Maureen L. Bricker
UOP LLC
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Maureen L. Bricker.
Applied Surface Science | 2004
Maureen L. Bricker; J. W. Adriaan Sachtler; Ralph D. Gillespie; Charles P. McGonegal; Honorio Vega; Dave S. Bem; Jennifer S. Holmgren
Abstract The integrated End-to-End™ combinatorial process for catalyst preparation and screening, with emphasis on its capability to vary both process and compositional parameters will be demonstrated. Additionally, each step of the combinatorial screening process has been validated against results from traditional screening methods. The greatest challenge of all has been the adherence to the core concepts of the combinatorial approach. Catalyst libraries have been made and tested for naphthalene dehydrogenation chemistry. The preparation of these libraries has included the application of high throughput techniques for: 1. metal impregnation; 2. catalyst finishing; 3. catalyst screening. The catalyst screening system has been used to find a non-noble metal catalyst system that can replace Pt in dehydrogenation applications in the petroleum industry. A proprietary catalytic composition was developed for the dehydrogenation of methylcyclohexane (MCH) to toluene starting with four non-noble metals of different proportions and four different supports (alumina, titania, zirconia and silica) prepared in different ways and applying a statistical design of experiments. These data demonstrate that all steps of catalyst preparation and screening are performed in a rapid, useful, high throughput manner. Data will be presented from the catalyst screening efforts will demonstrate that optimized metal composition is dependent on the support type.
Archive | 2003
Maureen L. Bricker; Ralph D. Gillespie; Jennifer S. Holmgren; J. W. Adriaan Sachtler; Richard R. Willis
The chemical industry faces a challenging business climate due to difficult economic conditions in much of the world, strong international competition, and worldwide environmental concern. In addition, innovation in this industry has slowed as catalyst and process technology has matured. The need for a methodology that can increase catalyst innovation while continuing to decrease cycle times has been recognized by the Council for Chemical Research (Catalysis Roadmap, Vision 2020) [1]. In the 1980s, the pharmaceutical industry faced similar circumstances. Downward pressure on drug prices became incompatible with the high cost of drug discovery. Combinatorial chemistry, based on advances in laboratory automation, high-throughput synthesis, and activity screening, allowed the pharmaceutical companies to break the innovation impasse [2, 3].
Catalysis Today | 2010
Hooman Rezaei; Xuebin Liu; Shahrzad Jooya Ardakani; Kevin J. Smith; Maureen L. Bricker
Archive | 2002
Paula L. Bogdan; Maureen L. Bricker
Archive | 2004
Maureen L. Bricker; J.W. Sachtler; Charles P. McGonegal; Mark A. Krawczyk; Ara J. Alexanian; Martin Plassen
Archive | 1994
Maureen L. Bricker; Thomas K. McBride; Karl Z. Steigleder
Catalysis Today | 2009
Wensheng Chen; Joseph A. Kocal; Timothy A. Brandvold; Maureen L. Bricker; Simon R. Bare; Robert W. Broach; Nanette Greenlay; Kristoffer E. Popp; Joel T. Walenga; Susan S. Yang; John J. Low
Archive | 1999
Paula L. Bogdan; Maureen L. Bricker
Archive | 2010
Alakananda Bhattacharyya; Beckay J. Mezza; Maureen L. Bricker; Lorenz J. Bauer
Archive | 2009
Maureen L. Bricker; Laura E. Leonard; Todd M. Kruse; James G. Vassilakis; Simon R. Bare