease, primary biliary cirrhosis, and obesity (body mass index >75th percentile for age and gender), as well as children referred via a cascade screening program and those from families with a known molecular diagnosis. Of the 269 children who remained after the exclusion criteria were applied, 255 (95%) carried a functional mutation ( LDLR , 95%; APOB , 5%). Conclusion— In the vast majority of children with an ADH phenotype, a causative mutation can be identified, strongly suggesting that most of the large-effect genes underlying ADH are known to date. # Clinical Perspective {#article-title-30}Background— Autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia (ADH) is characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and premature cardiovascular disease. Mutations in the genes encoding for low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), apolipoprotein B (APOB), and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) underlie ADH. Nevertheless, a proportion of individuals who exhibit the ADH phenotype do not carry mutations in any of these 3 genes. Estimates of the percentage of such cases among the ADH phenotype vary widely. We therefore investigated a large pediatric population with an unequivocal ADH phenotype to assess the molecular basis of hereditary hypercholesterolemia and to define the percentage of individuals with unexplained dyslipidemia. Methods and Results— We enrolled individuals with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels above the 95th percentile for age and gender and an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern of hypercholesterolemia from a large referred pediatric cohort of 1430 children. We excluded children with thyroid dysfunction, nephrotic syndrome, autoimmune disease, liver disease, primary biliary cirrhosis, and obesity (body mass index >75th percentile for age and gender), as well as children referred via a cascade screening program and those from families with a known molecular diagnosis. Of the 269 children who remained after the exclusion criteria were applied, 255 (95%) carried a functional mutation (LDLR, 95%; APOB, 5%). Conclusion— In the vast majority of children with an ADH phenotype, a causative mutation can be identified, strongly suggesting that most of the large-effect genes underlying ADH are known to date.

Familial hypercholesterolemia: current treatment and advances in management

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia is associated with elevated levels of LDL-cholesterol and the development of premature cardiovascular disease. The condition is considerably under-diagnosed and under-treated. Statins are the first choice treatment for all patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. For those patients who do not reach their treatment target or who are unable to use adequate statin dose, several alternative treatment modalities can be used, either as add-on therapy or as monotherapy. In this review the various treatment options are discussed.

Familial hypercholesterolemia in children.

Purpose of this review This review provides an update on recent advances in the diagnosis and management of children with familial hypercholesterolemia. Recent findings A large cross-sectional cohort study of paediatric familial hypercholesterolemia demonstrated that affected children had a 5-fold more rapid increase of carotid arterial wall intima-media thickness during childhood years than their affected siblings. This faster progression led to a significant deviation in terms of intima-media thickness from the age of 12 years and onwards. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was a strong and independent predictor of carotid artery intima-media thickness in these children, which confirms the pivotal role of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol for the development of atherosclerosis. In this condition lipid lowering by statin therapy is accompanied by carotid intima-media thickness regression in familial-hypercholesterolemic children, which suggests that initiation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-reducing medication in childhood already can inhibit or possibly reduce the faster progression of atherosclerosis. Furthermore, these trials demonstrated that statins are safe and do not impair growth or sexual development in these children. Conversely, products containing plant sterols reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 14%, but did not improve endothelial dysfunction as assessed by flow-mediated dilatation. Summary Children with familial hypercholesterolemia clearly benefit from lipid-lowering strategies. Statins are safe agents and have been proven to reduce elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels significantly. In addition, statins improve surrogate markers for atherosclerosis. Therefore these agents should become the pivotal therapy in children with familial hypercholesterolemia.

Plasma levels of PCSK9 and phenotypic variability in familial hypercholesterolemia.

The extent of hypercholesterolemia varies considerably in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). We hypothesized that the variability of the FH phenotype might be partly explained by variation in proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) activity. Individuals between 18 and 53 years of age who had been tested for a pathogenic LDLR or APOB mutation were eligible. Mutation carriers with a LDL-C level below the 75th percentile (called “FH low”) were selected, as well as those with LDL-C above the 90th percentile (called “FH high”). Relatives who tested negative for the mutation were the “controls.” PCSK9 plasma levels were assessed in 267 individuals who did not receive cholesterol-lowering treatment at the time of the study. Mean PCSK9 plasma levels (95% CI) were lower in the FH-low group compared with the FH-high group [152 (137–167) ng/ml vs. 186 (165–207) ng/ml, P = 0.010] and the control group [177 (164–190) ng/ml, P = 0.013]. Mean PCSK9 levels did not statistically differ between the FH-high and control groups (P = 0.50). Plasma PCSK9 levels are positively associated with LDL-C levels in FH patients and might contribute to the phenotypic severity in this disorder. Therefore, the results of pharmaceutical inhibition of PCSK9 in FH patients are eagerly awaited.